June 8, 2024

Roy Baumeister: Do Humans Have Free Will? The Self, Ego Depletion Theory, Self Control & Willpower

The player is loading ...
Roy Baumeister: Do Humans Have Free Will? The Self, Ego Depletion Theory, Self Control & Willpower
Professor Roy F. Baumeister is one of the world’s most prolific and influential Psychologists. He has published over 700 scientific works, including over 40 books, and is one of the most highly cited scientists alive today. In 2013, he received the highest award given by the Association for Psychological Science, the William James Fellow award, in recognition of his lifetime achievements. As of 2024, He holds affiliations with Harvard University, Constructor University Bremen, Florida State University, BetterUp, Inc., and the University of Bamberg. Additionally, Baumeister serves as the president-elect of the International Positive Psychology Association. He is a Fellow of both the Society for Personality and Social Psychology and the Association for Psychological Science. His 2011 book "Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength" (with John Tierney) was a New York Times bestseller. Some of his other works include: "The Self Explained: Why and How We Become Who We Are" (2022), and his upcoming book "The Science Of Free Will: Bridging Theory & Positive Psychology" (2024). TIMESTAMPS: (0:00) - Introduction (0:13) - The Self Explained: Why And How We Become Who We Are (6:45) - Addressing Free Will Skeptics (11:38) - The Science Of Free Will: 1) The Moral Agent; 2) The Economic Agent; 3) The Information Agent (17:26) - Free Will Books: Robert Sapolsky (Determined), Kevin Mitchell (Free Agents), Daniel Dennett & Gregg Caruso (Just Desserts) (21:49) - Morality & Determinism (30:05) - Ego Depletion Theory (42:31) - Positive Psychology & Negativity Bias (52:43) - Willpower (59:11) - Language, Meaning, & Uncertainty (1:08:00) - Roy's Willpower! (1:15:10) - Roy's Recommendations: Immanual Kant, Sigmund Freud, David Buss, Michael Tomasello, Francis Fukuyama (1:19:55) - Conclusion EPISODE LINKS: - Roy's Website: https://roybaumeister.com - Roy's Publications: https://tinyurl.com/k94wzzwd - Roy's Books: https://tinyurl.com/2evz225h - The Science of Free Will: https://tinyurl.com/t9sjykzs - Roy Baumeister v Robert Sapolsky Debate: https://youtu.be/xeb98U9d1hg?feature=shared - Noam Chomsky: https://youtu.be/ZYiv790TfzI?feature=shared - Kevin Mitchell: https://youtu.be/UdlkYGbuD7Q?feature=shared - Gregg Caruso: https://youtu.be/YztCgd-CqtA?feature=shared - Randolph Nesse: https://youtu.be/wOuX0JYtxhc?feature=shared CONNECT: - Website: https://tevinnaidu.com - Podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/drtevinnaidu - Twitter: https://twitter.com/drtevinnaidu - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/drtevinnaidu - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/drtevinnaidu - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/drtevinnaidu ============================= Disclaimer: The information provided on this channel is for educational purposes only. The content is shared in the spirit of open discourse and does not constitute, nor does it substitute, professional or medical advice. We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of listening/watching any of our contents. You acknowledge that you use the information provided at your own risk. Listeners/viewers are advised to conduct their own research and consult with their own experts in the respective fields.
1
00:00:10,080 --> 00:00:20,040
Roy, what is the self?
All right, well, it's a a mental

2
00:00:20,040 --> 00:00:24,200
system, a structure that
coordinates.

3
00:00:24,640 --> 00:00:29,000
It's it's how the brain uses
systems to coordinate action, to

4
00:00:29,000 --> 00:00:31,840
organize the body and then to
participate in the social

5
00:00:31,840 --> 00:00:34,400
system.
For the human, the the self is

6
00:00:34,400 --> 00:00:37,440
the interface between the
physical animal body and the

7
00:00:37,440 --> 00:00:42,480
social system.
When when you wrote the self

8
00:00:42,480 --> 00:00:46,560
explained, you spoke about how
and why we become who we are.

9
00:00:47,160 --> 00:00:49,360
And I know you're currently
writing a book on free will.

10
00:00:49,400 --> 00:00:54,800
So I'm curious to know how did
we get this system going?

11
00:00:55,080 --> 00:00:57,840
What are the origins of the
system that we call the self?

12
00:00:58,080 --> 00:01:02,240
And do you differentiate this
self from the concept of

13
00:01:02,240 --> 00:01:03,320
consciousness, let's say?
Well.

14
00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:07,720
Yeah, yes.
I mean, there, there's some

15
00:01:07,720 --> 00:01:13,760
overlap, but consciousness would
be the the way that the brain

16
00:01:13,760 --> 00:01:19,920
creates a subjective experience,
creates a simulation of the of

17
00:01:19,920 --> 00:01:21,880
the environment or past and
future.

18
00:01:24,400 --> 00:01:26,040
The self, the property is the
self.

19
00:01:27,280 --> 00:01:30,320
Foundation of my thinking is
that the human mind is created

20
00:01:30,320 --> 00:01:34,600
by nature for culture, so that
the human traits are the result

21
00:01:34,600 --> 00:01:39,640
of of, of biological adaptations
to enable us to participate in a

22
00:01:39,640 --> 00:01:43,280
complex social system with
sharing information and all the

23
00:01:43,280 --> 00:01:49,680
other features of culture.
So the self comes to be as the

24
00:01:49,680 --> 00:01:52,760
brain learns to operate the role
in the social system and the the

25
00:01:52,760 --> 00:01:56,520
properties of the self are are
partly defined by the

26
00:01:56,520 --> 00:01:58,280
requirements of the social
system.

27
00:01:58,600 --> 00:02:02,040
If you lived alone as a solitary
being, you wouldn't need much of

28
00:02:02,040 --> 00:02:04,320
A self.
You wouldn't even need a name.

29
00:02:05,480 --> 00:02:07,920
If you had possessions, they
wouldn't be your possessions

30
00:02:07,920 --> 00:02:12,000
'cause you only need that stuff
in, in social environments.

31
00:02:12,520 --> 00:02:17,000
Now simpler brains earlier in
evolution used systems to

32
00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:21,200
control the body to some degree.
I think I used the example of

33
00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:25,280
walking.
So they're four legs.

34
00:02:25,280 --> 00:02:30,240
You know, it learns to
coordinate so that they move in,

35
00:02:30,360 --> 00:02:33,760
in a coordinated system.
So the, you know, they're,

36
00:02:33,920 --> 00:02:37,760
they're the four legs say that
an animal has which are all

37
00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:42,200
independent structures, but the
brain imposes a system to maybe

38
00:02:42,200 --> 00:02:46,400
move them so they can help the
animal move in a in a systematic

39
00:02:46,400 --> 00:02:48,640
way.
It's usually the the left front

40
00:02:48,640 --> 00:02:52,200
and the right rear move and then
they plant and then the right

41
00:02:52,200 --> 00:02:54,400
front and the left rear move and
then they plant.

42
00:02:55,640 --> 00:03:00,920
So it has to understand front
and back, left and right and

43
00:03:00,920 --> 00:03:04,600
then the diagonal alternating
systems.

44
00:03:05,560 --> 00:03:09,320
So I mean, when you think of it
that way, it's a kind of a

45
00:03:09,320 --> 00:03:12,160
complicated system.
Obviously a lot of animals do it

46
00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:16,600
without being all that smart.
But you know, that's, that's the

47
00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:18,800
self.
The animal is moving as a whole,

48
00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:21,920
which the self is really the
creation of unity.

49
00:03:23,240 --> 00:03:28,960
And in in human beings, we have
unity across time, which is not

50
00:03:28,960 --> 00:03:32,440
nearly as pronounced, if it's
there at all, among other

51
00:03:32,440 --> 00:03:34,320
animals.
They mostly live in the present.

52
00:03:34,320 --> 00:03:37,400
But we are continuous with past
and future.

53
00:03:37,520 --> 00:03:39,920
And part of that is because,
again, of the requirements of

54
00:03:39,920 --> 00:03:44,640
the social system, society work
better if people are moral, if

55
00:03:45,320 --> 00:03:48,560
they obey the moral rules.
That's what moral rules are

56
00:03:48,560 --> 00:03:53,520
mostly to set aside selfish and
destructive impulses to do what?

57
00:03:53,640 --> 00:03:56,760
If everybody acted that way,
then society would would work

58
00:03:56,760 --> 00:04:05,280
better.
And I was going with it.

59
00:04:05,560 --> 00:04:12,480
Oh, so past and future morality
needs the continuity over time

60
00:04:12,480 --> 00:04:15,680
so that you cannot do something
immoral now and then There are

61
00:04:15,680 --> 00:04:19,360
no consequences.
You're a big part of what makes

62
00:04:19,360 --> 00:04:22,600
people behave in a morally
positive fashion is, is knowing

63
00:04:22,600 --> 00:04:29,440
that in the future, no one will
trust them or or or work with

64
00:04:29,440 --> 00:04:31,600
them if they, if they behave
immorally.

65
00:04:32,720 --> 00:04:36,120
So the, the time perspective
helps the brain, which again,

66
00:04:36,120 --> 00:04:39,560
doesn't need it in the present.
If you did, if you were alone,

67
00:04:39,560 --> 00:04:43,600
morality would would not be a a
concern at all.

68
00:04:44,680 --> 00:04:47,200
It, it regulates how people
relate to each other and get

69
00:04:47,200 --> 00:04:50,000
along with each other.
And it works.

70
00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:53,560
I mean, the, the, the human
population is expanding and

71
00:04:54,000 --> 00:04:58,720
you're up to 8 billion people,
whereas in most of the other

72
00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:01,720
mammal populations have been
declining for a long time.

73
00:05:03,080 --> 00:05:05,760
There are our closest relatives,
the chimpanzees.

74
00:05:06,360 --> 00:05:09,760
They estimate there's something
like 300,000 left in the in the

75
00:05:09,760 --> 00:05:12,520
wild.
So that's not their system is

76
00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:14,800
not working nearly as well as
ours.

77
00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:16,480
That's gotten us up to 8
billion.

78
00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:23,080
So it's an effective system, but
again, unity across time,

79
00:05:23,920 --> 00:05:26,840
morality is just one part of it.
Of course, you have education

80
00:05:26,840 --> 00:05:29,600
and you get credentials or you
get training for a job and then

81
00:05:29,600 --> 00:05:32,760
you perform the same job, the
same role in the system.

82
00:05:32,760 --> 00:05:36,360
And as we divide labor, so
different people do different

83
00:05:36,360 --> 00:05:40,880
jobs, it creates enough
resources that can be shared

84
00:05:40,880 --> 00:05:43,120
around.
I'm a professor.

85
00:05:43,400 --> 00:05:47,600
If I had to get my own food from
nature and build my own shelter,

86
00:05:47,600 --> 00:05:50,480
I would be in trouble.
I don't have have skills like

87
00:05:50,480 --> 00:05:54,800
that, but I can do what I do is,
you know, do psychology research

88
00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:58,920
and teaching and contribute to
the society and then then they

89
00:05:58,920 --> 00:06:01,920
give me money and I can use that
to get very nice food and

90
00:06:01,920 --> 00:06:05,480
shelter.
So, so tell me, Roy, I mean,

91
00:06:05,480 --> 00:06:09,000
you're such a prolific and
influential social psychologist,

92
00:06:09,720 --> 00:06:14,240
highly cited, I don't know how
many hundreds of thousands with

93
00:06:14,640 --> 00:06:19,120
with so much influence and so
much in depth analysis in this

94
00:06:19,120 --> 00:06:21,400
field over the time, over the
years, let's say.

95
00:06:22,400 --> 00:06:25,920
What have you noticed regarding
the shifting in in society's

96
00:06:25,920 --> 00:06:29,160
perception of the self?
Because there's this influx of

97
00:06:29,280 --> 00:06:31,560
philosophers coming in today to
say that the self is an

98
00:06:31,560 --> 00:06:33,920
illusion, which was something
people did in the past,

99
00:06:34,120 --> 00:06:38,400
particularly in the East.
How do you think of these new

100
00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:41,080
philosophies that Western
philosophers are now

101
00:06:41,440 --> 00:06:43,040
approaching?
Someone like Sam Harris, let's

102
00:06:43,040 --> 00:06:45,720
say, who's his free world of the
self is an illusion.

103
00:06:46,800 --> 00:06:49,040
Yes, yes, yes.
I'm not sure they really believe

104
00:06:49,040 --> 00:06:51,840
it, or maybe they do.
I I read there's the other

105
00:06:51,840 --> 00:06:54,880
neuroscientist who wrote a book,
Bruce Hood, the self illusion,

106
00:06:55,920 --> 00:06:58,240
which I said, OK, I really got
to take this seriously.

107
00:06:58,240 --> 00:07:01,080
I know it's a different point,
but I don't think he really

108
00:07:01,080 --> 00:07:02,720
believes it.
For one thing, he puts his name

109
00:07:02,720 --> 00:07:08,080
on the book Mr. Self illusion.
I I said in the book too, I

110
00:07:08,080 --> 00:07:11,680
think if you came home and, or
if he came home and found you in

111
00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:15,680
bed with his, his wife, he'd be
mad And you know, you'd say,

112
00:07:15,680 --> 00:07:18,480
well, selves are illusions.
All it means is somebody's

113
00:07:18,480 --> 00:07:20,960
having sex with someone else.
Certainly you can't object to

114
00:07:21,400 --> 00:07:24,880
sex in the abstract.
It's just one person.

115
00:07:24,880 --> 00:07:30,840
The the only oh, that this is my
wife would be, you know,

116
00:07:31,040 --> 00:07:34,920
postulating the self.
So I'm not sure they really

117
00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:36,280
believe it.
I I read his book.

118
00:07:36,280 --> 00:07:38,240
It was actually charming.
I was thinking it would be

119
00:07:38,240 --> 00:07:42,320
annoying and there were a lot of
cool things, but he didn't

120
00:07:42,320 --> 00:07:45,840
really try very hard to convince
me that the the self doesn't

121
00:07:45,840 --> 00:07:48,000
exist.
He sort of retreated and says,

122
00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:49,920
well, it's not exactly what it
seems.

123
00:07:50,200 --> 00:07:54,280
Well, that's very old news.
People have mistaken ideas about

124
00:07:54,280 --> 00:07:57,560
the about themselves and they
overestimate their good points

125
00:07:57,560 --> 00:08:02,280
and things like that.
And he didn't say you know what

126
00:08:02,280 --> 00:08:05,080
it was, or he says it's a useful
illusion.

127
00:08:10,480 --> 00:08:12,920
It's sort of Daniel Dennett and
consciousness, the way he

128
00:08:12,920 --> 00:08:16,560
approaches it, consciousness
being an illusion, but it's,

129
00:08:16,560 --> 00:08:18,120
it's a useful one.
It's, it's something that

130
00:08:18,120 --> 00:08:21,280
evolved to do that.
To play devil's advocate, let's

131
00:08:21,280 --> 00:08:28,680
say, what about the fact that we
perceive flowers, but we know

132
00:08:28,680 --> 00:08:30,200
it's just electromagnetic
radiation.

133
00:08:30,200 --> 00:08:33,280
We're sort of seeing photons of
light, but we still behave as if

134
00:08:33,280 --> 00:08:37,280
it's a flower.
You could flip that around to

135
00:08:37,280 --> 00:08:39,640
say, I mean, although the self
is an illusion, it's still

136
00:08:39,640 --> 00:08:43,480
useful to sort of go about life
pretending like it is.

137
00:08:44,880 --> 00:08:46,520
Is that not what he's trying to
do?

138
00:08:46,560 --> 00:08:49,040
I would say sure.
I haven't read the book so I

139
00:08:49,040 --> 00:08:54,960
can't speak for him.
OK, I don't know what Tenet said

140
00:08:54,960 --> 00:08:56,600
about it.
I've read a number of his books,

141
00:08:56,600 --> 00:09:01,560
but you know, having
philosophical arguments and I, I

142
00:09:01,560 --> 00:09:05,560
don't really understand nobody's
against or whatever.

143
00:09:06,680 --> 00:09:08,520
He had that book freedom
evolved, right?

144
00:09:08,600 --> 00:09:11,280
I was sort of making the same
point in, in the cultural

145
00:09:11,280 --> 00:09:14,040
animal.
So I was very interested to see,

146
00:09:14,040 --> 00:09:17,000
but he didn't really talk about
how it evolved or why it evolved

147
00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:19,880
or anything like that.
So in my new free will book, I,

148
00:09:19,880 --> 00:09:24,480
I, I talk about that and it's
beneficial again, it, it enables

149
00:09:24,480 --> 00:09:28,680
the social system to work, that
people had to make choices and,

150
00:09:28,680 --> 00:09:32,240
and recognize them and that they
have to have enough self-control

151
00:09:32,240 --> 00:09:36,240
to overcome some selfish
impulses to do what's best for

152
00:09:36,240 --> 00:09:39,280
others.
You can ask, why don't

153
00:09:40,080 --> 00:09:44,800
chimpanzees have restaurants?
Well, you know, 'cause

154
00:09:44,800 --> 00:09:47,520
restaurants are nice.
I just had lunch with my friend

155
00:09:47,520 --> 00:09:50,600
in one.
But they couldn't do it first.

156
00:09:50,600 --> 00:09:53,400
They would if they saw somebody
else had food on their plate

157
00:09:53,920 --> 00:09:55,720
that they wanted, they would
just take it if they were

158
00:09:55,720 --> 00:09:58,560
bigger.
And they don't understand money,

159
00:09:58,560 --> 00:10:01,960
so they wouldn't pay for it, so
they they couldn't make a

160
00:10:01,960 --> 00:10:04,520
restaurant work, so they have to
do without.

161
00:10:06,400 --> 00:10:11,520
All these things that make our
life so much better come from

162
00:10:11,520 --> 00:10:13,640
being able to participate in the
system.

163
00:10:14,680 --> 00:10:17,880
As when I give talks on this, I
put up a slide saying free will

164
00:10:17,880 --> 00:10:22,120
is for following rules.
And that's to sort of shock

165
00:10:22,120 --> 00:10:25,080
people a little bit 'cause, you
know, they think intuitively

166
00:10:25,080 --> 00:10:27,760
that freedom means being able to
do whatever I want with no

167
00:10:27,760 --> 00:10:31,720
rules.
But, but you don't need any

168
00:10:31,720 --> 00:10:35,600
advanced psychological powers to
do that or any animal out in the

169
00:10:35,600 --> 00:10:38,160
woods can do that, to do
whatever it feels like with no

170
00:10:38,160 --> 00:10:41,920
rules.
What you need advanced mental

171
00:10:41,920 --> 00:10:45,640
agency for is to operate in a
system where there are a lot of

172
00:10:45,640 --> 00:10:49,160
rules and still take care of
yourself and get what you want

173
00:10:50,000 --> 00:10:52,240
there.
And, and so that's the challenge

174
00:10:52,240 --> 00:10:54,360
of culture.
It, it needs a lot of rules and

175
00:10:54,360 --> 00:10:57,840
it needs, I thought about this,
you know, it, it doesn't need

176
00:10:57,840 --> 00:11:01,560
people to follow all of them all
the time because clearly that

177
00:11:01,560 --> 00:11:03,680
doesn't happen.
But if most of the people follow

178
00:11:03,680 --> 00:11:07,840
most of the rules most of the
time, then the culture works,

179
00:11:07,840 --> 00:11:12,040
which means it produces more
resources and shares them so

180
00:11:12,040 --> 00:11:15,880
that the, the, the population
can thrive, that people can live

181
00:11:15,880 --> 00:11:18,160
and raise children.
And then there's the next

182
00:11:18,160 --> 00:11:20,240
generation.
And that's what counts as

183
00:11:20,240 --> 00:11:27,480
success in a culture.
But all the things you have to

184
00:11:27,480 --> 00:11:32,240
do to participate in that
require advanced mental powers

185
00:11:32,240 --> 00:11:35,360
that are really beyond the
capability of most other other

186
00:11:35,360 --> 00:11:39,240
animals in the in the free will
book, which is going to be out

187
00:11:39,240 --> 00:11:45,480
September of this 2024 to try to
give more concrete examples.

188
00:11:45,480 --> 00:11:50,320
So so the moral agent is one
that you use these abstract

189
00:11:50,320 --> 00:11:53,040
ideas based on shared
understandings of what's right

190
00:11:53,040 --> 00:11:56,840
and wrong to guide your behavior
and you develop intuitions based

191
00:11:56,840 --> 00:12:00,400
on that.
Another would be economic agent

192
00:12:01,400 --> 00:12:05,880
that we participate in in
markets and we go to stores and

193
00:12:05,880 --> 00:12:08,880
buy things and we earn money and
all that stuff.

194
00:12:09,400 --> 00:12:12,080
Again, that really makes the
system work.

195
00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:15,360
No other animals have that.
None of them even have money.

196
00:12:16,440 --> 00:12:21,440
It's not clear they even have
trade, but trade increases

197
00:12:21,440 --> 00:12:25,120
wealth.
Matt Ridley in his last book

198
00:12:25,120 --> 00:12:28,240
said trade is 10 times older
than farming, which is kind of a

199
00:12:28,240 --> 00:12:32,440
shocking thing to realize.
But if our, you know, we think

200
00:12:32,440 --> 00:12:36,840
of the word agriculture is the
origin of the word culture, and

201
00:12:36,840 --> 00:12:38,640
that's farming.
And we associate it with that.

202
00:12:39,520 --> 00:12:41,680
But that's about 10 or 12,000
years ago.

203
00:12:41,680 --> 00:12:44,920
And if, if, if Ridley's right,
then trade is well over 100,000

204
00:12:44,920 --> 00:12:47,280
years old.
So that's something our species

205
00:12:47,280 --> 00:12:51,600
figured out how to do earlier.
And I, it took me a long time to

206
00:12:51,600 --> 00:12:55,320
realize this, but a marketplace
is basically a, a system of

207
00:12:55,320 --> 00:12:58,240
cooperation.
You know, we think of it as

208
00:12:58,240 --> 00:13:01,360
antagonistic and so on.
But the buyer wants to buy and

209
00:13:01,360 --> 00:13:05,200
the seller wants to sell.
And then yes, a higher price

210
00:13:05,200 --> 00:13:07,880
favors the seller and a lower
price favors the buyer.

211
00:13:08,120 --> 00:13:11,080
But if they can find a, a price
that's acceptable to both, then

212
00:13:11,080 --> 00:13:14,480
they are both better off.
That's the definition of

213
00:13:14,480 --> 00:13:18,520
cooperation, to have an
interaction that benefits both

214
00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:22,040
parties.
So a marketplace.

215
00:13:23,800 --> 00:13:27,600
All human societies have trade,
as far as we know, and again, no

216
00:13:27,600 --> 00:13:29,640
animal society.
So it's really one of the

217
00:13:29,640 --> 00:13:33,400
essential human traits, but it
takes advanced mental powers.

218
00:13:33,400 --> 00:13:37,600
You got to understand, you got
to negotiate, you need some

219
00:13:37,600 --> 00:13:40,760
degree of quantification even
before money.

220
00:13:40,760 --> 00:13:45,760
You have to understand, you
know, how many furs or how many

221
00:13:47,200 --> 00:13:50,040
wheat plants for how many fish
if, if that's what you're

222
00:13:50,040 --> 00:13:53,560
trading.
So you need some sense of value

223
00:13:53,560 --> 00:13:56,720
that can be transferred across
the different items.

224
00:13:57,320 --> 00:14:01,640
But still being able to do that
again, makes, makes both both

225
00:14:01,640 --> 00:14:04,400
parties better off.
So it it, it's hugely adaptive.

226
00:14:05,800 --> 00:14:08,040
So, so you've got the the moral
and the economic.

227
00:14:08,200 --> 00:14:10,520
Are there any other aspects to
this or is that too?

228
00:14:10,520 --> 00:14:14,320
Much the third agent, the third
agent you know there there are

229
00:14:14,400 --> 00:14:17,000
probably plenty more, but these
are three big ones.

230
00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:21,880
The third is the information
agent that humans spend a lot of

231
00:14:21,880 --> 00:14:24,920
time what they call trafficking
and information includes what

232
00:14:24,920 --> 00:14:32,880
we're doing right now, I guess.
But but I'm I'm Sudendorf in his

233
00:14:32,880 --> 00:14:35,040
book about the difference
between humans.

234
00:14:35,040 --> 00:14:37,480
It's called the gap between
humans and all others.

235
00:14:37,480 --> 00:14:41,520
And one of the big conclusions
was that he doesn't see any

236
00:14:41,520 --> 00:14:45,840
other animals that have this.
But humans, we have the urge to

237
00:14:45,840 --> 00:14:49,160
tell others what the contents of
our mind are.

238
00:14:49,200 --> 00:14:52,000
Our minds are, you know, we find
something, we see something

239
00:14:52,000 --> 00:14:54,040
cool.
Oh, I want to tell someone.

240
00:14:54,040 --> 00:14:55,960
I mean, it's even true on
e-mail.

241
00:14:55,960 --> 00:14:57,960
You know, something funny or
something interesting will come

242
00:14:57,960 --> 00:14:59,720
around and say, oh, I got to
share this.

243
00:14:59,720 --> 00:15:02,800
I got to send it on to, to
someone else.

244
00:15:04,000 --> 00:15:07,880
So, and that's, that's not the
only thing that's just like,

245
00:15:07,960 --> 00:15:11,520
well, the first step I suppose
is curiosity, wanting to get

246
00:15:11,520 --> 00:15:13,400
information.
And then a lot of animals have

247
00:15:13,400 --> 00:15:15,600
that, but that's as far as they
go.

248
00:15:15,800 --> 00:15:18,160
The 2nd is sharing it with
others.

249
00:15:18,680 --> 00:15:21,760
Then there's criticizing it,
there's passing it along that

250
00:15:21,760 --> 00:15:24,600
you hear from one person and you
tell to someone else.

251
00:15:24,600 --> 00:15:28,440
It's not just what you discover
on your own, various other

252
00:15:28,440 --> 00:15:31,520
things using information to, to
trick people or whatever.

253
00:15:31,520 --> 00:15:33,520
They're more advanced that sorts
of things.

254
00:15:33,520 --> 00:15:38,120
But I yes, the human being is an
information agent.

255
00:15:38,120 --> 00:15:42,160
And again, this requires
advanced mental powers.

256
00:15:42,160 --> 00:15:45,560
So I think the free will is a is
an appropriate term.

257
00:15:46,280 --> 00:15:49,360
It's if, if this were all
discovered today, we probably

258
00:15:49,360 --> 00:15:50,840
wouldn't choose the term free
will.

259
00:15:50,840 --> 00:15:54,160
But since we've been using it
for 1000 years, I think we're

260
00:15:54,160 --> 00:15:55,880
kind of stuck with it and it's
close enough.

261
00:15:56,280 --> 00:15:59,480
What would you call that, Troy?
Pardon me.

262
00:15:59,720 --> 00:16:02,160
What would you call it if not
Troy?

263
00:16:03,000 --> 00:16:07,840
I, I don't know if they
discovered it today and like

264
00:16:08,160 --> 00:16:14,200
the, I don't know, executive
function or some kind of thing

265
00:16:14,600 --> 00:16:18,320
that people do talk about
executive function in a somewhat

266
00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:24,440
related sense.
But I, I'm OK with the term free

267
00:16:24,440 --> 00:16:26,160
will.
I mean, for me, the, the, the

268
00:16:26,160 --> 00:16:30,160
free part is less of a problem
than the will part because we

269
00:16:30,160 --> 00:16:36,320
don't we don't have a psychology
of will psychology textbooks

270
00:16:36,320 --> 00:16:37,880
don't have a chapter on the
will.

271
00:16:38,640 --> 00:16:41,240
But the free, some actions are
clearly freer than others.

272
00:16:41,240 --> 00:16:43,080
And everybody's had that
experience.

273
00:16:43,080 --> 00:16:47,160
Where do you have the freedom to
do what you want or no?

274
00:16:47,160 --> 00:16:51,800
Are you constrained?
And the different processes that

275
00:16:51,800 --> 00:16:55,920
go into recognizing the freedom
and capitalizing and making the

276
00:16:55,920 --> 00:17:00,720
freer choice as opposed to just
accommodating to not having

277
00:17:00,720 --> 00:17:03,600
freedom.
Roy, what is the book called?

278
00:17:03,720 --> 00:17:06,200
Your new book Are you?
Have you given the title

279
00:17:06,200 --> 00:17:07,359
already?
Yeah, yeah.

280
00:17:07,359 --> 00:17:08,920
It's the the science of free
will.

281
00:17:09,400 --> 00:17:12,880
The science of free will they
When you prepare for a book like

282
00:17:12,880 --> 00:17:15,760
this, I'm always curious to know
how do authors prep?

283
00:17:16,160 --> 00:17:19,119
Whose books do they read?
Which books do they find most

284
00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:23,200
confirming for their biases?
Or perhaps which ones are the

285
00:17:23,200 --> 00:17:25,119
best arguments against it in
preparation?

286
00:17:25,119 --> 00:17:27,960
Have you read Sapolsky's
Determined by any chance in

287
00:17:27,960 --> 00:17:29,640
preparation?
Oh yes.

288
00:17:29,640 --> 00:17:32,800
Well, I read a, a lot of it.
I have an online debate with him

289
00:17:33,760 --> 00:17:35,960
that's available, open to
debate.

290
00:17:36,680 --> 00:17:41,920
We also both contributed to a
special issue of a journal where

291
00:17:41,920 --> 00:17:45,960
we kind of wrote.
I wanted more of a debate from

292
00:17:45,960 --> 00:17:48,920
him.
I he, he claims he's supporting

293
00:17:48,920 --> 00:17:50,880
determinism, but he's really
not.

294
00:17:50,880 --> 00:17:54,440
When I you press him the, the
classic determinism that there's

295
00:17:54,440 --> 00:17:57,400
only one possible future, He
doesn't, he doesn't believe that

296
00:17:58,840 --> 00:18:02,840
all he means is that things are
caused, which the philosophical

297
00:18:02,840 --> 00:18:05,000
term is causalism.
And I have no problem with that.

298
00:18:05,000 --> 00:18:08,280
To me, free will would be just
another kind of cause or another

299
00:18:08,280 --> 00:18:14,040
set of causes, probably.
So I don't have any, any, any

300
00:18:14,040 --> 00:18:16,320
trouble with that.
So I think we're, we're, we're

301
00:18:16,320 --> 00:18:20,080
closer than than he thinks.
He, he thought free will meant

302
00:18:20,080 --> 00:18:23,160
that you're exempt from
causality, that the you act

303
00:18:23,160 --> 00:18:26,560
independently of everything else
that ever happened or the rest

304
00:18:26,560 --> 00:18:28,840
of the world.
And I don't believe in that.

305
00:18:28,840 --> 00:18:30,680
I don't see why that would
evolve.

306
00:18:31,440 --> 00:18:34,680
When I say that the human mind
evolved to participate in

307
00:18:34,680 --> 00:18:38,240
culture, that means you have to
be highly responsive to a very

308
00:18:38,240 --> 00:18:43,080
complex environment.
It, it, it makes no sense to, to

309
00:18:43,080 --> 00:18:47,600
be immune to the environment, to
to be to shut it out, to act

310
00:18:47,600 --> 00:18:50,200
independently of it.
No, it's to act to your

311
00:18:50,200 --> 00:18:53,360
advantage within an environment
that's defined by multiple

312
00:18:53,360 --> 00:18:57,920
possibilities.
I just, I had a conversation and

313
00:18:57,920 --> 00:19:00,760
I just got an e-mail just now
from Professor Kevin Mitchell.

314
00:19:00,760 --> 00:19:02,160
I don't know if you're familiar
with his work.

315
00:19:02,160 --> 00:19:03,920
He wrote a book called Free
Agents.

316
00:19:05,440 --> 00:19:08,600
I don't know that one.
It's it's, it's very good.

317
00:19:08,600 --> 00:19:10,960
I think you should give it a
read if you ever get a chance.

318
00:19:11,960 --> 00:19:14,400
Talks about the evolution of
free will over time.

319
00:19:14,400 --> 00:19:17,360
And he gives you this wonderful
story of how we become sort of

320
00:19:17,360 --> 00:19:20,120
free agents.
Professor Kevin Mitchell.

321
00:19:20,520 --> 00:19:24,680
But yeah, he sent me an e-mail
today about, well, the similar

322
00:19:24,680 --> 00:19:26,600
thing.
I mean, this causation versus

323
00:19:27,200 --> 00:19:30,320
the difference in the way people
look at determinism, I mean,

324
00:19:30,320 --> 00:19:33,160
there is a sort of a slight
difference between determinism

325
00:19:33,160 --> 00:19:35,160
and and the causalism you're
talking about.

326
00:19:35,440 --> 00:19:37,480
Who?
Whose arguments have you found

327
00:19:37,480 --> 00:19:39,880
the most compelling against free
will?

328
00:19:42,520 --> 00:19:46,040
Against free will.
Well, I agree with a lot of the

329
00:19:46,040 --> 00:19:49,520
people who are against it
because they're defining free

330
00:19:49,520 --> 00:19:55,840
will as a being independent of
all causes or as like having a

331
00:19:55,840 --> 00:19:58,720
soul that causes behavior
independent of physical

332
00:19:58,720 --> 00:20:01,480
processes.
I can quote some biologists who

333
00:20:01,480 --> 00:20:06,200
say that that's what that means.
So if you define free will that

334
00:20:06,200 --> 00:20:08,120
way, then I I totally agree with
him.

335
00:20:08,120 --> 00:20:10,040
I don't, I don't, I don't
believe in that.

336
00:20:11,360 --> 00:20:14,520
I mean, on souls, I try to be
agnostic.

337
00:20:14,560 --> 00:20:16,720
I'm not religious, but I respect
religion.

338
00:20:18,000 --> 00:20:20,040
But it's clearly not a
scientific theory.

339
00:20:20,040 --> 00:20:25,520
There's no scientific work on on
souls, and so incorporating them

340
00:20:25,520 --> 00:20:31,360
into the causal sequence seems
seems a stretch that certainly

341
00:20:31,360 --> 00:20:39,360
I'm not willing to make.
So sorry I don't know this this

342
00:20:39,360 --> 00:20:41,440
Mitchell one.
I've, I've read lots of the

343
00:20:41,480 --> 00:20:46,600
other books and I've had plenty
of my own laboratory work.

344
00:20:47,520 --> 00:20:49,520
And while you're doing that, of
course you have to know

345
00:20:49,520 --> 00:20:52,040
everybody else's laboratory work
in the same area.

346
00:20:52,960 --> 00:20:59,400
So I know lots of that stuff.
And that's that's what I'm what

347
00:20:59,400 --> 00:21:02,960
I'm basing that on.
I'm I'm pretty sure you've read

348
00:21:02,960 --> 00:21:06,040
Just Desserts by with the.
Yes, yeah.

349
00:21:06,600 --> 00:21:10,960
So I mean, I found that argument
with Dirk Pierboom and Greg

350
00:21:10,960 --> 00:21:15,600
Russo a little bit more at least
founded upon the moral argument,

351
00:21:15,600 --> 00:21:19,280
which is quite fascinating to
see how hard incompatibilism can

352
00:21:20,040 --> 00:21:23,760
can discuss blameworthiness,
praiseworthiness and how they're

353
00:21:23,760 --> 00:21:26,440
giving sort of positive aspects
to that.

354
00:21:26,440 --> 00:21:29,800
I'm we don't necessarily agree
with it, but I think those

355
00:21:29,800 --> 00:21:33,160
arguments are actually a little
bit more along the lines of what

356
00:21:33,520 --> 00:21:35,480
you're trying to talk about.
There is this moral

357
00:21:35,480 --> 00:21:39,720
significance, there is a a very
valuable economic significance

358
00:21:39,720 --> 00:21:41,720
and information transmission
significance.

359
00:21:41,720 --> 00:21:44,400
So would would you say that
those arguments are a little

360
00:21:44,400 --> 00:21:46,640
better because we're almost
talking about the same thing at

361
00:21:46,640 --> 00:21:52,160
that point?
Yes, OK, I I read that book

362
00:21:52,160 --> 00:21:54,000
about two or three years ago
and.

363
00:21:54,040 --> 00:21:56,040
I also can't remember it as much
as I would say.

364
00:21:56,680 --> 00:21:59,920
I have quotations from it and
alluded to in the book, but I

365
00:21:59,920 --> 00:22:03,320
don't remember all this
particular things they said.

366
00:22:03,840 --> 00:22:06,280
You're certainly right.
I remember the the high emphasis

367
00:22:06,280 --> 00:22:08,640
on morality.
And, and that gets to one of the

368
00:22:08,640 --> 00:22:11,520
points, why do people care about
free will at all?

369
00:22:11,800 --> 00:22:15,120
And probably the biggest reason
is, is morality.

370
00:22:16,480 --> 00:22:20,840
And Nietzsche said that
theologians invented the idea of

371
00:22:20,840 --> 00:22:23,600
free will so they could punish
their neighbors for doing things

372
00:22:23,600 --> 00:22:27,480
that are wrong.
And Nietzsche was given to sort

373
00:22:27,480 --> 00:22:30,240
of cynical, sarcastic ways of
saying things.

374
00:22:30,240 --> 00:22:33,800
But the point is is basically,
basically correct and profound.

375
00:22:33,800 --> 00:22:37,640
In fact, we even had lab studies
that showed that if people read

376
00:22:38,000 --> 00:22:42,360
about someone else doing
something morally bad, their own

377
00:22:42,360 --> 00:22:44,600
belief in free will moves up a
little bit.

378
00:22:44,920 --> 00:22:48,360
They're more insistent that, you
know, the person should not have

379
00:22:48,640 --> 00:22:51,760
have done that.
I mean, what's become obvious to

380
00:22:51,760 --> 00:22:57,040
me is most moral judgments or
should the person have acted

381
00:22:57,040 --> 00:23:01,000
differently in that situation?
And that assumes that the person

382
00:23:01,000 --> 00:23:05,720
could have acted differently.
So the assumption of free will

383
00:23:05,720 --> 00:23:11,720
really underlies a great deal,
if not all moral judgement and

384
00:23:11,720 --> 00:23:14,000
and society works that way.
And, and again, it's the

385
00:23:14,000 --> 00:23:16,600
extension over time that makes
it much more powerful.

386
00:23:17,080 --> 00:23:22,040
You could in in theory have a
morality among animals who just

387
00:23:22,040 --> 00:23:27,240
lived in the present.
Although if you read like

388
00:23:27,240 --> 00:23:30,880
Tomasello's Natural History of
Morality, he doesn't think even

389
00:23:30,880 --> 00:23:34,280
the the smartest, the
chimpanzees, really get there

390
00:23:34,280 --> 00:23:37,920
all the way to to morality.
There are a few transitional

391
00:23:37,920 --> 00:23:42,400
steps, but again, this is
something that that humans and

392
00:23:42,400 --> 00:23:45,880
all societies have morals as far
as we know, and no animal

393
00:23:45,880 --> 00:23:50,640
societies have them anyway.
You could in principle have them

394
00:23:50,640 --> 00:23:53,760
understand morality as, but
living in the present, it would

395
00:23:53,760 --> 00:23:57,560
lose its force 'cause if you did
something immoral, well, So

396
00:23:57,560 --> 00:24:00,040
what?
There'd be no, no consequences.

397
00:24:00,640 --> 00:24:03,040
But in a small group, which is
how we evolved.

398
00:24:03,040 --> 00:24:07,880
And living in a small group, you
lied to someone a few times.

399
00:24:08,200 --> 00:24:10,800
Everyone else will know that and
they will remember that.

400
00:24:11,880 --> 00:24:16,200
And so it's going to be a long
time before people will trust

401
00:24:16,200 --> 00:24:18,080
you again.
And that's going to hamper your

402
00:24:18,560 --> 00:24:22,960
abilities to function and even
to to, to get food and shelter

403
00:24:22,960 --> 00:24:29,640
and, and mate, it's like.
You you're reminding me of when

404
00:24:29,680 --> 00:24:33,280
I spoke to Noam Chomsky and he
said everybody who's who says

405
00:24:33,280 --> 00:24:37,560
free will does not exist always
acts as if it does so they're.

406
00:24:37,560 --> 00:24:41,440
Always.
Yeah, yeah, it's like the no

407
00:24:41,440 --> 00:24:43,840
self people.
It's sort of a a intellectual

408
00:24:43,840 --> 00:24:46,880
thing.
I I used to be a a determinist

409
00:24:47,280 --> 00:24:50,680
myself for a while.
I was remember being smitten by

410
00:24:50,680 --> 00:24:54,720
the elegance of the thing that
everything is inevitable and

411
00:24:54,720 --> 00:24:59,440
science determines it all and
the laws of physics with are are

412
00:24:59,440 --> 00:25:02,200
unchangeable and therefore
everything in the future is

413
00:25:02,200 --> 00:25:07,720
already predetermined.
And I don't mean to disrespect

414
00:25:07,720 --> 00:25:10,800
the serious scientists who
believe in it, but I look back

415
00:25:10,800 --> 00:25:12,920
on that as as intellectual
masturbation.

416
00:25:13,400 --> 00:25:15,280
It's not the world we live, we
live in.

417
00:25:16,280 --> 00:25:20,800
It's, you know, you have to make
decisions and you have to

418
00:25:20,800 --> 00:25:24,200
confront multiple possibilities
and and you'll be judged on

419
00:25:24,200 --> 00:25:27,440
whether you should have done
something else or not that

420
00:25:27,440 --> 00:25:30,600
situation.
When did the that view change?

421
00:25:30,600 --> 00:25:32,360
Was there?
Was there a particular moment

422
00:25:32,360 --> 00:25:36,080
where you realized it, or was it
just a gradual change in your

423
00:25:36,080 --> 00:25:41,800
view?
I think it was somewhat gradual.

424
00:25:41,800 --> 00:25:44,920
I, I remember some conversations
when I was insisting on

425
00:25:44,920 --> 00:25:50,520
everything because there was a,
an older man who I, I, when I

426
00:25:50,520 --> 00:25:53,400
was a boy, I stayed with his
family and then I grew up.

427
00:25:53,400 --> 00:25:56,400
I went back and visited him
again and then he was talking

428
00:25:56,400 --> 00:25:57,920
about it.
He was a very wise man.

429
00:25:57,920 --> 00:26:01,040
And he said, well, like, I'm not
sure why, but the, the human

430
00:26:01,040 --> 00:26:02,680
does have some degree of
freedom.

431
00:26:02,680 --> 00:26:07,240
And so I thought, well, if
somebody that's smart and wise,

432
00:26:07,240 --> 00:26:10,280
I should continue that view.
And then over the years I

433
00:26:10,280 --> 00:26:12,480
started looking at things more
from both sides.

434
00:26:12,480 --> 00:26:16,880
And yeah, the determinism is
really useless.

435
00:26:16,880 --> 00:26:20,160
I just have a paper accepted
arguing that it's, it's really

436
00:26:20,160 --> 00:26:24,520
useless for psychology to assume
determinism because almost

437
00:26:24,520 --> 00:26:27,480
everything psychology is
explaining is people in

438
00:26:27,480 --> 00:26:29,800
environments with multiple
possibilities.

439
00:26:30,120 --> 00:26:32,960
How do they make their choices?
How do they react to threats and

440
00:26:32,960 --> 00:26:36,880
opportunities?
And dangers and pursue success

441
00:26:36,880 --> 00:26:40,920
rather than failure.
And for the determinist to come

442
00:26:40,920 --> 00:26:43,440
along and say, well, it was
really inevitable that that

443
00:26:43,440 --> 00:26:45,880
would happen anyway, it's
completely unhelpful.

444
00:26:47,040 --> 00:26:50,280
It adds nothing.
In fact, it just blinds you to

445
00:26:50,280 --> 00:26:53,720
the important thing, which is
the person sees that there is a

446
00:26:53,720 --> 00:26:57,280
threat, which means something
bad might happen, but might not.

447
00:26:59,120 --> 00:27:03,160
And and so you change your
behavior so you make it not

448
00:27:03,160 --> 00:27:08,200
happen if possible or again,
opportunity or success, failure,

449
00:27:08,200 --> 00:27:14,280
anything else like that.
That's what we need to explain.

450
00:27:14,280 --> 00:27:16,400
And the idea that it's
inevitable and all laid out in

451
00:27:16,400 --> 00:27:18,880
advance.
And it isn't really, it's really

452
00:27:20,640 --> 00:27:22,880
intellectual view from a couple
centuries ago.

453
00:27:24,840 --> 00:27:29,440
I understand Spinoza was was
sort of criticized for being

454
00:27:29,440 --> 00:27:32,000
that sort of material
determinist.

455
00:27:32,320 --> 00:27:34,560
He was criticized because they
thought it didn't it.

456
00:27:34,600 --> 00:27:38,320
It went against Christianity and
contradicted the notion of free

457
00:27:38,320 --> 00:27:42,320
will as our back and forth.
The most famous statement of

458
00:27:42,320 --> 00:27:47,080
determinism was by Laplace in
the early 1800s who said, you

459
00:27:47,120 --> 00:27:51,440
know, if you knew all the the
distance of every particle and

460
00:27:51,440 --> 00:27:53,880
all the laws of nature, you
could calculate the future with

461
00:27:53,880 --> 00:27:58,960
100% accuracy.
But in the 20th century, both

462
00:27:58,960 --> 00:28:03,280
science and philosophy moved
seriously beyond that.

463
00:28:03,760 --> 00:28:09,240
The the relativity said that
there's no simultaneous moment

464
00:28:09,520 --> 00:28:14,560
of the universe, so you couldn't
have the the preconditions for

465
00:28:14,560 --> 00:28:19,600
Laplace's thought experiment.
And modern physics suggests that

466
00:28:19,800 --> 00:28:23,400
some randomness or indeterminacy
is there in nature at the

467
00:28:23,400 --> 00:28:26,280
subatomic level.
Now some philosophers try to

468
00:28:26,280 --> 00:28:29,560
link that to free will, but must
think that that won't really

469
00:28:30,000 --> 00:28:34,200
won't really work, that the the
tiny little subatomic particles

470
00:28:34,640 --> 00:28:38,800
bounce this way or that way even
in identical situations.

471
00:28:39,320 --> 00:28:45,120
That doesn't doesn't help
explain human freedom at all.

472
00:28:46,040 --> 00:28:49,840
But meanwhile in philosophy we
had phenomenology, which

473
00:28:49,840 --> 00:28:54,120
privileges conscious experience,
and then existentialism, which

474
00:28:54,120 --> 00:28:56,840
sort of emphasizes the conscious
experience of choice.

475
00:28:57,960 --> 00:29:01,520
It, it's noteworthy, of course,
that there are no theories as

476
00:29:01,520 --> 00:29:03,560
far as I can find of unconscious
free will.

477
00:29:04,640 --> 00:29:08,680
It, it, it's always associated
with the conscious choice and

478
00:29:08,680 --> 00:29:12,120
being aware of the alternatives
and finding a way to decide that

479
00:29:12,120 --> 00:29:14,240
I want to do this one rather
than that one.

480
00:29:16,760 --> 00:29:20,960
So that's, that's a crucial
aspect of that.

481
00:29:20,960 --> 00:29:24,520
And, and that really moves us
beyond this deterministic

482
00:29:25,280 --> 00:29:27,320
worldview, the clockwork
universe.

483
00:29:28,840 --> 00:29:32,720
It's just obsolete.
It was an inspiring vision at a

484
00:29:32,720 --> 00:29:34,680
time.
And like I said, I was, I was

485
00:29:34,680 --> 00:29:36,960
taken in and I was inspired by
it for a while.

486
00:29:36,960 --> 00:29:40,200
But it it really, it's really
helping.

487
00:29:40,760 --> 00:29:45,880
When I look at your years,
decades of work, it, I feel like

488
00:29:45,880 --> 00:29:48,320
it was almost inevitable that
you had to at some point write a

489
00:29:48,320 --> 00:29:51,280
book on free world because I
mean, you start off with like

490
00:29:51,280 --> 00:29:56,160
self esteem, the self,
self-control, There's so many

491
00:29:56,160 --> 00:29:59,360
aspects, ego depletion.
I mean, it's almost like you had

492
00:29:59,360 --> 00:30:05,040
no choice but.
I actually got into it when it

493
00:30:05,040 --> 00:30:08,000
was, it was the research on ego
depletion, which is the idea

494
00:30:08,000 --> 00:30:10,640
that self-control depends on a
limited energy supply.

495
00:30:12,560 --> 00:30:15,680
And so this energy supply is an
important part of the self.

496
00:30:16,600 --> 00:30:19,920
And when we discovered that the
same is used for making

497
00:30:19,920 --> 00:30:24,640
decisions and choices, then we
had a link there.

498
00:30:24,640 --> 00:30:26,720
And then I pay it's, it's more
than self-control.

499
00:30:27,080 --> 00:30:30,440
And I saw that, you know, I'd
read philosophy for a long time

500
00:30:30,440 --> 00:30:32,600
off and on.
The philosophers, when they talk

501
00:30:32,600 --> 00:30:35,320
about free will, they have
examples of self-control and

502
00:30:35,320 --> 00:30:38,800
they have examples of rational
choice, but they don't really

503
00:30:38,800 --> 00:30:41,800
have any way of saying that
those are linked, that those are

504
00:30:41,800 --> 00:30:45,120
the same thing.
But but then we did

505
00:30:45,120 --> 00:30:49,560
psychologically, because we can
make people make a bunch of

506
00:30:49,560 --> 00:30:53,240
choices and then show that their
self-control is impaired or the

507
00:30:53,240 --> 00:30:56,400
other way around, have them use
up their willpower on

508
00:30:56,400 --> 00:30:59,760
self-control and then their
decision making gets much more

509
00:30:59,760 --> 00:31:05,440
simple minded.
So there's an underlying,

510
00:31:06,400 --> 00:31:10,200
probably physiological structure
that attends both.

511
00:31:10,480 --> 00:31:14,680
So that's what made me think I
needed a bigger, a bigger

512
00:31:14,680 --> 00:31:17,320
concept.
And well, I said this.

513
00:31:17,320 --> 00:31:19,520
This must be what free will is
about.

514
00:31:20,800 --> 00:31:23,400
It's hard to believe that
there's that there's something

515
00:31:23,400 --> 00:31:26,600
called free will that doesn't
involve self-control and

516
00:31:26,600 --> 00:31:29,680
rational choice.
As I said, if there's no free

517
00:31:29,680 --> 00:31:32,120
will, this is at least what's
commonly mistaken for it.

518
00:31:33,080 --> 00:31:35,080
And just, well, just, and just
to clarify for any of the

519
00:31:35,080 --> 00:31:37,400
listeners of viewers who are not
familiar with some of your work

520
00:31:37,720 --> 00:31:41,360
on ego depletion at the time, I
think the main understanding was

521
00:31:41,360 --> 00:31:44,440
that it's a, it must be sort of
a computer like system.

522
00:31:44,440 --> 00:31:47,640
I mean, if we, if we gain
information prior, we should

523
00:31:47,640 --> 00:31:50,520
have more priors and then
therefore be able to like a

524
00:31:50,520 --> 00:31:54,120
computer, be able to answer
questions better and have be

525
00:31:54,120 --> 00:31:55,720
more effective with whatever
we're doing.

526
00:31:55,720 --> 00:31:58,000
But your work sort of proved the
reverse, no?

527
00:31:58,440 --> 00:31:59,760
The opposite.
Yeah, That's, that's good.

528
00:31:59,760 --> 00:32:02,680
You saw that, that connection.
Yeah, back when we first came up

529
00:32:02,680 --> 00:32:06,240
with these findings in the 90s,
psychology was all smitten with

530
00:32:06,400 --> 00:32:08,240
me.
The mind is like a computer and

531
00:32:08,240 --> 00:32:10,080
information processing was
everything.

532
00:32:10,320 --> 00:32:13,760
I used to joke that energy
models were so out of fashion

533
00:32:13,760 --> 00:32:15,480
that we weren't even against
them anymore.

534
00:32:17,880 --> 00:32:23,040
But it really looked like energy
gets depleted and to.

535
00:32:23,200 --> 00:32:25,280
And we found it.
So you have to pursue your

536
00:32:25,280 --> 00:32:30,000
analogy, if if you have your
computer working on one task

537
00:32:30,000 --> 00:32:32,720
and, you know, doing word
processing or whatever, and then

538
00:32:32,720 --> 00:32:34,960
you give it another one, it's
faster 'cause it's already doing

539
00:32:34,960 --> 00:32:37,400
that.
So by analogy, if it's already

540
00:32:37,400 --> 00:32:40,400
engaged in self-control, it
should do better on another

541
00:32:40,400 --> 00:32:42,120
self-control test that comes
along.

542
00:32:42,120 --> 00:32:46,640
But we consistently found they
did worse, almost never found

543
00:32:48,480 --> 00:32:50,520
the the other, the other kind of
effect.

544
00:32:51,400 --> 00:32:56,200
So yeah, it was really way out
there at the time.

545
00:32:56,200 --> 00:33:01,480
In the 90s, as luck would have
it, psychology got a lot more

546
00:33:01,480 --> 00:33:04,280
interested in biological
processes around then.

547
00:33:04,280 --> 00:33:07,480
It was the decade of the brain
was how they called the 90s.

548
00:33:07,480 --> 00:33:09,800
And there were also genetic
studies and stuff.

549
00:33:09,800 --> 00:33:14,360
And life is an energy process.
So suddenly energy became more

550
00:33:14,520 --> 00:33:17,560
respectable again.
And so without having to change

551
00:33:17,560 --> 00:33:22,080
my ideas, I, I came from the
fringe into more of the centre

552
00:33:22,080 --> 00:33:25,760
in the mainstream.
But that was just the luck of

553
00:33:25,760 --> 00:33:28,200
what was happening there.
But but absolutely, you're right

554
00:33:28,200 --> 00:33:30,320
that the the computer models
would have predicted the

555
00:33:30,320 --> 00:33:32,720
opposite.
Because I think today the most

556
00:33:33,120 --> 00:33:35,800
prominent view in terms of
course of computational models

557
00:33:35,800 --> 00:33:38,320
would be the Bayesian brain sort
of models.

558
00:33:38,320 --> 00:33:41,760
Does does your view align with
that in in any ways?

559
00:33:41,760 --> 00:33:46,960
Or do you find that they still
don't seem to align with those

560
00:33:46,960 --> 00:33:49,440
views with those computational
models at least?

561
00:33:50,080 --> 00:33:54,720
OK, well I have to preface here.
My last statistics class was in

562
00:33:54,720 --> 00:33:59,360
1976, so it's been a while.
My recollection of the Bayesian

563
00:33:59,360 --> 00:34:01,760
thing is a is a bit fuzzy.
I know you have prior

564
00:34:01,760 --> 00:34:04,120
assumptions so you have to
explain where they came from.

565
00:34:04,480 --> 00:34:08,239
But yes, you update them and
revise them in the light of new

566
00:34:08,239 --> 00:34:09,960
things.
And you revise your

567
00:34:09,960 --> 00:34:12,880
probabilities for projecting in
the future, which itself is not

568
00:34:12,880 --> 00:34:17,920
a very deterministic process.
It's assuming there are multiple

569
00:34:18,199 --> 00:34:20,400
probabilities, at least
subjectively.

570
00:34:20,639 --> 00:34:23,000
And determinist can allow
subjective you.

571
00:34:23,000 --> 00:34:28,159
You might think something just
has a chance, but you know, to

572
00:34:28,159 --> 00:34:31,560
the strict determinist, there's
no such thing as a mere chance.

573
00:34:31,560 --> 00:34:34,719
It's either absolutely
guaranteed since The Big Bang

574
00:34:34,719 --> 00:34:36,560
that it's going to happen or
it's not going to happen.

575
00:34:38,679 --> 00:34:40,239
But that's not how people
operate.

576
00:34:40,239 --> 00:34:45,080
And they operate more in this
sense of, yeah, oh, I guess, you

577
00:34:45,080 --> 00:34:47,159
know, I'm not as good at tennis
as I thought.

578
00:34:47,800 --> 00:34:51,480
So you revise your, your initial
assumption in there and that

579
00:34:51,480 --> 00:34:56,000
that, yeah, I think we all have
to be consistent with that.

580
00:34:56,000 --> 00:35:00,320
It's hard to to get around that.
So there's a a profound insight

581
00:35:00,320 --> 00:35:02,400
there.
Now there may be more subtleties

582
00:35:02,400 --> 00:35:06,200
to the whole Bayesian stuff,
which as I said, I'm not not yet

583
00:35:06,200 --> 00:35:08,400
to at.
The time Roy did when?

584
00:35:08,440 --> 00:35:10,880
When you did this, I mean, I'm
assuming it was very

585
00:35:10,880 --> 00:35:14,000
controversial at the time, The
ego depletion theory

586
00:35:14,000 --> 00:35:17,920
specifically, do you feel at
this very moment currently it

587
00:35:17,920 --> 00:35:20,800
still holds up or cause 'cause I
think I see some studies online

588
00:35:20,800 --> 00:35:24,080
where they say that they they
don't, so they're they're unable

589
00:35:24,080 --> 00:35:28,400
to replicate this phenomenon.
Is that true, or is the study

590
00:35:28,400 --> 00:35:33,280
just flawed somehow?
There's something like 700 or

591
00:35:33,280 --> 00:35:37,000
800 published studies with
finding the effect, so it's

592
00:35:37,000 --> 00:35:39,240
definitely true.
I've looked.

593
00:35:39,240 --> 00:35:42,960
I know there was a famous
failure, they, they called it a

594
00:35:42,960 --> 00:35:45,640
failure to replicate, but it
wasn't actually a replication.

595
00:35:45,640 --> 00:35:49,560
They sort of did a watered down
version of a, of a rather weird

596
00:35:49,560 --> 00:35:53,000
experiment.
But it looks like what they're

597
00:35:53,000 --> 00:35:56,880
doing when they fail to get it
is they fail to, to provide a

598
00:35:56,880 --> 00:35:59,200
test of it.
See, you have to do 2 things.

599
00:35:59,200 --> 00:36:01,840
You have to, I mean, it's a form
of fatigue, right?

600
00:36:02,120 --> 00:36:05,520
Mental fatigue, ego depletion.
You've used up some of your

601
00:36:05,520 --> 00:36:07,880
willpower.
So you have to get people to use

602
00:36:07,880 --> 00:36:12,240
enough use it up first in the
depleted condition and not in a

603
00:36:12,240 --> 00:36:15,800
control condition, and then you
measure something else.

604
00:36:16,720 --> 00:36:19,000
But if they just go through the
motions in the 1st and people

605
00:36:19,000 --> 00:36:21,920
don't really exert self-control,
then they don't use their

606
00:36:21,920 --> 00:36:23,720
willpower.
So it's not a test.

607
00:36:24,680 --> 00:36:27,560
This is a big problem throughout
social psychology.

608
00:36:27,600 --> 00:36:31,320
A year or two ago we reviewed
all the multi lab.

609
00:36:31,320 --> 00:36:35,880
This is when they get 20
different laboratories to run

610
00:36:35,880 --> 00:36:38,120
the same experiment.
It seemed initially like a great

611
00:36:38,120 --> 00:36:41,400
idea, but to do that big an
operation, you want to get it

612
00:36:41,400 --> 00:36:44,280
all streamlined and be as simple
as possible and fast.

613
00:36:45,080 --> 00:36:48,280
And that means they'll they'll
do a A5 or six minute

614
00:36:48,640 --> 00:36:53,160
manipulation of of of fatigue.
You know my, my colleagues in

615
00:36:53,160 --> 00:36:56,800
France who are really studying
the effect on on ego depletion

616
00:36:56,800 --> 00:37:00,760
on sports, they have people do
these metal tasks for 20 or 30

617
00:37:00,760 --> 00:37:05,160
minutes and then then much more
reliable effects.

618
00:37:05,600 --> 00:37:12,320
So if, as I said, this is a,
this is an issue throughout

619
00:37:12,480 --> 00:37:17,360
social psychology, we, we found
36 of these projects that have

620
00:37:17,360 --> 00:37:19,600
been published and there were
only four that had worked,

621
00:37:19,800 --> 00:37:24,280
including one on ego depletion.
So that puts it in very select

622
00:37:24,280 --> 00:37:27,760
company in terms of quality of
replication.

623
00:37:27,800 --> 00:37:30,480
I think that's a good case to be
considered the best replicated

624
00:37:30,480 --> 00:37:35,120
finding in in social psychology.
But again, it has to assume you

625
00:37:35,120 --> 00:37:38,160
have to manipulate the
independent variable and there

626
00:37:38,160 --> 00:37:42,560
are lots of the others that
failed on other topics of these

627
00:37:42,640 --> 00:37:45,520
these multi lab manipulations,
we have what's called a

628
00:37:45,520 --> 00:37:49,520
manipulation check.
So if you're trying to study,

629
00:37:49,520 --> 00:37:53,560
say the effects of anxiety on
test taking, you manipulate.

630
00:37:53,560 --> 00:37:56,680
So half the people, you put them
in a state of high anxiety and

631
00:37:56,680 --> 00:38:00,640
half in low anxiety.
And then you have them take a

632
00:38:00,640 --> 00:38:03,680
test and usually what you'll do
it after the anxiety

633
00:38:03,680 --> 00:38:05,760
manipulation.
You have them, right?

634
00:38:05,760 --> 00:38:07,640
How do you feel?
Do you feel?

635
00:38:07,640 --> 00:38:09,640
And so then they can compute the
average.

636
00:38:09,640 --> 00:38:12,360
And if the high anxiety group
isn't reporting that they're

637
00:38:12,360 --> 00:38:16,440
more anxious than the low
anxiety group, then you're not

638
00:38:16,440 --> 00:38:19,040
learning anything about anxiety
from the experiment.

639
00:38:19,040 --> 00:38:23,000
You can't test the difference.
You might do do the study and

640
00:38:23,000 --> 00:38:26,040
nothing comes out and you say,
OK, we didn't replicate the

641
00:38:26,040 --> 00:38:28,760
finding anxiety has no effect on
test performance.

642
00:38:29,200 --> 00:38:33,760
But, and draw that conclusion
because you you didn't whatever

643
00:38:33,760 --> 00:38:35,560
you did to create anxiety didn't
work.

644
00:38:36,200 --> 00:38:38,520
Or there's also the possibility
that what you did in the control

645
00:38:38,520 --> 00:38:42,920
condition created anxiety too.
Yeah, my, my colleagues, they

646
00:38:42,920 --> 00:38:45,160
said when they, they were
starting to develop this longer

647
00:38:45,360 --> 00:38:47,760
manipulation, so they would make
sure people really depleted.

648
00:38:49,440 --> 00:38:51,840
They had the control condition,
just do a test that was really

649
00:38:51,840 --> 00:38:57,360
easy for 30 minutes, but it was
so boring that it really

650
00:38:57,360 --> 00:38:59,960
bothered them and they had to
push themselves to keep doing

651
00:38:59,960 --> 00:39:03,440
this really boring task.
So they ended up depleted too.

652
00:39:04,880 --> 00:39:09,560
So if if you want, you know, a
high quality reliable failure to

653
00:39:09,560 --> 00:39:13,320
replicate something, you need a
manipulation, you need to show

654
00:39:13,320 --> 00:39:17,640
that the manipulation check
worked, that again, that the

655
00:39:17,640 --> 00:39:20,680
high anxiety condition was more
anxious than the low anxiety

656
00:39:20,680 --> 00:39:24,320
condition and then no result on
the dependent variable.

657
00:39:24,760 --> 00:39:29,280
I don't find that level of
failure on pretty much anywhere

658
00:39:29,280 --> 00:39:31,920
on ego depletion.
I mean, in hundreds of studies,

659
00:39:31,920 --> 00:39:33,840
there must be one or two just by
chance.

660
00:39:34,760 --> 00:39:36,800
But it's a, it's a very reliable
effect.

661
00:39:39,120 --> 00:39:42,400
Somebody counted up already six
or seven years ago that there

662
00:39:42,400 --> 00:39:48,120
were over 600 published studies.
Most of them has significant

663
00:39:48,120 --> 00:39:50,440
results and none in the opposite
direction.

664
00:39:50,440 --> 00:39:53,600
So sometime you say that, well,
maybe you just got lucky and

665
00:39:53,600 --> 00:39:56,920
things turned out based on
chance, which can happen when

666
00:39:56,920 --> 00:39:59,760
you, you know, just do one
experiment and you maybe measure

667
00:39:59,760 --> 00:40:04,480
a lot of things and try out.
So especially with a small

668
00:40:04,480 --> 00:40:09,840
sample, occasionally you will
get a random random result, but

669
00:40:12,160 --> 00:40:14,200
random results should go in both
directions.

670
00:40:15,880 --> 00:40:19,600
So if if your anxiety experiment
is producing a random result,

671
00:40:19,600 --> 00:40:24,280
you know, half the time it'll be
the low anxious people who, who

672
00:40:24,280 --> 00:40:29,880
do worse on the on the test.
And, and there's none of that

673
00:40:29,960 --> 00:40:34,120
with ego depletion either, you
know, findings in the opposite

674
00:40:34,120 --> 00:40:35,880
direction.
Well, actually there are two,

675
00:40:35,880 --> 00:40:38,640
but they're highly set up to be
in the opposite direction.

676
00:40:38,640 --> 00:40:43,760
One of them is mine and it, it's
highly meaningful.

677
00:40:44,040 --> 00:40:46,160
The the other one is cooler.
Actually.

678
00:40:46,240 --> 00:40:52,160
They, they showed that when they
have interracial interactions in

679
00:40:52,160 --> 00:40:55,200
the US, you know, the white and
black thing is very, very tense

680
00:40:55,200 --> 00:40:59,160
right now.
So that white people are nervous

681
00:40:59,160 --> 00:41:01,800
as well where they'll say the
wrong thing and be accused of

682
00:41:01,800 --> 00:41:04,440
racism.
So the black people actually

683
00:41:04,440 --> 00:41:06,840
like the white people better
when the white people are

684
00:41:06,840 --> 00:41:09,840
depleted, if they put them
through depletion manipulation

685
00:41:09,840 --> 00:41:12,560
first.
So that in a sense the opposite

686
00:41:12,640 --> 00:41:15,960
finding that you actually do
better, but it's because you

687
00:41:15,960 --> 00:41:18,800
quit worrying about, oh, I've
got to be careful not to say

688
00:41:18,800 --> 00:41:22,280
this word or that word or, or
apply this, or they'll take

689
00:41:22,320 --> 00:41:25,040
offense at the slightest thing
and they just sort of relax and

690
00:41:25,040 --> 00:41:27,200
be themselves.
And so people like them better.

691
00:41:28,120 --> 00:41:31,040
So that's, that's one of the
opposite ones.

692
00:41:31,040 --> 00:41:34,480
The other has to do with the
leaders deciding what to do.

693
00:41:34,840 --> 00:41:38,080
But essentially, you know, in
terms of pure ego depletion

694
00:41:38,080 --> 00:41:40,640
studies, they're not in the
opposite, no findings the

695
00:41:40,640 --> 00:41:43,200
opposite direction.
There's some null ones, which as

696
00:41:43,200 --> 00:41:47,400
I said, are mostly failure to,
to manipulate the variable

697
00:41:47,400 --> 00:41:49,960
properly.
You gotta get people to put in

698
00:41:49,960 --> 00:41:54,480
the effort so, so that they get
mentally fatigued in, in, in

699
00:41:54,480 --> 00:41:57,080
this way.
And then it works very reliably.

700
00:41:58,320 --> 00:42:01,600
This so many different topics we
could talk about with with you

701
00:42:01,600 --> 00:42:03,240
because you've written on so
many different things.

702
00:42:03,240 --> 00:42:06,400
I mean, yourself esteem work and
positive psychology.

703
00:42:06,400 --> 00:42:08,760
I mean, right now, positive
psychology is one of the biggest

704
00:42:08,760 --> 00:42:11,200
things.
If you go online, it's, it's all

705
00:42:11,200 --> 00:42:15,640
about re affirming your positive
biases, talking about positive

706
00:42:15,640 --> 00:42:18,520
things, looking in the mirror,
telling yourself how great you

707
00:42:18,520 --> 00:42:20,080
are.
And I mean, you've shown in

708
00:42:20,520 --> 00:42:23,360
various different ways how it
doesn't always work.

709
00:42:23,360 --> 00:42:25,640
I mean, it's it, it's, it
actually does not work for the

710
00:42:25,640 --> 00:42:27,680
most part.
Do you want to talk about that?

711
00:42:27,680 --> 00:42:29,600
A.
Little bit.

712
00:42:29,600 --> 00:42:31,720
Well, at the moment I'm
president of the International

713
00:42:31,720 --> 00:42:36,720
Positive Psychology Association.
I, I'm not going to speak

714
00:42:36,920 --> 00:42:38,960
negative about it.
I mean, I think we should be

715
00:42:38,960 --> 00:42:43,120
critical.
And yes, there have been times

716
00:42:43,120 --> 00:42:47,720
when people were overly positive
about about things.

717
00:42:49,080 --> 00:42:51,200
I'm I'm friends with Martin
Seligman who started it, and

718
00:42:51,200 --> 00:42:54,120
that's why he insisted all along
we have to be very rigorous with

719
00:42:54,120 --> 00:42:56,680
research.
There was a earlier movement of

720
00:42:56,680 --> 00:42:59,920
humanistic psychology which had
a lot of the same ideas that

721
00:43:00,600 --> 00:43:03,800
health is not just the absence
of disease and we got to look at

722
00:43:03,920 --> 00:43:06,160
ways to help people flourish and
all that.

723
00:43:06,920 --> 00:43:11,280
And so in some ways, positive
psychology took over the same

724
00:43:11,280 --> 00:43:14,320
space, which some of the older
folks resent a little bit.

725
00:43:15,640 --> 00:43:18,920
Well, I think it's a continuum,
but, but like obviously people

726
00:43:18,920 --> 00:43:21,440
are taking it a little too far.
I mean, it is obviously a great

727
00:43:21,440 --> 00:43:24,240
thing to have, but.
Yes, yeah, yeah.

728
00:43:24,240 --> 00:43:27,760
And that's inevitable.
The thing will some people will

729
00:43:27,760 --> 00:43:31,640
carry it too far and so on.
But I think it's a a positive

730
00:43:33,400 --> 00:43:37,040
trend in psychology.
It's something and obviously we

731
00:43:37,040 --> 00:43:39,520
had the first priority to curing
sickness.

732
00:43:39,520 --> 00:43:43,680
So getting people from being
miserable to being nothing to

733
00:43:43,680 --> 00:43:46,720
being zero, that that took
precedence.

734
00:43:46,720 --> 00:43:49,720
But it doesn't stop there.
If you can take people from zero

735
00:43:49,720 --> 00:43:53,360
to +5, that's that's even
better.

736
00:43:54,520 --> 00:43:58,760
Probably harder to do because
one of my most cited papers is

737
00:43:58,760 --> 00:44:00,360
called Bad is Stronger than
Good.

738
00:44:01,160 --> 00:44:07,400
That it was just a a pattern we
found everywhere that negative

739
00:44:07,400 --> 00:44:10,720
stimuli have more impact on the
mind than positive ones.

740
00:44:11,320 --> 00:44:14,160
And your negativity, negativity
bias works also vary.

741
00:44:14,160 --> 00:44:15,960
That's another thing.
I mean, there's so many things

742
00:44:15,960 --> 00:44:17,640
you can chat about.
Yeah.

743
00:44:17,640 --> 00:44:25,360
Could you continue?
Just I was, I was just saying

744
00:44:26,040 --> 00:44:28,200
the positive psychologists
actually like this.

745
00:44:28,200 --> 00:44:31,840
The bad is stronger than good.
One thing it explains the need

746
00:44:31,840 --> 00:44:36,360
for positive psychology, because
we need, we need a lot of

747
00:44:36,360 --> 00:44:39,040
positive things.
It's, you know, a few big bad

748
00:44:39,040 --> 00:44:43,080
things can have a lot more
impact than than there are a few

749
00:44:43,080 --> 00:44:45,960
things that are that good.
I recall once one of my

750
00:44:45,960 --> 00:44:49,920
colleagues was running a study
where he asked married couples

751
00:44:49,920 --> 00:44:54,240
to remember something really bad
that their partner did.

752
00:44:56,080 --> 00:44:59,520
And then she didn't want them to
leave the lab, you know,

753
00:44:59,520 --> 00:45:02,120
thinking badly their partners.
So at the end she had them,

754
00:45:02,120 --> 00:45:04,240
well, think of something good
that the partner did.

755
00:45:04,840 --> 00:45:07,680
And, you know, the bad things
were often really bad and the

756
00:45:07,680 --> 00:45:11,280
good things were, Oh, well, you
know, she brought me soup when I

757
00:45:11,280 --> 00:45:14,440
was sick or whatever.
You know, they're not nearly at

758
00:45:14,440 --> 00:45:18,480
the same level.
So, so she said still wasn't

759
00:45:18,480 --> 00:45:20,080
working.
So what they they finally did is

760
00:45:20,080 --> 00:45:23,640
they have the partner name 10
different things that the good

761
00:45:23,640 --> 00:45:27,120
things that the partner did and
that seemed to enable them to

762
00:45:27,120 --> 00:45:31,720
leave in a more positive mood.
So we need a lot of sort of

763
00:45:31,720 --> 00:45:33,600
small positive things to
encourage.

764
00:45:33,600 --> 00:45:37,360
And I think positive psychology
has done really well finding a

765
00:45:37,360 --> 00:45:41,560
variety of these things to
cultivate and promote and, and

766
00:45:41,560 --> 00:45:46,040
how people can do them.
I think it also explains again

767
00:45:46,040 --> 00:45:51,680
why psychology started out on
the negative side because, well,

768
00:45:51,680 --> 00:45:54,320
you find a focus on people's
problems and plus the effects

769
00:45:54,320 --> 00:45:59,400
are bigger with the new science,
with the new methods, you want

770
00:45:59,400 --> 00:46:02,640
to get a significant result.
It's easier to get a bad effect

771
00:46:02,640 --> 00:46:06,880
than a good effect.
That paper bad is stronger than

772
00:46:06,880 --> 00:46:09,320
good.
It's been cited, which means

773
00:46:09,320 --> 00:46:12,160
it's been listed in the
reference section of over 10,000

774
00:46:12,160 --> 00:46:16,240
other scientific publications.
And it's mostly because people

775
00:46:16,240 --> 00:46:18,880
are saying, there it is again.
You know, they'll do something

776
00:46:18,880 --> 00:46:21,360
like there'll be a positive
condition and a negative

777
00:46:21,360 --> 00:46:23,840
condition, which are roughly the
same, and then a neutral

778
00:46:23,840 --> 00:46:26,720
control.
But when they get the data, the

779
00:46:26,720 --> 00:46:29,600
neutral control is a lot closer
to the positive than the

780
00:46:29,600 --> 00:46:31,320
negative.
And so the reviewers will say,

781
00:46:31,320 --> 00:46:34,080
well, why is that?
You know, you've got a condition

782
00:46:34,080 --> 00:46:37,520
where you gain $5, another
condition where you lose $5.

783
00:46:37,840 --> 00:46:41,280
And the, the, the, the neutral
one in the middle, people are

784
00:46:41,280 --> 00:46:44,720
more upset about losing $5, then
they're happy about the gaining

785
00:46:44,720 --> 00:46:49,440
$5.
And so this, this pattern comes

786
00:46:49,440 --> 00:46:52,120
up over and over again.
And so it helps people respond

787
00:46:52,120 --> 00:46:55,120
to the reviewers by saying,
well, that's, that's a very

788
00:46:55,120 --> 00:46:58,960
typical pattern.
From a social psychology

789
00:46:58,960 --> 00:47:05,600
perspective, do you think that
the bias will slowly wouldn't

790
00:47:05,600 --> 00:47:08,200
say evolve out or like change
over time?

791
00:47:08,200 --> 00:47:11,680
So let's say if this movement
continues for the next 50 years,

792
00:47:12,280 --> 00:47:15,480
do you think that the flip side
will start to occur or do you

793
00:47:15,480 --> 00:47:18,920
think it will continuously be
ingrained into our sort of DNA

794
00:47:19,040 --> 00:47:21,880
structural thinking and the way
we always will perceive things?

795
00:47:24,320 --> 00:47:26,480
You mean the greater power of
negativity?

796
00:47:26,720 --> 00:47:30,760
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that's
going to persist.

797
00:47:31,520 --> 00:47:35,400
It is so widespread.
We already set out to to review

798
00:47:35,400 --> 00:47:37,400
the literature.
I'd only seen it in a couple

799
00:47:37,400 --> 00:47:38,880
different places.
And so I said, well, let's see

800
00:47:38,880 --> 00:47:40,320
where it's true and where it's
not true.

801
00:47:40,760 --> 00:47:44,560
And then that'll enable us to
say why it happens and when it

802
00:47:44,560 --> 00:47:48,320
happens, and to, you know, make
a very interesting theory.

803
00:47:49,320 --> 00:47:52,200
It was a good approach, but the
problem was it was always true.

804
00:47:52,200 --> 00:47:57,440
We couldn't really find
exceptions so well, that was

805
00:47:57,480 --> 00:48:01,040
disappointing because all our
pet theories didn't come true

806
00:48:01,040 --> 00:48:04,640
and it wasn't going to be a
complicated, interesting idea.

807
00:48:04,640 --> 00:48:06,120
It was going to be fairly simple
minded.

808
00:48:06,360 --> 00:48:09,280
But on the other hand it had the
excitement that this must be one

809
00:48:09,280 --> 00:48:13,280
of the basic principles of how
the mind works, which also

810
00:48:13,360 --> 00:48:15,960
suggests that it's deeply
ingrained, probably from

811
00:48:15,960 --> 00:48:17,920
evolution.
In fact, I think we did find

812
00:48:17,920 --> 00:48:22,760
some studies with the rats and
so on where they showed the the

813
00:48:22,760 --> 00:48:25,040
same effect.
It's, it's, it's trickier to do

814
00:48:25,040 --> 00:48:30,520
that with rats since they can't
talk and tell you things, but

815
00:48:30,800 --> 00:48:33,880
you can look at how hard they
pull toward or away from

816
00:48:34,000 --> 00:48:42,200
something and, well, it, it
looks like it's probably going

817
00:48:42,200 --> 00:48:47,160
back fire in evolution, probably
for basic reasons that if you

818
00:48:47,160 --> 00:48:50,600
miss an opportunity for
something good, well, that's too

819
00:48:50,600 --> 00:48:53,240
bad.
But it's at the end of your

820
00:48:53,240 --> 00:48:55,080
life.
If you miss a predator who's

821
00:48:55,080 --> 00:48:58,360
coming to eat you, you know,
that's it and life is over.

822
00:48:58,840 --> 00:49:02,960
So it's more important to see
the dangers and threats first

823
00:49:02,960 --> 00:49:06,320
and give priority to them.
The same with food.

824
00:49:06,560 --> 00:49:09,360
Something makes you sick once,
you just won't won't eat it

825
00:49:09,360 --> 00:49:13,640
again.
And it's a Professor Randolph

826
00:49:13,800 --> 00:49:16,960
Nessie calls it the smoke
detector principle, I mean.

827
00:49:16,960 --> 00:49:18,560
We have.
Yeah, I know him.

828
00:49:18,560 --> 00:49:20,520
Yeah, he's he's very smart.
I don't collect his work.

829
00:49:20,880 --> 00:49:23,240
Yeah, yeah, you have to.
If, if, if your smoke detector

830
00:49:23,240 --> 00:49:25,960
goes off, you should assume
there's a fire and then just get

831
00:49:25,960 --> 00:49:29,080
out of the building.
So because the one that it is,

832
00:49:29,080 --> 00:49:34,120
you will probably die.
Yes, yes, yes, yeah.

833
00:49:34,120 --> 00:49:38,400
I remember when I went to
college, they'd put in smoke

834
00:49:38,400 --> 00:49:41,440
detectors and they were much
overreacting.

835
00:49:42,920 --> 00:49:46,040
So they would go on fairly
often.

836
00:49:46,040 --> 00:49:49,040
And we, you know, at first it's
alarming, but we gradually

837
00:49:49,040 --> 00:49:54,160
learned just to slam the door
and wait till it got shut off,

838
00:49:54,200 --> 00:49:57,320
that if there had been a fair
fire, it would have been a

839
00:49:57,320 --> 00:49:59,400
problem.
Nessie would have had a a great

840
00:49:59,400 --> 00:50:03,880
point there.
And so a a fire detector that a

841
00:50:03,880 --> 00:50:07,560
smoke detector that goes off too
much is not really useful.

842
00:50:08,680 --> 00:50:11,480
Yeah, the, it's also, what's
also intriguing to me is, I

843
00:50:11,560 --> 00:50:15,680
mean, we've got these negativity
biases and, and we focus on

844
00:50:15,680 --> 00:50:17,760
these things because obviously
it helps to keep us alive for

845
00:50:17,760 --> 00:50:20,120
the most part.
And today, obviously

846
00:50:20,120 --> 00:50:22,920
psychologically on the Internet,
it's not a good trait to have.

847
00:50:22,920 --> 00:50:25,560
But I mean, we never see it.
We, we, we could not see this

848
00:50:25,560 --> 00:50:27,120
coming.
But then you also have the flip

849
00:50:27,120 --> 00:50:28,160
side.
You've got this also this

850
00:50:28,160 --> 00:50:30,640
positivity recollection sort of
bias.

851
00:50:30,640 --> 00:50:33,160
So I remember once when we were
in Med school, we were, we were

852
00:50:33,160 --> 00:50:37,080
reading these papers on how when
you're finished with Med school,

853
00:50:38,000 --> 00:50:40,840
after all those years of trauma,
you look back and the only thing

854
00:50:40,840 --> 00:50:42,440
you focus on is getting the
degree.

855
00:50:42,440 --> 00:50:44,480
You know, those that main that
main?

856
00:50:45,440 --> 00:50:47,560
OK.
Fine, but I've got this degree

857
00:50:47,560 --> 00:50:49,480
and it makes me, it makes me a
doctor.

858
00:50:49,480 --> 00:50:51,880
It's quite cool.
So we also have these ingrained

859
00:50:51,880 --> 00:50:55,280
positivity biases that which is
quite fascinating as well.

860
00:50:55,640 --> 00:50:59,000
It's mainly with with memory
that there is the the editing.

861
00:51:00,880 --> 00:51:03,960
There's an early paper by Shelly
Taylor who said, well, when

862
00:51:03,960 --> 00:51:07,360
there's something bad happens,
the the mind mobilizes and

863
00:51:07,360 --> 00:51:10,520
minimizes.
It mobilizes its resources to

864
00:51:10,520 --> 00:51:14,360
cope in the present, and then it
gradually tries to minimize it

865
00:51:15,440 --> 00:51:18,360
in the past.
It's still there in your memory,

866
00:51:18,680 --> 00:51:24,080
but you try not to dwell on it.
And some people are more

867
00:51:24,080 --> 00:51:27,920
successful than others at doing
that.

868
00:51:28,480 --> 00:51:33,400
Now, there's a personality style
called the repressor, who, you

869
00:51:33,400 --> 00:51:36,160
know, reports that everything
is, is good and they're every

870
00:51:36,160 --> 00:51:38,520
positive and upbeat.
Someone said, well, they do.

871
00:51:38,520 --> 00:51:42,000
They just not have bad memories.
And somebody probed them and,

872
00:51:42,040 --> 00:51:44,840
and they have as many bad
memories as other people.

873
00:51:45,160 --> 00:51:46,800
They just never think about
them.

874
00:51:47,320 --> 00:51:50,560
They're sort of walled off.
You know, Freud talked about

875
00:51:50,600 --> 00:51:52,640
isolation as a defense
mechanism.

876
00:51:52,640 --> 00:51:56,320
If you don't make a lot of
associations to something, then

877
00:51:56,320 --> 00:51:59,240
it doesn't come up very often.
The opposite would be depressed

878
00:51:59,240 --> 00:52:03,760
people for whom everything bad
is sort of tied in to everything

879
00:52:03,760 --> 00:52:06,960
else that's bad.
And so as soon as something goes

880
00:52:06,960 --> 00:52:09,440
wrong, it reminds them of this
and reminds them of this and

881
00:52:09,440 --> 00:52:11,960
reminds them of this.
And they can go on and on to

882
00:52:11,960 --> 00:52:17,200
this long chain of of doomed
thoughts, which is why they're

883
00:52:17,200 --> 00:52:18,560
not that much fun to hang out
with.

884
00:52:22,800 --> 00:52:26,680
Tell me, Roy, when, when you
wrote Willpower, because that's,

885
00:52:26,680 --> 00:52:29,360
I mean, that's a New York Times
seller that that book really did

886
00:52:29,360 --> 00:52:32,400
well.
I mean, you used a, a folk word,

887
00:52:32,400 --> 00:52:35,360
normal word that everybody uses
day-to-day ordinary language.

888
00:52:35,720 --> 00:52:38,480
And you did that purposefully.
You just want to do, you just

889
00:52:38,480 --> 00:52:40,680
want to run through that a
little bit as to why you chose

890
00:52:40,680 --> 00:52:42,520
that word, because now we can
talk about all.

891
00:52:43,920 --> 00:52:45,520
Right.
I I wrote it with John Tierney.

892
00:52:45,520 --> 00:52:48,960
He was New York Times science
writer and very gifted writer,

893
00:52:48,960 --> 00:52:50,280
such a pleasure to deal with
him.

894
00:52:50,960 --> 00:52:53,000
So he suggested going to
Willpower.

895
00:52:53,200 --> 00:52:55,640
I had resisted using the term up
to that point.

896
00:52:55,640 --> 00:53:00,880
The scientists in general, when
there's a folk term bringing in

897
00:53:00,880 --> 00:53:04,240
a lot of baggage and
connotations and other ideas

898
00:53:04,240 --> 00:53:08,240
people have.
So we prefer to use jargon to

899
00:53:08,240 --> 00:53:11,000
develop our own term, not
because we want to confuse

900
00:53:11,000 --> 00:53:19,120
people, just be just simply
because it's just because it's

901
00:53:20,880 --> 00:53:30,200
more precise.
And so I hadn't wanted to say

902
00:53:30,200 --> 00:53:34,320
willpower, but by after about 10
years, it was becoming clear to

903
00:53:34,320 --> 00:53:38,000
me that this really was kind of
the same, the same thing.

904
00:53:39,080 --> 00:53:42,760
So I started using it.
And then when John said, well,

905
00:53:42,760 --> 00:53:44,600
is it, do you have a reason not
to use it for the book?

906
00:53:44,600 --> 00:53:47,360
Because that's what people will
be be interested in and will

907
00:53:47,360 --> 00:53:53,160
help it help it sell.
So I said, OK, let's, let's,

908
00:53:53,160 --> 00:53:55,320
let's use it.
And so I've used it ever since,

909
00:53:55,320 --> 00:54:01,960
including my scientific
writings, but it was it, it was

910
00:54:01,960 --> 00:54:06,520
so slow to do it for the first
ideas came out in sort of the

911
00:54:06,520 --> 00:54:08,880
early 90s when it started
thinking along these lines.

912
00:54:10,040 --> 00:54:12,680
And willpower was something like
2011.

913
00:54:13,680 --> 00:54:19,000
So it had been at least a good
15 years before I said, well,

914
00:54:19,000 --> 00:54:21,720
it's all right, let's, let's use
the will.

915
00:54:21,720 --> 00:54:24,920
Let's use the ordinary term to
connect with that.

916
00:54:25,880 --> 00:54:29,960
I assuming the science of free
will you you expand on this on

917
00:54:30,000 --> 00:54:31,600
this?
What are you fan of this?

918
00:54:31,600 --> 00:54:33,400
Quote, by the way, that that
wasn't my term either.

919
00:54:33,400 --> 00:54:36,320
I wanted to call it the case for
free will or the scientific case

920
00:54:36,320 --> 00:54:39,920
for free will, but the
publishers were very insistent

921
00:54:39,920 --> 00:54:42,440
about.
Always wishing for the for the

922
00:54:42,440 --> 00:54:45,400
better, for the more captioning
title.

923
00:54:46,040 --> 00:54:50,440
I, I, I guess, and sorry, I hope
they're right and it sells well.

924
00:54:51,040 --> 00:54:53,480
It does.
And I I sort of look at the

925
00:54:53,480 --> 00:54:57,080
title of a book as really more
of a marketing things.

926
00:54:57,080 --> 00:55:01,400
So in a sense, as an author,
I'll I've let them assuming they

927
00:55:01,400 --> 00:55:04,240
know what they're doing, which
is a strong assumption, but I'll

928
00:55:06,680 --> 00:55:08,800
let them make the title.
But anyway, yeah, that's the.

929
00:55:09,120 --> 00:55:11,360
So what about that?
No, I was going to.

930
00:55:11,800 --> 00:55:14,920
Say in, in in the science of
free world, do you do you use

931
00:55:14,920 --> 00:55:18,360
and explore a lot of your ideas
from world power to to defend

932
00:55:18,360 --> 00:55:20,160
your argument for freedom of the
world?

933
00:55:23,920 --> 00:55:26,960
Well.
Directly sort of an indirect

934
00:55:26,960 --> 00:55:30,560
approach.
The the book has a lot of short

935
00:55:30,560 --> 00:55:33,600
chapters because I think with
the modern reader, they don't

936
00:55:33,600 --> 00:55:37,280
have the attention span for the
long chapters the way we used

937
00:55:37,280 --> 00:55:38,440
to.
That's what people are saying.

938
00:55:38,960 --> 00:55:42,800
And so there's one short chapter
on the ego depletion because

939
00:55:42,800 --> 00:55:45,160
it's a key part of it.
And then there's one that sort

940
00:55:45,160 --> 00:55:47,760
of was a follow up to relate it
to other things.

941
00:55:48,120 --> 00:55:51,000
So it's there.
It's not a big part of that

942
00:55:51,000 --> 00:55:56,120
book, but but you know, again,
for me, the scientific challenge

943
00:55:56,120 --> 00:56:00,800
is to understand how this human
mental system works 'cause

944
00:56:00,800 --> 00:56:02,280
there's nothing like it in
nature.

945
00:56:02,280 --> 00:56:05,160
It's, it's radically different
even from how the the

946
00:56:05,160 --> 00:56:09,240
chimpanzees are and gorillas and
orangutans, our closest

947
00:56:09,240 --> 00:56:15,280
relatives, how they behave.
So, and even even the skeptics

948
00:56:15,280 --> 00:56:18,440
of free will agree that the
human system for controlling

949
00:56:18,440 --> 00:56:22,440
action, the human mental system,
is, is, is radically different

950
00:56:22,440 --> 00:56:25,440
from everything else.
So to me that's the scientific

951
00:56:25,440 --> 00:56:28,280
challenge.
And and certainly the ego

952
00:56:28,280 --> 00:56:33,000
depletion is, is, is part of
that, the limited energy aspect.

953
00:56:33,000 --> 00:56:36,520
But there are plenty of others.
So I've tried to cover the whole

954
00:56:36,520 --> 00:56:39,240
topic.
So yeah, as I said.

955
00:56:40,520 --> 00:56:44,480
Certain animals, for example,
orcas, dolphins, those, I mean,

956
00:56:44,480 --> 00:56:47,840
those, these, these aquatic
mammals that say that have these

957
00:56:47,840 --> 00:56:50,280
complex relationships and seem
to have some sort of speech

958
00:56:50,280 --> 00:56:52,800
that's quite intriguing and we
just don't understand it yet.

959
00:56:53,080 --> 00:56:57,200
I find that those are the
closest we'd get in terms of

960
00:56:57,200 --> 00:57:01,880
looking at some sort of societal
moral relationship occurring,

961
00:57:01,880 --> 00:57:03,360
but we just don't understand
enough.

962
00:57:03,360 --> 00:57:06,200
But I think they are the closest
to us.

963
00:57:06,880 --> 00:57:08,440
Yeah, that's, that's
interesting.

964
00:57:08,440 --> 00:57:13,360
And it's I, I confess I don't
really know that much about

965
00:57:13,360 --> 00:57:15,360
dolphins, but I have heard
people say that.

966
00:57:15,360 --> 00:57:17,080
And so it is.
It is a plausible case.

967
00:57:17,480 --> 00:57:18,720
Yeah, it.
Was a recent.

968
00:57:18,720 --> 00:57:22,800
It's still not that posed to us.
Have a sorry, sorry to, to

969
00:57:22,800 --> 00:57:23,800
interrupt you there.
Alright.

970
00:57:23,800 --> 00:57:26,600
There was a recent study done
about orcas and their language

971
00:57:26,600 --> 00:57:29,520
system and, and the more they're
slowly decoding some of their

972
00:57:29,800 --> 00:57:31,840
their patterns, they're starting
to realize that it's very

973
00:57:31,840 --> 00:57:33,600
systemic.
It's very systematic.

974
00:57:33,600 --> 00:57:36,840
Sorry, and and and purposeful in
a sense.

975
00:57:37,480 --> 00:57:40,280
And that could be quite game
changing if we do sort of figure

976
00:57:40,320 --> 00:57:42,520
out that they have a complex
language system.

977
00:57:43,640 --> 00:57:47,800
Right, yes.
I mean, the conventional wisdom

978
00:57:47,800 --> 00:57:51,320
is that linguistics don't really
think there's certainly

979
00:57:51,320 --> 00:57:56,360
communication among a lot of
species, but it's it's doesn't

980
00:57:56,360 --> 00:57:58,120
rise to the level of what
linguists say.

981
00:57:58,160 --> 00:58:05,640
This is really a language and if
they resemble us that that is

982
00:58:05,920 --> 00:58:07,800
not provoking interesting in a
different way.

983
00:58:07,800 --> 00:58:10,800
I mean, why aren't I borrow our
biological relatives more

984
00:58:10,800 --> 00:58:15,640
similar to us, has us in a
completely different environment

985
00:58:15,640 --> 00:58:20,760
from the the orcas, the giant
whales who live in the ocean and

986
00:58:20,760 --> 00:58:22,480
have a completely different
lifestyle.

987
00:58:22,800 --> 00:58:25,960
Why would they come around to
having the same sort of mind

988
00:58:25,960 --> 00:58:31,720
that we do when we live in
cities, buildings that we've

989
00:58:31,760 --> 00:58:38,280
made with industrial processes
and building codes and

990
00:58:38,280 --> 00:58:45,040
everything else?
So, you know, understanding

991
00:58:45,040 --> 00:58:47,400
what's unique and essential
about human beings.

992
00:58:47,800 --> 00:58:52,120
The main comparisons are our
closest relatives because we

993
00:58:52,120 --> 00:58:56,080
evolved from a common ancestor
within our common ancestor with

994
00:58:57,520 --> 00:59:01,000
with giant whales is is way
farther back.

995
00:59:01,280 --> 00:59:03,440
Yeah, it is.
It is quite a leap.

996
00:59:03,600 --> 00:59:04,840
What, what?
What are your thoughts on the

997
00:59:04,840 --> 00:59:09,040
role of language in terms of our
understanding of the mind, free

998
00:59:09,040 --> 00:59:11,720
will, consciousness and all
these concepts we discuss well?

999
00:59:15,480 --> 00:59:19,920
That continues to be something I
I reflect on and learn new

1000
00:59:19,920 --> 00:59:22,200
things.
Language Again, all human

1001
00:59:22,200 --> 00:59:26,440
societies, as far as we know,
have language and know animal

1002
00:59:26,440 --> 00:59:28,560
societies have a full-fledged
language.

1003
00:59:29,120 --> 00:59:33,040
Maybe a couple really different
ones are getting close in some

1004
00:59:33,040 --> 00:59:41,720
respect, but there are many
potential links.

1005
00:59:41,760 --> 00:59:45,840
Obviously enables us first to
share information and have

1006
00:59:45,840 --> 00:59:51,120
common understandings.
Second, it enables us to think

1007
00:59:51,120 --> 00:59:55,200
more effectively because you can
organize information better with

1008
00:59:55,200 --> 01:00:04,840
language. 3rd, it's, it's
possible this is getting into

1009
01:00:04,840 --> 01:00:07,880
some difficult ideas that I'm,
I'm just grappling with now.

1010
01:00:07,880 --> 01:00:12,760
But you see, meaning always
postulates the opposite.

1011
01:00:13,520 --> 01:00:16,600
You know, there can't be wet
unless there's dry.

1012
01:00:16,600 --> 01:00:20,560
You know the concept of wet
requires dry and high and low

1013
01:00:20,560 --> 01:00:24,480
and good and bad and.
All these different ones, they

1014
01:00:24,480 --> 01:00:27,920
sort of imply the opposite.
And so when you put a label on

1015
01:00:27,920 --> 01:00:31,960
it, you imply the existence of
the opposite.

1016
01:00:31,960 --> 01:00:33,800
It's this why?
Well, it could have been that

1017
01:00:33,800 --> 01:00:35,480
it's wet, but it could have been
dry.

1018
01:00:35,480 --> 01:00:38,320
Or it's it's wet, but it was dry
earlier.

1019
01:00:39,640 --> 01:00:45,800
It changed.
And that then applying meaning

1020
01:00:45,800 --> 01:00:51,280
to reality brings in more of, of
what Sarge called non being in

1021
01:00:51,280 --> 01:00:56,680
his theory of consciousness,
which again, I read some time

1022
01:00:56,680 --> 01:01:00,440
ago, but still continues to to
affect me.

1023
01:01:01,400 --> 01:01:03,760
You know, you can put it this
way, A computer sees what's

1024
01:01:03,760 --> 01:01:07,080
there and it compare.
You can compare it with another

1025
01:01:07,080 --> 01:01:11,080
idea, but it it doesn't have a
direct experience of something

1026
01:01:11,080 --> 01:01:13,880
not being there the way we do.
If you're looking for your keys

1027
01:01:13,880 --> 01:01:17,880
and you look on the desk and you
look in your pocket and you know

1028
01:01:17,880 --> 01:01:20,000
your experiences, it's not
there.

1029
01:01:20,520 --> 01:01:22,360
It's not like you're, oh, here's
my pocket.

1030
01:01:22,560 --> 01:01:25,080
Now let me compare it with an
idea of what my pocket would

1031
01:01:25,080 --> 01:01:31,920
feel like if my keys were in it.
So, so he thought a key part to

1032
01:01:31,920 --> 01:01:36,280
understand consciousness was
this, this being a non being.

1033
01:01:36,560 --> 01:01:40,320
I think other people call it
transparency that you, you hear

1034
01:01:40,320 --> 01:01:46,040
a high pitched tone as high
pitched, but it, that's only

1035
01:01:46,040 --> 01:01:48,480
meaningful if there could have
been a low pitched tone.

1036
01:01:50,520 --> 01:01:55,360
So you're aware of the one
without the other.

1037
01:01:55,600 --> 01:02:01,920
Anyway, I, I, I, I think to some
degree language contributes to,

1038
01:02:03,200 --> 01:02:08,160
to the power of consciousness
through this, this feature of

1039
01:02:08,160 --> 01:02:10,920
meaning.
But I'm not completely convinced

1040
01:02:10,920 --> 01:02:12,920
of that.
It's just an idea I've been I've

1041
01:02:13,960 --> 01:02:15,640
been exploring and thinking
about.

1042
01:02:17,360 --> 01:02:19,800
Is there anything else that
you're currently exploring

1043
01:02:19,800 --> 01:02:22,440
except for Free World that you
just find utterly fascinating?

1044
01:02:23,800 --> 01:02:30,560
Oh well, there are a bunch.
Yes, I have a big review article

1045
01:02:30,560 --> 01:02:38,040
coming out on uncertainty that
some follow up papers in in

1046
01:02:38,040 --> 01:02:45,240
there uncertainty is topic
that's, you know, of practical

1047
01:02:45,240 --> 01:02:47,640
relevance.
It's something people face in

1048
01:02:47,640 --> 01:02:49,720
their daily lives.
In fact, I think the United

1049
01:02:49,720 --> 01:02:55,440
Nations a year or two ago said
global uncertainty is going up

1050
01:02:55,440 --> 01:02:59,960
and it's one of the biggest
causes of problems in the world.

1051
01:02:59,960 --> 01:03:03,200
So uncertainty itself is is
inherently bad.

1052
01:03:05,240 --> 01:03:11,200
I'd had a APHD student who so
back when I was really getting

1053
01:03:11,320 --> 01:03:15,960
high geared with the depletion
research, she said I think being

1054
01:03:15,960 --> 01:03:18,440
exposed to uncertainty make is
depleting.

1055
01:03:19,640 --> 01:03:22,400
And she read a whole bunch of
experiments which worked very

1056
01:03:22,400 --> 01:03:24,440
consistently.
It put people through an

1057
01:03:24,440 --> 01:03:28,000
uncertain experience and then
they would they would act like

1058
01:03:28,000 --> 01:03:30,480
depleted people did.
It was a hard time getting them

1059
01:03:30,480 --> 01:03:33,720
published because they wanted to
know exactly how or why.

1060
01:03:33,720 --> 01:03:36,280
You know, this is the usual
psychological science.

1061
01:03:36,560 --> 01:03:40,400
What are the inner processes?
So we thought, well, maybe if

1062
01:03:40,400 --> 01:03:44,680
you're uncertain, you're trying
to keep several different lines

1063
01:03:44,680 --> 01:03:46,920
of interpretation at the same
time.

1064
01:03:48,240 --> 01:03:52,520
So like one of the manipulations
was we told people, oh, there's

1065
01:03:52,520 --> 01:03:54,920
an experiment.
People are going to give a, give

1066
01:03:54,920 --> 01:03:57,800
a little speech and, and, and
other people will listen to it

1067
01:03:57,800 --> 01:04:00,400
and form an impression.
And mostly people, especially

1068
01:04:00,400 --> 01:04:02,080
students are scared of giving
speeches.

1069
01:04:02,280 --> 01:04:05,480
So this is a very negative idea.
And so some are told they're

1070
01:04:05,480 --> 01:04:07,280
going to give a speech, some are
told they're not going to give a

1071
01:04:07,280 --> 01:04:09,880
speech.
And some were told, oh, I don't

1072
01:04:09,880 --> 01:04:12,400
have your assignment.
I'm going to have to go look it

1073
01:04:12,400 --> 01:04:14,640
up.
So I'll get back and let you

1074
01:04:14,640 --> 01:04:16,480
know in a minute.
And then we give them the

1075
01:04:16,480 --> 01:04:19,960
measure while they're uncertain.
And it turned out uncertainty

1076
01:04:19,960 --> 01:04:25,320
was worse than being sure of the
bad thing in terms of how badly

1077
01:04:25,320 --> 01:04:27,800
they performed.
The uncertain people did worse.

1078
01:04:27,800 --> 01:04:31,440
So we thought, well, are they at
the same time trying to think, I

1079
01:04:31,440 --> 01:04:33,640
am going to give a speech, I'm
not going to give a speech.

1080
01:04:34,400 --> 01:04:36,120
What is it like for this or that
one?

1081
01:04:36,320 --> 01:04:39,120
Well, we couldn't find any
evidence that that that was

1082
01:04:39,120 --> 01:04:43,920
true.
Anyway, we finally did get some

1083
01:04:43,920 --> 01:04:46,040
of those studies published.
I think that the idea we came

1084
01:04:46,040 --> 01:04:50,160
around with is uncertainty is a
cue to conserve resources.

1085
01:04:51,000 --> 01:04:53,160
And so it mimics depletion,
cause depletion.

1086
01:04:53,160 --> 01:04:55,440
It turns out we initially
thought, well, the brain is out

1087
01:04:55,440 --> 01:04:58,800
of fuel so it can't do
self-control anymore.

1088
01:04:59,000 --> 01:05:02,080
But that's, that's not right.
That's very soon overcame that.

1089
01:05:03,000 --> 01:05:06,320
So after you exerted
self-control, then you start to

1090
01:05:06,320 --> 01:05:09,960
conserve your, your resources,
which would be adaptive.

1091
01:05:11,360 --> 01:05:14,720
So that could have easily
evolved and probably means we

1092
01:05:14,720 --> 01:05:17,040
all have more self-control than
we think because we start

1093
01:05:17,040 --> 01:05:20,280
conserving energy.
And, and that's the same with

1094
01:05:20,280 --> 01:05:22,400
physical muscles.
You start to feel tired.

1095
01:05:22,400 --> 01:05:25,240
Your brain sends out a tired
signal when the muscle's still

1096
01:05:25,240 --> 01:05:28,040
perfectly capable of, of
performing at full level.

1097
01:05:28,360 --> 01:05:30,800
There is a point at which the
muscle can't perform anymore,

1098
01:05:31,240 --> 01:05:33,160
but long before that you feel
tired.

1099
01:05:33,840 --> 01:05:38,240
But I, I've read some of the
recent Physiology studies and so

1100
01:05:38,240 --> 01:05:40,920
on, they'll have someone in and
have them do stuff and get to be

1101
01:05:40,920 --> 01:05:44,080
tired and say, all right, we
need you to, to press as hard as

1102
01:05:44,080 --> 01:05:46,960
you can one more time.
You know, we'll give you $5 or

1103
01:05:46,960 --> 01:05:49,160
whatever.
And they can press just as hard

1104
01:05:49,160 --> 01:05:51,720
as they did when they walked in,
even even after it.

1105
01:05:51,720 --> 01:05:56,360
So, so tiredness and and ego
depletion are, are signals to

1106
01:05:56,360 --> 01:05:59,600
conserve resources.
Now we think uncertainty is kind

1107
01:05:59,600 --> 01:06:01,480
of the same signal, which would
make sense if you don't know

1108
01:06:01,480 --> 01:06:04,720
what's happening in the future.
I just want to conserve your

1109
01:06:04,720 --> 01:06:07,240
resources so you'll be better
able to to cope with it.

1110
01:06:07,960 --> 01:06:10,160
What got me thinking this way?
Are there some studies with

1111
01:06:10,160 --> 01:06:13,040
animals and when there's
uncertainty in the environment,

1112
01:06:13,560 --> 01:06:18,120
they start saving food, they'll
start to squirrel it away and

1113
01:06:18,120 --> 01:06:21,360
hide it or some of them even
just get fatter in an uncertain

1114
01:06:21,360 --> 01:06:23,840
environment, which is storing
the food inside yourself.

1115
01:06:24,840 --> 01:06:29,120
So, so and that again, that
would be adaptive, right 'cause

1116
01:06:29,760 --> 01:06:32,560
if you know, maybe tomorrow
there's not going to be any

1117
01:06:32,560 --> 01:06:36,560
food, it'd be better to have
some stored or have already

1118
01:06:36,560 --> 01:06:41,040
eaten in it.
So, so you can have that anyway.

1119
01:06:41,280 --> 01:06:44,400
That aspect of uncertainty was
interesting, we saw.

1120
01:06:44,480 --> 01:06:46,080
That directly with COVID as
well.

1121
01:06:46,080 --> 01:06:49,520
When, when, when people were
were told that you have to stay

1122
01:06:49,520 --> 01:06:52,480
home, people rushed to the
stores, bought all the toilet

1123
01:06:52,480 --> 01:06:54,400
paper during COVID they bought.
All the.

1124
01:06:55,120 --> 01:06:57,480
Food they they could.
So we've seen this directly.

1125
01:06:57,520 --> 01:06:59,960
I mean, this is what we do.
Yes, yes, that's a good analogy.

1126
01:06:59,960 --> 01:07:03,600
Yeah.
The so the hoarding toilet paper

1127
01:07:03,840 --> 01:07:10,120
for hence uncertainty.
Yes, so there's that.

1128
01:07:10,120 --> 01:07:12,400
The uncertainty has positive
effects too.

1129
01:07:12,400 --> 01:07:17,000
I'm thinking maybe the opposite
of uncertainty is boredom, and

1130
01:07:17,000 --> 01:07:19,280
so you really want to sort of be
in the middle.

1131
01:07:20,680 --> 01:07:23,160
I'll certainly have some space
of life aspect.

1132
01:07:23,160 --> 01:07:26,160
Yeah.
And about.

1133
01:07:26,160 --> 01:07:28,080
Like too much, too little is too
boring.

1134
01:07:28,080 --> 01:07:29,520
Yeah, I get, I get where you're
coming from.

1135
01:07:29,520 --> 01:07:31,960
So you kind of you need, you
need a little, but just to keep

1136
01:07:31,960 --> 01:07:32,960
you going.
The.

1137
01:07:34,480 --> 01:07:39,520
Roy, you went from so South self
esteem to self-control

1138
01:07:39,520 --> 01:07:42,040
willpower, neither science or
free will.

1139
01:07:42,240 --> 01:07:43,800
Where do you think you're going
to head off to this?

1140
01:07:43,800 --> 01:07:48,520
I mean, if after certainty, I
mean, there's general artificial

1141
01:07:48,520 --> 01:07:49,920
intelligence that people are
talking about.

1142
01:07:49,920 --> 01:07:53,560
Do you think at some point that
that would be an approach, a

1143
01:07:53,560 --> 01:07:55,280
topic you would address in the
future?

1144
01:07:55,280 --> 01:07:58,840
Because it's it's clearly become
the biggest thing people talk

1145
01:07:58,840 --> 01:08:03,360
about today.
Yes, I, I, I don't know.

1146
01:08:03,360 --> 01:08:05,480
I, I, so far I haven't really
made use of it.

1147
01:08:05,480 --> 01:08:07,760
I think I got to start playing
around with it and learning

1148
01:08:07,760 --> 01:08:09,560
about it.
And I was just talking to

1149
01:08:09,560 --> 01:08:14,680
someone who's doing research on
sort of social robots and

1150
01:08:15,480 --> 01:08:20,000
forming relationships with them.
And what do they need to do to

1151
01:08:20,000 --> 01:08:23,399
make people feel like, you know,
they're having a relationship

1152
01:08:23,399 --> 01:08:25,720
with this artificial intelligent
person?

1153
01:08:27,040 --> 01:08:30,560
It's related to two, sometimes
people when their spouse dies,

1154
01:08:30,960 --> 01:08:35,479
they could have a, a hologram or
a artificial version that would

1155
01:08:35,479 --> 01:08:38,520
talk to you.
Would that be creepy or would

1156
01:08:38,520 --> 01:08:40,800
that be reassuring?
So there are a lot of

1157
01:08:40,800 --> 01:08:46,720
interesting questions there.
I, I mostly review when there's

1158
01:08:46,720 --> 01:08:49,279
a lot of research already been
done and try to put it together

1159
01:08:49,279 --> 01:08:52,560
for the big picture.
I don't think we'll be at that

1160
01:08:52,800 --> 01:08:55,279
place for a while.
And I am with, with artificial

1161
01:08:55,279 --> 01:08:57,880
intelligence where there's a, a
lot to go on.

1162
01:08:58,680 --> 01:09:07,279
So I have, you know, more books
I want to write, but that in

1163
01:09:07,279 --> 01:09:11,479
terms of coming up with no idea
about artificial intelligence

1164
01:09:11,479 --> 01:09:16,080
and how it works that I, I could
write a book about I'm, I'm not

1165
01:09:16,080 --> 01:09:19,279
confident of that happening
certainly in the next few years.

1166
01:09:19,920 --> 01:09:23,960
How do you get the world power
to write hundreds of journals

1167
01:09:23,960 --> 01:09:25,840
and over 40 books?
I mean, where do you get it

1168
01:09:25,880 --> 01:09:27,600
from?
It's pretty, it's pretty

1169
01:09:27,600 --> 01:09:32,680
incredible.
Well, I, I'd say it's been a

1170
01:09:32,680 --> 01:09:37,399
very nice job, but most people
when they start writing, at

1171
01:09:37,399 --> 01:09:40,439
first it's a real struggle to
make do it.

1172
01:09:40,439 --> 01:09:43,800
But after a while, if you write
a lot, it becomes more and more

1173
01:09:43,800 --> 01:09:47,319
automatic and you can
concentrate on interesting

1174
01:09:47,319 --> 01:09:50,840
parts.
So, I mean, officially I've

1175
01:09:50,840 --> 01:09:53,680
retired twice, although I'm I'm
working all day every day.

1176
01:09:54,840 --> 01:09:57,120
But I retired from two other
universities because it was a

1177
01:09:57,120 --> 01:09:59,080
way of staying connected after I
left them.

1178
01:10:00,640 --> 01:10:05,560
But, you know, some of my
friends retire and then they're

1179
01:10:05,560 --> 01:10:08,040
just done with working and done
with psychology.

1180
01:10:08,040 --> 01:10:11,480
But I can't imagine what I would
do with my time.

1181
01:10:11,480 --> 01:10:15,320
Doing crossword puzzles is not
nearly as interesting as, you

1182
01:10:15,360 --> 01:10:18,040
know, reading and thinking about
human beings.

1183
01:10:19,120 --> 01:10:21,760
My matter called our basic
curiosity about people.

1184
01:10:23,120 --> 01:10:26,240
So there's always more
interesting stuff to learn.

1185
01:10:26,240 --> 01:10:33,320
So I haven't, I mean I have good
self-discipline I guess and and

1186
01:10:33,320 --> 01:10:38,440
so on, but I haven't suffered to
produce that much.

1187
01:10:38,440 --> 01:10:42,800
It was some of them were labours
of love and some of them were

1188
01:10:42,800 --> 01:10:45,800
chores.
But All in all, and I liked

1189
01:10:45,800 --> 01:10:49,120
working with the young people.
I had a lot of fortunate to have

1190
01:10:49,120 --> 01:10:55,920
a lot of talented PhD students,
and it's always fun to see them

1191
01:10:57,280 --> 01:10:58,960
start off.
They're beginning Graduate

1192
01:10:58,960 --> 01:11:02,040
School and they don't know
what's what or how to do things.

1193
01:11:02,040 --> 01:11:05,280
And then I like to go see them
after they've got a job and

1194
01:11:05,280 --> 01:11:09,040
they're an assistant professor
and people are respecting them.

1195
01:11:09,040 --> 01:11:13,280
It's such a nice satisfying
feeling to, you know, maybe I

1196
01:11:13,280 --> 01:11:17,400
helped a little bit or at least
didn't hurt them to reach their

1197
01:11:17,400 --> 01:11:20,440
goal and become a, a successful
person.

1198
01:11:20,720 --> 01:11:23,760
So there have been a lot of
positives in there and I've

1199
01:11:24,400 --> 01:11:27,600
I've, I've really enjoyed my
career.

1200
01:11:28,640 --> 01:11:31,520
I think it it would have been,
it would have been a complete

1201
01:11:31,520 --> 01:11:35,040
oxymoron if if you came out
writing all these books like

1202
01:11:35,040 --> 01:11:38,680
Willpower, self-control,
etcetera, and having not been

1203
01:11:38,680 --> 01:11:40,920
the successful.
So it would be quite weird if

1204
01:11:40,920 --> 01:11:43,800
you weren't able to actually
prove it by publishing over 40

1205
01:11:43,800 --> 01:11:48,120
books being sighted at all these
times with because you are the

1206
01:11:48,120 --> 01:11:51,000
person who talks about habits
and self-control, self aware.

1207
01:11:52,080 --> 01:11:54,400
So I think it fits perfectly and
beautifully.

1208
01:11:54,400 --> 01:11:57,200
So I thank you for your
contributions to the field.

1209
01:11:57,880 --> 01:11:59,000
Oh, well, thank you very much.
Yeah.

1210
01:11:59,440 --> 01:12:01,960
Yeah, no, it's, it's, it's been
a pleasure to like to read your

1211
01:12:01,960 --> 01:12:05,800
work, explore it and, and and I
can't wait to read the book when

1212
01:12:05,800 --> 01:12:07,480
it comes out.
Anything about the book, Roy,

1213
01:12:07,480 --> 01:12:11,560
that you want to mention to the
audience to look forward to, to

1214
01:12:11,560 --> 01:12:15,160
expect?
Oh, all on the free will book.

1215
01:12:15,200 --> 01:12:19,600
I mean, there are several books
by by various things people

1216
01:12:19,600 --> 01:12:22,080
saying, oh, there's no free
will, it's an illusion, blah,

1217
01:12:22,080 --> 01:12:24,040
blah, blah.
So somebody should make the

1218
01:12:24,040 --> 01:12:31,600
positive case which which I did.
And I think it's it's quite

1219
01:12:31,840 --> 01:12:37,320
reasonable that certainly the
the humans, we have a an

1220
01:12:37,320 --> 01:12:41,360
advanced form of by which the
mind controls actions.

1221
01:12:42,560 --> 01:12:46,160
And I explain how it works.
And I think the term free will

1222
01:12:46,160 --> 01:12:50,040
is is close enough.
Like I said, the free is less of

1223
01:12:50,040 --> 01:12:56,600
a problem than the will part.
The will is a metaphor, but but

1224
01:12:56,600 --> 01:12:58,960
we do this.
It's highly useful and adaptive.

1225
01:12:59,880 --> 01:13:01,400
It's something we all do every
day.

1226
01:13:01,880 --> 01:13:04,960
I forget who you quoted who said
to the people who say they don't

1227
01:13:04,960 --> 01:13:08,080
believe in free will.
I think it was Chomsky maybe.

1228
01:13:08,320 --> 01:13:09,840
They still act like they have
it.

1229
01:13:11,120 --> 01:13:15,160
Yeah, I remember somebody was
somebody was was telling me in

1230
01:13:15,160 --> 01:13:19,760
Germany, they had a a fellow
come who was really a starch

1231
01:13:19,760 --> 01:13:23,080
determinist and everything.
And they asked them, was this

1232
01:13:23,080 --> 01:13:27,320
how you're raising your sons?
He said Oh no, they have to be

1233
01:13:27,320 --> 01:13:29,120
held responsible for their
actions.

1234
01:13:29,600 --> 01:13:33,320
It's, it's, it's, it's, it's,
it's very difficult to just

1235
01:13:33,320 --> 01:13:36,760
break away and just completely
believe, to fall into that

1236
01:13:36,760 --> 01:13:40,640
belief to, to act that way.
I I think it's completely

1237
01:13:40,640 --> 01:13:42,720
impossible for most humans.
Right, yes.

1238
01:13:42,720 --> 01:13:46,640
So the world we live in has
multiple possibilities and and

1239
01:13:46,640 --> 01:13:50,840
the choices have to be made.
If if someone if someone's

1240
01:13:50,840 --> 01:13:53,040
getting ready prepped and you
know they want to get your book,

1241
01:13:53,040 --> 01:13:56,640
they want to read it, are there
any primers or or further

1242
01:13:56,640 --> 01:13:59,520
recommendation for reading that
they should that you'd recommend

1243
01:13:59,840 --> 01:14:02,200
they should check out in order
in order to prepare themselves

1244
01:14:02,200 --> 01:14:04,160
to what for what you have to
say?

1245
01:14:05,760 --> 01:14:11,440
Oh, mine is.
Is is written in a real, fairly

1246
01:14:11,920 --> 01:14:15,520
layperson language.
It's, it's not that.

1247
01:14:17,120 --> 01:14:18,760
It's not that they need to read
other things.

1248
01:14:18,760 --> 01:14:20,360
There are other interesting
books.

1249
01:14:21,160 --> 01:14:23,560
My friend Al Mele has written is
a philosopher.

1250
01:14:23,560 --> 01:14:27,600
He's written a number of books
about free will for ordinary

1251
01:14:27,600 --> 01:14:30,640
people.
He's written others for

1252
01:14:31,360 --> 01:14:34,120
technical sophisticated
philosophers.

1253
01:14:35,120 --> 01:14:39,560
But I think it's a recent one is
opinionated Guide.

1254
01:14:39,560 --> 01:14:41,080
So that that's a pretty good
book.

1255
01:14:44,120 --> 01:14:47,080
Ken Sheldon had a nice, nice one
a year or two ago.

1256
01:14:48,080 --> 01:14:50,880
So there's some other good works
as well.

1257
01:14:50,880 --> 01:14:54,120
But you don't need anything else
to understand, mind, it'll make

1258
01:14:54,120 --> 01:14:56,440
sense.
Roy, throughout your career with

1259
01:14:56,480 --> 01:15:01,000
growing up to now the are there
any philosophers or

1260
01:15:01,400 --> 01:15:04,280
psychologists, social
neuroscientists, etcetera, who

1261
01:15:04,280 --> 01:15:08,160
inspired you, you, you think are
up there in that Mount Rushmore

1262
01:15:08,160 --> 01:15:10,920
of yours for people to check
out?

1263
01:15:11,440 --> 01:15:15,080
I'm most curious to know if it's
not the best question because

1264
01:15:15,080 --> 01:15:18,040
obviously we're just
highlighting the best, but it's

1265
01:15:18,040 --> 01:15:19,960
cute.
It's nice to know who you think

1266
01:15:19,960 --> 01:15:26,960
are some of the greatest.
All right, well, in training to

1267
01:15:26,960 --> 01:15:31,440
think I did philosophy for a
while and I'm not sure other

1268
01:15:31,440 --> 01:15:34,160
people want to read this, but
reading Kant, I was really

1269
01:15:34,160 --> 01:15:38,840
impressed with how disciplined
his his mind worked and he

1270
01:15:38,840 --> 01:15:41,560
wasn't just looking to make the
best case for his side.

1271
01:15:42,080 --> 01:15:46,640
He was sort of ruthlessly
critical of arguments on both

1272
01:15:46,640 --> 01:15:48,440
sides.
So that was an early one.

1273
01:15:49,520 --> 01:15:54,960
I think Freud got me into into
psychology.

1274
01:15:54,960 --> 01:16:00,120
He was reading some of probably
I'd been reading moral

1275
01:16:00,120 --> 01:16:05,720
philosophy who who try to
understand what's right and

1276
01:16:05,720 --> 01:16:07,840
wrong and very conceptual
analysis.

1277
01:16:08,120 --> 01:16:09,400
And then I read some of Freud's
stuff.

1278
01:16:09,400 --> 01:16:12,320
He said, well, let's look at how
people actually get their

1279
01:16:12,320 --> 01:16:14,560
morals.
How did children learn what's

1280
01:16:14,560 --> 01:16:17,000
right and wrong?
He also went to the

1281
01:16:17,400 --> 01:16:22,200
anthropological evidence of his
day, which was rather primitive

1282
01:16:22,200 --> 01:16:25,440
by today's standards.
But still look, how did the

1283
01:16:25,440 --> 01:16:31,960
earliest societies, what are the
forms of of morality that they

1284
01:16:31,960 --> 01:16:34,200
have first?
And so I thought, well, that

1285
01:16:34,200 --> 01:16:36,280
could be interesting.
You could tackle these

1286
01:16:36,280 --> 01:16:39,840
philosophical questions as as
scientific questions with social

1287
01:16:39,840 --> 01:16:42,960
science data.
So that kind of inspired me.

1288
01:16:44,760 --> 01:16:53,440
In terms of more current authors
in psychology, David Buss, the

1289
01:16:53,440 --> 01:16:56,240
evolutionary psychologist,
really had a huge effect on me

1290
01:16:56,240 --> 01:16:59,760
because I was taught everything
is socialization and everything

1291
01:16:59,760 --> 01:17:04,400
is learned.
And so Buss was an early leader

1292
01:17:04,400 --> 01:17:07,320
in in pointing out a lot of
behaviors have evolutionary

1293
01:17:07,320 --> 01:17:11,240
bases, a pattern.
So he's had a huge effect on my

1294
01:17:11,240 --> 01:17:14,240
thinking.
Some of my other favourites,

1295
01:17:15,600 --> 01:17:21,400
Michael Tomasello and there are
a lot of writers who say, oh,

1296
01:17:21,400 --> 01:17:24,440
humans are just like the apes.
You know, we're all, we're all

1297
01:17:24,440 --> 01:17:26,640
very similar.
And others say, oh, no, no,

1298
01:17:26,640 --> 01:17:29,200
we're totally different.
And he's really disciplined to

1299
01:17:29,200 --> 01:17:33,160
say, well, the apes do this the
same we do, but they don't do

1300
01:17:33,160 --> 01:17:36,960
that.
And so his books like Natural

1301
01:17:36,960 --> 01:17:40,640
History of cognition, Natural
History of morality, Cultural

1302
01:17:40,640 --> 01:17:44,000
origins of human cognition,
those I've really found

1303
01:17:44,120 --> 01:17:48,560
brilliant and, and, and helpful
in terms of the bigger picture,

1304
01:17:48,560 --> 01:17:53,080
social science, Francis
Fukuyama, I think is a

1305
01:17:53,200 --> 01:17:56,800
extraordinary genius and a, a
number of his books Origins of

1306
01:17:56,800 --> 01:18:00,080
political order.
I think is, is a is a huge

1307
01:18:00,280 --> 01:18:04,400
influence on my thinking.
It's it's two volumes, but you

1308
01:18:04,400 --> 01:18:06,560
don't have to read them both,
but read the earlier one.

1309
01:18:08,120 --> 01:18:10,280
It goes from, you know, starts
from the Stone Age.

1310
01:18:10,680 --> 01:18:15,480
He starts with the Hobbes was
the philosopher who said, you

1311
01:18:15,480 --> 01:18:19,280
know, the the state of nature is
the war of all against all, you

1312
01:18:19,360 --> 01:18:22,840
know, And at some point people
agreed to make a social contract

1313
01:18:23,560 --> 01:18:25,480
to work together.
And Fukuyama said, no, that's

1314
01:18:25,480 --> 01:18:29,720
not the starting point.
We evolved from apes and so they

1315
01:18:29,720 --> 01:18:33,400
have a hierarchy.
And so how did we move from

1316
01:18:33,400 --> 01:18:36,200
their hierarchical society to
the hunter gatherers who were

1317
01:18:36,200 --> 01:18:39,560
very egalitarian?
And then how did the hierarchy

1318
01:18:39,560 --> 01:18:44,240
come back?
And really, again, careful

1319
01:18:44,240 --> 01:18:51,400
thinker, lots of information.
So another one that I find

1320
01:18:51,400 --> 01:18:53,800
inspiring.
Do you do you read fiction?

1321
01:18:53,840 --> 01:18:56,040
Fiction, Roy, Do you?
Do you enjoy fiction?

1322
01:18:57,840 --> 01:19:02,160
I do off and on.
I I'm reading some more more

1323
01:19:02,160 --> 01:19:03,640
recently.
For many years I didn't.

1324
01:19:03,640 --> 01:19:07,680
I only read non fiction.
The fiction wasn't true.

1325
01:19:07,680 --> 01:19:10,400
But you know, a beautifully
written novel, especially at

1326
01:19:10,400 --> 01:19:13,080
bedtime.
It's nice to take your mind off

1327
01:19:13,080 --> 01:19:17,240
things and read novels.
So I'm reading some of the

1328
01:19:17,240 --> 01:19:21,200
Bernard Cornwell, the ones I
like fiction that just gives me

1329
01:19:21,200 --> 01:19:24,680
a glimpse of a completely
different life of my own.

1330
01:19:25,040 --> 01:19:29,880
So these carnival ones are about
Great Britain before it was

1331
01:19:29,880 --> 01:19:36,120
Great Britain, you know, back in
the 900 and the, the Vikings are

1332
01:19:36,120 --> 01:19:40,160
taking over half the country and
the Saxons and the the different

1333
01:19:40,160 --> 01:19:43,480
tribes are having their
different countries and just

1334
01:19:44,680 --> 01:19:47,520
very well, very well resourced.
So it's a glimpse of what it

1335
01:19:47,680 --> 01:19:51,840
felt like to live back then.
I at least I assume.

1336
01:19:52,600 --> 01:19:55,600
Now, Roy, thank this has been
such a pleasurable conversation

1337
01:19:55,600 --> 01:19:57,840
and I really appreciate it.
Thank you so much for joining

1338
01:19:57,840 --> 01:19:58,520
me.
Anything.

1339
01:19:58,520 --> 01:19:59,920
Any final words from your side,
Roy?

1340
01:20:00,680 --> 01:20:03,120
No, I think that's good.
I've enjoyed the conversation

1341
01:20:03,120 --> 01:20:03,720
too.
Thank you.

1342
01:20:04,120 --> 01:20:08,200
Thanks very much for including
me and I hope you get a good a

1343
01:20:08,200 --> 01:20:10,560
good audience.
Yeah, I think they'll love it.

1344
01:20:10,560 --> 01:20:12,640
I think.
I think you've given so much for

1345
01:20:12,640 --> 01:20:15,120
them to think about.
And obviously a great book

1346
01:20:15,120 --> 01:20:17,360
coming soon as well.
And I'll put a link to that once

1347
01:20:17,360 --> 01:20:20,120
it's out as well.
And I really am grateful for

1348
01:20:20,120 --> 01:20:21,520
your time, Roy.
Thank you so much.

1349
01:20:22,200 --> 01:20:23,320
Thanks for that, Terence.
Hold on.