Nir Lahav: Can Physics Explain Consciousness? A Relativistic Theory & the Equivalence Principle

Dr Nir Lahav PhD, is a Physicist from Bar-Ilan University, now at Cambridge University. His field of study is in Neuroscience and Consciousness studies. He uses network theory, non linear dynamics and chaos. He developed The Relativistic Theory of Consciousness - a new physical theory in order to solve the hard problem of consciousness. He is also developing a model for chaotic neural networks in collaboration with Zachariah Neemeh, his 2022 paper ("A Relativistic Theory of Consciousness") was chosen as one of the most influential articles of the year by Neuroscience News. TIMESTAMPS: (0:00) - Introduction (1:18) - Definition of Consciousness (5:44) - A Relativistic Theory of Consciousness (15:48) - The Equivalence Principle & the Zombie Argument (21:42) - Physicalism vs Reductive Materialism (28:56) - Nir's Exploration of Relativity & Consciousness (37:20) - How to test the Relativistic Theory (future experiments & predictions) (42:08) - Emergentism, Functionalism, & Cognitive Frames of Reference (53:25) - Cognitive Maps & Consciousness (1:00:00) - Animal/AI Consciousness (minimal conditions) (1:03:30) - Free Will & Determinism (1:12:55) - Is the Universe be Conscious? (from a Relativistic Approach) (1:22:18) - From Absolutism to Relativism (1:31:20) - Future work (1:33:10) - Conclusion EPISODE LINKS: - Nir's Website: https://www.lahavnir.com/ - Nir's Paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079610723001128 - Nir's "GoFundMe": https://gofund.me/b37c00d5 CONNECT: - Website: https://tevinnaidu.com
- Podcast: https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/mindbodysolution
- YouTube: https://youtube.com/mindbodysolution
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/drtevinnaidu
- Facebook: https://facebook.com/drtevinnaidu
- Instagram: https://instagram.com/drtevinnaidu
- LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/drtevinnaidu ============================= Disclaimer: The information provided on this channel is for educational purposes only. The content is shared in the spirit of open discourse and does not constitute, nor does it substitute, professional or medical advice. We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of listening/watching any of our contents. You acknowledge that you use the information provided at your own risk. Listeners/viewers are advised to conduct their own research and consult with their own experts in the respective fields.
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,080
I love your questions, they are
so good.
2
00:00:02,560 --> 00:00:06,560
Very interesting question.
Wow you, you almost made me cry.
3
00:00:06,840 --> 00:00:10,440
You are the first podcast.
I think that I will try to
4
00:00:10,440 --> 00:00:13,240
explain something from my next
paper to the principle of
5
00:00:13,240 --> 00:00:17,840
relativity is the key.
And in Cambridge we are we want
6
00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:21,000
to to do an experiment.
Look for the first time maybe we
7
00:00:21,000 --> 00:00:23,920
have a solution for the mind
body problem.
8
00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:33,240
Nina, thanks for joining me
today we're going to discuss and
9
00:00:33,240 --> 00:00:37,600
dissect your relatively and we
can mind the Pandey new theory
10
00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:41,600
of consciousness theory of
consciousness.
11
00:00:41,960 --> 00:00:45,200
I have to say, when when I read
this paper, the first time I
12
00:00:45,200 --> 00:00:49,200
read it, I I didn't get it.
Part of me was like, I wonder,
13
00:00:49,600 --> 00:00:51,600
I'm trying to figure out exactly
what he means.
14
00:00:51,800 --> 00:00:54,040
But the second time I read it,
it was almost like it was
15
00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:57,560
sudden, obvious, an obvious
reality just hit me.
16
00:00:57,560 --> 00:01:01,000
And I thought to myself, why
haven't we really tried to do
17
00:01:01,000 --> 00:01:02,440
this?
This is actually quite a good
18
00:01:02,720 --> 00:01:05,640
approach.
So I think before we start and
19
00:01:05,640 --> 00:01:07,720
go to the paper, let's start
with definitions.
20
00:01:08,760 --> 00:01:13,240
How do you define consciousness
and how do you define relativity
21
00:01:13,480 --> 00:01:16,360
in terms of from physics?
And then we can slowly move into
22
00:01:16,360 --> 00:01:17,800
your theory of consciousness
from there.
23
00:01:19,120 --> 00:01:21,800
Yeah, that's a good question.
Because consciousness, it's,
24
00:01:21,800 --> 00:01:25,920
it's one of those words that
different people will have
25
00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:27,640
different definitions for,
right?
26
00:01:29,600 --> 00:01:34,360
But in consciousness studies,
usually the canonical definition
27
00:01:34,360 --> 00:01:39,200
is if there is something that is
like for the creature, then the
28
00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:43,360
creature has consciousness.
So you know, it comes from Negel
29
00:01:43,360 --> 00:01:46,000
from his paper.
What is it like to be a bet?
30
00:01:46,680 --> 00:01:53,440
And the idea is that if, let's
say, if the bat has something
31
00:01:53,440 --> 00:01:57,680
that is like to being, you know,
if, if he has something that is
32
00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:03,280
like to feel to, to, to maybe to
think to, to, to see the world,
33
00:02:03,720 --> 00:02:12,960
world, world with his sonar
abilities, then the bat has
34
00:02:13,040 --> 00:02:17,920
consciousness.
And the same idea is also for
35
00:02:17,920 --> 00:02:21,760
every creature like us that that
has consciousness.
36
00:02:22,160 --> 00:02:27,280
So if we have something that is
like to feel or to sense the
37
00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:31,480
world or, or to think, then we
say, yes, we, we have
38
00:02:31,480 --> 00:02:33,400
consciousness.
But then let's say when we are
39
00:02:33,760 --> 00:02:38,640
under anesthesia or in deep
sleep with no dreams, then we
40
00:02:38,640 --> 00:02:41,280
just have nothing that is like
for us, it's like it goes like
41
00:02:41,280 --> 00:02:42,760
that, right?
And you wake up.
42
00:02:43,760 --> 00:02:46,440
So this is consciousness.
This is what we want to
43
00:02:46,440 --> 00:02:50,120
understand, our ability to
experience the world and
44
00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:53,560
ourselves.
And then if you had to define
45
00:02:53,560 --> 00:02:57,320
relativity from the physics
perspective, and then I think
46
00:02:57,320 --> 00:02:59,480
from there, we'll slowly branch
into your theory of
47
00:02:59,480 --> 00:03:01,280
consciousness.
Sure.
48
00:03:01,280 --> 00:03:04,280
Maybe before that also the
mystery, the big mystery here,
49
00:03:04,280 --> 00:03:08,560
because it sounds relatively
simple that OK, we have our
50
00:03:08,560 --> 00:03:14,080
brain, we know that our brain
create everything that we do,
51
00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:19,240
that we think that we feel.
And So what is the problem here?
52
00:03:19,840 --> 00:03:25,120
But then of course there is this
big mystery of how to bridge the
53
00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:28,120
gap between the third person
point of view and the first
54
00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:31,520
person point of view.
The fact that from the outside
55
00:03:32,120 --> 00:03:36,400
you can measure my brain
patterns when while I see an
56
00:03:36,400 --> 00:03:41,520
apple, for example, but then I
actually experienced this apple
57
00:03:42,040 --> 00:03:45,480
and then it's a problem how to
bridge this gap.
58
00:03:45,480 --> 00:03:50,040
Because from the outside, when
we try to understand how the
59
00:03:50,040 --> 00:03:57,440
brain represents, how it
represents the apple we are, you
60
00:03:57,440 --> 00:04:02,520
know, we should speak about some
state space and multidimensional
61
00:04:02,520 --> 00:04:06,360
state space of the brain.
And then over there are some
62
00:04:06,360 --> 00:04:10,920
complex representation of those
neural patterns.
63
00:04:12,240 --> 00:04:17,320
But but in the end, my
experience is not that I don't
64
00:04:17,320 --> 00:04:20,279
experience this multidimensional
patterns.
65
00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:25,800
I experience a 3D red round
shape apple.
66
00:04:27,240 --> 00:04:32,080
And it seems that there is no
way how the brain can create
67
00:04:32,440 --> 00:04:37,640
this experience because the
brain, all it all it can do is
68
00:04:37,840 --> 00:04:41,240
to create more and more neural
patterns, maybe more and more
69
00:04:41,240 --> 00:04:46,960
complex, but no, but no, nowhere
in the brain it can create this
70
00:04:47,480 --> 00:04:52,160
3D round shaped apple and it
should create it, right?
71
00:04:52,160 --> 00:04:57,080
We should if, if we, if we think
that the brain should create our
72
00:04:57,080 --> 00:05:01,240
conscious mind, we, if we are
part of physicalism, you know,
73
00:05:01,240 --> 00:05:05,640
we are part of physics, then we
should find a mechanism how the
74
00:05:05,640 --> 00:05:09,920
brain can create it.
And it seems that we cannot find
75
00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:11,680
it right.
This is the hard problem.
76
00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:14,680
This is the mystery of
consciousness, right?
77
00:05:14,880 --> 00:05:17,240
Of phenomenal consciousness, how
they like to call it.
78
00:05:18,640 --> 00:05:20,880
And Emil, you're obviously
talking about Levine's
79
00:05:21,640 --> 00:05:24,600
explanatory gap and, and and
and, and the Thomas heart
80
00:05:24,600 --> 00:05:27,400
problem.
You, you go as far as claiming,
81
00:05:27,400 --> 00:05:30,360
look, you're able to dissolve
the heart problem and bridge
82
00:05:30,360 --> 00:05:33,200
this gap.
So let's try and do that.
83
00:05:33,200 --> 00:05:36,000
Let's try and see how a
relativistic theory of
84
00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:37,600
consciousness does.
Then let's scratch the
85
00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:40,200
definition for relativity and go
straight into it, because I
86
00:05:40,200 --> 00:05:42,720
think it is a better approach to
slowly, systematically break
87
00:05:42,720 --> 00:05:45,280
this down for people.
That's true.
88
00:05:45,800 --> 00:05:51,880
So in physics we we know about
properties that are relative or
89
00:05:51,880 --> 00:05:55,320
relativistic, for example
velocity.
90
00:05:55,320 --> 00:06:01,440
So constant velocity is a, is a
property that is not absolute.
91
00:06:01,800 --> 00:06:05,240
It's relative to the frame of
reference and to the
92
00:06:05,240 --> 00:06:07,200
measurements of the frame of
reference.
93
00:06:08,000 --> 00:06:11,880
So then if you are on a moving
train with constant velocity and
94
00:06:11,880 --> 00:06:16,480
I'm on the platform, you, you,
all their experiments that you
95
00:06:16,480 --> 00:06:21,440
can do on the train will show
you the result that you are
96
00:06:21,480 --> 00:06:25,480
stationary, you're addressed.
And I am the one with the
97
00:06:25,480 --> 00:06:28,880
platform that goes backwards,
right?
98
00:06:29,320 --> 00:06:31,920
And then I of course will say
the opposite to that I'm
99
00:06:31,920 --> 00:06:34,520
interested in.
You are the one that moves.
100
00:06:35,360 --> 00:06:39,120
And from a physical point of
view, we cannot distinguish who
101
00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:42,840
is right and who is wrong.
There is a symmetry here between
102
00:06:43,040 --> 00:06:46,560
those two frames of reference.
That's why there is.
103
00:06:47,200 --> 00:06:51,960
It's a relative phenomenon.
OK, Both of us are right at the
104
00:06:51,960 --> 00:06:57,560
same time.
So this example shows us what is
105
00:06:57,560 --> 00:07:01,000
the principle of relativity.
The principle of relativity of
106
00:07:01,000 --> 00:07:07,160
relativity means that there is
no absolute property.
107
00:07:08,280 --> 00:07:14,360
Every natural property that we
can think of should be relative
108
00:07:14,920 --> 00:07:20,160
to a frame of reference to some
measurements that an observer
109
00:07:20,480 --> 00:07:24,800
can do.
Now I have to say two things.
110
00:07:25,000 --> 00:07:30,760
You know, one question that
always people ask me is do I
111
00:07:30,760 --> 00:07:37,320
mean that my theory is based on
Einstein relativity theory of
112
00:07:37,320 --> 00:07:41,320
Florence, transformation and
space and time and all that.
113
00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:44,640
And the answer is no, there's
no.
114
00:07:47,760 --> 00:07:49,400
It's something completely
different.
115
00:07:49,400 --> 00:07:56,520
The, the only thing that is in
common here is that I use the
116
00:07:56,720 --> 00:08:00,600
principle that guided Einstein,
the principle of relativity.
117
00:08:00,840 --> 00:08:04,560
It also guided the Galileo
before, for example, Right.
118
00:08:04,560 --> 00:08:08,240
So it's a principle about how
things are in nature.
119
00:08:08,240 --> 00:08:10,040
And now what is the ontology of
nature?
120
00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:12,560
And yeah.
And it just means that there's
121
00:08:12,560 --> 00:08:15,160
nothing absolute.
And all there are are those
122
00:08:15,160 --> 00:08:17,440
observers and the measurements
that they can do.
123
00:08:19,440 --> 00:08:23,520
And now it can help us.
Well, what I try to claim is
124
00:08:23,520 --> 00:08:27,560
that it can help us to dissolve
the hard problem.
125
00:08:29,960 --> 00:08:34,120
And you can think and, and why
actually it's interesting to, to
126
00:08:34,159 --> 00:08:38,799
ask you, what was the difference
for you between the first time
127
00:08:38,799 --> 00:08:41,400
that you read it the, the paper
and the second time?
128
00:08:41,400 --> 00:08:44,200
I wonder because for me, you
know, I'm into it, right?
129
00:08:44,200 --> 00:08:47,400
So, so for me, it's, it's, it's
obvious.
130
00:08:47,400 --> 00:08:50,400
Let's say why it, it, it, it
won't, it, it's working.
131
00:08:50,640 --> 00:08:53,000
And then it's really interesting
to hear from someone else.
132
00:08:53,200 --> 00:09:00,240
What was the process that, that
you actually got in order to, I
133
00:09:00,240 --> 00:09:02,440
don't know, to see that.
Oh, maybe there is something
134
00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:07,080
there.
Honestly, for anyone who hasn't
135
00:09:07,080 --> 00:09:09,760
read the paper, obviously read
it and try and get a deeper
136
00:09:09,760 --> 00:09:14,400
understanding of it.
But the, and the first main
137
00:09:14,400 --> 00:09:16,960
assumption you do take so that I
just want everyone to be clear,
138
00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:19,880
is that this is a physicalist
theory of consciousness, not
139
00:09:19,880 --> 00:09:24,080
necessarily a reductive
materialist approach, but a
140
00:09:24,080 --> 00:09:26,400
physicalist approach.
So the main assumption here is
141
00:09:26,400 --> 00:09:29,440
this is physicalist.
And the, the first time I read
142
00:09:29,440 --> 00:09:32,080
it, I remember going through it,
finishing the paper and
143
00:09:32,080 --> 00:09:36,960
thinking, OK, if this
equivalence principle, which
144
00:09:36,960 --> 00:09:41,720
we'll get into afterwards is
occurring, how does this affect
145
00:09:41,720 --> 00:09:45,080
certain systems that are so
complex, like biological systems
146
00:09:45,080 --> 00:09:49,280
and, and physics we struggle
with in biology to just simplify
147
00:09:49,280 --> 00:09:52,800
things into a physical
understanding, let's say.
148
00:09:53,240 --> 00:09:56,360
And as a doctor, someone who
practices medicine, biology is
149
00:09:56,360 --> 00:10:00,520
very much ingrained in my, in my
overall experience, I would say.
150
00:10:00,760 --> 00:10:04,160
And, and, and it took me a while
to sort of understand exactly
151
00:10:04,160 --> 00:10:06,200
what you meant.
But the second time I read it,
152
00:10:06,200 --> 00:10:08,800
when, when, when I looked at the
mathematical formalization of
153
00:10:08,800 --> 00:10:11,440
this and the way you were
approaching it as a physicist
154
00:10:11,880 --> 00:10:14,720
and not as a philosopher, it
started to make a little bit
155
00:10:14,720 --> 00:10:16,400
more sense how this is coming
together.
156
00:10:16,400 --> 00:10:18,080
And I know you had help.
I forgot his name, is it
157
00:10:18,080 --> 00:10:21,840
Zechariah?
Yes, yes, exactly the.
158
00:10:22,320 --> 00:10:24,440
Philosopher and you guys managed
to get this together and it
159
00:10:24,440 --> 00:10:27,440
slowly then clicked to me.
And I know the last person
160
00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:29,920
before I took the break from
this podcast who I spoke to was
161
00:10:29,920 --> 00:10:33,240
Robert Lawrence Kuhn.
And you're in the relational
162
00:10:33,240 --> 00:10:35,960
category in that In the Last
Name of consciousness.
163
00:10:36,600 --> 00:10:40,120
And I know you're there with
Andy Clark and a few others, but
164
00:10:40,360 --> 00:10:42,880
at that point I started to think
and try and fuse it together
165
00:10:42,880 --> 00:10:45,280
with those thinkers.
And then it sort of started to
166
00:10:45,280 --> 00:10:47,240
click for me.
It was like, OK, this
167
00:10:47,240 --> 00:10:50,120
equivalence principle can sort
of be applied in this way.
168
00:10:50,480 --> 00:10:52,520
And but I'll let you explain
that to people.
169
00:10:52,520 --> 00:10:55,160
Let's let's almost paint a
picture for them and make it
170
00:10:55,160 --> 00:10:58,000
easier because I don't want what
happened to me in my
171
00:10:58,000 --> 00:11:00,520
misunderstanding to occur for
the listener or the viewer.
172
00:11:01,080 --> 00:11:03,560
So, so let's look at this
problem one more time.
173
00:11:03,600 --> 00:11:06,920
You're talking about, let's say
you can, we can either use
174
00:11:06,920 --> 00:11:09,520
Einstein in the lift to dropping
something down, or we could just
175
00:11:09,520 --> 00:11:12,360
use the train scenario.
Two people having a
176
00:11:12,360 --> 00:11:15,880
disagreement, however,
experiencing something that's
177
00:11:15,880 --> 00:11:19,240
almost the same.
When we speak about relativity,
178
00:11:20,640 --> 00:11:23,680
until my hearing right, it's not
about consciousness, it's not
179
00:11:23,680 --> 00:11:27,080
about how we perceive the world,
it's about physics.
180
00:11:27,080 --> 00:11:33,120
It's about nature as it is and
we are just another observer.
181
00:11:33,200 --> 00:11:35,400
There's nothing special with us,
OK.
182
00:11:35,720 --> 00:11:39,400
And I so I don't, and this is a
good assumption.
183
00:11:39,400 --> 00:11:43,400
This is something that we always
assume when we do physics, we
184
00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:48,000
try to understand nature.
And so from the point of view of
185
00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:53,080
the laws of nature, you cannot
distinguish if if there is a
186
00:11:53,080 --> 00:11:59,240
system under constant velocity
or stationary.
187
00:11:59,440 --> 00:12:05,240
OK, So there's no relation
between that and our experience
188
00:12:05,240 --> 00:12:08,320
of consciousness.
Now what I try to do is to take
189
00:12:08,320 --> 00:12:11,640
the same idea.
Let's let's have a look on
190
00:12:11,640 --> 00:12:15,480
consciousness from a physical
point of view, not from our
191
00:12:15,760 --> 00:12:20,800
perspective, what we think about
it, but from the perspective of
192
00:12:20,800 --> 00:12:26,680
nature, of the laws of natures,
and to try to see how a property
193
00:12:26,840 --> 00:12:32,680
like consciousness can arise.
And what they're trying to claim
194
00:12:33,160 --> 00:12:37,880
is firstly, we have this gap
right between the third third
195
00:12:37,880 --> 00:12:40,200
person point of view and the
first person point of view.
196
00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:46,200
But if we think from a
relativistic approach, then it
197
00:12:46,200 --> 00:12:50,360
makes sense that we'll have this
seemingly 2 points of view.
198
00:12:50,360 --> 00:12:55,600
We just need to think about them
as two different frames of
199
00:12:55,600 --> 00:12:59,640
reference, or as I call it in
the paper, cognitive frames of
200
00:12:59,640 --> 00:13:03,200
reference.
And then each cognitive frame of
201
00:13:03,200 --> 00:13:08,400
reference can do different
measurements on the environment
202
00:13:09,480 --> 00:13:13,160
and because of those
measurements it can it will
203
00:13:13,160 --> 00:13:16,560
manifest different physical
properties.
204
00:13:17,320 --> 00:13:19,920
One of those properties can be
consciousness and another
205
00:13:19,920 --> 00:13:27,360
property can be neural patterns.
But again, the point here is
206
00:13:27,360 --> 00:13:29,600
that I speak from a physical
point of view.
207
00:13:29,600 --> 00:13:34,520
It's not our choice if we see
consciousness or not.
208
00:13:34,960 --> 00:13:38,720
It's OK, I try, I, you know,
later on we'll see how.
209
00:13:38,720 --> 00:13:42,320
But I try to show a mechanism, a
physical mechanism.
210
00:13:42,320 --> 00:13:47,520
Why in our brain we have some
kind of interactions or
211
00:13:47,520 --> 00:13:52,960
measurements that must create
this new physical property that
212
00:13:52,960 --> 00:13:56,720
we call it consciousness.
OK, so this is the idea.
213
00:13:56,960 --> 00:14:02,880
And if we succeed, then we can
show like a plausible
214
00:14:02,880 --> 00:14:07,440
explanation how to bridge the
gap because now we have to.
215
00:14:07,440 --> 00:14:11,000
It's not, you know, it's not two
different points of view.
216
00:14:11,000 --> 00:14:13,200
It's just two different frames
of reference.
217
00:14:13,640 --> 00:14:17,800
And it's obvious that one frame
of reference can create
218
00:14:17,800 --> 00:14:20,400
different physical properties
than the other.
219
00:14:21,520 --> 00:14:25,320
And that's why they, you know,
when they actually don't agree,
220
00:14:25,640 --> 00:14:29,120
Just like with velocity, in
velocity we will not agree,
221
00:14:29,120 --> 00:14:32,040
right?
Who is stationary and who is
222
00:14:32,040 --> 00:14:34,360
moving.
Also with consciousness it's the
223
00:14:34,360 --> 00:14:38,600
same because when I look at your
brain, I cannot find your
224
00:14:38,600 --> 00:14:43,040
conscious experience and
anywhere all in your patterns.
225
00:14:43,480 --> 00:14:47,360
So I can conclude that maybe you
are very sophisticated robot or
226
00:14:47,360 --> 00:14:48,920
a zombie, right, with no
consciousness.
227
00:14:49,840 --> 00:14:52,400
And you, when you look at me,
it's the opposite.
228
00:14:52,520 --> 00:14:54,560
I mean, for you, you know that
you have consciousness, but for
229
00:14:54,560 --> 00:14:56,200
me, you, you, you cannot find
it.
230
00:14:56,720 --> 00:15:00,760
So it's very similar.
You see, like with velocity, how
231
00:15:00,880 --> 00:15:04,040
it seems like there is a
contradiction here.
232
00:15:04,400 --> 00:15:08,360
But actually if, if, if we are
thinking from a relativistic
233
00:15:08,360 --> 00:15:11,200
point of view, there is no
contradiction, just different,
234
00:15:11,480 --> 00:15:20,800
you know, measurements or
different, different ways to
235
00:15:20,800 --> 00:15:26,200
describe reality.
And and then when you talking
236
00:15:26,200 --> 00:15:28,320
about measurements, you know,
you're obviously talking about
237
00:15:28,640 --> 00:15:32,080
something akin to an observer.
So in physics, when we're
238
00:15:32,080 --> 00:15:34,320
talking about an observer, and
that can be anything from a
239
00:15:34,320 --> 00:15:37,920
measuring via a tool, I mean,
maybe using your eye as the
240
00:15:37,920 --> 00:15:41,480
measuring tool.
So this is a very much physics
241
00:15:41,800 --> 00:15:44,840
perspective of consciousness.
And then you introduce what's
242
00:15:44,840 --> 00:15:46,240
known as the equivalence
principle.
243
00:15:46,240 --> 00:15:51,920
Do you want to go into that?
Yeah, just it's very important
244
00:15:51,920 --> 00:15:56,080
to note what you just said and
because again, people ask me
245
00:15:56,080 --> 00:16:00,080
about, you know, about it.
And so again, I come from
246
00:16:00,480 --> 00:16:04,920
physical point of view.
And in physics, a measurement is
247
00:16:04,920 --> 00:16:08,840
just another name for
interaction, more or less.
248
00:16:08,840 --> 00:16:12,040
It's it's more complicated than
that, of course, in quantum
249
00:16:12,040 --> 00:16:15,720
mechanics.
But for, you know, to us, we can
250
00:16:16,200 --> 00:16:21,280
define it as interactions and an
observer can be anything.
251
00:16:21,480 --> 00:16:27,680
The electron is an observer and
it measures let's say a magnetic
252
00:16:27,680 --> 00:16:31,880
field because of the
electromagnetic interaction.
253
00:16:31,880 --> 00:16:35,040
This is the measurement, let's
say between them.
254
00:16:35,480 --> 00:16:44,000
OK, so, so again, it's not about
us as a as, as a subjective
255
00:16:44,000 --> 00:16:46,400
person that can choose or
whatever.
256
00:16:46,400 --> 00:16:51,560
Now it's about physics and about
the laws of, of, of, of nature.
257
00:16:51,960 --> 00:16:58,280
I'd say OK and then, OK.
So keeping in mind in mind this
258
00:16:58,840 --> 00:17:04,000
part, we can move on to the
equivalence principle because in
259
00:17:04,000 --> 00:17:07,520
relativity, if we have two
different frames of reference,
260
00:17:08,040 --> 00:17:13,599
but all the experiments that
they do show the same results,
261
00:17:13,599 --> 00:17:17,079
exactly the same results, then
because we cannot distinguish
262
00:17:17,119 --> 00:17:20,440
between them and because there's
nothing absolute here in
263
00:17:20,440 --> 00:17:23,000
relativity, then they are the
same.
264
00:17:23,240 --> 00:17:26,119
They are equivalent.
They have the same laws of
265
00:17:26,119 --> 00:17:28,600
nature and we just cannot
distinguish between them.
266
00:17:29,240 --> 00:17:36,120
OK, there's nothing absolutely.
So let's take this notion and
267
00:17:36,120 --> 00:17:37,840
apply it to consciousness,
right?
268
00:17:37,840 --> 00:17:42,000
Again, we assume now that
consciousness is a relativistic
269
00:17:42,240 --> 00:17:45,560
physical phenomenon and and
let's see what will happen.
270
00:17:46,360 --> 00:17:49,160
So then I take the zombie
argument.
271
00:17:49,680 --> 00:17:55,120
Chalmers, you know, wrote about
it a lot in his book Right in
272
00:17:55,120 --> 00:17:57,800
the Conscious Mind.
So I take this zombie argument
273
00:17:57,880 --> 00:18:03,440
and notice that in the zombie
argument we cannot distinguish
274
00:18:03,440 --> 00:18:04,920
between the zombie and the
human.
275
00:18:05,520 --> 00:18:08,040
They have the same physics and
the same body and the same
276
00:18:08,040 --> 00:18:10,160
brain, the same cognitive
system.
277
00:18:10,640 --> 00:18:12,800
So the same dynamics in the
brain at the same
278
00:18:13,160 --> 00:18:15,560
representations and the same
neural patterns.
279
00:18:16,360 --> 00:18:20,680
Of course, the same behavior,
the same reports, everything is
280
00:18:20,680 --> 00:18:24,440
the same, so we cannot
distinguish between them.
281
00:18:24,600 --> 00:18:28,240
Any experiment at all that the
zombie will do upon himself and
282
00:18:28,240 --> 00:18:32,400
any experiment that the person,
the human will do upon himself
283
00:18:32,960 --> 00:18:37,240
will will have the same results.
So according to the principle of
284
00:18:37,240 --> 00:18:42,120
relativity, there's nothing
absolute beyond those observers.
285
00:18:42,160 --> 00:18:46,080
If there's no nothing that can
be distinguished between them,
286
00:18:46,400 --> 00:18:52,920
then they are equivalent and,
and, and from the argument
287
00:18:52,920 --> 00:18:58,160
itself there is, you know, they
are the same.
288
00:18:58,160 --> 00:19:00,080
There's nothing that can be
distinguished.
289
00:19:01,120 --> 00:19:05,200
So it means that also because
they are equivalent now also
290
00:19:05,200 --> 00:19:08,200
consciousness should be
equivalent in both of them.
291
00:19:09,040 --> 00:19:12,000
So if the human has
consciousness also the zombie
292
00:19:12,000 --> 00:19:15,880
must have consciousness as well.
So if not.
293
00:19:16,400 --> 00:19:18,400
Sorry, sorry again, it's almost
insane.
294
00:19:19,080 --> 00:19:22,360
If the prime information of both
machines, let's say us and the
295
00:19:22,360 --> 00:19:26,000
zombie, if the prime information
are similar or if not the same,
296
00:19:26,240 --> 00:19:31,760
leading to a similar conclusion,
then it's it's OK to then assume
297
00:19:31,760 --> 00:19:34,120
with this relativistic theory
that then therefore
298
00:19:34,120 --> 00:19:36,800
consciousness exists in both
species.
299
00:19:37,800 --> 00:19:42,000
Yeah, but yeah, but you do need
to remember that again, from a
300
00:19:42,240 --> 00:19:45,440
physical point of view, it's
about the physical experiments,
301
00:19:45,680 --> 00:19:49,520
experiments that each of each of
those systems can do.
302
00:19:50,080 --> 00:19:54,560
So all the experiments that the
zombie zombie can do it on
303
00:19:54,560 --> 00:19:59,000
himself, let's say, and all the
experiments experiments that the
304
00:19:59,000 --> 00:20:02,640
person could do.
On himself will show no
305
00:20:02,640 --> 00:20:04,280
difference.
All the results will be the
306
00:20:04,280 --> 00:20:06,000
same.
And if you're saying
307
00:20:06,000 --> 00:20:09,440
experiments, are you then
referring to self questioning,
308
00:20:09,440 --> 00:20:13,240
almost self doubt, subjective
thought, internal monologues?
309
00:20:13,240 --> 00:20:16,040
Or are you talking about some
sort of an objective approach
310
00:20:16,040 --> 00:20:19,040
like scanning, trying to figure
out brain waves, trying to
311
00:20:19,040 --> 00:20:21,800
figure out computational models
within the in the algorithm of
312
00:20:21,800 --> 00:20:23,120
the AI?
What?
313
00:20:23,120 --> 00:20:25,640
What exactly would you be
referring to in this sense?
314
00:20:26,320 --> 00:20:30,200
Everything, all the experiments
that you did that you just
315
00:20:30,200 --> 00:20:34,240
mentioned.
So this inner, inner thoughts,
316
00:20:34,520 --> 00:20:38,600
inner monologue, but also the
behavior and also the dynamics
317
00:20:38,600 --> 00:20:40,800
in the brain.
Let's say everything.
318
00:20:41,080 --> 00:20:43,720
And then according to the
argument, everything should be
319
00:20:43,720 --> 00:20:45,840
the same.
The zombie will argue that he
320
00:20:45,840 --> 00:20:50,360
also has an or she, you know,
also has some, some sort of
321
00:20:50,360 --> 00:20:53,920
inner monologue, for example.
It's it's so we cannot.
322
00:20:53,920 --> 00:20:58,120
Distinguish even in your paper,
you also talk about illusionism
323
00:20:58,120 --> 00:21:00,480
and then you go into
naturalistic dualism as well.
324
00:21:00,760 --> 00:21:03,560
And, and I've noticed that
because quite a few authors tend
325
00:21:03,560 --> 00:21:06,600
to get illusionism very much
misunderstood and incorrect.
326
00:21:06,880 --> 00:21:09,640
But you managed to you, you
really get illusionism as a
327
00:21:09,640 --> 00:21:11,280
theory of consciousness.
And you can tell that you
328
00:21:11,280 --> 00:21:14,240
they're not just saying that
this isn't this doesn't exist.
329
00:21:14,240 --> 00:21:17,040
I mean, this is a very much real
experience.
330
00:21:17,040 --> 00:21:20,440
It's the way we're interpreting
afterwards that's that's leading
331
00:21:20,440 --> 00:21:25,000
to the misunderstanding.
Let's say that you you then you
332
00:21:25,000 --> 00:21:27,040
mentioned the dual aspect monism
at some point.
333
00:21:27,040 --> 00:21:28,720
I think I remember reading that
at some point.
334
00:21:29,080 --> 00:21:32,520
How would you describe theory if
you had to?
335
00:21:32,920 --> 00:21:35,320
You had to apply it into a
philosophical category because I
336
00:21:35,320 --> 00:21:37,480
know a lot of Robert
Interrelational theory of
337
00:21:37,480 --> 00:21:39,520
consciousness.
Philosophically, how would you
338
00:21:39,520 --> 00:21:44,920
describe yours?
So first of all, it's not, as
339
00:21:44,920 --> 00:21:48,800
you said before, it's not a
materialistic and materialistic
340
00:21:48,880 --> 00:21:51,320
how, how do you call it a
reductive materialism?
341
00:21:52,400 --> 00:21:56,840
Because we didn't speak about it
deeply enough.
342
00:21:56,840 --> 00:22:02,920
But my theory, in my theory,
it's not enough to have only
343
00:22:02,920 --> 00:22:06,200
calculations.
If if you have a machine like
344
00:22:06,200 --> 00:22:11,560
our brain that does a lot of
calculations, it's not enough.
345
00:22:12,160 --> 00:22:15,240
We'll still have this gap.
And that's why it's not a
346
00:22:15,240 --> 00:22:19,640
reductive materialism where you
can take consciousness and do a
347
00:22:19,640 --> 00:22:23,360
reduction into all the
calculations of, you know, that
348
00:22:23,360 --> 00:22:26,920
the brain can do.
It's more about physics.
349
00:22:26,920 --> 00:22:32,720
It's about how we have natural
properties in the world, how new
350
00:22:33,400 --> 00:22:38,320
properties can merge or can be
realized in the world.
351
00:22:39,440 --> 00:22:43,480
And for that we need to take
relativity, the relativistic
352
00:22:43,480 --> 00:22:47,400
principle into account.
OK, So it means that it's part
353
00:22:47,400 --> 00:22:50,640
of physicalism, but it's not a
redactive materialism.
354
00:22:52,400 --> 00:22:56,840
And I think that relational,
the, the name relational theory,
355
00:22:57,280 --> 00:23:02,360
it's pretty, pretty good name in
that sense, because relational
356
00:23:03,280 --> 00:23:07,880
is a part of the principle of
relativity actually.
357
00:23:08,840 --> 00:23:12,920
And I always like to give an
example from Einstein relativity
358
00:23:12,920 --> 00:23:18,000
to show how relational goes in,
you know, get inside the
359
00:23:18,160 --> 00:23:21,760
relativistic approach.
So let me tell you a bit about
360
00:23:21,760 --> 00:23:26,000
the about that maybe.
So Einstein speak about the
361
00:23:26,000 --> 00:23:31,120
equivalence principle, and in
his case it's the equivalence
362
00:23:31,120 --> 00:23:35,520
between acceleration and
gravity.
363
00:23:36,400 --> 00:23:42,840
So let's think about two
spacecrafts. 1 spaceship is here
364
00:23:42,840 --> 00:23:49,320
on Earth and one is in outer
space, far away from any star,
365
00:23:49,320 --> 00:23:54,160
any gravitational object.
Now the astronauts in in those
366
00:23:54,200 --> 00:23:57,840
two spaceships are doing the
same experiments.
367
00:23:57,840 --> 00:24:01,440
For example, they take a ball in
their hands and release the ball
368
00:24:02,040 --> 00:24:04,280
here on Earth.
It's pretty easy to understand
369
00:24:04,280 --> 00:24:06,840
what will happen when she
release the ball.
370
00:24:06,840 --> 00:24:11,200
It will just fall into the
ground right inside the
371
00:24:11,240 --> 00:24:15,160
spaceship.
Now in out of space, let's say
372
00:24:15,160 --> 00:24:19,440
that our spaceship is
accelerating upwards towards the
373
00:24:19,440 --> 00:24:23,120
ceiling, if we can call it, you
know the ceiling of the space
374
00:24:23,560 --> 00:24:27,240
spacecraft.
And then she release the ball
375
00:24:27,240 --> 00:24:29,880
from her hand.
Now because of the acceleration,
376
00:24:29,880 --> 00:24:34,960
now the ball is not attached to
the but the OR to the
377
00:24:35,320 --> 00:24:43,560
accelerated spaceship and and so
the ball continues with its own
378
00:24:43,600 --> 00:24:48,000
velocity while the astronaut in
the spaceship accelerates
379
00:24:48,000 --> 00:24:50,880
upwards.
So from her point of view, what
380
00:24:50,880 --> 00:24:54,880
she will see is that the ball
goes down, right, accelerate
381
00:24:54,880 --> 00:25:01,120
down all the way to the floor,
exactly as the case on Earth or
382
00:25:01,160 --> 00:25:05,080
under gravitation, right.
So Einstein realized, realized
383
00:25:05,480 --> 00:25:11,120
that this is a general thing
that no matter which experiment
384
00:25:11,120 --> 00:25:14,440
we will try to do, we cannot
distinguish between the system
385
00:25:14,440 --> 00:25:18,600
under gravitational field and
the system under acceleration.
386
00:25:19,080 --> 00:25:24,880
And that's why again, there is a
those two systems are relative
387
00:25:25,560 --> 00:25:28,560
to the observers.
There's nothing absolute here.
388
00:25:29,120 --> 00:25:32,720
And because the two observers
have the same, the same
389
00:25:33,040 --> 00:25:35,840
measurements, the same results,
then they are equivalent.
390
00:25:36,120 --> 00:25:40,080
OK, so this is so until now we
just gave, I just gave you
391
00:25:40,080 --> 00:25:43,400
another example for the
principle of relativity.
392
00:25:44,040 --> 00:25:47,560
But now let me show you why it's
also there is a relational
393
00:25:49,640 --> 00:25:52,120
assumption there.
Now again, what what is
394
00:25:52,120 --> 00:25:56,920
relationalism?
It means that the properties of
395
00:25:56,920 --> 00:26:00,120
nature themselves, they are not
absolute.
396
00:26:00,200 --> 00:26:05,760
They realized because of
measurements of the relations
397
00:26:05,760 --> 00:26:09,360
that a system can measure.
And this is exactly, exactly
398
00:26:09,360 --> 00:26:15,920
what we see here, because let's
think about this spaceship in
399
00:26:15,920 --> 00:26:19,240
outer space, the accelerating
spaceship.
400
00:26:20,080 --> 00:26:24,200
And now let's take another
astronaut from the outside that
401
00:26:24,200 --> 00:26:27,120
observes this accelerating
spaceship.
402
00:26:27,640 --> 00:26:32,120
So from the outside, the
relations that this astronaut
403
00:26:32,120 --> 00:26:40,560
measures will will manifest for
him an an acceleration or a
404
00:26:40,560 --> 00:26:44,640
space spaceship that is
accelerated and there's no
405
00:26:44,640 --> 00:26:48,560
gravity over there, right?
But from the inside of the
406
00:26:49,520 --> 00:26:54,240
spaceship, when we transform
into this frame of reference,
407
00:26:54,240 --> 00:26:58,480
now there's no acceleration at
all, but there is a different
408
00:26:58,520 --> 00:27:02,480
physical property.
There is a gravity force all of
409
00:27:02,480 --> 00:27:06,760
a sudden.
OK, so we see now that from
410
00:27:07,120 --> 00:27:10,200
different points of view,
different frames of reference
411
00:27:10,800 --> 00:27:13,360
manifest different physical
properties.
412
00:27:14,120 --> 00:27:17,800
I like to say a bit, it's a bit
like in a coin when you see a
413
00:27:17,800 --> 00:27:21,480
head or tail, right?
So we can like manifest
414
00:27:21,480 --> 00:27:27,280
different physical properties
even and the same should happen
415
00:27:27,520 --> 00:27:29,880
with consciousness.
Again, if consciousness is
416
00:27:29,880 --> 00:27:35,880
relativistic, then it can
explain why from from the
417
00:27:35,880 --> 00:27:41,480
outside, from a third person
frame of reference, I measure
418
00:27:41,480 --> 00:27:45,320
one thing, I measure newer
patterns, but from the inside,
419
00:27:45,360 --> 00:27:48,120
just like from the inside of the
spaceship, if you like, here
420
00:27:48,120 --> 00:27:51,960
from the inside of our brain, we
measure completely different
421
00:27:54,120 --> 00:27:58,960
results and we measured and, and
there is a manifestation of a
422
00:27:58,960 --> 00:28:02,240
new physical property, which we
call consciousness.
423
00:28:03,120 --> 00:28:05,840
So this is the idea here.
And again, it's like 2.
424
00:28:06,440 --> 00:28:10,600
It's like the head and the tail.
Both of us, you know, from the
425
00:28:10,600 --> 00:28:13,040
outside and from the inside
describe the same underlying
426
00:28:13,040 --> 00:28:16,280
reality, but from different
points of view and with
427
00:28:16,280 --> 00:28:20,080
different relationalism.
Here different physical
428
00:28:20,080 --> 00:28:26,400
properties has had realized in
those two different frames of
429
00:28:26,400 --> 00:28:30,240
reference, like newer patterns
and the phenomenal consciousness
430
00:28:30,240 --> 00:28:34,120
if you like.
And then you tell me when
431
00:28:34,600 --> 00:28:36,760
similar to Einstein, I mean, he
obviously came up with his
432
00:28:36,760 --> 00:28:39,400
thought experiments to figure
out his use.
433
00:28:40,120 --> 00:28:43,160
At what point did you think
about consciousness and then
434
00:28:43,560 --> 00:28:46,040
realize that, OK, this could be
something that's relative and
435
00:28:46,040 --> 00:28:48,480
this could be this could be
approached in a similar way.
436
00:28:48,480 --> 00:28:51,240
I know you're a big fan of
Einstein, but was it his work
437
00:28:51,280 --> 00:28:55,160
specifically or or did it just
come to you at some point?
438
00:28:55,160 --> 00:28:56,280
Similar in a thought.
Experience.
439
00:28:57,520 --> 00:29:02,000
Wow, that's a great question.
So actually I always liked the
440
00:29:02,120 --> 00:29:09,160
principle of relativity.
I always felt that there is a
441
00:29:09,160 --> 00:29:13,200
lot of potential with this
principle and that we can
442
00:29:13,200 --> 00:29:18,040
explain all of the mysteries
that we now have, like quantum
443
00:29:18,040 --> 00:29:24,960
mechanics, for example, how you
know how to continue and and
444
00:29:24,960 --> 00:29:29,880
create the next theory, you
know, that will capture both
445
00:29:30,280 --> 00:29:32,360
general relativity and quantum
mechanics.
446
00:29:32,680 --> 00:29:38,000
So my intuition was and still is
that the principle of relativity
447
00:29:38,000 --> 00:29:43,720
is the key to do that.
And so I, when I started and
448
00:29:43,800 --> 00:29:47,480
even before I started to learn
physics in the university, I, I
449
00:29:47,480 --> 00:29:52,800
thought about it and I started
to develop theories how you know
450
00:29:52,800 --> 00:30:00,200
how to continue and develop this
principle of relativity.
451
00:30:02,040 --> 00:30:06,640
And I guess that's why I was
used to think from this
452
00:30:06,640 --> 00:30:13,160
relativistic approach.
Now I all, I, I also, I love all
453
00:30:13,160 --> 00:30:16,920
those mysteries that we have in
nature because those mysteries,
454
00:30:16,920 --> 00:30:21,760
those are the doors for me, at
least to, you know, to
455
00:30:21,760 --> 00:30:25,000
understand what is out there,
you know, to understand another
456
00:30:25,680 --> 00:30:29,240
patches of, of Infinity.
Let's say it's like to open the
457
00:30:29,240 --> 00:30:33,720
door and to see Narnia for me.
And then consciousness is one of
458
00:30:33,720 --> 00:30:37,960
those mysteries.
And then during COVID, actually,
459
00:30:38,560 --> 00:30:47,320
I, I think I understood that I
can do, I, I can create a theory
460
00:30:47,560 --> 00:30:51,440
with the principle of relativity
to explain consciousness just
461
00:30:51,440 --> 00:30:55,520
because I took lots of, of
classes from UC Berkeley
462
00:30:55,520 --> 00:31:00,480
actually about cognitive science
and it was covered.
463
00:31:00,480 --> 00:31:04,720
I didn't have other things to do
right.
464
00:31:04,720 --> 00:31:07,920
So I took, it was like a
marathon of lots of classes
465
00:31:07,920 --> 00:31:11,040
about cognitive science.
And all of a sudden all of this
466
00:31:11,480 --> 00:31:14,600
knowledge, you know, merge into
this theory.
467
00:31:15,480 --> 00:31:18,280
So this is how I got to this
approach.
468
00:31:19,000 --> 00:31:22,840
How has it been as a if someone
with a physics background trying
469
00:31:22,840 --> 00:31:27,760
to convince an audience of
philosophers a philosophical
470
00:31:27,760 --> 00:31:29,960
theory of consciousness?
How's that transition been for
471
00:31:29,960 --> 00:31:34,240
you?
You know when when you're in the
472
00:31:34,240 --> 00:31:37,600
middle, you get hit from both
sides?
473
00:31:39,200 --> 00:31:43,240
Like great great place to be in.
I can't imagine I'm the first.
474
00:31:43,440 --> 00:31:47,320
It's, it's a radical new way of
thinking about it for many
475
00:31:47,320 --> 00:31:48,800
people.
I'm pretty sure some people,
476
00:31:49,000 --> 00:31:51,240
they get the concept, they,
they, they understand it, but
477
00:31:51,240 --> 00:31:54,920
it's, it's, it's very different
from the usual theories of
478
00:31:54,920 --> 00:31:58,120
consciousness.
And it's also very different
479
00:31:58,120 --> 00:32:02,080
from the usual theories in
physics, some from so.
480
00:32:02,160 --> 00:32:06,920
So physicists, when they hear
about it, they don't understand
481
00:32:06,920 --> 00:32:10,960
what I want from them.
You know, why there is a hard
482
00:32:10,960 --> 00:32:13,160
problem to begin with, for
example.
483
00:32:13,880 --> 00:32:18,520
And then people from cognitive
science, neuroscience,
484
00:32:18,760 --> 00:32:24,720
philosophers, they really, it's
hard for them to grasp this
485
00:32:24,720 --> 00:32:28,320
physical point of view, for
example, what we started from to
486
00:32:28,320 --> 00:32:32,200
think from this point of view of
the laws of nature and not to
487
00:32:32,240 --> 00:32:37,360
think from our own perspective.
You know, it's not our choice if
488
00:32:37,360 --> 00:32:40,640
we have consciousness.
So not, for example, it's a
489
00:32:40,640 --> 00:32:44,000
physical process that happens in
our brain, you know.
490
00:32:44,200 --> 00:32:46,560
So this notion is also hard for
them.
491
00:32:47,560 --> 00:32:49,800
And then of course, when I come
with mathematics, it's like.
492
00:32:50,160 --> 00:32:53,000
I can imagine the non
physicalist philosophers
493
00:32:53,280 --> 00:32:56,440
attacking you and then obviously
the physicist because physical
494
00:32:56,880 --> 00:32:59,160
physicalism is their ultimate
reality and understanding
495
00:32:59,160 --> 00:33:02,560
obviously coming at you as well.
So yeah, it is a bit of a sticky
496
00:33:02,560 --> 00:33:07,080
situation to be in.
Yes, yes, but I mean, it's, it's
497
00:33:07,080 --> 00:33:11,520
fun in the end of the day
because I, I, I feel that I do
498
00:33:11,520 --> 00:33:16,960
have something nice to show and
then it's, it's fun to try and
499
00:33:16,960 --> 00:33:21,760
show them, you know, the hidden,
the deeper layers that maybe
500
00:33:21,760 --> 00:33:26,080
they, they didn't see to begin
with, you know.
501
00:33:26,640 --> 00:33:29,120
Quite seriously, I mean,
obviously Robert included it in
502
00:33:29,120 --> 00:33:32,240
his landscape, which you're
among legends, if you think
503
00:33:32,240 --> 00:33:34,320
about it.
I mean your your name with with
504
00:33:34,760 --> 00:33:37,160
tremendously influential
thinkers.
505
00:33:37,520 --> 00:33:40,840
How's the reception been for you
this paper and and when you came
506
00:33:40,840 --> 00:33:43,000
out of it?
What's happened since then?
507
00:33:44,680 --> 00:33:48,280
Wow, let's see.
So first of all, something very
508
00:33:48,280 --> 00:33:54,200
nice that happened in 2021.
Was it I think the paper one to
509
00:33:54,200 --> 00:33:57,920
be one of the most influential
papers of 2020.
510
00:33:58,240 --> 00:34:01,320
Sorry, 2020.
When was it 2022?
511
00:34:01,320 --> 00:34:02,120
Sorry.
Yeah.
512
00:34:02,720 --> 00:34:06,120
So one of the most information
papers of 2022.
513
00:34:07,200 --> 00:34:13,960
And now inside Academy.
It's very interesting, the
514
00:34:13,960 --> 00:34:19,880
reaction of neuroscientists.
Actually, most of them told me
515
00:34:20,920 --> 00:34:27,520
that it's a very nice
intellectual idea, but how can I
516
00:34:27,520 --> 00:34:30,320
prove it?
Do I have any experiment to
517
00:34:30,320 --> 00:34:34,000
check if it's right or wrong,
you know, And next question.
518
00:34:35,719 --> 00:34:39,880
Yeah, but I mean, for me, of
course, it's very important.
519
00:34:40,000 --> 00:34:44,159
And without experiments we
cannot distinguish, right?
520
00:34:44,159 --> 00:34:47,159
We don't.
We cannot know how to how to
521
00:34:47,159 --> 00:34:50,280
carry on or which theory is a
good one and which one is not.
522
00:34:50,280 --> 00:34:54,360
So of course it's very
important, but it's not the only
523
00:34:54,360 --> 00:34:57,760
thing, you know, I, I come from
physics and in physics we have
524
00:34:57,760 --> 00:35:01,440
theoretical physics and
experimental physics, and it's
525
00:35:01,440 --> 00:35:05,440
not the same.
No one expected Einstein or
526
00:35:05,440 --> 00:35:10,360
Stephen Hawking or Roger Penrose
to do experiments, you know,
527
00:35:10,920 --> 00:35:14,280
but, but here in neuroscience,
it's not the case because it's
528
00:35:14,280 --> 00:35:19,680
very young discipline and it's,
it's very oriented towards
529
00:35:19,680 --> 00:35:21,440
experiments.
They don't really have
530
00:35:21,440 --> 00:35:24,600
theoretical neuroscience.
I, I would say not as, not as,
531
00:35:24,680 --> 00:35:26,520
not as something that I know
from physics.
532
00:35:27,080 --> 00:35:31,160
So then for them, they don't
really care a lot about the
533
00:35:31,160 --> 00:35:33,240
theory.
You know, I tried to tell them,
534
00:35:33,240 --> 00:35:35,680
but but wait before the, the,
the experiment.
535
00:35:35,680 --> 00:35:40,760
Look, I have for the first time,
OK, let's say that I'm let's say
536
00:35:40,760 --> 00:35:44,000
that I'm not so modest.
And I tried to say, look, for
537
00:35:44,000 --> 00:35:47,560
this first time, maybe we have a
solution for the mind body
538
00:35:47,560 --> 00:35:50,040
problem.
Don't you think it's, it's
539
00:35:50,320 --> 00:35:55,040
worthwhile to to go deep into
that, even if we still don't
540
00:35:55,040 --> 00:36:01,200
have the experiment?
No, because you know, only for
541
00:36:01,200 --> 00:36:06,200
the theoretical sake, we have
here a puzzle that we didn't
542
00:36:06,200 --> 00:36:10,320
know how to solve for 2000
years.
543
00:36:10,320 --> 00:36:15,760
So maybe if, if there is an
interesting way to solve it,
544
00:36:17,200 --> 00:36:19,280
maybe the, you know, maybe there
is something here.
545
00:36:19,280 --> 00:36:23,200
So let's, let's dip into it.
But again, most of them don't
546
00:36:23,200 --> 00:36:28,520
really like, you know, to go to
the deep to the theory and they
547
00:36:28,520 --> 00:36:34,760
want me to go as quickly as I
can to the to do an experiment
548
00:36:36,040 --> 00:36:37,440
to check if.
It's, I think a lot of
549
00:36:37,680 --> 00:36:40,040
physicalist theories of
consciousness are at a
550
00:36:40,040 --> 00:36:42,960
disadvantage because of that.
Because when if you if you take
551
00:36:42,960 --> 00:36:46,400
an idealist or or a pan
psychist, it, it's a lot easier
552
00:36:46,400 --> 00:36:50,040
to make philosophical arguments
that that make logical sense and
553
00:36:50,040 --> 00:36:53,320
then you can just get away with
it because it's very difficult
554
00:36:53,320 --> 00:36:56,040
to put that to the test.
I mean, how do you really test
555
00:36:56,520 --> 00:36:59,320
idealist philosophers?
I mean, you get you have like
556
00:36:59,320 --> 00:37:01,920
Donald Hoffman and certain other
people who are doing active
557
00:37:02,280 --> 00:37:05,520
experimentation, but a
physicalist has is almost like
558
00:37:05,520 --> 00:37:09,240
you have to show us.
Sure, yeah.
559
00:37:09,280 --> 00:37:11,600
What is the?
Plan what's going to happen
560
00:37:11,600 --> 00:37:13,720
within the next few years.
I mean, obviously you're trying
561
00:37:13,720 --> 00:37:16,080
to get funding.
If anyone wants to fund your
562
00:37:16,080 --> 00:37:18,160
research, obviously I'll put a
link to your website as well.
563
00:37:18,600 --> 00:37:21,240
What is your?
Yeah.
564
00:37:21,440 --> 00:37:24,720
So yeah, actually you're right.
Maybe if if you already already
565
00:37:24,720 --> 00:37:31,120
mentioned it, I will mention
that I started this year a a
566
00:37:33,480 --> 00:37:39,320
postdoc in the Cognition and
Consciousness Lab in Cambridge
567
00:37:39,320 --> 00:37:47,440
University in England.
And we also try to reach the
568
00:37:47,440 --> 00:37:54,760
public and to do fundraising,
you know, like I forgot the name
569
00:37:54,760 --> 00:37:59,920
of the go fund me.
Yeah, go, go fund me.
570
00:37:59,920 --> 00:38:01,800
Right.
So we, we opened the go go fund
571
00:38:01,800 --> 00:38:05,440
me in order to, to fund this,
this researcher.
572
00:38:05,440 --> 00:38:11,320
So if you like to, to help us,
then please go to the link over
573
00:38:11,320 --> 00:38:16,320
there.
And, and in Cambridge, we are,
574
00:38:16,320 --> 00:38:21,520
we want to, to do an experiment
to check the, the theory.
575
00:38:21,880 --> 00:38:24,720
But in order to understand what
the experiment is, we need to go
576
00:38:25,120 --> 00:38:28,760
even deeper into the theory.
We just started, let's say.
577
00:38:30,720 --> 00:38:34,520
So let's go.
So let's dive in a bit more.
578
00:38:35,640 --> 00:38:41,040
So first question is, you can
ask me what is the difference?
579
00:38:41,360 --> 00:38:45,280
I mean, according to the
approach, we, we have two
580
00:38:45,280 --> 00:38:51,160
different frames of reference,
third person frame of reference
581
00:38:51,160 --> 00:38:54,800
and the first person frame of
reference from the inside.
582
00:38:56,040 --> 00:38:59,400
And what I try to say is that
the measurements that we do from
583
00:38:59,400 --> 00:39:03,800
the inside, from our brain,
those measurements or
584
00:39:03,800 --> 00:39:08,480
interactions are very different
from the one that we're doing
585
00:39:08,480 --> 00:39:11,720
from the outside.
So first question is, is it
586
00:39:11,720 --> 00:39:12,880
true?
OK.
587
00:39:12,920 --> 00:39:15,480
And then the second question is
what are those measurements
588
00:39:15,480 --> 00:39:19,120
exactly?
So first of all, let me show you
589
00:39:19,120 --> 00:39:23,560
that it's very different indeed.
And I think it's pretty obvious
590
00:39:23,560 --> 00:39:28,280
to see it because from the
outside, in order to observe, to
591
00:39:28,280 --> 00:39:33,400
do a measurements, we must use
our sensory devices like our
592
00:39:33,400 --> 00:39:37,880
eyes or our ears.
But from the inside, we don't
593
00:39:37,880 --> 00:39:42,040
have any sensory devices like
eyes or ears, right?
594
00:39:42,480 --> 00:39:47,200
So that's why from the inside
our interactions or measurements
595
00:39:47,200 --> 00:39:51,200
are completely different.
And that's why I try to say that
596
00:39:51,200 --> 00:39:55,640
it it will manifest different
physical properties.
597
00:39:56,320 --> 00:40:02,640
Now, now you can ask which kind
of measurements we have from the
598
00:40:02,640 --> 00:40:07,000
inside.
What, what do I, what do we do
599
00:40:07,000 --> 00:40:09,800
for what our brain does
actually?
600
00:40:10,200 --> 00:40:13,480
So we have different.
About different areas in our
601
00:40:13,480 --> 00:40:22,000
neural network, each of them
interact with other sub networks
602
00:40:22,760 --> 00:40:25,600
and then we have those neural
patterns that represent
603
00:40:25,960 --> 00:40:28,200
something.
So, so now we have interactions
604
00:40:28,200 --> 00:40:32,680
between those neural patterns
and what the brain can do is
605
00:40:32,680 --> 00:40:39,760
just compare those neural
patterns in order to check the
606
00:40:39,760 --> 00:40:44,880
differences and the resemblance
between those neural patterns in
607
00:40:44,880 --> 00:40:49,680
order to reconstruct what we
see, what we hear, you know,
608
00:40:49,680 --> 00:40:53,560
and, and, and and create
thoughts and and feelings.
609
00:40:54,920 --> 00:40:56,840
And then, OK, so now you can ask
me.
610
00:40:56,880 --> 00:41:03,560
OK, until now it sounds very
simple, physical neuro
611
00:41:03,640 --> 00:41:07,840
neuroscientists theory, right?
Nothing special.
612
00:41:07,840 --> 00:41:12,400
How can we get to consciousness
from here?
613
00:41:14,000 --> 00:41:18,240
OK, so for that I will you are
the first podcast.
614
00:41:18,240 --> 00:41:22,280
I think that I will try to
explain something from my next
615
00:41:22,280 --> 00:41:25,720
paper.
Now I'm right, I'm writing a
616
00:41:25,720 --> 00:41:30,840
paper to explain exactly what is
the mechanism of what are the
617
00:41:30,840 --> 00:41:34,360
measurements inside our brain
that manifest consciousness.
618
00:41:36,400 --> 00:41:39,120
And hopefully I will finish the
paper soon.
619
00:41:39,120 --> 00:41:43,320
And you know, we'll publish it.
So let me try to explain it.
620
00:41:43,880 --> 00:41:47,440
And please tell me how was the
explanation because it's, it's
621
00:41:47,440 --> 00:41:51,320
my first time.
So sorry for the if it will not
622
00:41:51,320 --> 00:41:55,760
be clear enough, but let's try,
let's try to do this.
623
00:41:56,800 --> 00:42:00,040
So what I tried to to
understand, I, I, I start from a
624
00:42:00,040 --> 00:42:04,560
different question.
I start from the question of
625
00:42:04,560 --> 00:42:08,360
emergence.
What is an emergence, for
626
00:42:08,360 --> 00:42:11,280
example?
So emergence in physics means
627
00:42:11,280 --> 00:42:16,560
that we have some kind of
physical property that it's
628
00:42:16,560 --> 00:42:19,240
bigger than the sum of its
parts.
629
00:42:20,280 --> 00:42:23,240
Everybody know about water, for
example, example.
630
00:42:23,240 --> 00:42:27,960
Water is the canonical example
for emergent property because we
631
00:42:27,960 --> 00:42:33,560
have the oxygen and hydrogen
molecules and when they they
632
00:42:33,560 --> 00:42:39,080
interact together, all of a
sudden we have a new physical
633
00:42:39,080 --> 00:42:44,720
property, water that has new
properties that they don't have,
634
00:42:45,000 --> 00:42:47,560
right.
They it's like a wetness if you
635
00:42:47,560 --> 00:42:57,360
like, or, or all even
temperature and all those macro
636
00:42:58,800 --> 00:43:02,000
properties.
OK, so this is example for
637
00:43:02,000 --> 00:43:07,400
emergence, but we don't have any
good theory in physics still to
638
00:43:07,560 --> 00:43:10,200
explain.
Is there like a unification, a
639
00:43:10,200 --> 00:43:16,480
unified mechanism for emergence?
And is it real?
640
00:43:16,680 --> 00:43:19,720
Is it real?
Because some philosopher will
641
00:43:19,720 --> 00:43:24,600
tell you that water or any
emergence is not real.
642
00:43:24,840 --> 00:43:28,040
Like there's no real ontology
there.
643
00:43:28,720 --> 00:43:33,880
It's our convenience to to speak
about water, but actually what's
644
00:43:33,880 --> 00:43:37,600
really there are the musicals.
And then even the musicals are
645
00:43:37,600 --> 00:43:39,360
not really there.
What's really there are the
646
00:43:39,720 --> 00:43:47,440
elementary particles, right?
So we're all just is how to say
647
00:43:47,440 --> 00:43:51,000
a sea of, of elementary
particles and that's it.
648
00:43:52,720 --> 00:43:58,040
And I don't agree with that.
And actually you can understand
649
00:43:58,040 --> 00:44:02,320
why if you think from the
relativistic approach.
650
00:44:03,680 --> 00:44:07,800
Because what?
So those kind of philosophers, I
651
00:44:07,800 --> 00:44:11,920
think that the name of this
approach is eliminativism.
652
00:44:12,480 --> 00:44:19,160
They eliminate everything, you
know, but they take an absolute
653
00:44:19,520 --> 00:44:20,640
approach.
Here.
654
00:44:21,000 --> 00:44:26,600
There's only one absolute frame
of reference, which is the most
655
00:44:26,720 --> 00:44:31,720
elementary substance of reality,
right?
656
00:44:31,760 --> 00:44:35,520
Of let's say fields or particles
or something like that.
657
00:44:36,560 --> 00:44:42,760
But if if the relativistic
approach is true, then it's a
658
00:44:42,760 --> 00:44:47,240
mistake.
There's no absolute frame of
659
00:44:47,240 --> 00:44:52,640
reference anymore.
And then all we have now are
660
00:44:52,640 --> 00:44:55,480
different observers, right?
Different frames of reference.
661
00:44:56,040 --> 00:45:02,760
So then micro in the micro world
there it's, you know, 1 frame of
662
00:45:02,760 --> 00:45:05,200
reference, the micro frame of
reference.
663
00:45:05,800 --> 00:45:14,000
And over there something will
measure just the musicals of
664
00:45:14,000 --> 00:45:18,640
hydrogen and oxygen, and they
cannot observe or they cannot
665
00:45:18,640 --> 00:45:22,280
measure water at all.
But from the macro frame of
666
00:45:22,280 --> 00:45:26,400
reference, like our frame of
reference, we cannot measure
667
00:45:27,400 --> 00:45:31,720
molecules at all, but we can
measure water, and then water is
668
00:45:31,720 --> 00:45:35,040
the real phenomena.
This is exactly relationalism
669
00:45:35,040 --> 00:45:40,120
again, right?
So, so you see now how all of a
670
00:45:40,120 --> 00:45:44,800
sudden when we take really the
principle of relativity
671
00:45:44,960 --> 00:45:49,520
seriously enough, we see that it
can explain also what is an
672
00:45:49,520 --> 00:45:52,000
emergence.
And it shows us that emergence
673
00:45:52,000 --> 00:45:54,680
is a real thing.
It's a real physical property
674
00:45:54,680 --> 00:46:01,280
that that manifested just
because of relationalism, just
675
00:46:01,280 --> 00:46:07,120
because that in our macro frame
of reference, we have some
676
00:46:07,120 --> 00:46:10,920
relations that we can measure
and not other relations like in
677
00:46:10,920 --> 00:46:17,040
the micro frame of reference.
OK, So now that in mind we can
678
00:46:17,720 --> 00:46:24,560
go into the mind and we can go
into our brain and explain what
679
00:46:24,560 --> 00:46:28,320
is consciousness.
So now consciousness will be an
680
00:46:28,320 --> 00:46:33,120
emergent property.
But from a relativistic point of
681
00:46:33,120 --> 00:46:36,560
view, again, from this point of
view that I just described, and
682
00:46:37,320 --> 00:46:40,240
in order to get to
consciousness, first of all, we
683
00:46:40,240 --> 00:46:45,480
need to start from a lower
level, which is cognitive,
684
00:46:46,800 --> 00:46:49,920
cognitive frames of reference.
So first of all, I will show you
685
00:46:50,160 --> 00:46:53,200
something interesting about
cognitive frames of reference
686
00:46:53,200 --> 00:46:59,200
and then consciousness, OK, It's
a bit like we start from the
687
00:46:59,200 --> 00:47:04,560
micro musicals, then we go to
water, and then we'll go even
688
00:47:04,560 --> 00:47:08,760
higher to the next emergence of
waves on the water.
689
00:47:09,080 --> 00:47:11,040
OK?
So the waves will be like
690
00:47:11,040 --> 00:47:13,360
consciousness, if you like, in
this analogue.
691
00:47:14,120 --> 00:47:22,080
All right, So what is a
cognitive system for from this
692
00:47:22,680 --> 00:47:27,600
relativistic approach, a
cognitive system, it's, it's
693
00:47:27,600 --> 00:47:31,600
another frame of reference.
Of course it's a cognitive frame
694
00:47:31,600 --> 00:47:34,920
of reference.
First of all, maybe I I would
695
00:47:34,920 --> 00:47:39,200
just note here that a cognitive
system is a system that can
696
00:47:39,200 --> 00:47:43,040
learn it.
It has inputs, do some
697
00:47:43,920 --> 00:47:49,720
calculations, no manipulations
of information and has outputs.
698
00:47:50,040 --> 00:47:53,680
In order to do all those
manipulations, it creates
699
00:47:54,200 --> 00:48:00,120
representations of the inputs
and representations of of the of
700
00:48:00,120 --> 00:48:04,040
itself as well.
If it's, you know if it's
701
00:48:04,040 --> 00:48:09,560
complex enough.
So, so this is a cognitive
702
00:48:09,560 --> 00:48:12,480
system.
But now notice that for this
703
00:48:12,480 --> 00:48:18,680
system, all those
representations, they are real,
704
00:48:18,840 --> 00:48:21,240
they are real physical
phenomenon.
705
00:48:21,440 --> 00:48:23,440
It's a new emergence if you
like.
706
00:48:24,640 --> 00:48:28,920
So now we can speak about those
representations as a real
707
00:48:28,920 --> 00:48:35,680
emergent physical property, or
they just was manifested there
708
00:48:35,680 --> 00:48:39,360
because of the measurements of
the interactions that the system
709
00:48:39,360 --> 00:48:43,920
can do.
So for example, our brain, you
710
00:48:43,920 --> 00:48:47,560
know, in the future we can, we
would have the ability, I guess
711
00:48:47,560 --> 00:48:53,960
to, to write the equations of
how our brain is working.
712
00:48:54,000 --> 00:48:57,920
So can describe all these
equations of how our cognitive
713
00:48:57,920 --> 00:49:02,440
system, how our our brain works.
And we have variables in those
714
00:49:02,440 --> 00:49:06,160
equations, right.
But those variables, they will
715
00:49:06,160 --> 00:49:10,160
not be our neurons.
They will be the
716
00:49:10,840 --> 00:49:14,000
representations, actually those
are the variables.
717
00:49:14,520 --> 00:49:19,120
So it means that those
representations, they have now
718
00:49:19,120 --> 00:49:22,800
all the causal power, if you
like, in the system.
719
00:49:23,080 --> 00:49:28,800
And that's why now these are the
physical properties that we
720
00:49:28,960 --> 00:49:32,840
measure that are manifested in
this cognitive frame of
721
00:49:32,840 --> 00:49:35,200
reference.
OK, so this is something
722
00:49:35,200 --> 00:49:39,400
already, I think pretty
interesting or pretty different.
723
00:49:39,400 --> 00:49:43,000
That's the way that we think
nowadays about cognition.
724
00:49:43,600 --> 00:49:46,840
And let me stress that it's
still not about consciousness.
725
00:49:47,400 --> 00:49:51,960
It's just about representations
and cognitive system, just like
726
00:49:52,000 --> 00:49:55,440
GPT, if you like, or or I don't
know, Facebook or something like
727
00:49:55,440 --> 00:49:57,960
that.
All the algorithms there not
728
00:49:57,960 --> 00:50:01,720
about consciousness yet, but
already they are a cognitive
729
00:50:01,720 --> 00:50:05,560
frame of reference and they
manifest a new kind of physical
730
00:50:05,560 --> 00:50:08,680
property, the representations.
OK.
731
00:50:10,080 --> 00:50:14,920
And it also means, I wonder if
your audience familiar with
732
00:50:16,720 --> 00:50:22,480
functionalism, because this is
exactly functionalism, because
733
00:50:22,480 --> 00:50:26,400
when we think about it in
functionalism, what we think,
734
00:50:26,400 --> 00:50:35,000
what we say is that the, the
essence of consciousness or, or
735
00:50:35,000 --> 00:50:39,200
the brain is not the material,
the substance itself, but the
736
00:50:39,200 --> 00:50:43,040
functions.
Now usually we need to assume
737
00:50:43,240 --> 00:50:45,600
functionalism, but now we don't
need to assume it.
738
00:50:45,600 --> 00:50:48,840
We start from physics, we start
from the principle of relativity
739
00:50:49,320 --> 00:50:53,720
and we get to this cognitive
frame of reference, right?
740
00:50:53,720 --> 00:50:58,080
And over there we have a new
physical property, the
741
00:50:58,080 --> 00:51:01,360
representation.
And they, we don't, they don't
742
00:51:01,360 --> 00:51:06,640
measure the substance, the micro
substance, like it doesn't
743
00:51:06,640 --> 00:51:13,320
matter if it's the brain or if I
took your brain and mimic it in
744
00:51:13,400 --> 00:51:18,520
the computer.
If it's the same with the same
745
00:51:18,520 --> 00:51:23,000
cognitive abilities and the same
equations, you know, and the
746
00:51:23,000 --> 00:51:26,520
same dynamics, then it's the
same cognitive frame of
747
00:51:26,520 --> 00:51:30,920
reference with the same physical
property that we call the, you
748
00:51:30,920 --> 00:51:32,520
know, the representations,
right?
749
00:51:32,520 --> 00:51:35,520
So it's the same thing, the same
a cognitive frame of effort.
750
00:51:36,320 --> 00:51:41,240
So, so now we see that
functionalism can, can, can be
751
00:51:41,240 --> 00:51:47,040
understood from the principle of
relativity, OK.
752
00:51:48,680 --> 00:51:51,120
And now we can continue to the
next level.
753
00:51:51,120 --> 00:51:53,560
So it's still not about
consciousness, but already we
754
00:51:53,560 --> 00:51:58,800
see something interesting here
that representations are already
755
00:51:58,800 --> 00:52:03,360
part of physics now, OK, now
representations, it's something
756
00:52:03,360 --> 00:52:10,160
that it, it has, let's call it
maybe proto subjectivity because
757
00:52:10,160 --> 00:52:14,320
it's something that a cognitive
system has created after
758
00:52:14,320 --> 00:52:18,280
learning something, OK.
And already now it's a physical
759
00:52:18,280 --> 00:52:21,480
property.
So we going, we are coming
760
00:52:21,480 --> 00:52:24,880
closer to explain subjectivity
in consciousness because of
761
00:52:24,880 --> 00:52:30,760
that, but it's still not enough.
In order to for it to be enough,
762
00:52:30,760 --> 00:52:37,000
what I claim is that we need
another emergence to happen or
763
00:52:37,200 --> 00:52:44,960
to find another frame of
reference that now is supervene
764
00:52:44,960 --> 00:52:48,760
on the cognitive frame of
reference or supervene on the
765
00:52:49,040 --> 00:52:52,720
representations on this physical
property we called
766
00:52:52,760 --> 00:52:54,080
representations.
OK.
767
00:52:56,080 --> 00:53:01,920
And then it will also give us
the I I will remind you that we
768
00:53:01,920 --> 00:53:05,440
started all that in order to
understand what will be the
769
00:53:05,520 --> 00:53:08,280
experiment, right?
So, so you'll see how it will
770
00:53:08,280 --> 00:53:12,400
give us a prediction, OK, So it
will give us a mechanism of what
771
00:53:12,400 --> 00:53:16,840
exactly is consciousness, how
can we can manifest it, but also
772
00:53:16,840 --> 00:53:22,080
it will give us a prediction
what to check in an experiment.
773
00:53:22,800 --> 00:53:27,720
OK, So what I claim is that now
if we have a cognitive system
774
00:53:27,720 --> 00:53:32,120
like the brain that can create
something that we call a
775
00:53:32,160 --> 00:53:39,360
cognitive map, then
consciousness must be
776
00:53:39,680 --> 00:53:44,680
manifested, you know.
So let me tell you what I what I
777
00:53:44,680 --> 00:53:48,040
mean by that.
And when we look at the map,
778
00:53:49,200 --> 00:53:52,400
then we see, let's say it's a
map of, of, of, I don't know of
779
00:53:52,400 --> 00:53:55,080
the world of something.
So we see all the countries over
780
00:53:55,080 --> 00:53:58,480
there.
So we see all all the countries
781
00:53:58,480 --> 00:54:06,360
at once.
Now in cognitive science, we, we
782
00:54:06,360 --> 00:54:10,480
have lots of theories that the
brain also create cognitive
783
00:54:10,560 --> 00:54:14,040
maps.
So the brain actually creates
784
00:54:16,200 --> 00:54:22,240
like an abstract space, if you
like a space of some XS.
785
00:54:22,720 --> 00:54:27,400
Each axis is a different
feature, and inside this map it
786
00:54:27,400 --> 00:54:31,920
can put all the relevant
representations.
787
00:54:31,920 --> 00:54:39,480
For example, we have a very,
let's say, good evidence that
788
00:54:40,040 --> 00:54:46,400
our our brain knows where it is
in space because of cognitive
789
00:54:46,600 --> 00:54:50,360
maps that actually map our 3D
World.
790
00:54:50,800 --> 00:54:58,160
We call it the the grid cells
and places and they work
791
00:54:58,160 --> 00:55:01,120
together and together they
created.
792
00:55:01,120 --> 00:55:06,920
So those grid cells create our
3D space, let's say and and then
793
00:55:06,920 --> 00:55:12,280
we have inside of this 3D space
our the map.
794
00:55:12,320 --> 00:55:16,320
And this is how we can navigate
and this is how we can know how
795
00:55:16,320 --> 00:55:19,760
to make shortcuts, for example,
because you have the whole map.
796
00:55:20,560 --> 00:55:25,840
Now what is the, what is, what
is the relation between that and
797
00:55:26,320 --> 00:55:29,720
relativity?
The relation is that if we have,
798
00:55:30,400 --> 00:55:36,160
if the brain can create this
access system of access and map,
799
00:55:37,360 --> 00:55:44,640
then now we have a new macro
system, let's call it a new
800
00:55:44,640 --> 00:55:47,840
macro frame of reference of this
cognitive map.
801
00:55:48,480 --> 00:55:53,640
Now it doesn't really matter
what are the substrate of this
802
00:55:53,640 --> 00:55:56,960
map, what are the
representations that created the
803
00:55:56,960 --> 00:56:02,720
access and you know the places,
let's call it inside the map,
804
00:56:03,440 --> 00:56:07,120
they are not relevant anymore.
What what's relevant now are the
805
00:56:07,680 --> 00:56:12,640
relationships between the access
and the points inside the map.
806
00:56:13,400 --> 00:56:17,760
If we capture all those
relationships like the position
807
00:56:17,760 --> 00:56:23,160
and the relationships with other
positions, then we actually
808
00:56:23,160 --> 00:56:29,960
created here again a new
emergence or a new frame of
809
00:56:29,960 --> 00:56:33,040
reference.
And in this frame of reference,
810
00:56:33,040 --> 00:56:37,920
now again we have a new physical
property like we had, like water
811
00:56:37,920 --> 00:56:41,200
was a new physical property and
representations were a new
812
00:56:41,520 --> 00:56:44,840
physical property.
Now we have a new physical
813
00:56:44,840 --> 00:56:50,280
property that is distinguished
from the substrate, like water
814
00:56:50,280 --> 00:56:53,480
was distinguished from the
molecules and representations
815
00:56:53,480 --> 00:56:58,520
were distinguished from the
brain or computer chips or
816
00:56:58,520 --> 00:57:01,680
whatever.
So now all those relations in
817
00:57:01,680 --> 00:57:06,520
the, in the map are
distinguished or from, you know,
818
00:57:06,520 --> 00:57:09,120
the representations that created
them.
819
00:57:09,760 --> 00:57:16,520
And what I try to claim it is
that this, this physical
820
00:57:16,520 --> 00:57:24,160
property, this is consciousness.
And in order to of course, that
821
00:57:24,160 --> 00:57:27,960
in order to measure it, you need
to be in the frame of reference
822
00:57:27,960 --> 00:57:30,960
of the cognitive map.
You need to do this measurement
823
00:57:30,960 --> 00:57:34,160
or to be in the interactions
that create this map, right.
824
00:57:34,160 --> 00:57:38,920
Only then you can manifest this
kind of of this, this new
825
00:57:38,920 --> 00:57:42,120
property, right?
Like we need to be in the macro
826
00:57:42,280 --> 00:57:44,880
frame of reference in order to
measure water.
827
00:57:44,880 --> 00:57:49,440
So here we need to be in the
dynamics of those cognitive
828
00:57:49,440 --> 00:57:54,120
maps.
And this new, you can ask this
829
00:57:54,120 --> 00:57:57,640
new, you can ask me why this new
physical property should be
830
00:57:57,640 --> 00:58:02,080
consciousness.
And the, the, the answer is
831
00:58:02,080 --> 00:58:08,200
because now we have first of
all, we have subjectivity here,
832
00:58:08,480 --> 00:58:13,840
all those maps, something that
the brain created in other, you
833
00:58:13,840 --> 00:58:18,600
know, to explain the word from
its own point of view, let's
834
00:58:18,600 --> 00:58:24,080
say.
And also we have new information
835
00:58:24,080 --> 00:58:28,280
here about, let's call it about
the meaning.
836
00:58:28,480 --> 00:58:34,520
There is a meaning here.
And what what I mean is like in
837
00:58:34,520 --> 00:58:38,840
a language, when you think of a
language we have when, when you
838
00:58:38,840 --> 00:58:42,160
learn new language, in the
beginning, if you learn only one
839
00:58:42,160 --> 00:58:45,680
word in, I don't know, German or
something, it will not tell you
840
00:58:45,680 --> 00:58:47,680
a lot.
But when you know enough words
841
00:58:47,680 --> 00:58:50,640
and you know the relations
between them, all of a sudden
842
00:58:50,640 --> 00:58:54,080
you there is a new information
here meaning of these words.
843
00:58:54,320 --> 00:58:59,000
So same thing happens here.
Now the brain measures not only
844
00:58:59,000 --> 00:59:03,160
one representation, but all the
relations all at once, and
845
00:59:03,160 --> 00:59:04,720
that's why we have new meaning
here.
846
00:59:05,600 --> 00:59:09,080
And this is this new physical
property that I spoke of, and
847
00:59:09,080 --> 00:59:14,480
that's why it's consciousness.
So this is more or less the
848
00:59:14,480 --> 00:59:17,480
mechanism that now I try to
write on the mathematics of
849
00:59:17,480 --> 00:59:22,480
that, you know, to explain what
is the mechanism from a
850
00:59:22,480 --> 00:59:25,720
relativistic point of view in
order to manifest consciousness.
851
00:59:26,400 --> 00:59:32,640
I hope it was relatively clear.
It's obviously a lot to take in,
852
00:59:32,720 --> 00:59:37,360
but the first question that
comes to my mind is once you've
853
00:59:37,360 --> 00:59:41,280
done that and if, if if let's
say we generate an AI that can
854
00:59:41,600 --> 00:59:44,440
accomplish or fit into these
cognitive frames in that, in
855
00:59:44,440 --> 00:59:48,320
that information sector at least
that allows us to determine and
856
00:59:48,320 --> 00:59:50,320
say that it is conscious just
like us.
857
00:59:50,920 --> 00:59:53,880
What does that say for animals
or other species?
858
00:59:54,080 --> 00:59:57,680
I mean, how do we don't go about
then trying to assess other
859
00:59:57,680 --> 00:59:59,880
forms of consciousness that are
not human?
860
01:00:01,160 --> 01:00:04,520
Yeah, that's, that's a great
question because exactly as you
861
01:00:04,520 --> 01:00:06,840
said, there's nothing absolute
here.
862
01:00:06,840 --> 01:00:10,600
It's all about the measurements.
So if the same measurements can
863
01:00:10,600 --> 01:00:15,640
be created in other animals or
machines, then they will have
864
01:00:15,960 --> 01:00:18,800
consciousness as well.
They are in this frame of
865
01:00:18,800 --> 01:00:21,840
reference.
They do the same in all this
866
01:00:21,840 --> 01:00:26,000
minimal, let's say that there
are no minimal conditions for
867
01:00:26,000 --> 01:00:27,920
measurements that manifest
consciousness.
868
01:00:28,240 --> 01:00:40,760
So every animal or machine or AI
that will create those minimal
869
01:00:40,760 --> 01:00:49,520
conditions, they will have a
conscious state now, now, and,
870
01:00:49,520 --> 01:00:54,160
and you're right that now,
because we have those
871
01:00:54,160 --> 01:01:00,120
conditions, we can actually
check which animals fit to those
872
01:01:00,120 --> 01:01:04,480
minimal conditions or which AIS
fit to those minimal conditions.
873
01:01:05,000 --> 01:01:08,880
And if they do, according to my
theory, they actually must have
874
01:01:08,880 --> 01:01:12,320
consciousness.
And then near is there, is there
875
01:01:12,320 --> 01:01:14,360
credence level given to these
minimal conditions?
876
01:01:14,360 --> 01:01:19,200
Do you have certain criteria,
let's say that that would, let's
877
01:01:19,200 --> 01:01:21,560
say measurements actually, are
they certain sort of
878
01:01:21,560 --> 01:01:26,360
measurements or or or criteria
that would over override others
879
01:01:27,280 --> 01:01:30,560
in trying to figure out where in
this cognitive frame someone
880
01:01:30,560 --> 01:01:35,080
falls or something falls?
So the word measurements here
881
01:01:35,080 --> 01:01:38,280
are problematic because I use
the word measurements from a
882
01:01:38,280 --> 01:01:39,960
physical point of view.
And maybe this is what you
883
01:01:39,960 --> 01:01:43,960
meant, I'm not sure, but for me,
right measurements are different
884
01:01:43,960 --> 01:01:48,280
world for interactions, right?
And this is how because of those
885
01:01:48,280 --> 01:01:51,960
interactions and measurements,
you in the frame of reference,
886
01:01:52,600 --> 01:01:56,680
there are some relations that
manifest physical properties.
887
01:01:57,280 --> 01:02:00,520
So now you ask which kind of
measurements or interactions
888
01:02:00,800 --> 01:02:05,040
will manifest consciousness?
And the answer is that first of
889
01:02:05,040 --> 01:02:07,960
all, you need to be a cognitive
frame of reference.
890
01:02:08,360 --> 01:02:13,720
So first of all, first of all,
you need to be a system that
891
01:02:15,960 --> 01:02:21,920
that for it for the system
representations are a physical
892
01:02:21,920 --> 01:02:25,000
property.
OK, so it learns, it creates a
893
01:02:25,120 --> 01:02:28,800
representations and this is a.
This is how it works.
894
01:02:29,160 --> 01:02:36,000
And then OK, and then it needs
to create cognitive maps.
895
01:02:36,800 --> 01:02:42,080
So it needs to create a
representations of access and
896
01:02:42,080 --> 01:02:46,440
the and to put inside this map,
inside this abstract space
897
01:02:47,400 --> 01:02:52,880
although all the different
representations.
898
01:02:53,320 --> 01:02:59,000
So then, right, it can measure
all those relations all at once.
899
01:02:59,960 --> 01:03:02,400
Only then those are the minimal
conditions.
900
01:03:02,400 --> 01:03:07,600
When this happens, then
according to the theory,
901
01:03:09,120 --> 01:03:12,240
consciousness is manifested.
Good.
902
01:03:12,320 --> 01:03:14,880
Let's say, let's say we've got
the H, the molecules as the
903
01:03:16,160 --> 01:03:18,320
cognitive frames.
Then we've got water as
904
01:03:18,320 --> 01:03:21,880
consciousness, the waves.
Would you consider free will to
905
01:03:21,880 --> 01:03:26,040
be you have to add an another
emergent step here.
906
01:03:27,360 --> 01:03:31,360
Yeah, waves of consciousness.
I love your questions.
907
01:03:31,360 --> 01:03:34,080
They are so good.
Very interesting question.
908
01:03:35,040 --> 01:03:38,520
No, OK, it's an interesting
question.
909
01:03:38,720 --> 01:03:42,840
So first of all, let's start
with if we take molecules and
910
01:03:42,840 --> 01:03:44,600
water and waves, here is an
analogy.
911
01:03:45,000 --> 01:03:49,760
Molecules will be the neurons,
the activity of the neurons,
912
01:03:50,280 --> 01:03:55,240
water will be the
representations, OK.
913
01:03:55,440 --> 01:04:00,280
And that's why water can be made
out of different molecules,
914
01:04:00,280 --> 01:04:06,120
maybe like representations can
be made out of computer chips.
915
01:04:06,200 --> 01:04:11,080
OK, now consciousness is like
the waves on the water.
916
01:04:11,920 --> 01:04:16,440
So consciousness, right, is a
supervene, let's call it.
917
01:04:16,440 --> 01:04:21,240
It's on, on those
representations.
918
01:04:21,560 --> 01:04:26,280
It's a new frame of reference
that is independent.
919
01:04:26,720 --> 01:04:32,640
You can say from the
representations independent in,
920
01:04:32,640 --> 01:04:35,840
in, in, in the way that you can.
We can change now the
921
01:04:35,840 --> 01:04:40,680
representations to be others.
But if still the map, if all the
922
01:04:40,680 --> 01:04:45,040
relations in the map, if we
somehow managed to do it, the
923
01:04:45,120 --> 01:04:48,480
map and the relations are the
same, then you'll have still the
924
01:04:48,480 --> 01:04:52,520
same consciousness, the same map
and the same consciousness, just
925
01:04:52,520 --> 01:04:56,560
exactly like water.
If we can do water out of
926
01:04:56,920 --> 01:05:00,720
different molecules somehow that
will preserve all the properties
927
01:05:00,720 --> 01:05:02,200
of water, then it's the same
water.
928
01:05:02,360 --> 01:05:08,120
OK, so same idea here.
So, OK, so, so waves here are
929
01:05:08,120 --> 01:05:12,560
consciousness.
Now you ask, maybe we can find a
930
01:05:12,560 --> 01:05:15,920
new level, a new frame of
reference or something.
931
01:05:17,280 --> 01:05:21,520
But then the answer here is no
and the it's not.
932
01:05:21,760 --> 01:05:25,400
It will not give us free will,
unfortunately.
933
01:05:26,400 --> 01:05:30,360
Why?
Because if you remember, we have
934
01:05:30,360 --> 01:05:35,680
here because it's relativistic.
We have equivalence between
935
01:05:36,160 --> 01:05:39,240
third person point of view and
1st person point of view.
936
01:05:40,440 --> 01:05:44,320
Let me remind you now when we
know more about you know the
937
01:05:44,360 --> 01:05:48,440
cognitive maps.
So let let let me tell you again
938
01:05:48,440 --> 01:05:52,680
about about this equivalence
from the outside.
939
01:05:53,640 --> 01:05:57,760
When you will measure my brain,
you will measure that I have
940
01:05:57,760 --> 01:06:00,760
just cognitive maps, right?
You will measure my neural
941
01:06:00,760 --> 01:06:03,160
patterns and you can maybe
understand that those neural
942
01:06:03,160 --> 01:06:05,280
patterns creating a cognitive
map.
943
01:06:06,120 --> 01:06:10,720
But from the inside, when I
actually inside this frame of
944
01:06:10,720 --> 01:06:15,640
reference that creates that has
created this cognitive map with
945
01:06:15,760 --> 01:06:19,200
all the dynamics there, all
those measurements, we will
946
01:06:19,200 --> 01:06:21,560
manifest consciousness all
right.
947
01:06:21,800 --> 01:06:27,520
But now notice that we have
equivalence between those two.
948
01:06:29,240 --> 01:06:30,760
We cannot distinguish between
them.
949
01:06:31,520 --> 01:06:36,520
So it means that if everything
that I explained with cognitive
950
01:06:36,520 --> 01:06:43,160
maps and and neurons, I can
explain with consciousness.
951
01:06:43,680 --> 01:06:51,080
So I can explain, I can say I, I
went to eat because I felt
952
01:06:51,160 --> 01:06:55,480
hunger.
So now I explained it with those
953
01:06:55,480 --> 01:06:59,200
physical properties of
consciousness and I can explain
954
01:06:59,200 --> 01:07:04,040
it from, you know, the frame of
reference of, of third person
955
01:07:04,520 --> 01:07:10,680
frame of reference with neurons
created a cognitive map of my,
956
01:07:10,680 --> 01:07:17,320
of my body situation and there
was not enough food and you
957
01:07:17,320 --> 01:07:22,320
know, and also and so on.
So it means that now if we try
958
01:07:22,320 --> 01:07:26,680
to think about causality here,
the causal power of
959
01:07:26,680 --> 01:07:31,360
consciousness versus the causal
power of neurons, they are
960
01:07:31,360 --> 01:07:34,880
equivalent.
It's the same, just from
961
01:07:34,880 --> 01:07:39,000
different points of view, right
Head and tail, they are the same
962
01:07:39,000 --> 01:07:42,160
exactly.
So exactly the the same causal
963
01:07:42,160 --> 01:07:44,880
power.
And because we know that we have
964
01:07:44,880 --> 01:07:50,880
determinism with physics about
neurons and and and and
965
01:07:50,880 --> 01:07:53,640
cognitive maps, then we
understand that we have the same
966
01:07:53,640 --> 01:07:59,080
kind of causality and the same
determinism also with
967
01:07:59,160 --> 01:08:04,560
consciousness.
So so my theory does not help us
968
01:08:04,600 --> 01:08:11,600
unfortunately with the question
of of free will and free choice.
969
01:08:12,640 --> 01:08:15,640
It ultimately determinist.
Determinist.
970
01:08:15,800 --> 01:08:18,520
Yes, yes, yeah, because it's
part of physics, so it makes
971
01:08:18,520 --> 01:08:20,200
sense in the end of the day.
It does.
972
01:08:20,760 --> 01:08:25,080
Ideally, that would have been.
My guess is that it would hit
973
01:08:26,080 --> 01:08:27,240
yeah.
But.
974
01:08:27,240 --> 01:08:31,680
But actually I have to say that
I, at least it saves something
975
01:08:31,680 --> 01:08:33,760
else.
It, it, it gives us autonomy,
976
01:08:35,160 --> 01:08:38,359
which is also something, you
know, I, I, I have a friend and
977
01:08:38,359 --> 01:08:44,080
she told me once we spoke about
it and she told me if we don't
978
01:08:44,080 --> 01:08:48,600
have free will, then we are just
very complicated machines.
979
01:08:48,600 --> 01:08:51,680
We are like a coffee machine, a
complicated coffee machine.
980
01:08:53,240 --> 01:08:58,479
And I was very annoyed by that.
But then I told her, well, not
981
01:08:58,479 --> 01:09:01,640
exactly.
We do have autonomy, like a very
982
01:09:01,640 --> 01:09:05,000
complex coffee machine has no
autonomy.
983
01:09:05,640 --> 01:09:08,920
We are the one that built it and
we are the one that need to
984
01:09:08,920 --> 01:09:14,120
press on a button to create, I
don't know, a very complicated
985
01:09:14,120 --> 01:09:20,399
coffee, right?
But in our case, it's different.
986
01:09:20,840 --> 01:09:23,520
First of all, we are part of
life, right?
987
01:09:23,520 --> 01:09:30,160
And for in life we are a system
that evolved to for itself,
988
01:09:30,160 --> 01:09:32,399
right?
We are not evolved for someone
989
01:09:32,399 --> 01:09:34,720
else.
So this is first thing that we
990
01:09:34,720 --> 01:09:39,240
have some kind of autonomy.
But now with my theory, we have
991
01:09:39,240 --> 01:09:43,800
much more autonomy physically.
We have autonomy because now we
992
01:09:43,800 --> 01:09:49,560
are an actual cognitive frame of
reference and 1st person frame
993
01:09:49,560 --> 01:09:51,200
of reference.
We have consciousness.
994
01:09:52,040 --> 01:09:59,200
So we have a lot of autonomy in
the sense that we project or we,
995
01:09:59,760 --> 01:10:05,280
let's say that we create
physical properties, which we
996
01:10:05,280 --> 01:10:07,840
call qualia, right?
Those are now physical
997
01:10:07,840 --> 01:10:14,000
properties and we have
manifested them in our own frame
998
01:10:14,000 --> 01:10:19,360
of reference.
So, so it gives us a huge, for
999
01:10:19,360 --> 01:10:23,280
me, I, I guess it feels like a
huge autonomy.
1000
01:10:23,720 --> 01:10:29,440
We are our own frame of
reference that is in some sense
1001
01:10:29,960 --> 01:10:36,520
separate, you know, from from
our substrate, just like what we
1002
01:10:36,520 --> 01:10:39,640
discussed before, separate.
It's almost like to summarize,
1003
01:10:39,640 --> 01:10:43,600
it's kind of like the the
consciousness is observer
1004
01:10:43,600 --> 01:10:46,560
dependent and and you can see it
from two different ways.
1005
01:10:46,600 --> 01:10:50,480
We can see it other as from the
neural correlations of what's
1006
01:10:50,480 --> 01:10:53,800
going on and from the first
person subject to phenomenal
1007
01:10:53,800 --> 01:10:56,800
experience and both the
equivalent and therefore
1008
01:10:57,800 --> 01:11:00,640
relative.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
1009
01:11:00,720 --> 01:11:04,160
But it's more than that, that
now we can create the same
1010
01:11:04,160 --> 01:11:07,320
consciousness in different with
different subtracts if we like.
1011
01:11:07,360 --> 01:11:10,240
Yes, so so there is.
An artificial intelligence?
1012
01:11:10,560 --> 01:11:14,720
If yes, it's able to produce
similar outcomes, therefore it's
1013
01:11:14,720 --> 01:11:18,440
also equivalent in that regard.
And our perspective is not
1014
01:11:18,440 --> 01:11:24,640
necessarily more valuable when
trying to assess the AI, let's
1015
01:11:24,640 --> 01:11:30,360
say.
Yeah, it depends if the AI has
1016
01:11:30,360 --> 01:11:32,720
met the minimal conditions or
not.
1017
01:11:32,720 --> 01:11:35,240
But if it's met at the minimal
conditions, then it has.
1018
01:11:35,360 --> 01:11:38,240
You're talking at a more
advanced AI at this point, not
1019
01:11:38,240 --> 01:11:38,880
what?
Exactly.
1020
01:11:39,040 --> 01:11:42,440
Currently so not like.
Exactly, exactly.
1021
01:11:42,560 --> 01:11:45,080
But also if we take in the
future, if we can take your
1022
01:11:45,080 --> 01:11:49,800
cognitive maps, for example, and
copy them, do like a copy paste
1023
01:11:49,800 --> 01:11:56,360
in some kind of AI, then there
is again, it's the same first
1024
01:11:56,360 --> 01:11:58,640
person frame of reference just
like you.
1025
01:11:59,320 --> 01:12:01,600
It will create the same
measurements just like you, if
1026
01:12:01,600 --> 01:12:04,520
we do it properly, right?
The proper copy paste, let's
1027
01:12:04,520 --> 01:12:08,160
call it, and the proper
dynamically copy paste.
1028
01:12:08,160 --> 01:12:14,360
So it's dynamically doing the
same dynamics like what happens
1029
01:12:14,720 --> 01:12:17,960
when you create your own
cognitive maps, right?
1030
01:12:18,160 --> 01:12:24,320
Then it will create the same
frame of reference with the same
1031
01:12:24,320 --> 01:12:29,960
consciousness just like you so.
You see, you ever have do you
1032
01:12:29,960 --> 01:12:34,560
think about teleological
outcomes or what what's going to
1033
01:12:34,560 --> 01:12:37,080
happen in the future?
I mean, because this could then
1034
01:12:37,080 --> 01:12:41,840
be the plan for the universe,
but we're obviously able to
1035
01:12:41,840 --> 01:12:47,400
transmit this sort of conscious
entity into substrates that will
1036
01:12:47,400 --> 01:12:51,960
last longer and survive this
harsh universe that'll easily
1037
01:12:51,960 --> 01:12:56,280
kill a biological system.
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
1038
01:12:56,600 --> 01:12:59,040
I mean, that can be the
solution, right, For us if we
1039
01:12:59,040 --> 01:13:02,960
like to, to live forever, first
of all.
1040
01:13:03,800 --> 01:13:09,240
And yeah, who knows, maybe in
the future we, we can find a
1041
01:13:09,280 --> 01:13:15,000
more finer substrate than
biological one.
1042
01:13:15,560 --> 01:13:20,120
Maybe even we can use elements
from quantum mechanics, you
1043
01:13:20,120 --> 01:13:24,840
know, like something like
quantum fields or whatever.
1044
01:13:24,920 --> 01:13:27,360
You know, maybe in the far
future we can do something with
1045
01:13:27,360 --> 01:13:32,600
that and then, you know, the,
the universe is the limit or
1046
01:13:32,600 --> 01:13:39,360
even beyond, you know, And
another question is sometimes
1047
01:13:39,360 --> 01:13:43,160
people ask me if I do, I think
if, if the universe as a whole
1048
01:13:43,440 --> 01:13:47,280
is consciousness, for example.
And this is also a very
1049
01:13:47,280 --> 01:13:50,440
interesting question.
I I think that the answer is no,
1050
01:13:50,920 --> 01:13:56,800
but but we, we cannot know yet
because in order to to to answer
1051
01:13:56,800 --> 01:14:01,000
this question, we need to, to
know if the universe is a
1052
01:14:01,000 --> 01:14:04,920
cognitive system first of all.
It's, it's almost like I talked
1053
01:14:04,920 --> 01:14:09,320
about earlier when we look at
each scale of of each molecule,
1054
01:14:09,320 --> 01:14:12,400
you we don't have that macro
level scale that's needed.
1055
01:14:12,880 --> 01:14:16,200
So it's it's actually impossible
to exclude that as an option
1056
01:14:16,200 --> 01:14:18,040
right now.
Exactly.
1057
01:14:18,040 --> 01:14:20,040
And you know what?
You remind me a very nice
1058
01:14:20,040 --> 01:14:24,520
analogy for that There is an
analogy from the 80s.
1059
01:14:24,520 --> 01:14:32,440
I think it's net block he he so
he created this weird analogy
1060
01:14:32,520 --> 01:14:36,360
analogy again with Chinese.
I don't know they have lots of
1061
01:14:36,640 --> 01:14:41,080
analogies with the Chinese in in
in the philosophy of the of mind
1062
01:14:41,560 --> 01:14:46,960
for some reason.
So this is the Chinese brain
1063
01:14:46,960 --> 01:14:50,160
analogy or something like that.
So in this analogy, let's say
1064
01:14:50,520 --> 01:14:57,360
that we take all the population
of China and each person now
1065
01:14:58,080 --> 01:15:04,200
must behave like a neuron.
So I don't know, the government
1066
01:15:04,200 --> 01:15:12,280
gives them some, some, some
equipment in order for them to
1067
01:15:13,000 --> 01:15:18,920
interact with other people just
like what neuron does.
1068
01:15:18,960 --> 01:15:21,320
OK, let's say that it's possible
to do that.
1069
01:15:22,000 --> 01:15:25,960
So now and let's say that we
have enough Chinese or whatever
1070
01:15:26,720 --> 01:15:34,080
to have enough neurons and and
now we have enough neurons just
1071
01:15:34,080 --> 01:15:37,200
like in human, in the human
brain.
1072
01:15:37,520 --> 01:15:43,360
So now let's say that we take
your brain and now the Chinese
1073
01:15:43,360 --> 01:15:48,760
people, they are the one that
mimic it and they and they mimic
1074
01:15:48,760 --> 01:15:53,000
it in in a good way.
So it's a cognitive system
1075
01:15:53,000 --> 01:15:59,720
actually and it and it creates
everything that your brain is
1076
01:15:59,720 --> 01:16:04,040
creating.
Now the question is do does this
1077
01:16:04,040 --> 01:16:08,520
brain has does it have
consciousness Now in the
1078
01:16:08,520 --> 01:16:12,200
beginning, I have to say that it
sounds weird to say yes, it has
1079
01:16:12,240 --> 01:16:15,560
consciousness, right?
Because if you ask one Chinese,
1080
01:16:16,960 --> 01:16:22,400
do you feel the consciousness of
Tevin, he will tell you, no,
1081
01:16:22,640 --> 01:16:25,040
I'm, I'm Changhu, what do you
want from me?
1082
01:16:27,600 --> 01:16:30,920
Right.
But then when you think about it
1083
01:16:31,720 --> 01:16:36,480
from the perspective of, you
know, the relativistic
1084
01:16:36,480 --> 01:16:39,200
perspective of my theory, then
it makes sense.
1085
01:16:39,440 --> 01:16:47,440
Because when you ask one Chinese
about consciousness, he, he or
1086
01:16:47,440 --> 01:16:53,800
she, they are in their own
cognitive frame of reference,
1087
01:16:53,960 --> 01:16:56,000
right?
So this is the measurement that
1088
01:16:56,000 --> 01:16:57,800
they can do.
And they manifest their own
1089
01:16:57,800 --> 01:17:00,600
consciousness.
In order to see that there is a
1090
01:17:01,800 --> 01:17:04,680
bigger consciousness here, let's
call it, we need to, to
1091
01:17:04,680 --> 01:17:09,400
transform into the frame of
reference of the whole Chinese
1092
01:17:09,400 --> 01:17:11,840
brain.
And then in this brain, of
1093
01:17:11,840 --> 01:17:15,200
course, there will be in the
manifestation of consciousness.
1094
01:17:16,000 --> 01:17:18,960
So then now it's more intuitive
even to think about it.
1095
01:17:20,000 --> 01:17:23,360
And now you can think that it's
very, it's maybe it's the same
1096
01:17:23,360 --> 01:17:27,920
with the whole universe.
I mean, just exactly as one
1097
01:17:27,920 --> 01:17:33,360
Chinese didn't know about the
whole Chinese brain, we don't
1098
01:17:33,360 --> 01:17:35,720
know about the whole universe
because we are just not in the
1099
01:17:35,720 --> 01:17:39,080
right frame of reference and.
I think you're touching on
1100
01:17:39,080 --> 01:17:42,560
something that's quite a few
people I've had on the show have
1101
01:17:42,560 --> 01:17:44,760
this.
Some people, for example, will
1102
01:17:44,760 --> 01:17:49,240
say countries are conscious in,
in, in a way.
1103
01:17:49,240 --> 01:17:52,800
So America has this type of
thinking and mindset and, and
1104
01:17:52,800 --> 01:17:55,160
this sort of process that's
happening with similar cognitive
1105
01:17:55,160 --> 01:17:58,720
frames in that regard.
Whereas China or India have a
1106
01:17:58,720 --> 01:18:00,600
different sort of cognitive
process.
1107
01:18:00,600 --> 01:18:04,440
But but in a sense they are
conscious entities just thinking
1108
01:18:04,440 --> 01:18:05,440
differently.
That's it.
1109
01:18:05,840 --> 01:18:09,240
So it's not impossible to
exclude these as options because
1110
01:18:09,240 --> 01:18:10,840
I've had quite a few so bring
these up.
1111
01:18:12,600 --> 01:18:19,800
Yes, but you're right.
You're right that of course when
1112
01:18:19,800 --> 01:18:27,000
we look culturally, we see, you
know, similarities between
1113
01:18:27,000 --> 01:18:31,000
different cultures.
I can tell you personally, I I'm
1114
01:18:31,000 --> 01:18:35,000
here from I'm from Israel and
the culture here is very
1115
01:18:35,000 --> 01:18:40,280
Mediterranean.
So when I go to Spain or Italy
1116
01:18:40,280 --> 01:18:43,360
or Egypt, you know, it's very
similar.
1117
01:18:43,600 --> 01:18:49,920
But then for the last nine years
I lived in Berkling, California.
1118
01:18:50,600 --> 01:18:56,440
So I actually feel it very much
the differences, the cultural
1119
01:18:56,440 --> 01:19:00,440
differences, you know, between
the US and the Mediterranean,
1120
01:19:00,440 --> 01:19:05,160
let's say.
But, and it's very, by the way,
1121
01:19:05,160 --> 01:19:08,480
very interesting topic as well
to see what are those
1122
01:19:08,480 --> 01:19:11,680
differences and why and all this
but.
1123
01:19:11,760 --> 01:19:14,160
I completely understand.
I'm from South Africa, so I go
1124
01:19:14,520 --> 01:19:16,120
when I travel to Europe and
other places.
1125
01:19:16,120 --> 01:19:19,560
I know the, I know the feeling.
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
1126
01:19:19,560 --> 01:19:22,880
Because it's it's, I was
surprised how different it will
1127
01:19:22,880 --> 01:19:24,800
be.
By the way, I thought that
1128
01:19:24,800 --> 01:19:28,000
because all of us are part of,
you know, Western world liberal
1129
01:19:28,000 --> 01:19:32,920
democracy, and we see the same
movies and hear the same music
1130
01:19:32,920 --> 01:19:38,560
and TV, you know, the, the
differences won't be so big.
1131
01:19:39,080 --> 01:19:43,880
And I was surprised to see how
huge the differences are, by the
1132
01:19:43,880 --> 01:19:44,480
way.
Yeah.
1133
01:19:45,440 --> 01:19:48,800
But taking all that into
account, it it, it still doesn't
1134
01:19:48,800 --> 01:19:53,080
mean that as a whole, the
country of the US, for example,
1135
01:19:53,280 --> 01:19:58,520
or the culture has its own
conscious mind.
1136
01:19:59,400 --> 01:20:03,360
In order to have a conscious
mind, we need to show that it,
1137
01:20:03,520 --> 01:20:11,240
it, it, that it, that it.
Fits for the minimal conditions
1138
01:20:11,240 --> 01:20:15,040
for consciousness and we don't
know what those minimal
1139
01:20:15,040 --> 01:20:16,840
conditions now according to the
theory.
1140
01:20:17,280 --> 01:20:19,840
So one condition, it should be a
cognitive system.
1141
01:20:20,400 --> 01:20:24,120
Now is it a cognitive system?
Can we speak of a country as the
1142
01:20:24,120 --> 01:20:28,680
system that gets inputs, create
representations and do outputs
1143
01:20:28,680 --> 01:20:31,280
out of those representations?
I'm not sure.
1144
01:20:31,280 --> 01:20:35,000
I don't think so.
I think as individuals we do it,
1145
01:20:35,400 --> 01:20:42,280
but as as as a culture, let's
say I don't see again, we need
1146
01:20:42,280 --> 01:20:45,480
to think about it maybe more,
but I don't see how we, how the
1147
01:20:45,480 --> 01:20:51,200
culture create and create
representations that are
1148
01:20:51,200 --> 01:20:54,760
different than the
representations that we already
1149
01:20:54,760 --> 01:20:58,000
created in our minds.
You see, this is the thing here
1150
01:20:58,000 --> 01:21:01,200
that we need to create now a
different frame of reference.
1151
01:21:01,200 --> 01:21:06,720
It cannot be our what you know,
the, the representations that
1152
01:21:06,760 --> 01:21:11,320
are in our mind in order to
scale up with the relativistic
1153
01:21:11,320 --> 01:21:14,320
approach, because you need the
separation, right?
1154
01:21:14,320 --> 01:21:18,160
You need to distinguish between
the micro and the macro frame of
1155
01:21:18,160 --> 01:21:21,160
reference.
It's not the same, OK, in that
1156
01:21:21,160 --> 01:21:22,880
sense.
And here I think it's the
1157
01:21:22,880 --> 01:21:24,920
problem.
I don't think that cultures or
1158
01:21:24,920 --> 01:21:28,600
countries will create it.
And again, I don't think that
1159
01:21:28,600 --> 01:21:32,280
the planet can create it or the
solar system or the universe as
1160
01:21:32,280 --> 01:21:34,120
a whole.
But who knows, you know, maybe,
1161
01:21:34,720 --> 01:21:38,280
maybe we'll find something that
we don't understand for for now.
1162
01:21:39,320 --> 01:21:41,960
I trust me, I'm pretty sure we
can find a philosopher online or
1163
01:21:41,960 --> 01:21:46,800
will give us, we can give us
some understanding of of why
1164
01:21:46,800 --> 01:21:49,880
there is that.
That's the for sure starting
1165
01:21:49,880 --> 01:21:52,880
this podcast is you can you
cannot find almost any theory
1166
01:21:52,880 --> 01:21:55,360
that that can explain almost
anything when it comes to
1167
01:21:55,360 --> 01:21:57,560
conscious.
What has been the most difficult
1168
01:21:57,720 --> 01:22:01,080
aspect of this relational
theory, this relativistic theory
1169
01:22:01,080 --> 01:22:04,080
of consciousness that you've had
to deal with in terms of
1170
01:22:04,080 --> 01:22:06,640
misunderstandings?
Of course, English, English is
1171
01:22:06,640 --> 01:22:08,120
not your first language.
I'm assuming yes.
1172
01:22:09,200 --> 01:22:10,840
That's true, yeah.
It's Hebrew.
1173
01:22:10,840 --> 01:22:14,280
My my view.
Express this view to the larger
1174
01:22:14,480 --> 01:22:16,800
philosophical community.
What's been the most difficult
1175
01:22:16,800 --> 01:22:23,000
part?
The most difficult part, yeah,
1176
01:22:23,000 --> 01:22:28,400
to convey the physicalist
approach, how to look from a
1177
01:22:28,400 --> 01:22:32,520
physical point of view and not
from a psychological point of
1178
01:22:32,520 --> 01:22:36,400
view or neuroscience,
neuroscience point of view.
1179
01:22:37,160 --> 01:22:42,240
But, and oh, you know what?
Even more than that, to convey
1180
01:22:42,240 --> 01:22:46,880
people to look from relativistic
approach and not absolute
1181
01:22:46,880 --> 01:22:53,000
approach, because our culture is
based on an absolute approach.
1182
01:22:53,480 --> 01:22:56,520
Think about the religions.
It's very absolute, right?
1183
01:22:56,520 --> 01:23:02,480
You have God, some sort of God.
This isn't the most absolute
1184
01:23:02,760 --> 01:23:06,760
entity ever, right?
And then it's very dominant in
1185
01:23:06,760 --> 01:23:13,480
most cultures.
And also we start as kids from
1186
01:23:13,480 --> 01:23:16,760
this absolute notion that we
know everything.
1187
01:23:16,760 --> 01:23:18,560
Our parents knows everything,
right?
1188
01:23:18,560 --> 01:23:19,920
We are the centre of the
universe.
1189
01:23:20,800 --> 01:23:30,400
So it takes time to switch this
notion and to think not from an
1190
01:23:30,400 --> 01:23:34,760
absolute way of thinking.
You see, it's so ingrained in
1191
01:23:34,760 --> 01:23:39,600
our way of thinking, this
absolute, that absolute
1192
01:23:39,600 --> 01:23:45,760
approach, that eliminativism
sounds plausible for us, because
1193
01:23:45,760 --> 01:23:50,720
it's plausible for us that the
element, elementary particles,
1194
01:23:50,720 --> 01:23:54,640
let's say, should be the
absolute frame of reference you
1195
01:23:54,640 --> 01:23:57,840
see.
So that's why it takes some time
1196
01:23:57,840 --> 01:24:01,280
to realize, oh wait, we can
think about it in a completely
1197
01:24:01,280 --> 01:24:04,040
different way where it's all
relative.
1198
01:24:04,040 --> 01:24:09,280
We don't have one God I from
above, you know, an absolute
1199
01:24:09,280 --> 01:24:14,120
thing.
We have different frames and all
1200
01:24:14,120 --> 01:24:17,560
of them are correct.
You know, so it takes time to to
1201
01:24:17,800 --> 01:24:20,480
to get used.
And yet it's so anything, it's
1202
01:24:20,480 --> 01:24:23,360
so obvious in a sense that
everything is relative to
1203
01:24:23,360 --> 01:24:25,640
something else.
So it's, it's like a doubling.
1204
01:24:25,640 --> 01:24:28,120
Yeah.
You think it's a case where it's
1205
01:24:28,160 --> 01:24:32,520
it's simultaneously obvious and
not occurring at the same time.
1206
01:24:33,800 --> 01:24:36,600
Exactly, exactly.
You know that we forgot
1207
01:24:36,600 --> 01:24:39,920
something.
You asked me what is the
1208
01:24:39,920 --> 01:24:43,760
experiment that I would like to
do, and then I started all this
1209
01:24:44,040 --> 01:24:49,280
conversation, but we forgot.
I forgot to tell you in the end
1210
01:24:49,280 --> 01:24:52,040
of the day, what is this?
What is the experiment?
1211
01:24:53,400 --> 01:24:59,560
So now after we know those
conditions, we can speak of a
1212
01:24:59,560 --> 01:25:03,720
prediction here before, you
know, we try to take it into the
1213
01:25:04,040 --> 01:25:09,120
very interesting questions of
human of sorry animals or AI.
1214
01:25:09,520 --> 01:25:13,320
First of all, we have the
prediction that in humans that
1215
01:25:13,320 --> 01:25:18,800
we know that has have
consciousness while we awake or
1216
01:25:18,800 --> 01:25:22,760
while we have consciousness,
then we must have at least one
1217
01:25:22,760 --> 01:25:28,640
cognitive map operating, right?
Because those are what manifest
1218
01:25:28,640 --> 01:25:34,280
consciousness and while we are
unconscious then we must see no
1219
01:25:34,600 --> 01:25:37,600
activation of cognitive maps at
all.
1220
01:25:38,680 --> 01:25:42,160
So we have a prediction now that
you can check and we can check
1221
01:25:42,160 --> 01:25:45,280
it in couple of different
experiments.
1222
01:25:45,280 --> 01:25:48,920
Actually we can do it in the
level of the state of
1223
01:25:48,920 --> 01:25:51,760
consciousness.
So for example, someone awake
1224
01:25:51,920 --> 01:25:56,720
versus someone with deep sleep
and versus someone with in dream
1225
01:25:56,720 --> 01:25:59,600
when dreams, because when we
dream we do have consciousness,
1226
01:25:59,600 --> 01:26:02,000
right.
So again, we should see over
1227
01:26:02,000 --> 01:26:05,520
there cognitive maps, but not
when we have deep sleep with no
1228
01:26:05,520 --> 01:26:07,960
consciousness.
And of course anesthesia is
1229
01:26:07,960 --> 01:26:12,200
well, but then we can do a finer
experiments than that.
1230
01:26:12,640 --> 01:26:19,760
You know, all those experiments
that use, you see in one eye,
1231
01:26:19,760 --> 01:26:24,000
you know one thing with the
other eye a different stimulus,
1232
01:26:24,760 --> 01:26:29,840
but you have consciousness only
for the stimulus from one eye
1233
01:26:29,840 --> 01:26:37,520
but not from the other.
So if we can do it, you know, in
1234
01:26:37,520 --> 01:26:43,360
a fine manner, let's say we can
distinguish and and, and, and we
1235
01:26:43,360 --> 01:26:49,320
will try to show how when you
conscious for, let's say a
1236
01:26:49,320 --> 01:26:53,680
house, but not for a face, then
the cognitive map that is
1237
01:26:53,680 --> 01:26:57,360
responsible for the house will
be activated, but not the
1238
01:26:57,360 --> 01:27:01,160
cognitive map of the house and
vice versa, right.
1239
01:27:01,160 --> 01:27:04,280
So all those kind of
experiments, we, this is what we
1240
01:27:04,280 --> 01:27:08,560
want to do.
Now in the consciousness and
1241
01:27:08,560 --> 01:27:10,080
cognition that I've been in
Cambridge.
1242
01:27:11,680 --> 01:27:14,120
And well, we've covered quite a
lot.
1243
01:27:14,160 --> 01:27:18,920
Is there any part of it that you
think I haven't touched on that
1244
01:27:18,920 --> 01:27:21,640
you think is important for
people to know regarding your
1245
01:27:21,640 --> 01:27:25,000
theory?
So one question that maybe
1246
01:27:25,000 --> 01:27:30,000
people can ask themselves is
more again, why it's not
1247
01:27:30,000 --> 01:27:33,960
reductive materialism.
I, I think this is something a
1248
01:27:33,960 --> 01:27:43,120
bit subtle and I have so through
time I tried to develop this
1249
01:27:43,120 --> 01:27:49,400
example to, to explain why it's
not reductive materialism with
1250
01:27:49,400 --> 01:27:52,760
the example of Einstein of what
we started with the equivalence
1251
01:27:52,760 --> 01:27:57,600
principle between gravity,
gravitation and acceleration.
1252
01:27:58,240 --> 01:28:02,000
So if we take this scenario and
think about it, I think it, it
1253
01:28:02,000 --> 01:28:06,480
can give us a very good idea of
what, why it's not reductive
1254
01:28:06,480 --> 01:28:09,600
materialism.
So over there inside the
1255
01:28:09,920 --> 01:28:15,880
accelerating spaceship, the
astronaut measures gravitational
1256
01:28:15,880 --> 01:28:21,360
force and the astronaut from the
outside measures acceleration,
1257
01:28:21,880 --> 01:28:24,160
right?
Very similar.
1258
01:28:24,160 --> 01:28:29,680
Like from the outside you will
measure only my neural patterns,
1259
01:28:29,680 --> 01:28:32,440
but from the inside I will
measure consciousness.
1260
01:28:32,800 --> 01:28:38,000
Now, reductive materialism is a
bit like to say that I want to
1261
01:28:38,320 --> 01:28:44,200
understand from the astronaut
outside that measure
1262
01:28:44,600 --> 01:28:51,320
acceleration, how to reach
gravitational force, you know,
1263
01:28:51,960 --> 01:28:55,360
but it's not the same.
It's, it's, you don't need to
1264
01:28:55,360 --> 01:28:57,800
reach from acceleration to
gravitational force.
1265
01:28:58,120 --> 01:29:02,080
It's just two different frames
of reference, right?
1266
01:29:02,200 --> 01:29:04,200
You just need to go to the
different frames of reference
1267
01:29:04,200 --> 01:29:06,720
and over there to understand
what is going on, what are the
1268
01:29:06,720 --> 01:29:12,160
measurements that are going on
inside the spaceship and, and,
1269
01:29:12,160 --> 01:29:18,520
and, and then you understand why
you see then manifests gravity,
1270
01:29:19,000 --> 01:29:22,280
right?
You don't need to go from from
1271
01:29:22,280 --> 01:29:25,560
acceleration, right?
So same thing is happening here.
1272
01:29:25,960 --> 01:29:31,440
You don't need to go from the
outside, from brain neural
1273
01:29:31,440 --> 01:29:33,800
patterns to explain
consciousness.
1274
01:29:33,800 --> 01:29:38,120
It will not work.
What you need to do is to check
1275
01:29:38,120 --> 01:29:41,800
the measurements from the
inside, inside the brain and why
1276
01:29:41,800 --> 01:29:44,400
they manifest consciousness.
And this is what we try to do
1277
01:29:44,400 --> 01:29:47,040
with emergence and all that
It's.
1278
01:29:47,480 --> 01:29:50,480
Almost like it's you don't have
to break it down into the sum of
1279
01:29:50,480 --> 01:29:52,960
its pots in order to fully
understand exactly what's going
1280
01:29:52,960 --> 01:29:54,960
on.
Which is why and also because
1281
01:29:55,040 --> 01:29:56,160
productive.
Yeah.
1282
01:29:58,080 --> 01:30:02,040
Yeah, but also it's because you
don't need to explain head by
1283
01:30:02,040 --> 01:30:06,520
the Pali by sorry by the tail.
You know you needed to describe
1284
01:30:06,520 --> 01:30:09,160
each of them separately?
Or what are the measurements
1285
01:30:09,160 --> 01:30:13,640
separately in each of the frames
of reference?
1286
01:30:13,640 --> 01:30:16,600
They're not merely reducing the
thing to the sum of its parts.
1287
01:30:17,320 --> 01:30:19,440
Exactly.
And you don't and you don't
1288
01:30:19,440 --> 01:30:22,240
reduce it from 1 frame to the
other.
1289
01:30:22,240 --> 01:30:25,440
This is wrong, right?
This is not the relativistic
1290
01:30:25,440 --> 01:30:27,280
approach.
You cannot reduce one to the
1291
01:30:27,280 --> 01:30:32,360
other.
They are both they they have the
1292
01:30:32,360 --> 01:30:36,760
same the equivalent, right?
So, so, so we cannot reduce one
1293
01:30:36,760 --> 01:30:38,400
to the other, right?
Yeah.
1294
01:30:38,520 --> 01:30:42,120
So this is the idea.
It's a it's a beautiful when you
1295
01:30:42,120 --> 01:30:44,880
finally grasp the concept, which
I still think there's a lot I
1296
01:30:44,880 --> 01:30:48,080
can learn about it and I haven't
yet maybe appreciate it.
1297
01:30:48,080 --> 01:30:50,320
I'm not yet appreciating it as
much as I probably should.
1298
01:30:51,560 --> 01:30:54,240
But the more I've read about it
and the more I've gotten into
1299
01:30:54,240 --> 01:30:56,560
it, the more I'm getting it.
And, and I think that even
1300
01:30:56,560 --> 01:30:58,760
having this conversation, it's,
it's, it's a lot more eye
1301
01:30:58,880 --> 01:31:02,440
opening for me.
And it's, and it's quite a nice
1302
01:31:02,680 --> 01:31:05,640
way to approach this in a very
simplistic manner as well.
1303
01:31:05,960 --> 01:31:09,120
So not only is it not, but it's
also simple once you get the,
1304
01:31:09,840 --> 01:31:12,560
once you get the gist of it,
any, anything else near near
1305
01:31:12,560 --> 01:31:16,120
that you think is important for
us to know before we close or
1306
01:31:16,120 --> 01:31:19,240
any final words about the theory
or where we're going from here?
1307
01:31:21,960 --> 01:31:24,640
That's it.
So now in the couple of years,
1308
01:31:24,720 --> 01:31:29,560
of course, I will publish the
new paper about you know what
1309
01:31:29,840 --> 01:31:35,160
the emergence from the
relativistic approach and a lot
1310
01:31:35,160 --> 01:31:40,880
of a lot of other interesting
phenomena like what is going on
1311
01:31:41,000 --> 01:31:43,920
in deep meditation.
You know, all those people that
1312
01:31:43,920 --> 01:31:48,520
say that they have only like
they are only observer, they
1313
01:31:48,520 --> 01:31:51,760
have no content, you know how to
explain that.
1314
01:31:52,200 --> 01:31:56,200
So all those interesting
phenomena, I will publish papers
1315
01:31:56,200 --> 01:32:02,280
about that and of course try to,
you know, to test the the
1316
01:32:02,280 --> 01:32:05,160
theory.
Hopefully it will prove the
1317
01:32:05,160 --> 01:32:08,920
theory even.
And yes, everybody needs to, if
1318
01:32:08,920 --> 01:32:12,160
they can support, support the
work and try and assist.
1319
01:32:12,160 --> 01:32:13,880
I'll put the link to it down
below as well.
1320
01:32:14,200 --> 01:32:17,920
So if, if anyone's excited about
your work and, and willing to
1321
01:32:17,920 --> 01:32:20,760
contribute, please do.
I, I think it's very
1322
01:32:20,760 --> 01:32:22,640
fascinating.
I never enjoyed it quite a bit.
1323
01:32:22,640 --> 01:32:24,480
And it's, it's, this has been
such a pleasure here.
1324
01:32:24,480 --> 01:32:28,480
Thanks so much for joining me.
Thank you very much, Tavan.
1325
01:32:28,480 --> 01:32:31,320
It was it was a wonderful
conversation.
1326
01:32:31,320 --> 01:32:32,000
Thank you.
Yeah.
1327
01:32:32,000 --> 01:32:34,840
And, and, and look, as things go
on, I, I look forward to many
1328
01:32:34,840 --> 01:32:36,800
more because it seems like
there's a lot that's still going
1329
01:32:36,800 --> 01:32:40,040
to be done in this, in this
niche field for you.
1330
01:32:40,160 --> 01:32:43,520
And it's very interdisciplinary.
So which means there's going to
1331
01:32:43,520 --> 01:32:45,160
be a lot for us to talk about in
the future.
1332
01:32:46,360 --> 01:32:49,080
For sure, for sure.
And for me it's even only the
1333
01:32:49,080 --> 01:32:55,160
first application of of
relativity for consciousness.
1334
01:32:55,360 --> 01:32:58,680
Later on I will try to take it
for different relays.
1335
01:32:58,680 --> 01:33:02,120
So a lot of work.
You can apply this to everything
1336
01:33:02,120 --> 01:33:05,760
to be honest.
This is, yeah, this is what I
1337
01:33:05,760 --> 01:33:09,280
will try to do until, until the
end, you know?
1338
01:33:09,480 --> 01:33:15,760
Proud I noticed this just as a
close off the let me just find
1339
01:33:15,760 --> 01:33:18,480
this I know on your in your
e-mail.
1340
01:33:18,480 --> 01:33:22,560
So when you you close your sign
off is a a quote by Einstein
1341
01:33:24,040 --> 01:33:26,600
which I really what was it
again?
1342
01:33:28,320 --> 01:33:29,960
Wow.
Well.
1343
01:33:30,560 --> 01:33:32,160
You try to find this I.
Will open it.
1344
01:33:32,160 --> 01:33:35,640
Let's open the.
It's a nice sign of Here We Go 1
1345
01:33:35,640 --> 01:33:39,800
cannot help but be in awe when
one contemplates the mysteries
1346
01:33:39,800 --> 01:33:43,680
of eternity, of life, of the
marvellous structure of reality.
1347
01:33:44,160 --> 01:33:47,920
And I think your work following
Einstein's, he would be very
1348
01:33:47,920 --> 01:33:51,080
proud.
Well, thank you very much.
1349
01:33:53,040 --> 01:33:53,800
Wow.
You you.
1350
01:33:53,920 --> 01:33:56,040
You almost made me cry, Lilo.
It's like.
1351
01:33:58,120 --> 01:33:59,280
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
1352
01:34:00,120 --> 01:34:03,600
At the end of the day,
consciousness is the question
1353
01:34:03,600 --> 01:34:05,680
is, is consciousness observer
dependent?
1354
01:34:06,600 --> 01:34:09,520
And that leads to the
relativistic theory of
1355
01:34:09,520 --> 01:34:12,160
consciousness.
If anyone has any further
1356
01:34:12,160 --> 01:34:14,160
information and wants to know
more, I'll put a link to your
1357
01:34:14,160 --> 01:34:16,520
paper as well.
Any final thoughts?
1358
01:34:16,520 --> 01:34:18,560
Anything else you want to say
that you think I might have
1359
01:34:18,560 --> 01:34:20,720
missed?
That's it.
1360
01:34:20,720 --> 01:34:24,880
I hope maybe I will try to do
some retreats in, in the future
1361
01:34:25,120 --> 01:34:27,440
about the mystery of
consciousness for the popular
1362
01:34:27,440 --> 01:34:29,640
audience.
I started now here in Israel in
1363
01:34:29,640 --> 01:34:32,040
Hebrew.
And if it will go well, I will
1364
01:34:32,040 --> 01:34:36,920
try to do it as well, you know,
back in Berkeley or Cambridge or
1365
01:34:36,920 --> 01:34:38,640
something like that.
So stay tuned.
1366
01:34:39,080 --> 01:34:43,040
My Facebook, I, I don't know, I,
I'm still in Facebook.
1367
01:34:43,920 --> 01:34:46,800
So just to have a look.
Next to your to your website and
1368
01:34:46,800 --> 01:34:49,400
socials as well.
Yeah, great.
1369
01:34:49,560 --> 01:34:50,680
And thank you very much.