Nov. 19, 2023
John Horgan: Can Science Explain Everything? Scientism & Philosophy's Role In Science
The player is loading ...

🧠Dive into the Depths of the Mind-Body Problem with John Horgan 📚 Welcome to our latest podcast episode, where we embark on an exploration of science & consciousness with John Horgan, a distinguished science writer, journalist, and author, known for his thought-provoking insights. 📰 📖 In this enlightening conversation, we delve into the complexities of consciousness, life's improbability, and the mysteries of science & enlightenment. Join us as we discuss the balance between being a conscious observer and an active participant in life. 🌌 🔍 What to Expect: (00:00) The Mind-Body Problems (04:12) The allure of science mysteries. (10:30) Philosophy's role in science. (15:20) Contemplating consciousness. (25:16) Determinism and free will. (30:15) Implications of denying free will. (38:10) Robert Sapolsky's challenge to free will. (46:00) Dennett on competence without comprehension. (58:25) The beauty of recognizing life's improbability. (1:06:40) Balancing truth with practicality. (1:15:40) Challenges in modern science. (1:25:02) The importance of humility in scientific claims. ============================= 🤝 Stay Connected With Us: 👉 Website: https://tevinnaidu.com/ 👉 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/drtevinnaidu 👉 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/drtevinnaidu/ 👉 Twitter: https://twitter.com/drtevinnaidu/ 👉 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/drtevinnaidu/ 📧 For Business Inquiries: info@tevinnaidu.com ============================= ABOUT MIND-BODY SOLUTION: Mind-Body Solution explores the nature of consciousness, reality, free will, morality, mental health, and more. This podcast presents enlightening discourse with the world’s leading experts in philosophy, physics, neuroscience, psychology, linguistics, AI, and beyond. It will change the way you think about the mind-body dichotomy by showing just how difficult — intellectually and practically — the mind-body problem is. Join Dr. Tevin Naidu on a quest to conquer the mind-body problem and take one step closer to the mind-body solution. Dr Tevin Naidu is a medical doctor, philosopher & ethicist. He attained his Bachelor of Medicine & Bachelor of Surgery degree from Stellenbosch University, & his Master of Philosophy degree Cum Laude from the University of Pretoria. His academic work focuses on theories of consciousness, computational psychiatry, phenomenological psychopathology, values-based practice, moral luck, addiction, & the philosophy & ethics of science, mind & mental health. ===================== Disclaimer: We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of watching any of our publications. You acknowledge that you use the information provided at your own risk. Do your research. Copyright Notice: This video and audio channel contain dialog, music, and images that are the property of Mind-Body Solution. You are authorised to share the link and channel, and embed this link in your website or others as long as a link back to this channel is provided. © Mind-Body Solution
1
00:00:10,240 --> 00:00:14,160
John, you wrote a wonderful book
called Mind Body Problems and I
2
00:00:14,160 --> 00:00:16,239
remember when I read it I
thought this is such a creative
3
00:00:16,239 --> 00:00:19,200
way to approach the infamous
mind body problem.
4
00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:23,280
So my first question for you is
what is your interpretation of
5
00:00:23,280 --> 00:00:27,040
the mind Body problem and how
did that inspire you to write
6
00:00:27,040 --> 00:00:30,160
the book?
Yeah, good question.
7
00:00:31,840 --> 00:00:36,840
My, my, my way of looking at the
mind body problem has evolved a
8
00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:44,600
lot over the decades.
I first started writing about it
9
00:00:45,400 --> 00:00:49,160
when I was writing about
consciousness in the early 90s.
10
00:00:49,200 --> 00:00:54,440
Consciousness.
The hard problem I was actually
11
00:00:54,800 --> 00:00:57,400
at.
A talk by David Chalmers in the
12
00:00:57,400 --> 00:01:01,240
early 1990s at this big
conference in in Tucson, AZ,
13
00:01:01,400 --> 00:01:05,040
where he used the phrase the
hard problem for the first time.
14
00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:07,920
And there weren't many people in
the audience.
15
00:01:07,960 --> 00:01:11,160
Chalmers was just this obscure
long haired philosopher from
16
00:01:11,160 --> 00:01:14,040
Australia.
But I remember the audience
17
00:01:14,040 --> 00:01:16,560
there is it was early morning
and people were kind of sleepy,
18
00:01:16,560 --> 00:01:19,600
but people perked up at that
phrase, the hard consciousness.
19
00:01:19,960 --> 00:01:22,360
I mean the hard problem.
And I wrote it down in my
20
00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:24,600
notebook.
I reported on this.
21
00:01:25,320 --> 00:01:28,680
This talk and other things that
happened at this meeting for
22
00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:34,160
Scientific American.
So my initial idea of the mind
23
00:01:34,160 --> 00:01:40,360
body problem was how does the
brain generate conscious states?
24
00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:45,240
These first person states that I
and you presumably also are
25
00:01:45,240 --> 00:01:49,200
having right now.
So I saw the mind body problem
26
00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:54,640
in pretty narrow terms.
And this is the way it had been
27
00:01:54,640 --> 00:01:58,800
defined by Francis Crick, this
guy named Christophe Koch, who
28
00:01:58,800 --> 00:02:03,600
is was Crick's collaborator in
trying to solve the the mind
29
00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:07,720
body problem.
Over time, my my view of the
30
00:02:07,720 --> 00:02:12,800
mind body problem became much
more expansive, and now I think
31
00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:20,120
of it as the question of what we
are, what we are as humans, and
32
00:02:20,120 --> 00:02:24,760
that encompasses.
Personal identity What am I?
33
00:02:25,680 --> 00:02:31,400
What kind of human being am I?
It it it encompasses the idea of
34
00:02:31,400 --> 00:02:35,280
collective identity.
What are humans in general?
35
00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:39,000
What have we always been?
What will we be in the future?
36
00:02:39,160 --> 00:02:43,480
I think it encompasses moral
questions, because if you're if
37
00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:47,360
we're talking about what we are,
we also, at least implicitly,
38
00:02:47,360 --> 00:02:52,040
are always talking about.
What we should be, what
39
00:02:52,160 --> 00:02:55,280
constitutes a good person?
What constitutes a good life?
40
00:02:55,840 --> 00:03:00,320
And we're also talking about
what we can be.
41
00:03:00,320 --> 00:03:02,920
And that's where science comes
in.
42
00:03:02,920 --> 00:03:07,640
To what extent can we alter what
we are through these different
43
00:03:07,640 --> 00:03:09,480
technologies?
Brain implants, genetic
44
00:03:09,480 --> 00:03:12,360
engineering, drugs, those sorts
of things.
45
00:03:12,360 --> 00:03:15,800
So now the mind body problem is
all these different
46
00:03:15,800 --> 00:03:19,640
interconnected questions.
They come down to the big
47
00:03:19,680 --> 00:03:23,120
primordial question.
What are we really?
48
00:03:30,910 --> 00:03:33,230
Sorry, Jonah, the connection
just stopped for a second there.
49
00:03:33,390 --> 00:03:36,030
Are you back?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I saw you.
50
00:03:36,150 --> 00:03:38,510
You just froze.
You're in South Africa, right?
51
00:03:38,710 --> 00:03:40,750
No.
So that's my fault because I
52
00:03:40,750 --> 00:03:43,910
just switched over to my to my
to another Internet connection.
53
00:03:44,910 --> 00:03:46,670
Oh, OK.
Sorry about that.
54
00:03:46,990 --> 00:03:48,910
Continue.
Yeah.
55
00:03:49,270 --> 00:03:51,150
Sorry.
Yes, I am South Africa, by the
56
00:03:51,150 --> 00:03:56,880
way.
Yeah, so my point was that the
57
00:03:56,880 --> 00:04:02,640
mind body problem I see now as
including the hard problem of
58
00:04:02,640 --> 00:04:06,160
consciousness, but all these
other sorts of questions too,
59
00:04:06,160 --> 00:04:12,040
about personal identity, about
collective collective identity,
60
00:04:12,040 --> 00:04:14,120
about how we should live our
lives.
61
00:04:14,120 --> 00:04:19,440
So it includes these sorts of
moral and and even political
62
00:04:19,800 --> 00:04:23,440
questions.
And it also includes questions
63
00:04:23,440 --> 00:04:28,800
about what we can be, to what
extent can we alter ourselves
64
00:04:29,240 --> 00:04:34,440
with technology, with with brain
implants and genetic engineering
65
00:04:34,440 --> 00:04:38,280
and and these sorts of things.
I remember when I spoke to
66
00:04:38,280 --> 00:04:41,360
Nicholas Humphrey, he he was the
one who told me about your book
67
00:04:41,360 --> 00:04:43,920
because I hadn't I I had not
seen it at the time.
68
00:04:43,920 --> 00:04:46,400
And when I read it, I found this
approach very fascinating
69
00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:49,000
because essentially what you're
talking about right now, how
70
00:04:49,000 --> 00:04:51,200
this incorporates so many
different ideas, personal
71
00:04:51,200 --> 00:04:56,120
identity, moral responsibility.
I mean you you approached it by
72
00:04:56,120 --> 00:04:59,040
looking at the philosophers or
scientists from their own
73
00:04:59,040 --> 00:05:01,560
journeys and their personal
journeys moving forward.
74
00:05:01,560 --> 00:05:03,000
So talk to me about that
process.
75
00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:10,040
What inspired them?
Well, I gradually began to
76
00:05:11,080 --> 00:05:16,400
arrive at this idea that I began
questioning the idea that there
77
00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:19,680
was.
A solution to the mind body
78
00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:25,040
problem, either as narrowly
defined as the the hard problem
79
00:05:25,040 --> 00:05:28,520
of consciousness or this more
expansive idea of the mind body
80
00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:31,480
problem, answering the question
of what we really are.
81
00:05:31,760 --> 00:05:38,200
How can it possibly be that one
answer can suffice for all of
82
00:05:38,200 --> 00:05:41,160
us?
Now you can look at human
83
00:05:41,160 --> 00:05:45,480
history in a way as the struggle
to find one answer.
84
00:05:46,160 --> 00:05:48,720
To this question of what we
really are, all religions
85
00:05:49,000 --> 00:05:53,720
purport to answer that question.
You've got non religious
86
00:05:53,800 --> 00:05:58,280
ideologies like Marxism.
That also is really kind of a
87
00:05:58,280 --> 00:06:01,440
response to to the mind body
problem.
88
00:06:01,440 --> 00:06:03,240
Marx is saying this is what we
are.
89
00:06:03,240 --> 00:06:06,520
We're these economic agents and
we they're we, we inhabit
90
00:06:06,520 --> 00:06:08,200
different classes and all this
sorts of.
91
00:06:08,880 --> 00:06:11,960
All this sort of stuff.
And this is how we should live
92
00:06:11,960 --> 00:06:14,680
our lives.
We should reform ourselves in in
93
00:06:15,200 --> 00:06:17,680
these various ways that Marx
spelled out.
94
00:06:17,960 --> 00:06:21,760
Then you've got these other
scientific theories like
95
00:06:21,760 --> 00:06:26,000
eugenics that also is this
implicit answer to the mind body
96
00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:28,960
problem.
Lots of theories when you get
97
00:06:29,040 --> 00:06:33,000
closer to the present, saying
that we're we're a bunch of
98
00:06:33,000 --> 00:06:36,440
algorithms, we're a collection
of genes.
99
00:06:37,640 --> 00:06:41,120
Richard Dawkins, the famous
biologist, defined us as just a
100
00:06:41,520 --> 00:06:44,120
a cluster of selfish genes
trying to get into the next
101
00:06:44,120 --> 00:06:47,080
generation.
That's an interesting idea.
102
00:06:47,760 --> 00:06:50,760
We're just a bunch of
neurotransmitters rattling
103
00:06:50,760 --> 00:06:58,360
around in in our skulls.
So the answers, the potential
104
00:06:58,360 --> 00:07:02,880
answers to the mind body problem
have have proliferated
105
00:07:02,880 --> 00:07:05,040
enormously.
And that.
106
00:07:05,600 --> 00:07:10,120
Especially makes me think that
no answer can suffice,
107
00:07:10,920 --> 00:07:14,320
especially since science keeps
evolving, philosophy keeps
108
00:07:14,320 --> 00:07:18,640
evolving and that means that
there will be answers proposed
109
00:07:18,640 --> 00:07:23,240
to this question 10/20/50 years
from now that nobody even
110
00:07:23,240 --> 00:07:29,480
anticipated.
Also, each individual is going
111
00:07:29,480 --> 00:07:34,600
to answer the mind body problem.
At different times in his or her
112
00:07:34,600 --> 00:07:39,360
life, in different ways, and I
personally, and I assume this
113
00:07:39,360 --> 00:07:42,280
happens with you too, I keep
changing my mind about what I
114
00:07:42,280 --> 00:07:45,920
really AM and what I should be
and what I want out of life.
115
00:07:47,480 --> 00:07:51,720
So to dramatize this idea, which
at first was very kind of blurry
116
00:07:51,720 --> 00:07:56,160
in my head, I decided to write a
book about.
117
00:07:57,000 --> 00:08:01,880
Mind body scholars, coming from
very different philosophical or
118
00:08:01,880 --> 00:08:07,200
scientific perspectives, who
actually had struggled with the
119
00:08:07,200 --> 00:08:09,560
mind body problem in a really
personal way.
120
00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:13,720
They had, they had, They weren't
sure about their own sexual
121
00:08:13,720 --> 00:08:17,520
identity.
They struggled with profound
122
00:08:17,760 --> 00:08:20,920
depression.
I interviewed this one
123
00:08:20,920 --> 00:08:24,600
philosopher who had a brain
tumor that dramatically changed
124
00:08:24,600 --> 00:08:26,640
his.
His personality.
125
00:08:26,640 --> 00:08:31,080
People struggling with severe
grief and as a result, changing
126
00:08:31,080 --> 00:08:36,640
their ideas about who they
really are and about what humans
127
00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:40,880
collectively should be.
So that was my that was my goal
128
00:08:40,880 --> 00:08:44,039
in writing this, in writing the
book, was to dramatize this
129
00:08:44,039 --> 00:08:48,760
suddenly pluralistic view I had
of the mind body problem.
130
00:08:49,240 --> 00:08:52,560
I think you're right, because
not only do I change my mind in
131
00:08:52,560 --> 00:08:55,320
general, but from starting this
podcast, I mean, obviously I
132
00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:57,480
call it Mind Body solution,
paying homage to the problem,
133
00:08:58,000 --> 00:09:00,800
but I don't necessarily believe
we'll find one.
134
00:09:01,240 --> 00:09:05,160
And my own perspective on the
problem in itself has changed
135
00:09:05,360 --> 00:09:07,080
dramatically since starting the
podcast.
136
00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:10,480
I mean, I came in with certain
biases and views and and I've
137
00:09:10,480 --> 00:09:13,520
noticed it just changed the more
someone's able to provide me a
138
00:09:13,640 --> 00:09:16,480
coherent counter arguments to
whatever I believe.
139
00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:19,400
And I find that very fascinating
because it shows just how
140
00:09:19,400 --> 00:09:21,040
difficult this problem actually
is.
141
00:09:22,360 --> 00:09:26,120
And it it's.
I mean, I understand why some
142
00:09:26,120 --> 00:09:33,560
people want to have the answer.
Life is puzzling and it's
143
00:09:33,760 --> 00:09:36,680
agonizing and it can be very,
very difficult.
144
00:09:37,040 --> 00:09:41,720
And we want to think that there
is a solution out there.
145
00:09:42,680 --> 00:09:47,400
We get it and and we and we
realize, ah, this is how I
146
00:09:47,400 --> 00:09:49,680
should live my life.
This is how we should all live
147
00:09:49,680 --> 00:09:54,280
our lives.
And there are lots of people out
148
00:09:54,280 --> 00:09:56,880
there saying that they have
discovered the answer and
149
00:09:56,880 --> 00:10:01,120
they're telling us we should
accept the same answer as as
150
00:10:01,120 --> 00:10:03,320
they do.
But that's such a cramped,
151
00:10:03,320 --> 00:10:07,920
narrow way of looking at life.
It's so much more exhilarating
152
00:10:07,920 --> 00:10:12,880
to me and also more of a
reflection of what reality
153
00:10:12,880 --> 00:10:17,480
actually is to to be open minded
and to say, well here's an
154
00:10:17,480 --> 00:10:21,760
interesting idea.
I'm going to explore this for a
155
00:10:21,760 --> 00:10:24,960
little while, but oh, look over
there.
156
00:10:24,960 --> 00:10:28,480
There's an interesting idea too.
This is something that happens
157
00:10:28,840 --> 00:10:32,320
when a person like you just
talks to other people and you
158
00:10:32,320 --> 00:10:37,720
read books and and you suddenly
see the whole issue in a in a
159
00:10:37,720 --> 00:10:40,320
different light.
That's a wonderful thing, but it
160
00:10:40,320 --> 00:10:47,040
just means you have to give up
this idea of reaching a final
161
00:10:47,040 --> 00:10:49,840
answer.
You have to give up the idea
162
00:10:49,840 --> 00:10:54,160
that there can be certainty when
we're trying to figure out who
163
00:10:54,160 --> 00:10:57,880
we really are.
I spoke to a philosopher named
164
00:10:58,240 --> 00:11:02,440
Francois.
He's French he's he's a camera.
165
00:11:02,480 --> 00:11:04,080
I'm not sure if I'm saying that
correctly surname.
166
00:11:04,080 --> 00:11:08,360
But anyway, he he's a strong
defendant of illusionism and I
167
00:11:08,360 --> 00:11:10,200
told him how my views shifted
over time.
168
00:11:10,200 --> 00:11:12,720
And and even though some
sometimes when I do chat to
169
00:11:12,720 --> 00:11:15,280
certain people, I do disagree
with the view fundamentally.
170
00:11:15,600 --> 00:11:18,920
But I'm able to sort of now at
this time in my life and this
171
00:11:18,920 --> 00:11:20,800
point in my life, I'm able to
create these almost virtual
172
00:11:20,800 --> 00:11:22,080
realities.
And that's what he said I'm
173
00:11:22,080 --> 00:11:25,080
doing is basically I'm creating
this virtual reality, going with
174
00:11:25,080 --> 00:11:27,400
the narrative and just having
the conversation.
175
00:11:27,720 --> 00:11:31,160
And I believe that's been so
vital to making this work
176
00:11:31,160 --> 00:11:35,000
because that way I'm open minded
to all the possibilities while
177
00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:39,440
still remaining a while still
maintaining a reasonable amount
178
00:11:39,440 --> 00:11:41,160
of scepticism.
Do you think that's a good way,
179
00:11:41,160 --> 00:11:44,320
as you from writing, as a
science journalist, someone who
180
00:11:44,320 --> 00:11:48,200
very much attacks a lot of
science from a sceptical manner,
181
00:11:48,200 --> 00:11:51,600
not necessarily anti science?
Well, we'll chat about that in
182
00:11:51,600 --> 00:11:54,520
more detail, but do you think
that's a great way to maintain
183
00:11:54,520 --> 00:11:59,720
an open mind?
Yeah, so I have this this old
184
00:11:59,720 --> 00:12:04,120
friend.
He used to teach history of
185
00:12:04,120 --> 00:12:06,880
science at my school's name is
Jim McClellan.
186
00:12:07,120 --> 00:12:09,960
He retired a few years ago but
we're we're still constantly in
187
00:12:09,960 --> 00:12:13,720
in in touch and he's an honest
to God postmodernist.
188
00:12:13,880 --> 00:12:16,920
So he thinks whenever you talk
about truth or knowledge you
189
00:12:16,920 --> 00:12:20,520
should put it in put those terms
in scare quotes.
190
00:12:21,440 --> 00:12:24,880
He says that all our theories
are best.
191
00:12:24,880 --> 00:12:28,520
Scientific knowledge is really
just a bunch of stories.
192
00:12:29,720 --> 00:12:31,560
And the stories.
Some stories are better than
193
00:12:31,560 --> 00:12:35,840
others, but you should never
mistake your any story for the
194
00:12:35,840 --> 00:12:40,640
final word on what's out there
or what's in here.
195
00:12:42,280 --> 00:12:48,320
And I completely reject
postmodernism as it applies to,
196
00:12:48,320 --> 00:12:50,240
I don't know, mapping out the
universe.
197
00:12:51,800 --> 00:12:56,360
I think we discover, we have
discovered lots of things.
198
00:12:57,840 --> 00:13:02,880
That are are true about the
universe from the existence of
199
00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:06,080
sub atomic particles like
electrons and protons to to
200
00:13:06,080 --> 00:13:10,480
elements galaxies out there
beyond the the Milky Way.
201
00:13:10,480 --> 00:13:13,120
Those aren't stories.
Those are real things about
202
00:13:13,800 --> 00:13:17,840
about the universe.
But when it comes to ourselves,
203
00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:23,280
when it comes to understanding.
What we are I think
204
00:13:23,280 --> 00:13:26,200
postmodernism is absolutely
appropriate.
205
00:13:26,200 --> 00:13:30,920
I think we should see
neuroscientific or evolutionary
206
00:13:30,920 --> 00:13:38,040
or computer science models of
the human mind as stories that
207
00:13:38,040 --> 00:13:42,440
can do things for us, that can
help us see ourselves in ways
208
00:13:42,440 --> 00:13:46,960
that are that are useful, that
might help us come up with
209
00:13:46,960 --> 00:13:49,920
better treatments for mental
illness that might be consoling
210
00:13:49,920 --> 00:13:54,200
to us.
That help us deal with death and
211
00:13:54,320 --> 00:14:00,240
the ephemerality of of life, but
that are always replaceable by
212
00:14:00,240 --> 00:14:04,040
better stories or just by
different stories in the future.
213
00:14:04,280 --> 00:14:05,560
It's almost like a useful
analogy.
214
00:14:05,640 --> 00:14:09,320
The same way religion was useful
to the people at the time and
215
00:14:09,800 --> 00:14:12,920
and it was it was thought to be
the truth for those people at
216
00:14:12,920 --> 00:14:14,560
the time.
It was very useful.
217
00:14:14,600 --> 00:14:18,240
I mean, you can still see a lot
of usage within it, and the same
218
00:14:18,240 --> 00:14:21,920
way descending applies for
Newtonian physics when when he
219
00:14:21,920 --> 00:14:25,560
came across telling people this
is how the motion of bodies work
220
00:14:26,000 --> 00:14:28,200
and then Einstein comes and
changed that along, but you
221
00:14:28,200 --> 00:14:29,840
realize that it's still very
useful.
222
00:14:31,160 --> 00:14:35,720
Yeah, and and usefulness can be
defined in lots, lots of
223
00:14:35,720 --> 00:14:40,920
different ways.
So there are some theories that
224
00:14:41,040 --> 00:14:44,440
have enormous practical
consequences.
225
00:14:44,440 --> 00:14:47,880
So.
Plain old Newtonian mechanics is
226
00:14:47,880 --> 00:14:51,680
enough to land a spaceship on
the moon, which is pretty
227
00:14:51,680 --> 00:14:57,680
impressive.
Nuclear physics allowed us to
228
00:14:57,680 --> 00:15:03,360
build hydrogen bombs, which have
altered history in ways that are
229
00:15:04,680 --> 00:15:07,520
horrible.
But still, that's an impressive
230
00:15:07,520 --> 00:15:13,360
sign.
That those theories of subatomic
231
00:15:13,360 --> 00:15:16,320
matter and energy are on to
something, That they're pretty
232
00:15:16,320 --> 00:15:19,520
close to grasping the actual
truth.
233
00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:24,120
But there are these less
tangible ways of saying that a
234
00:15:24,560 --> 00:15:30,040
theory works.
For example, I'm I'm interested
235
00:15:30,040 --> 00:15:33,600
in theories that say
consciousness is the basis of
236
00:15:33,600 --> 00:15:37,720
reality instead of matter.
I mean, there's this ancient
237
00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:43,560
debate about the primacy of
matter versus versus mind, and I
238
00:15:43,560 --> 00:15:45,440
haven't made-up my mind, which
is right.
239
00:15:45,440 --> 00:15:49,200
Maybe we can talk about that.
But the idea that everything is
240
00:15:49,200 --> 00:15:54,080
consciousness and that the
consciousness that you and I
241
00:15:54,080 --> 00:15:57,280
both possess right now, in some
sense, it's ever.
242
00:15:57,280 --> 00:16:01,920
It's never ending.
It's just going to merge in in
243
00:16:01,920 --> 00:16:04,920
with some kind of.
Greater collective consciousness
244
00:16:04,920 --> 00:16:08,200
when we're gone, I find that
very consoling.
245
00:16:08,880 --> 00:16:13,240
I don't necessarily believe it,
but I like to think about it now
246
00:16:13,240 --> 00:16:18,320
and then when I'm feeling a
little fragile and and mortal.
247
00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:22,200
So that is another way in which
a theory can be very powerful
248
00:16:22,200 --> 00:16:24,720
and very effective.
I was, yeah.
249
00:16:24,720 --> 00:16:25,680
I was going to ask you about
that.
250
00:16:25,680 --> 00:16:28,360
At this point in your life,
after chatting to all these
251
00:16:28,360 --> 00:16:30,920
philosophers and scientists,
where's your header?
252
00:16:30,920 --> 00:16:33,600
What is consciousness to you?
What do you believe it really
253
00:16:33,600 --> 00:16:35,160
is?
Is there a group you fall into
254
00:16:35,160 --> 00:16:36,840
at this point?
Do you consider yourself a pan
255
00:16:36,840 --> 00:16:38,520
psychist in that regard?
Or idealist?
256
00:16:38,880 --> 00:16:44,600
Or where are you?
No, I am, you said before I I'm,
257
00:16:45,800 --> 00:16:48,240
I'm a sceptic.
I I love ideas.
258
00:16:48,640 --> 00:16:50,920
I became a science journalist
because I love.
259
00:16:51,440 --> 00:16:56,400
I love watching science do it's
thing and coming up come up with
260
00:16:56,400 --> 00:16:58,600
these.
These different ideas about
261
00:16:58,600 --> 00:17:05,400
what's going on in the world and
I I've been reporting on mind
262
00:17:05,400 --> 00:17:09,560
body theories, theories of
consciousness for decades now.
263
00:17:10,040 --> 00:17:16,599
And I'll be honest the the more
I do it and I I right up to the
264
00:17:16,599 --> 00:17:20,880
present I've been, I've been
commenting on some developments
265
00:17:20,880 --> 00:17:25,760
in in consciousness studies just
recently just over the last
266
00:17:25,760 --> 00:17:30,200
couple of months.
The more I do this, the more I
267
00:17:30,200 --> 00:17:32,400
think nobody really knows what
they're talking about.
268
00:17:33,800 --> 00:17:39,120
The more I the more mysterious
the problem becomes, the more
269
00:17:39,120 --> 00:17:41,960
mysterious.
This experience I'm having right
270
00:17:41,960 --> 00:17:47,160
now of being this conscious
thing becomes absolutely
271
00:17:47,160 --> 00:17:54,200
baffling to me.
I think that when we look
272
00:17:54,200 --> 00:17:58,400
straight.
At our own existence, including
273
00:18:00,400 --> 00:18:05,320
the fact that we're conscious,
if we really saw it clearly, we
274
00:18:05,320 --> 00:18:10,440
should be absolutely dumbfounded
all the time.
275
00:18:11,240 --> 00:18:14,200
And we should realize that every
single theory, no matter how
276
00:18:14,200 --> 00:18:19,240
powerful, no matter how
seemingly effective, no matter
277
00:18:19,240 --> 00:18:23,760
the practical consequences that
it has, is absolutely
278
00:18:24,400 --> 00:18:28,000
inadequate.
And that includes panpsychism
279
00:18:28,000 --> 00:18:31,960
and idealism and materialism.
I don't even think we have the
280
00:18:31,960 --> 00:18:36,800
right language yet to solve
these problems, to even talk
281
00:18:36,800 --> 00:18:42,480
about them in a coherent way.
I think this is almost like the
282
00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:48,480
equivalent of physics in the
14th century, where you look
283
00:18:48,480 --> 00:18:52,520
back at how people were talking
about about matter and things
284
00:18:52,520 --> 00:18:55,520
moving around in space and you
think, wow, they were just.
285
00:18:56,720 --> 00:18:58,840
So deluded.
They really didn't know.
286
00:18:58,840 --> 00:19:01,600
I mean, they're making an honest
effort, but they really don't
287
00:19:01,600 --> 00:19:03,440
know what the hell they're
talking about.
288
00:19:03,720 --> 00:19:06,320
I think in the future we're
going to look back on this
289
00:19:06,320 --> 00:19:09,800
period with integrated
information theory and the
290
00:19:09,800 --> 00:19:13,160
global workspace theory and all
these different theories of
291
00:19:13,160 --> 00:19:16,800
mine, and we're going to go, Oh
my God, those those people
292
00:19:16,800 --> 00:19:18,720
actually believed in that shit
that time.
293
00:19:20,240 --> 00:19:24,160
I mean, I saw you wrote the that
paper on the brouhaha of the
294
00:19:24,160 --> 00:19:27,480
whole IIT dilemma.
What are your thoughts on that?
295
00:19:28,960 --> 00:19:30,240
Yeah, do you want to give some
thought?
296
00:19:30,320 --> 00:19:31,960
This is to the to the list of
viewers.
297
00:19:31,960 --> 00:19:35,960
Maybe you you can also do that.
Yeah, so Integrated Information
298
00:19:35,960 --> 00:19:42,240
Theory is this very serious
attempt to solve the hard
299
00:19:42,240 --> 00:19:44,720
problem of consciousness.
It's about 20 years old.
300
00:19:45,320 --> 00:19:49,680
It was introduced by this guy
named Giulio Tononi, who's got a
301
00:19:49,680 --> 00:19:51,720
fancy.
Pedigree.
302
00:19:51,720 --> 00:19:55,000
He was a graduate student under
this guy named Gerald Edelman, a
303
00:19:55,240 --> 00:19:59,480
Nobel Prize winner who also had
very ambitious ideas about
304
00:19:59,560 --> 00:20:01,640
solving the hard problem of
consciousness.
305
00:20:01,640 --> 00:20:08,320
So Tononi is a really serious
guy and and he proposed this
306
00:20:09,240 --> 00:20:14,560
mathematical theory of and the
and the the fact that it's it's
307
00:20:14,560 --> 00:20:18,760
mathematical impresses a lot of
people but it's a mathematical
308
00:20:18,760 --> 00:20:23,600
theory of consciousness.
That says consciousness arises
309
00:20:23,920 --> 00:20:29,880
out of any system that has parts
that interact in the certain way
310
00:20:29,880 --> 00:20:32,600
that you can mathematically
define.
311
00:20:33,600 --> 00:20:37,080
The interconnection of the
components is sometimes called
312
00:20:37,080 --> 00:20:42,320
the synergy of the system.
The mathematical quantity is
313
00:20:42,320 --> 00:20:46,480
called Phi, and there's this
little Greek symbol for for
314
00:20:46,480 --> 00:20:50,600
that.
It's really impenetrable.
315
00:20:50,600 --> 00:20:54,880
If you read the initial papers,
it's extremely dense.
316
00:20:55,320 --> 00:20:58,440
I went to a workshop in 2015
because I was trying to
317
00:20:58,440 --> 00:21:00,760
understand it.
The main reason I took it
318
00:21:00,760 --> 00:21:05,200
seriously was not only because
Tononi had proposed it, but
319
00:21:05,240 --> 00:21:09,400
because Christophe Koch, who I
mentioned before, one of the
320
00:21:09,400 --> 00:21:13,000
world's leading neuroscientists,
embraced it about, I don't know,
321
00:21:13,000 --> 00:21:16,280
15 years ago or so and said,
yeah, this is it, man.
322
00:21:16,280 --> 00:21:19,560
This is, this is the best theory
of consciousness we've got.
323
00:21:19,840 --> 00:21:23,160
So these very serious people
were espousing this theory.
324
00:21:23,160 --> 00:21:27,880
They got lots of other folks,
graduate students, postdocs,
325
00:21:27,920 --> 00:21:30,240
other theorists to jump on the
bandwagon.
326
00:21:30,800 --> 00:21:33,680
And the New York Times wrote big
stories about it.
327
00:21:33,960 --> 00:21:36,120
I wrote about it for Scientific
American.
328
00:21:36,120 --> 00:21:39,440
A lot of people were saying I
was skeptical of my sake from
329
00:21:39,440 --> 00:21:43,800
the beginning, but a lot of
people were saying, yeah, man,
330
00:21:43,800 --> 00:21:46,840
this is it.
Maybe this is at least if it's
331
00:21:46,840 --> 00:21:49,840
not the final theory of
consciousness, it's a stepping
332
00:21:49,840 --> 00:21:54,280
stone.
But the theory is was ridiculous
333
00:21:54,280 --> 00:21:57,880
from the start.
It it I mean it.
334
00:21:57,880 --> 00:22:00,560
Basically.
It basically says what
335
00:22:00,560 --> 00:22:07,320
Christophe KOK told me was that
the synergy that's defined by
336
00:22:07,320 --> 00:22:13,000
the theory can occur in a single
proton, which consists of three
337
00:22:13,000 --> 00:22:16,040
interacting quarks that are, if
you can think of them as
338
00:22:16,040 --> 00:22:18,720
exchanging information.
So there's a little spark of
339
00:22:18,720 --> 00:22:20,880
consciousness in a single
protein.
340
00:22:21,040 --> 00:22:23,200
That means that consciousness is
everywhere.
341
00:22:23,560 --> 00:22:29,360
So that's panpsychism.
I went to this workshop at NYU
342
00:22:29,360 --> 00:22:33,000
on on Integrated Information
Theory as I mentioned in 2015,
343
00:22:33,280 --> 00:22:36,560
and there was actually a bit a
debate at one point over whether
344
00:22:36,560 --> 00:22:44,000
dark energy is conscious.
Whether I integrated information
345
00:22:44,000 --> 00:22:49,720
theory implies that there was
this this brilliant computer
346
00:22:49,720 --> 00:22:55,720
scientist named Scott Aronson
who is at the meeting and mainly
347
00:22:55,720 --> 00:22:57,920
the meeting was sort of
cheerleading for for this
348
00:22:57,920 --> 00:23:01,160
theory.
Scott Aronson just drove a stake
349
00:23:01,160 --> 00:23:05,040
through the theory's heart by
pointing out that according to
350
00:23:05,040 --> 00:23:13,720
the mathematical definition of
the theory, A ACD player should
351
00:23:13,720 --> 00:23:15,680
be more conscious than a human
being.
352
00:23:16,640 --> 00:23:21,760
So he was just pointing out all
these absurd conclusions of of
353
00:23:21,760 --> 00:23:25,400
the theory.
But it's it's persisted.
354
00:23:25,880 --> 00:23:30,760
And because it's exciting and
it's ambitious and it's
355
00:23:30,760 --> 00:23:36,080
mathematical and all that.
But there's some people who've
356
00:23:36,080 --> 00:23:39,120
always been skeptical, not just
as science journalists like me,
357
00:23:39,120 --> 00:23:41,920
but some other serious
theorists, scientists and
358
00:23:41,920 --> 00:23:47,280
philosophers and and just
recently, I guess it was last
359
00:23:47,280 --> 00:23:49,680
month, a bunch of them got
together.
360
00:23:49,680 --> 00:23:52,080
More than 100 people signed this
letter, and this is including
361
00:23:52,080 --> 00:23:56,720
some real big shots like Daniel
Dennett and Joe Ledoux was a
362
00:23:56,720 --> 00:24:01,920
neuroscientist at NYU.
And they said we're just sick of
363
00:24:01,920 --> 00:24:04,720
basically, I'm paraphrasing,
we're sick of all the attention
364
00:24:04,720 --> 00:24:07,360
this theory has been getting
because this theory is
365
00:24:07,360 --> 00:24:12,040
pseudoscience.
And and so I wrote a piece about
366
00:24:12,040 --> 00:24:16,920
that for my blog and 'cause I
thought it was really funny.
367
00:24:17,440 --> 00:24:21,920
And I, you know, my reaction was
kind of, yeah, of course it's
368
00:24:22,280 --> 00:24:24,920
pseudoscience.
All theories of consciousness at
369
00:24:24,920 --> 00:24:28,840
this point are pseudoscience,
and that none of them can
370
00:24:28,840 --> 00:24:30,640
really.
None of them is rigorously
371
00:24:30,640 --> 00:24:36,080
enough defined so that they can
be falsified.
372
00:24:36,840 --> 00:24:40,280
So that was that was my column.
Basically I'm saying yeah,
373
00:24:40,360 --> 00:24:42,240
integrated information theory,
pseudoscience.
374
00:24:42,480 --> 00:24:45,040
But then here look at some of
these other theories that are
375
00:24:45,040 --> 00:24:48,120
also pseudoscience.
And then I went on to say that
376
00:24:48,120 --> 00:24:53,680
their theories in physics and I
just started shooting wildly in
377
00:24:53,680 --> 00:24:58,120
all directions, pointing out
that science is is riddled with
378
00:24:58,120 --> 00:25:02,960
pseudoscience if you really want
to be mean about it.
379
00:25:03,240 --> 00:25:06,240
So why single out integrated
information theory?
380
00:25:06,840 --> 00:25:09,840
So anyway, yeah, that's the back
story of that controversy.
381
00:25:10,360 --> 00:25:13,400
I think it's it's amazing how
much controversy that's
382
00:25:13,560 --> 00:25:17,960
initiated because it was such a
big topic of conversation that
383
00:25:17,960 --> 00:25:20,280
some neuroscientists and
philosophers who came out made a
384
00:25:20,280 --> 00:25:23,080
statement, even started
retracting these statements
385
00:25:23,080 --> 00:25:26,840
because it was so intense.
I mean, that's probably a great
386
00:25:26,840 --> 00:25:30,640
thing in the sense that finally
consciousness research at least
387
00:25:31,600 --> 00:25:33,560
is getting the attention it
deserves.
388
00:25:33,560 --> 00:25:36,960
But then it also reminds people
of the fact that there was a
389
00:25:36,960 --> 00:25:39,000
time where this happened and it
keeps going through these sort
390
00:25:39,000 --> 00:25:41,800
of influxes of like, people are
interested, people lose
391
00:25:41,800 --> 00:25:44,320
interest, people are interested,
people lose interest.
392
00:25:44,640 --> 00:25:48,280
Do you see that as a pattern
lately or do you think it's
393
00:25:48,280 --> 00:25:52,800
finally the recognition phase in
reality that it deserves?
394
00:25:53,920 --> 00:25:58,720
I I think I have the and.
It's not even that important and
395
00:25:58,720 --> 00:26:00,840
we should focus on more
important science.
396
00:26:01,880 --> 00:26:05,040
Well, or just more important
things out there in the world.
397
00:26:05,320 --> 00:26:11,320
I I think I've got, I've got
sort of a jaded view.
398
00:26:11,360 --> 00:26:14,280
You know, I've been writing
about science for 40 years now
399
00:26:14,280 --> 00:26:17,320
and I've seen seen a lot of fads
come and go.
400
00:26:17,320 --> 00:26:22,160
I've seen these boom bust cycles
and and and all sorts of
401
00:26:23,080 --> 00:26:26,320
different fields and it makes
me, I I'm, you know, what I had
402
00:26:26,320 --> 00:26:30,120
try to guard against is becoming
so jaded that any new idea that
403
00:26:30,120 --> 00:26:34,200
comes up, I go, that's bullshit.
Come on, nobody's going to
404
00:26:34,200 --> 00:26:37,800
believe that because sometimes
new ideas do come along that are
405
00:26:37,800 --> 00:26:42,960
really exciting and and some of
those ideas might be kind of
406
00:26:42,960 --> 00:26:44,920
bullshitty.
They might be pseudo scientific
407
00:26:44,920 --> 00:26:52,640
in one sense and still really
exciting, still there, they're
408
00:26:52,640 --> 00:26:56,200
interesting and they give you a
new way of looking at the world.
409
00:26:57,240 --> 00:26:59,920
I think that's true of
integrated information theory.
410
00:27:00,840 --> 00:27:04,960
This theory actually has made me
think really hard.
411
00:27:04,960 --> 00:27:09,160
Just trying to figure out why
it's wrong why it it's not
412
00:27:09,160 --> 00:27:15,320
really a serious theory makes me
think about the hard problem and
413
00:27:15,360 --> 00:27:20,120
and new ways and focus on it
more intently and this happens
414
00:27:20,120 --> 00:27:25,520
throughout science.
So in in the book that my first
415
00:27:25,520 --> 00:27:28,120
book, which is the book that I'm
best known for in the end of
416
00:27:28,120 --> 00:27:34,120
science, I I coined this term
ironic science to describe
417
00:27:34,120 --> 00:27:41,520
science that is so speculative
that it can never be confirmed.
418
00:27:41,520 --> 00:27:45,200
You can never really get
evidence that it's true.
419
00:27:46,160 --> 00:27:51,720
And I as as an example of that,
I I cited string theory, super
420
00:27:51,720 --> 00:27:56,200
string theory, which is this
this unified theory of matter
421
00:27:56,200 --> 00:28:00,000
and energy that's been kicking
around for more than 40 years
422
00:28:00,000 --> 00:28:03,480
now was really popular.
Now it's kind of declining.
423
00:28:03,600 --> 00:28:06,600
The problem with it from the
start was that it predicts
424
00:28:06,600 --> 00:28:10,760
things that can't be accessed by
any experiment.
425
00:28:12,400 --> 00:28:14,560
But what an amazing theory it
is.
426
00:28:14,960 --> 00:28:18,240
So from the start I thought,
God, I don't see this going
427
00:28:18,240 --> 00:28:22,600
anywhere, but holy cow, little
strings wriggling in 11
428
00:28:22,600 --> 00:28:27,400
dimensions give rise to our four
dimensional space-time.
429
00:28:28,920 --> 00:28:33,000
That's really cool.
The same way with multiverse
430
00:28:33,000 --> 00:28:36,120
theories, which also are an
implication of string theory and
431
00:28:36,600 --> 00:28:41,040
the many worlds interpretation
of of quantum mechanics.
432
00:28:41,920 --> 00:28:46,080
Other universes in addition to
our own that never can be
433
00:28:46,080 --> 00:28:48,440
accessed experimentally.
Come on.
434
00:28:48,440 --> 00:28:55,440
But wow, what an idea.
It's mind blowing at the same
435
00:28:55,440 --> 00:29:00,400
time as I'm like pointing out
all the flaws with it.
436
00:29:00,600 --> 00:29:06,560
So I've always had this
ambivalence about about, I don't
437
00:29:06,560 --> 00:29:09,480
know what you might call
pseudoscience and kind of
438
00:29:09,480 --> 00:29:13,560
bullshit science, ironic
science, to use the term that I
439
00:29:13,560 --> 00:29:16,880
coined.
But in a way, some of that
440
00:29:16,880 --> 00:29:22,560
science is the most fun to write
about because it's wild.
441
00:29:22,560 --> 00:29:26,200
It's ambitious, it's
imaginative, it's scientists
442
00:29:26,200 --> 00:29:31,400
going beyond the bounds of
what's respectable and making up
443
00:29:31,400 --> 00:29:34,840
some really crazy shit and
saying maybe the world is this
444
00:29:34,840 --> 00:29:39,200
way and you go, yeah, well,
probably not, but yeah, that's
445
00:29:39,200 --> 00:29:42,400
really cool.
Do you think that people often
446
00:29:42,400 --> 00:29:47,800
misinterpret your scepticism as
not not anti scientism, but
447
00:29:47,800 --> 00:29:52,360
almost a version of wouldn't
even say pseudoscience?
448
00:29:52,360 --> 00:29:54,560
But I'm I'm sure you get what
I'm trying to say, but people do
449
00:29:54,560 --> 00:29:58,000
put you in this category that.
Do you think you deserve that?
450
00:29:59,160 --> 00:30:04,760
Yeah, I listen, I've, I've taken
a lot of heat and I I don't
451
00:30:04,760 --> 00:30:10,160
really, it doesn't bother me
that much because I'm out there.
452
00:30:10,720 --> 00:30:14,640
I'm out there taking shots at
other people's ideas.
453
00:30:14,640 --> 00:30:16,600
I've said some really mean
things about different
454
00:30:16,600 --> 00:30:21,280
scientists and about different
theories over the years.
455
00:30:21,280 --> 00:30:29,280
I could be very mocking and and
dismissive and I'll use all my
456
00:30:29,280 --> 00:30:33,040
rhetorical tricks to try to
puncture different theories.
457
00:30:33,040 --> 00:30:38,000
And so people accuse me of being
anti science or or pseudo
458
00:30:38,160 --> 00:30:43,480
scientific or say you know, a
lot of people just say who
459
00:30:43,480 --> 00:30:46,080
listens to John Oregon, He's
just a science writer.
460
00:30:46,080 --> 00:30:49,960
He only has a degree in
literature and journalism.
461
00:30:49,960 --> 00:30:53,760
He doesn't know what the hell
he's talking about and you know
462
00:30:53,760 --> 00:31:00,240
go yeah I guess that's true.
I mean I you just like I just
463
00:31:00,240 --> 00:31:02,400
look at my track record.
I think I've got a pretty good
464
00:31:02,400 --> 00:31:06,760
track record and and and saying
that certain theories are are
465
00:31:06,760 --> 00:31:08,880
dead ends and they're not going
to go anywhere.
466
00:31:08,880 --> 00:31:11,760
Finally people are starting to
accept that when it comes to
467
00:31:12,200 --> 00:31:16,160
string theory and multiverse
theories and and things like
468
00:31:16,160 --> 00:31:19,840
that.
So I'm pretty thick skinned.
469
00:31:20,160 --> 00:31:25,560
I what what I'm what makes me
happy is that people still
470
00:31:26,400 --> 00:31:28,840
serious philosophers and
scientists still want to talk to
471
00:31:28,840 --> 00:31:31,000
me.
They still want to persuade me
472
00:31:31,000 --> 00:31:36,000
that their theory is yeah.
Morgan you've like been trashing
473
00:31:36,000 --> 00:31:38,080
and everything in this field for
decades now.
474
00:31:38,080 --> 00:31:40,400
But I've got a theory that I
think you're really going to
475
00:31:40,400 --> 00:31:41,320
like.
It's really cool.
476
00:31:41,320 --> 00:31:44,280
And I'm like OK bring it on man.
Let me let me check this out.
477
00:31:44,280 --> 00:31:46,240
Let me see what you got.
And.
478
00:31:46,760 --> 00:31:48,400
In that sense, you're almost
like the girl who's playing hard
479
00:31:48,400 --> 00:31:50,680
to get for them.
They're still trying to win you
480
00:31:50,680 --> 00:31:53,400
over there.
They've got this deepest and
481
00:31:53,920 --> 00:31:57,160
psychological urge to please you
at this point.
482
00:31:58,480 --> 00:32:03,520
I think that's part of it.
And but the fact is I the best
483
00:32:03,520 --> 00:32:07,400
part of this job is feeling like
I'm part of this conversation
484
00:32:08,080 --> 00:32:13,920
that goes back actually
thousands of years about what is
485
00:32:13,920 --> 00:32:17,040
this like?
What's going on here?
486
00:32:17,280 --> 00:32:18,480
What am I?
What are you?
487
00:32:19,000 --> 00:32:22,040
What is existence?
And there are all these smart
488
00:32:22,040 --> 00:32:25,160
people out there trying to
figure it out, people who know a
489
00:32:25,160 --> 00:32:29,120
lot more than I do.
And and then I'm, I'm listening
490
00:32:29,120 --> 00:32:32,880
to what they have to say and I
have reactions to it.
491
00:32:33,120 --> 00:32:35,720
And some of them say, oh, shut
up, nobody cares what you think.
492
00:32:35,840 --> 00:32:40,160
And others say, oh, OK, yeah, I
think you might have a point
493
00:32:40,160 --> 00:32:42,440
there.
But the But what's cool for me
494
00:32:42,440 --> 00:32:46,880
is that I am part of this
conversation and that I picked
495
00:32:46,880 --> 00:32:49,280
the right job.
Science journalism turned out to
496
00:32:49,280 --> 00:32:52,600
be the I'm I'm kind of a misfit,
but science journalism turned
497
00:32:52,600 --> 00:32:55,160
out to be the perfect career for
me.
498
00:32:56,080 --> 00:32:58,520
I mean, in that regard, I
completely empathize with you
499
00:32:58,520 --> 00:33:01,600
because starting this podcast,
I've been able to chat to some
500
00:33:01,600 --> 00:33:03,640
of my heroes.
I mean, it's been it's been such
501
00:33:03,640 --> 00:33:08,000
an amazing journey for me and
even though I feel like I'm not
502
00:33:08,000 --> 00:33:10,560
bringing much to the table, it's
still so great to be.
503
00:33:11,120 --> 00:33:13,960
In in such great company, I mean
you guys have done so much,
504
00:33:13,960 --> 00:33:15,080
you've written so much about
this.
505
00:33:15,080 --> 00:33:17,440
So even just chatting to you
guys, it's it's quite surreal
506
00:33:17,440 --> 00:33:20,520
sometimes.
Yeah, it's.
507
00:33:20,640 --> 00:33:26,560
And to me, you know, I described
before how I think if you see
508
00:33:26,560 --> 00:33:30,400
things, if you see reality
clearly you're like, what the
509
00:33:30,440 --> 00:33:32,040
hell.
Your eyes are bugging out, your
510
00:33:32,040 --> 00:33:37,160
mouth is dropping open.
You're just in a state of of awe
511
00:33:37,160 --> 00:33:42,760
and wonderment and confusion,
and it's kind of a mystical
512
00:33:42,760 --> 00:33:44,040
state.
This happens to me when I'm
513
00:33:44,040 --> 00:33:49,200
tripping too, and talking to
other people about their
514
00:33:49,200 --> 00:33:53,200
theories often puts me in that
state, swapping ideas with
515
00:33:53,200 --> 00:33:58,720
Christophe Koch about about
integrated information theory
516
00:33:59,040 --> 00:34:02,080
and the hard problem and his
dark energy conscious.
517
00:34:02,080 --> 00:34:09,440
And I'm like, yeah, man, it's
everything is is so God damn
518
00:34:09,440 --> 00:34:14,120
weird.
That's that's one of the joys of
519
00:34:14,280 --> 00:34:18,239
of, of this whole process of
science journalism.
520
00:34:18,760 --> 00:34:21,840
Yeah, I mean the universe in
itself, The story of the
521
00:34:21,840 --> 00:34:25,320
universe is quite trippy.
When when you actually try and
522
00:34:25,320 --> 00:34:27,400
understand it, it is.
It's one of those things where I
523
00:34:27,400 --> 00:34:30,400
often tell people you don't need
religion to have a a truly awe
524
00:34:30,400 --> 00:34:34,560
inspiring religious experience.
With science you can just trying
525
00:34:34,560 --> 00:34:36,639
to understand the well, not even
just with science, but I mean
526
00:34:36,639 --> 00:34:40,880
with understanding the universe.
It's a yeah, it's quite trippy.
527
00:34:42,000 --> 00:34:49,320
I So one thing that's a little
distressing to me is so I I
528
00:34:49,320 --> 00:34:52,080
teach college.
I I teach at an engineering
529
00:34:52,080 --> 00:34:55,440
school, I live in Hoboken, and I
teach at a school called Stevens
530
00:34:55,440 --> 00:34:59,440
Institute of Technology.
I teach freshman humanities
531
00:34:59,440 --> 00:35:02,160
classes.
I teach a seminar in science
532
00:35:02,160 --> 00:35:05,280
writing.
I teach a class on on science
533
00:35:05,280 --> 00:35:07,160
and war.
I wrote I'm interested in war,
534
00:35:07,160 --> 00:35:11,840
and I wrote a book about that.
And I sometimes try to get my
535
00:35:11,880 --> 00:35:14,280
students to care about the
things I care about.
536
00:35:14,600 --> 00:35:20,240
And so I I might say, you know
maybe I saw some images from the
537
00:35:20,240 --> 00:35:24,160
James Webb telescope and I'm
like yeah wow those those
538
00:35:24,160 --> 00:35:29,200
pictures of those galaxies way
back in time or or messing up
539
00:35:29,200 --> 00:35:33,200
the cosmologists, they they the
they don't know what to make of
540
00:35:33,200 --> 00:35:36,680
these galaxies.
It seems to have formed before
541
00:35:36,680 --> 00:35:39,320
The Big Bang theory says they
should have formed.
542
00:35:39,600 --> 00:35:41,920
And I kind of looking at my
students and some look
543
00:35:41,960 --> 00:35:44,640
interested and most of them are
just kind of gone.
544
00:35:45,320 --> 00:35:49,000
And I say, I did this just like
within the last couple weeks.
545
00:35:49,000 --> 00:35:52,240
I say who cares about where the
universe came from.
546
00:35:52,760 --> 00:35:55,960
And they're all kind of looking
at each other and maybe a couple
547
00:35:55,960 --> 00:35:59,200
of hands go go up.
They don't really care about
548
00:35:59,200 --> 00:36:03,400
this stuff where the I'm like,
are you crazy?
549
00:36:03,400 --> 00:36:04,840
How could you not care about
that?
550
00:36:09,880 --> 00:36:15,280
And I and then I try to tell
them about what we know about
551
00:36:15,280 --> 00:36:18,480
the universe and how one of the
most amazing discoveries of all
552
00:36:18,480 --> 00:36:25,680
time, because it's
comprehensible is the idea that
553
00:36:25,680 --> 00:36:29,760
the universe is expanding and
probably had this beginning
554
00:36:29,760 --> 00:36:34,280
about when we've calculated it
to be about 14 billion years
555
00:36:34,280 --> 00:36:36,320
ago.
Why do we believe that?
556
00:36:36,320 --> 00:36:40,360
So I go through the redshift
data and the abundances of
557
00:36:40,360 --> 00:36:46,640
elements and the the the cosmic
afterglow, microwave afterglow
558
00:36:46,640 --> 00:36:50,080
of the universe and I tell them
all that and some of them are
559
00:36:50,080 --> 00:36:52,200
like, yeah, that is kind of
cool.
560
00:36:54,000 --> 00:36:59,480
And so that's another thing I
try to do in my own writing, not
561
00:36:59,480 --> 00:37:05,520
only to just kind of dump on
theories that I think are a
562
00:37:05,520 --> 00:37:09,360
little overly ambitious, aren't
that well supported, but to to
563
00:37:10,160 --> 00:37:13,720
talk about what we do know and
what is really well supported,
564
00:37:13,720 --> 00:37:17,640
like the basic Big Bang Theory.
And I present the evidence.
565
00:37:17,640 --> 00:37:22,080
I just remind people of how well
supported that is and try to get
566
00:37:22,080 --> 00:37:25,560
them to realize how incredible
that is.
567
00:37:25,560 --> 00:37:30,400
The universe had a beginning.
Wow, think of the implications
568
00:37:30,400 --> 00:37:32,760
of that.
The Big Bang theory was rejected
569
00:37:32,760 --> 00:37:36,320
for a long time by a lot of
physicists, astronomers,
570
00:37:36,840 --> 00:37:40,120
scientists in general because it
was seen as being too religious.
571
00:37:40,520 --> 00:37:44,160
It had too much in common with
creation stories coming from the
572
00:37:44,160 --> 00:37:46,920
Bible and and other sacred
texts.
573
00:37:47,280 --> 00:37:51,000
But hey, guess what?
The Big Bang theory seems real.
574
00:37:51,200 --> 00:37:55,320
This is 1 area where I don't my
old friend Jim McClellan, the
575
00:37:55,320 --> 00:37:57,960
postmodernist.
He thinks that The Big Bang
576
00:37:57,960 --> 00:38:01,000
theory is just another story.
I just wrote a piece recently
577
00:38:01,000 --> 00:38:04,040
saying The Big Bang theory is
true.
578
00:38:04,320 --> 00:38:08,080
Deal with it, because the
evidence for it is overwhelming.
579
00:38:08,840 --> 00:38:10,600
I think, well, that's also one
of my favorite stories.
580
00:38:10,600 --> 00:38:13,240
I remember the first time going
through that figuring out, I
581
00:38:13,240 --> 00:38:16,240
mean the guys I I think there
was it was birds.
582
00:38:16,960 --> 00:38:18,800
They thought it was, they
thought birds were making a
583
00:38:18,800 --> 00:38:20,880
noise and they're trying to
eliminate the sound.
584
00:38:20,880 --> 00:38:23,360
And and then slowly Hubble comes
in and shows you that the
585
00:38:23,360 --> 00:38:25,360
universe it was.
It's one of those awe inspiring
586
00:38:25,360 --> 00:38:26,640
stories.
It's kind of like this.
587
00:38:26,800 --> 00:38:30,080
It's such a logical jump to
think, OK, if it's moving this
588
00:38:30,080 --> 00:38:32,920
way, let's just go backward.
And sort of figure out what
589
00:38:32,920 --> 00:38:35,040
would happen.
I mean, that's such a good thing
590
00:38:35,040 --> 00:38:38,200
to think about.
Do you think it's like, yeah,
591
00:38:38,240 --> 00:38:40,240
well, things where it's just
it's incredible.
592
00:38:40,240 --> 00:38:43,040
It's one of those things.
It's so obvious and yet it's so
593
00:38:43,040 --> 00:38:45,720
epic at the same time.
Yeah.
594
00:38:45,920 --> 00:38:49,800
And well, another thing that's
amazing about the whole story of
595
00:38:49,800 --> 00:38:54,600
The Big Bang is that if you go
back just like 100 years ago, I
596
00:38:54,600 --> 00:38:56,240
mean that's a blink of the an
eye.
597
00:38:58,760 --> 00:39:02,880
Most astronomers, physicists,
people who thought about the
598
00:39:02,880 --> 00:39:06,560
structure of the universe at
all, just assume that the
599
00:39:06,560 --> 00:39:08,440
universe consists of the Milky
Way.
600
00:39:08,440 --> 00:39:11,040
All these stars that that we can
see at night.
601
00:39:11,040 --> 00:39:14,640
We're in this big.
Our sun is in this big swirl of
602
00:39:14,640 --> 00:39:16,800
stars.
There were these little fuzzy
603
00:39:16,800 --> 00:39:21,520
patches in the sky that some
people going back to Immanuel
604
00:39:21,520 --> 00:39:26,800
Kant, the great Austrian
philosopher thought might be
605
00:39:26,920 --> 00:39:29,560
other island universes like the
Milky Way.
606
00:39:29,920 --> 00:39:33,760
But we couldn't be sure until
then.
607
00:39:33,760 --> 00:39:37,840
Telescopes in the 1920s got big
enough so they could look at
608
00:39:37,840 --> 00:39:41,640
those little tiny fuzzy patches
and see individual stars in
609
00:39:41,640 --> 00:39:44,400
them.
And they realized those are
610
00:39:44,760 --> 00:39:50,400
other galaxies like the Milky
Way, really far away.
611
00:39:51,200 --> 00:39:54,680
So even before we discovered the
redshift which indicated the
612
00:39:54,680 --> 00:39:58,880
expansion, all of a sudden the
universe became exponentially
613
00:39:58,880 --> 00:40:04,480
bigger.
The boundaries of our world just
614
00:40:05,160 --> 00:40:09,240
flew out.
So that and that just just 100
615
00:40:09,240 --> 00:40:10,240
years ago, it's.
It's.
616
00:40:11,280 --> 00:40:15,360
It's and the story I remember,
it was, I think Hubble just
617
00:40:15,360 --> 00:40:18,160
decided to leave the telescope
placed in that spot.
618
00:40:18,480 --> 00:40:20,880
It wasn't really an active
decision, it was more one of
619
00:40:20,880 --> 00:40:22,320
those things.
That's where the ultra deep feel
620
00:40:22,320 --> 00:40:24,400
comes from.
It was more just one of those
621
00:40:24,400 --> 00:40:26,120
random things where you're like,
let's just leave it, then
622
00:40:26,120 --> 00:40:29,560
collect as much photons as
possible and then you get blown
623
00:40:29,560 --> 00:40:32,480
away with this information that
literally changes everything,
624
00:40:32,480 --> 00:40:36,000
you know.
Yeah, the Redshift data.
625
00:40:36,440 --> 00:40:41,640
And then another very
serendipitous discovery that
626
00:40:41,760 --> 00:40:46,640
really helped.
It convinced most people that
627
00:40:46,640 --> 00:40:49,720
The Big Bang is real.
Happened right here in northern
628
00:40:49,720 --> 00:40:54,120
New Jersey, just down the road
from my school at Bell
629
00:40:54,120 --> 00:40:57,040
Laboratories.
You had a bunch of guys, radio
630
00:40:57,040 --> 00:41:01,520
engineers who were working on a
microwave communication system
631
00:41:01,520 --> 00:41:05,120
for the the telephone network
and kept getting this weird
632
00:41:05,120 --> 00:41:09,960
buzzing.
And in their transmissions and
633
00:41:09,960 --> 00:41:15,040
they thought that it might be
that, you know, birds had pooped
634
00:41:15,040 --> 00:41:16,040
up.
Yeah, that was, that was what I
635
00:41:16,040 --> 00:41:17,920
was mentioning earlier.
The birds, they thought it was
636
00:41:17,920 --> 00:41:21,480
birds pooping and stuff.
Yeah, epic story.
637
00:41:22,520 --> 00:41:26,080
So they and then they realized.
Then one of them remembered,
638
00:41:26,960 --> 00:41:32,440
Hey, I read this paper that said
that the The Big Bang should
639
00:41:32,440 --> 00:41:35,920
have left A.
A residual afterglow in the form
640
00:41:35,920 --> 00:41:40,560
of microwaves that are almost
exactly what we're observing
641
00:41:40,560 --> 00:41:41,840
here.
Could it be that?
642
00:41:43,120 --> 00:41:46,640
And of course it was that and
these guys who weren't even
643
00:41:46,640 --> 00:41:50,480
looking for it won a Nobel Prize
for discovering the afterglow of
644
00:41:50,480 --> 00:41:53,120
The Big Bang, just trying to
eliminate a sound.
645
00:41:53,160 --> 00:41:57,040
Can you imagine the the
scientific and philosophical
646
00:41:57,040 --> 00:42:00,360
implications that from the IT?
It's such a shift in thought
647
00:42:00,360 --> 00:42:03,160
because I often tell people, Can
you imagine living in a universe
648
00:42:03,160 --> 00:42:08,120
where, well, in what was a
Galaxy, where suddenly it's just
649
00:42:08,120 --> 00:42:10,960
open up to almost an infinite
reality?
650
00:42:10,960 --> 00:42:12,760
That's such a weird thing to go
through.
651
00:42:13,200 --> 00:42:15,120
Do you think that's currently
happening, 'cause I saw a tweet
652
00:42:15,120 --> 00:42:16,520
today, I think it was Brian
Keating.
653
00:42:16,760 --> 00:42:19,120
He could have just been
clickbait, but he 'cause now, as
654
00:42:19,120 --> 00:42:23,000
you mentioned, they are starting
to question whether this is
655
00:42:23,240 --> 00:42:26,360
whether it does expand further
than 13.8 billion watches.
656
00:42:26,720 --> 00:42:28,680
Do you think this is?
I haven't followed the data
657
00:42:28,680 --> 00:42:29,120
enough?
What?
658
00:42:29,120 --> 00:42:34,040
What are your thoughts there?
So I've been tracking cosmology,
659
00:42:34,040 --> 00:42:38,440
this, the study of the whole
universe, for decades now and
660
00:42:40,240 --> 00:42:44,520
and it's the field is in a funny
situation because in a sense,
661
00:42:44,520 --> 00:42:48,480
they're really proud of having a
basic framework for
662
00:42:48,480 --> 00:42:54,040
understanding the universe.
It's the the basic Big Bang
663
00:42:54,040 --> 00:42:57,320
expanding universe model which
we just been.
664
00:42:58,000 --> 00:43:01,120
Talking about But The Big Bang
is kind of like the theory of
665
00:43:01,120 --> 00:43:02,760
evolution by a natural
selection.
666
00:43:03,000 --> 00:43:07,440
It's it's always, there are
always these outstanding
667
00:43:07,640 --> 00:43:10,240
questions.
So for evolution, well, how
668
00:43:10,240 --> 00:43:14,280
exactly do species form and how
do they diverge from each other?
669
00:43:15,000 --> 00:43:19,320
For The Big Bang cosmology, it's
how do galaxies form.
670
00:43:19,320 --> 00:43:21,960
Well, how did they form?
When did they form?
671
00:43:21,960 --> 00:43:26,680
After the initial Big Bang?
And there are lots of other
672
00:43:26,680 --> 00:43:29,760
questions, like that sort of
detailed questions about how we
673
00:43:29,760 --> 00:43:33,120
got from this supposed creation
event to where we are today.
674
00:43:33,560 --> 00:43:38,160
And there are all these
additions to The Big Bang theory
675
00:43:39,680 --> 00:43:44,600
to try to solve some of these
questions involving dark matter,
676
00:43:45,400 --> 00:43:51,080
dark energy, something called
inflation, which is a a theory
677
00:43:51,080 --> 00:43:55,400
of enormous cosmic expansion.
That happened right after the
678
00:43:55,400 --> 00:43:57,480
initial Big Bang.
That would solve some of the
679
00:43:57,480 --> 00:44:03,120
observational problems we have.
So, and a lot of these theories
680
00:44:03,120 --> 00:44:07,200
sort of come and go.
I've seen them come and go and
681
00:44:07,640 --> 00:44:12,080
and then when there are problems
with some of these additional
682
00:44:12,080 --> 00:44:15,800
theories, people say, oh, The
Big Bang is in trouble in the
683
00:44:15,800 --> 00:44:18,440
same way that sometimes.
I don't know.
684
00:44:18,440 --> 00:44:23,000
Epigenetics or something in
biology leads people to say, oh,
685
00:44:23,000 --> 00:44:26,280
Darwin was wrong.
No, Darwin wasn't wrong.
686
00:44:26,720 --> 00:44:30,200
The theory of evolution by
natural selection is rock solid
687
00:44:30,920 --> 00:44:36,040
and The Big Bang that the idea
that the universe had a
688
00:44:36,040 --> 00:44:40,280
beginning and is still expanding
to this day, that is rock solid.
689
00:44:40,480 --> 00:44:44,600
But there are all these other
questions that that we've tried
690
00:44:44,600 --> 00:44:46,280
to solve with additional
theories.
691
00:44:46,600 --> 00:44:51,040
And those come and go and lead
cosmologists to say, oh, we need
692
00:44:51,040 --> 00:44:54,920
a new paradigm, everything is in
peril now and we're going to
693
00:44:54,920 --> 00:44:57,880
have a revolution.
And they want that to happen
694
00:44:57,880 --> 00:45:01,040
because it's getting a little
boring in cosmology nowadays.
695
00:45:01,680 --> 00:45:03,840
Yeah, no, for sure.
I spoke to Lawrence Krauss.
696
00:45:03,840 --> 00:45:07,880
It was about a week or two ago,
and we were discussing whether
697
00:45:07,880 --> 00:45:10,160
science needs philosophy.
And I know you've addressed this
698
00:45:11,400 --> 00:45:14,080
quite a lot, including the topic
of him discussing it.
699
00:45:14,480 --> 00:45:17,120
What are your thoughts about?
Because he firmly believes
700
00:45:17,120 --> 00:45:21,360
science is the ultimate truth,
so the anything beyond
701
00:45:21,360 --> 00:45:25,680
scientific truth or empirical
evidence is not possible from
702
00:45:25,680 --> 00:45:29,360
his perspective.
Yeah, it's, I don't know, I'm,
703
00:45:29,400 --> 00:45:34,600
I'm got I I have sort of.
Let me see what can I say about
704
00:45:34,640 --> 00:45:39,640
old Lawrence Krauss?
I'm chatting to you and maybe I
705
00:45:39,640 --> 00:45:45,280
can ask a question for you.
Yeah, he's he's he's a funny
706
00:45:45,280 --> 00:45:50,400
person because he does a lot of
philosophy in his writing.
707
00:45:50,600 --> 00:45:54,120
He's just not very good at it.
He's what I'd call a naive
708
00:45:54,120 --> 00:45:56,200
philosopher.
So he wrote a book, I can't
709
00:45:56,200 --> 00:45:58,840
remember the title, that's
basically saying we've solved
710
00:45:58,840 --> 00:46:01,640
this.
The the mystery of why the
711
00:46:01,640 --> 00:46:06,040
universe exists at all.
Yeah, Universe from nothing.
712
00:46:06,560 --> 00:46:09,960
And and and he made disparaging
comments about philosophy.
713
00:46:10,440 --> 00:46:15,720
In in that book, even though
there are lots of philosophical
714
00:46:15,720 --> 00:46:18,560
assumptions in the book.
So he's basically saying that
715
00:46:18,560 --> 00:46:22,160
and this is an old idea, it
wasn't, it certainly wasn't
716
00:46:22,160 --> 00:46:25,120
something that he came up with
that the universe might have
717
00:46:25,120 --> 00:46:29,720
started with some kind of
quantum fluctuation in a cosmic
718
00:46:30,680 --> 00:46:34,360
void.
And this is the inflation theory
719
00:46:34,360 --> 00:46:37,960
which I mentioned earlier is
kind of that.
720
00:46:39,120 --> 00:46:43,080
General idea that quantum
mechanics says that there's no
721
00:46:43,080 --> 00:46:45,520
such thing as a true vacuum.
You always get these particles
722
00:46:45,840 --> 00:46:48,680
blinking in and out of existence
and one of those might have
723
00:46:48,960 --> 00:46:52,480
suddenly expanded and become a a
whole universe.
724
00:46:52,800 --> 00:46:56,440
Well then the question is, well,
where did that quantum field
725
00:46:56,440 --> 00:46:59,240
come from?
That's not nothing, that's
726
00:46:59,240 --> 00:47:02,040
something.
And this is what some critics
727
00:47:02,040 --> 00:47:07,560
pointed out about Kraus.
So I think another area where
728
00:47:07,920 --> 00:47:11,960
physics needs philosophy or
philosophy has certainly been
729
00:47:11,960 --> 00:47:15,520
helpful is in interpreting
theories like quantum mechanics.
730
00:47:15,840 --> 00:47:20,840
Is this incredibly powerful
mathematical model of that
731
00:47:20,840 --> 00:47:25,680
explains why light and why
electrons and protons and
732
00:47:25,680 --> 00:47:29,600
neutrons do what they do, why
they behave in certain ways in
733
00:47:30,120 --> 00:47:33,160
in experiments?
But nobody knows what it means.
734
00:47:33,480 --> 00:47:36,600
It doesn't make any sense.
And so you've got all these
735
00:47:36,600 --> 00:47:39,360
philosophers who are trying to
explain it.
736
00:47:39,360 --> 00:47:43,000
But even more importantly,
they're pointing out all the
737
00:47:43,000 --> 00:47:48,480
ways in which quantum mechanics
on its face is incoherent and
738
00:47:48,480 --> 00:47:51,680
actually poses all these
fundamental philosophical
739
00:47:52,440 --> 00:47:57,520
problems about the universe so,
and about the nature of reality
740
00:47:57,760 --> 00:48:01,120
so.
You know, I take a lot of shots
741
00:48:01,120 --> 00:48:05,240
at philosophers too.
I think philosophy makes a
742
00:48:05,240 --> 00:48:08,840
mistake when it thinks it's
solving problems.
743
00:48:09,160 --> 00:48:11,640
Some philosophers actually think
that they're going to come up
744
00:48:11,640 --> 00:48:15,600
with a solution to the meaning
of quantum mechanics.
745
00:48:15,880 --> 00:48:18,960
Here it is, it's the pilot wave
theory, or it's many worlds, or
746
00:48:19,160 --> 00:48:22,720
something like that.
What I think philosophers are
747
00:48:22,720 --> 00:48:26,160
best at, even though this is not
something they would necessarily
748
00:48:26,240 --> 00:48:30,120
agree with, is.
Pointing all out, all the
749
00:48:30,120 --> 00:48:34,440
inadequacies of our knowledge,
all the ways in which our
750
00:48:34,440 --> 00:48:39,360
theories, as powerful as they
might be, don't really tell us
751
00:48:39,360 --> 00:48:43,080
what we want to know about how
the world works.
752
00:48:43,840 --> 00:48:46,760
So yeah, I maybe I say this
about philosophy because I
753
00:48:46,760 --> 00:48:50,240
consider myself a kind of
amateur philosopher.
754
00:48:51,040 --> 00:48:54,680
I think I was guilty of the same
thing as Lawrence from coming
755
00:48:54,680 --> 00:48:58,640
into studying medicine, going
through pretty much a phase of
756
00:48:58,640 --> 00:49:01,200
life where hard science was the
only answer for me.
757
00:49:01,320 --> 00:49:04,080
And I thought that is the only
way to gain truth.
758
00:49:04,080 --> 00:49:07,480
But often doing a philosophy
degree, I realized how blindly
759
00:49:07,480 --> 00:49:09,840
ignorant I was.
I'm not speaking for Lawrence
760
00:49:09,840 --> 00:49:12,960
because this is not this podcast
isn't a platform for people to
761
00:49:12,960 --> 00:49:15,040
get into debates, it's more
about understanding everyone's
762
00:49:15,040 --> 00:49:17,960
perspective, getting the ideas.
But I did realize that I had
763
00:49:17,960 --> 00:49:22,040
fundamental flaws in assuming
everything could be answered in
764
00:49:22,040 --> 00:49:24,920
science or or the scientific
method as a body of knowledge
765
00:49:25,160 --> 00:49:29,360
used to gain truth.
I I mean that postmodernist
766
00:49:29,360 --> 00:49:31,760
belief it kind of.
I mean I empathize with that
767
00:49:31,760 --> 00:49:33,400
too.
It's very difficult I feel
768
00:49:33,400 --> 00:49:38,240
sometimes to gain access to the
ultimate truth and and I think
769
00:49:38,240 --> 00:49:41,800
that's probably that probably
opens the door to philosophers
770
00:49:41,800 --> 00:49:45,480
then going against science in
many ways where a scientist
771
00:49:45,480 --> 00:49:48,200
cannot really defend themselves.
So if someone does claim, OK,
772
00:49:48,200 --> 00:49:50,720
well we don't understand
Augment, do you think that sort
773
00:49:50,720 --> 00:49:53,640
of puts them in a position out
to then argue for anything is
774
00:49:53,640 --> 00:49:56,680
possible?
They're relativist argument.
775
00:49:57,800 --> 00:50:00,040
That's the problem.
This is why I'm not a
776
00:50:00,040 --> 00:50:06,720
postmodernist, not a true
postmodernist who thinks that
777
00:50:06,720 --> 00:50:11,600
everything is relative, that one
story is is as good as another,
778
00:50:11,600 --> 00:50:15,360
and that we never really settle
any scientific questions for
779
00:50:15,360 --> 00:50:17,080
once and for all.
I just think that that is
780
00:50:17,080 --> 00:50:19,520
obviously untrue.
There are lots of scientific
781
00:50:19,520 --> 00:50:22,960
questions that we have settled
once and for all of, like like
782
00:50:22,960 --> 00:50:25,600
the one I mentioned earlier, one
of those fuzzy patches.
783
00:50:26,160 --> 00:50:29,000
In the sky or the Are those
clouds of gas here in the Milky
784
00:50:29,000 --> 00:50:33,400
Way, or are those other galaxies
far beyond our own?
785
00:50:33,600 --> 00:50:36,480
We solved that There are other
galaxies out there.
786
00:50:38,240 --> 00:50:42,680
But in terms of I've become more
I became a science journalist
787
00:50:42,680 --> 00:50:46,720
because I thought in the 1980s,
because I thought science is the
788
00:50:46,720 --> 00:50:50,040
most exciting.
Human endeavor.
789
00:50:50,120 --> 00:50:53,480
It's the human endeavor that
most makes progress.
790
00:50:53,480 --> 00:50:56,080
It gets somewhere.
It's transformed our world
791
00:50:56,080 --> 00:51:01,320
intellectually and materially,
in just countless ways.
792
00:51:01,600 --> 00:51:05,960
And I also thought that science
was our best hope of telling us
793
00:51:05,960 --> 00:51:08,920
what we are and explaining where
the universe came from, solving
794
00:51:08,920 --> 00:51:13,800
all these profound mysteries
that once religion tried to
795
00:51:13,800 --> 00:51:16,160
solve.
The older I get, the more I
796
00:51:16,160 --> 00:51:22,280
realize how limited science is.
And and how much we need
797
00:51:24,320 --> 00:51:32,440
philosophy and the arts and
mysticism.
798
00:51:32,440 --> 00:51:35,360
Certain kinds of religion,
especially if it's not dogmatic
799
00:51:35,360 --> 00:51:39,960
religion.
To try to understand what the
800
00:51:39,960 --> 00:51:45,240
hell is going on.
I just posted this morning a
801
00:51:45,240 --> 00:51:51,320
little column on.
The Golden Bowl, which is the
802
00:51:51,320 --> 00:51:57,840
last novel written by Henry
James, it's It came out in 1904.
803
00:51:58,040 --> 00:52:01,960
It's one of James's most
famously obscure difficult
804
00:52:01,960 --> 00:52:03,880
works.
Hardly anybody reads it because
805
00:52:03,880 --> 00:52:08,920
it's just it's just nasty.
It's interminable and but James
806
00:52:08,920 --> 00:52:12,720
thought it was his best book.
So I thought, OK, I've got to
807
00:52:12,720 --> 00:52:16,600
read this and.
I read it.
808
00:52:16,600 --> 00:52:19,360
I finished the damn thing.
I don't recommend it to anybody
809
00:52:19,360 --> 00:52:23,120
else, but in the course of
reading it, I think I figured
810
00:52:23,120 --> 00:52:28,120
out what James was up to.
It's, you know, it's got a
811
00:52:28,120 --> 00:52:30,200
really simple plot.
It's just four people.
812
00:52:30,200 --> 00:52:34,560
It's kind of a love quadrangle 2
two of the characters or having
813
00:52:34,560 --> 00:52:37,880
an affair that can hurt the
other two to whom they're
814
00:52:37,880 --> 00:52:40,120
married.
And it's so it's like really
815
00:52:40,120 --> 00:52:43,080
simple.
But then James just goes on and
816
00:52:43,080 --> 00:52:45,600
on about it.
What he's trying to do is.
817
00:52:46,480 --> 00:52:52,840
Show that each of us has what's
called what cognitive scientists
818
00:52:52,840 --> 00:52:58,800
call a theory of mind, meaning a
a kind of model of other people.
819
00:52:58,800 --> 00:53:03,400
So you and I both have a little
theory of mind for each other
820
00:53:03,400 --> 00:53:06,000
now just because of this
conversation we're having and
821
00:53:06,560 --> 00:53:09,560
we're constantly updating it and
changing and you know it's it's
822
00:53:09,560 --> 00:53:13,240
based on very limited data.
And we're we're constantly
823
00:53:13,320 --> 00:53:15,400
updating it as we talk to each
other.
824
00:53:15,760 --> 00:53:21,720
You also have a theory of mind
of other people around you that
825
00:53:21,720 --> 00:53:26,200
you're close to, that you love
and your theories of mind of
826
00:53:26,200 --> 00:53:31,040
those other people, those are
also always changing and and
827
00:53:31,120 --> 00:53:35,040
when you have a theory of a mind
of someone else, you also have
828
00:53:35,040 --> 00:53:38,920
to have an idea of what their
theory of mind is for you.
829
00:53:39,920 --> 00:53:43,240
So, James.
I realized this is what James is
830
00:53:43,360 --> 00:53:46,000
up to.
He's showing that you have just
831
00:53:46,000 --> 00:53:53,080
4 characters, and there is this
what could be called what
832
00:53:53,080 --> 00:53:59,040
complexity theorists would call
a combinatorial explosion of
833
00:53:59,040 --> 00:54:04,840
theories of mind, which are all
sort of feeding back to each
834
00:54:04,840 --> 00:54:08,960
other in these endless loops.
This is theory of mind.
835
00:54:09,440 --> 00:54:13,320
Is one of the deepest questions
in cognitive science and
836
00:54:13,320 --> 00:54:18,720
philosophy right now.
And here is Henry James in this
837
00:54:19,280 --> 00:54:23,160
bizarre novel about a bunch of
rich assholes Who cares about
838
00:54:23,160 --> 00:54:25,160
them?
But there's this theme at the
839
00:54:25,160 --> 00:54:29,960
bottom of it that is absolutely
profound and applies to all of
840
00:54:29,960 --> 00:54:32,840
us.
It's it's like a punch in the
841
00:54:32,840 --> 00:54:37,320
face that's telling us.
No one really knows what's going
842
00:54:37,320 --> 00:54:43,480
on in anybody else's head.
We all we do is guess and that's
843
00:54:43,760 --> 00:54:46,920
that is something that
supplements through this work of
844
00:54:46,920 --> 00:54:50,520
brilliant literature.
Although brilliant but really
845
00:54:50,520 --> 00:54:52,920
hard to read.
You know I'm I'm looking at it
846
00:54:52,920 --> 00:54:55,680
now so it's your tweets.
To distract myself from
847
00:54:55,680 --> 00:54:57,240
everything.
I just wrote a review on Henry
848
00:54:57,240 --> 00:55:01,240
James so it's called Paulo.
So I'm I'm looking at your
849
00:55:01,240 --> 00:55:03,600
Twitter Bible.
It says know nothing know it all
850
00:55:03,600 --> 00:55:08,000
science lovers science basher.
I mean I like that it's a it's a
851
00:55:08,000 --> 00:55:10,880
good way to sort of maintain
that humility among while
852
00:55:11,280 --> 00:55:13,200
performing this search for
truth.
853
00:55:13,360 --> 00:55:15,880
Well, I I know you don't like
the postmodern version of that.
854
00:55:16,440 --> 00:55:21,040
That a quote.
Yeah, the, the, the know nothing
855
00:55:21,040 --> 00:55:23,320
know it all because who the hell
am I?
856
00:55:23,320 --> 00:55:26,920
I'm I'm like passing judgement
on string theory and.
857
00:55:27,800 --> 00:55:34,960
Interpretations of of quantum
mechanics and you know theories
858
00:55:34,960 --> 00:55:38,760
all across integrated
information theory at with and
859
00:55:38,760 --> 00:55:41,600
all I do is I sort of look into
these things and talk to people
860
00:55:41,600 --> 00:55:46,320
about them and then I I dare to
have opinions on them.
861
00:55:46,320 --> 00:55:51,040
So that makes me a big know it
all you know and an arrogant
862
00:55:51,040 --> 00:55:53,760
bastard.
And at the same time, as I told
863
00:55:53,760 --> 00:55:57,080
you, the the older I get, the
more I realize that.
864
00:55:57,680 --> 00:55:59,200
I don't know anything.
I'm.
865
00:55:59,400 --> 00:56:08,600
I feel appallingly ignorant and
confused by by reality, and I I
866
00:56:08,600 --> 00:56:12,960
feel as though and I I don't.
I've given up hope that I'll
867
00:56:12,960 --> 00:56:18,320
have some huge revelation that
will suddenly make everything
868
00:56:19,480 --> 00:56:23,600
sensible to me.
In fact it's it's pretty it's
869
00:56:23,600 --> 00:56:26,440
pretty consistently going the
other way and I've just tried to
870
00:56:26,440 --> 00:56:28,480
embrace it.
So it might seem like a paradox.
871
00:56:28,480 --> 00:56:34,080
The know it all know nothing
thing, but from where I am it,
872
00:56:34,160 --> 00:56:38,520
it actually works really well.
Tell me throughout the years
873
00:56:38,520 --> 00:56:41,400
when writing on these topics,
particularly let's get back to
874
00:56:41,400 --> 00:56:43,120
the mind body problem.
When you wrote about these
875
00:56:43,120 --> 00:56:46,720
topics, which philosophers and
scientists do you think had the
876
00:56:46,720 --> 00:56:47,520
best?
Sort of.
877
00:56:47,560 --> 00:56:51,320
Well, the closest approach to
the to the solution.
878
00:56:51,320 --> 00:56:53,840
That's it.
Yeah.
879
00:56:56,240 --> 00:57:00,760
In terms of so there's there's
when it comes to philosophers,
880
00:57:00,920 --> 00:57:03,480
see I think of philosophy as
being kind of a branch of
881
00:57:03,480 --> 00:57:10,440
literature almost like a kind of
really weird poetry and that has
882
00:57:10,440 --> 00:57:14,400
very various aesthetic effects.
So I'm I'm.
883
00:57:16,120 --> 00:57:20,280
I look at the I I respond to the
style of philosophers as well as
884
00:57:20,280 --> 00:57:22,520
to the substance of what they're
actually saying.
885
00:57:22,760 --> 00:57:25,520
And one of my all time favorite
philosophers and I and I've been
886
00:57:25,520 --> 00:57:28,360
fortunate enough to interview a
lot of the greatest philosophers
887
00:57:28,960 --> 00:57:32,240
of the 20th century, especially
philosophers of science.
888
00:57:32,240 --> 00:57:36,720
And one of my favourites was
this guy named Paul Feyerabend
889
00:57:37,280 --> 00:57:41,120
was an Austrian philosopher.
He was old enough to actually
890
00:57:41,120 --> 00:57:45,080
have served.
In the German army at the toward
891
00:57:45,080 --> 00:57:49,480
the tail end of of World War Two
he was shot in the back.
892
00:57:49,480 --> 00:57:53,160
So he was permanent, permanently
crippled.
893
00:57:53,640 --> 00:58:00,240
He had difficulty walking and
and he had trained in physics
894
00:58:00,240 --> 00:58:04,240
and then decided to go into
philosophy because he just loved
895
00:58:04,240 --> 00:58:10,600
arguing with people and and he
turned into he called himself a
896
00:58:10,600 --> 00:58:16,520
philosophical anarchist.
Meaning that he didn't believe
897
00:58:16,520 --> 00:58:20,120
in philosophical systems, he was
kind of destructive, he liked to
898
00:58:20,120 --> 00:58:28,080
tear things down and and he had
the the style of doing it that
899
00:58:28,080 --> 00:58:31,200
was really flamboyant.
He's kind of like a performance
900
00:58:31,200 --> 00:58:33,680
artist.
So he's he's basically a
901
00:58:33,680 --> 00:58:37,360
philosopher who's saying that
philosophy is impossible.
902
00:58:38,280 --> 00:58:42,160
And so he's like a walking
contradiction and he kind of
903
00:58:42,160 --> 00:58:45,600
embraced that.
He was he he savagely mocked
904
00:58:45,640 --> 00:58:51,400
other people, but he also
savagely mocked himself and and
905
00:58:51,400 --> 00:58:58,560
he especially mocked the whole
idea of understanding reality.
906
00:58:58,560 --> 00:59:02,560
I I interviewed him in the 1990s
at a period when a lot of people
907
00:59:02,560 --> 00:59:06,280
were still taken seriously.
The idea of A of a Theory of
908
00:59:06,280 --> 00:59:09,200
everything.
This is a term that Stephen
909
00:59:09,200 --> 00:59:12,760
Hawking helped to popularize a A
theory of physics.
910
00:59:12,760 --> 00:59:15,960
But it could also be coming from
other fields that would tell us
911
00:59:15,960 --> 00:59:20,200
why we're here, that could tell
us why there's something rather
912
00:59:20,200 --> 00:59:24,480
than nothing and Fire.
Rob and I still kind of believe
913
00:59:24,480 --> 00:59:28,800
that when I talked to Firebin
and Fire, Robin said to me, are
914
00:59:28,800 --> 00:59:32,720
you kidding me?
A theory that's going to tell
915
00:59:32,720 --> 00:59:36,840
us.
What really is out there?
916
00:59:36,880 --> 00:59:39,680
We're nothing.
Human beings are nothing.
917
00:59:39,800 --> 00:59:44,600
We're we're just like like flies
that are here for a second and
918
00:59:45,000 --> 00:59:47,560
then we're gone.
We think and we keep saying we
919
00:59:47,560 --> 00:59:52,560
found the truth about reality.
Meanwhile the truth is behind is
920
00:59:52,920 --> 00:59:55,480
is still out there laughing at
us.
921
00:59:55,760 --> 01:00:01,640
So he had this this really
dramatic way of of of talking
922
01:00:01,640 --> 01:00:03,040
that I.
That I loved.
923
01:00:03,040 --> 01:00:06,480
And at the time when I
interviewed him, I thought he
924
01:00:06,480 --> 01:00:10,200
goes too far.
He was just denigrating science
925
01:00:10,840 --> 01:00:15,600
and the whole Western
intellectual tradition so much
926
01:00:16,120 --> 01:00:22,640
and even saying that we have to
have more consideration for the
927
01:00:22,680 --> 01:00:28,920
the beliefs of indigenous people
and religious ideas of creation.
928
01:00:29,400 --> 01:00:31,640
And I I was, I didn't want to
hear that.
929
01:00:31,960 --> 01:00:35,440
And as time goes on, I've I've
become more sympathetic toward
930
01:00:35,440 --> 01:00:40,080
him, especially because I
realized what he was telling me
931
01:00:40,080 --> 01:00:45,400
was that knowledge can become
oppressive knowledge when you
932
01:00:45,400 --> 01:00:48,720
know the scientists are saying
this is what's happening and you
933
01:00:48,720 --> 01:00:50,520
must accept it because it's
true.
934
01:00:51,360 --> 01:00:54,680
And fire Robin was saying, and
this is radical at the time.
935
01:00:54,680 --> 01:00:58,840
Now it doesn't seem so radical
fire, Robin was saying, saying
936
01:00:59,520 --> 01:01:04,160
why do we have to accept it?
Maybe we prefer to see the the
937
01:01:04,160 --> 01:01:09,560
earth is being born out of some
like primordial earth goddess.
938
01:01:10,160 --> 01:01:15,720
And if that gives us comfort, if
and if that connects us to our
939
01:01:16,680 --> 01:01:20,520
our ancestors, then who are the
scientists to take that away
940
01:01:20,520 --> 01:01:24,400
from us?
So it was he was showing that
941
01:01:24,400 --> 01:01:27,520
there's this kind of dichotomy
between truth and freedom.
942
01:01:28,160 --> 01:01:29,600
Fire.
Robin believed in truth.
943
01:01:29,600 --> 01:01:31,160
People didn't understand that
about him.
944
01:01:32,200 --> 01:01:34,480
He believed in truth.
And that's one reason why he
945
01:01:34,480 --> 01:01:40,000
thought science was dangerous,
because it actually does figure
946
01:01:40,000 --> 01:01:43,480
out the world and it and imposes
ideas on people.
947
01:01:43,720 --> 01:01:46,680
But he didn't necessarily.
He thought that that might be
948
01:01:48,240 --> 01:01:51,320
lead to some kind of
totalitarian system where people
949
01:01:51,320 --> 01:01:53,040
all have to believe the same
thing.
950
01:01:54,080 --> 01:01:59,440
And I'm, you know, I still have
problems at that point of view,
951
01:01:59,440 --> 01:02:02,560
but I really.
But I see what he is after and
952
01:02:02,560 --> 01:02:07,360
more and more freedom of
thought, which is what mattered
953
01:02:07,360 --> 01:02:09,920
to fire Rob and also matters to
me.
954
01:02:10,400 --> 01:02:12,680
That's I'm I'm definitely going
to check him out and it sounds
955
01:02:12,960 --> 01:02:17,760
it sounds very intriguing.
Have you noticed the the IT
956
01:02:17,760 --> 01:02:21,880
seems that a lot of people
online today when they approach
957
01:02:21,880 --> 01:02:25,400
this topic of consciousness and
the mind body problem.
958
01:02:26,440 --> 01:02:29,240
It seems that there seems to be
an increase of illusionist
959
01:02:29,240 --> 01:02:32,000
thinkers now, I think
particularly within the last,
960
01:02:32,000 --> 01:02:35,640
let's say 10 years.
I think Dennis and then wrote a
961
01:02:35,640 --> 01:02:38,080
paper around 2016 Keith
Frankish.
962
01:02:38,080 --> 01:02:40,200
They wrote on illusionism as a
theory of consciousness.
963
01:02:40,400 --> 01:02:42,400
Something I noticed recently is
that all of them seem to be
964
01:02:42,400 --> 01:02:46,560
quitting Twitter one by one.
I think Dennis recently posted a
965
01:02:46,560 --> 01:02:48,640
tweet that he's leaving.
Keith seems to be doing the same
966
01:02:48,640 --> 01:02:49,800
thing.
What are your thoughts on
967
01:02:49,800 --> 01:02:51,480
illusionism as a theory of
consciousness?
968
01:02:53,160 --> 01:03:01,960
Yeah, all right, so I actually
just post reposted something on
969
01:03:02,240 --> 01:03:08,800
related to Illusionism.
I'm an old acid head, OK?
970
01:03:09,120 --> 01:03:13,280
I started taking LSD
psychedelics when I was just a
971
01:03:13,280 --> 01:03:16,560
boy.
I was like 15 or 16 years old
972
01:03:17,080 --> 01:03:24,040
and and that has that has
altered my thinking or it's
973
01:03:24,040 --> 01:03:27,440
something that always is there
in the background when I'm
974
01:03:27,440 --> 01:03:31,400
thinking about questions like
what is reality really?
975
01:03:31,400 --> 01:03:34,760
What's the relation of mind and
and matter and which is the
976
01:03:34,760 --> 01:03:38,320
primary?
Does matter come out of mind or
977
01:03:38,320 --> 01:03:41,680
does mind come out of matter?
What is it?
978
01:03:42,120 --> 01:03:49,280
I'm also really interested in in
mysticism, by which I mean these
979
01:03:49,280 --> 01:03:52,080
extraordinary experiences that
people have had throughout
980
01:03:52,080 --> 01:03:56,720
history and still have from all
different cultures and
981
01:03:56,880 --> 01:04:02,760
traditions that seem to point
toward the existence of
982
01:04:02,760 --> 01:04:09,960
something beyond this where we
are right now and different
983
01:04:09,960 --> 01:04:14,360
mystical traditions in different
ways, Buddhism, Hinduism and
984
01:04:14,360 --> 01:04:18,800
even Christianity.
Some of the the western
985
01:04:18,800 --> 01:04:25,080
religions all suggest they imply
and or some state very
986
01:04:25,080 --> 01:04:28,320
explicitly that this is an
illusion.
987
01:04:29,440 --> 01:04:35,200
This is like a dream state and
the actual reality is something
988
01:04:35,200 --> 01:04:41,720
entirely different.
So I had enough LSD that I take
989
01:04:41,720 --> 01:04:46,840
that idea very seriously.
I've been, I'd been tripping and
990
01:04:46,840 --> 01:04:49,880
suddenly thought yeah this is
this is like a dream.
991
01:04:50,320 --> 01:04:56,560
And I've even felt like I sort
of went beyond the veil and and
992
01:04:56,560 --> 01:05:00,720
saw what was what was behind it.
I I wrote a whole book on this
993
01:05:00,720 --> 01:05:03,480
called Rational Mysticism where
I tried to make sense of some of
994
01:05:03,480 --> 01:05:10,480
these experiences that I'd had
the problem and then you know
995
01:05:10,480 --> 01:05:13,640
their modern scientific versions
of illusionism.
996
01:05:14,280 --> 01:05:16,880
Donald Hoffman is 1 purveyor of
this.
997
01:05:17,200 --> 01:05:20,280
I also have become sort of
unlikely friends over the last
998
01:05:20,280 --> 01:05:23,760
few years with Deepak Chopra
who's who's kind of an
999
01:05:23,760 --> 01:05:26,800
illusionist.
It's somebody who basically says
1000
01:05:26,800 --> 01:05:33,880
that mind is the basis of of
everything and not and and not
1001
01:05:33,880 --> 01:05:35,520
matter.
So I'm sympathetic toward these
1002
01:05:35,720 --> 01:05:42,280
ideas, but at the same time I'm,
I'm really skeptical of them and
1003
01:05:42,440 --> 01:05:48,400
I even have a moral objection to
them in this world.
1004
01:05:48,400 --> 01:05:50,440
They're bad things happening.
They're suffering and
1005
01:05:50,440 --> 01:05:55,880
oppression.
I mean, like right now of just
1006
01:05:56,440 --> 01:05:59,560
they're suffering.
That is unimaginable.
1007
01:06:00,640 --> 01:06:06,640
And and what bothers me about
illusionism, or even the idea
1008
01:06:06,640 --> 01:06:10,440
that everything is consciousness
and and this is true of
1009
01:06:10,440 --> 01:06:16,120
multiverse theories too, they
sort of get us to discount this
1010
01:06:16,120 --> 01:06:19,920
world we're living in where
there are people in pain like
1011
01:06:19,960 --> 01:06:27,880
right now and and people who are
being treated unfairly, who are
1012
01:06:27,880 --> 01:06:32,240
being brutalized.
And I don't.
1013
01:06:32,240 --> 01:06:36,320
Apart from whether Illusionism
is right or wrong, or whether
1014
01:06:36,320 --> 01:06:39,720
idealism or pan psychism or
they're right or wrong.
1015
01:06:40,640 --> 01:06:44,720
They're the practical moral
consequences of ideas like this.
1016
01:06:45,280 --> 01:06:54,880
And I don't like any theory or
world view that gets us off the
1017
01:06:54,880 --> 01:07:00,160
hook to an extent about doing
something, about the terrible
1018
01:07:00,160 --> 01:07:04,720
things happening in this world
that are not illusions that are
1019
01:07:04,720 --> 01:07:07,360
real.
There's nothing more real than
1020
01:07:07,360 --> 01:07:11,840
human pain.
So I'm, I'm kind of I, you know
1021
01:07:11,840 --> 01:07:17,400
I've written about it a lot also
I it bothers me that so humans
1022
01:07:17,400 --> 01:07:20,440
are sort of narcissists.
We're all natural narcissists.
1023
01:07:20,760 --> 01:07:24,880
Every person is the center of of
his or her cosmos.
1024
01:07:25,360 --> 01:07:28,680
Right.
And we humans collectively think
1025
01:07:28,680 --> 01:07:30,880
we're really great.
We think we're better than all
1026
01:07:30,880 --> 01:07:34,680
the other organisms on Earth.
So from the beginning, and we've
1027
01:07:34,680 --> 01:07:38,400
always thought that the all of
existence was about us, it was
1028
01:07:38,400 --> 01:07:42,400
created for us for some kind of
spiritual project that we're
1029
01:07:42,400 --> 01:07:47,200
engaged in.
And we started seriously
1030
01:07:47,200 --> 01:07:49,360
questioning that about 500 years
ago.
1031
01:07:49,560 --> 01:07:53,880
And I see that as one of
humanity's triumphs is to
1032
01:07:53,880 --> 01:07:58,080
overcome its innate narcissism
and realize that no, we're just
1033
01:07:58,080 --> 01:08:03,640
like 1 little type of Organism
on a little speck of dust going
1034
01:08:03,640 --> 01:08:08,800
around one little star in this
unimaginably big universe.
1035
01:08:09,400 --> 01:08:15,440
So we should get over ourselves.
And now I see this trend, I call
1036
01:08:15,440 --> 01:08:18,439
it Neo geocentrism.
It's like a return of
1037
01:08:19,439 --> 01:08:25,000
geocentrism.
I see this as theories like
1038
01:08:25,680 --> 01:08:28,720
integrated information theory
and Donald Hoffman's theory, and
1039
01:08:28,720 --> 01:08:33,160
all these theories that give
primacy to consciousness as as a
1040
01:08:33,160 --> 01:08:38,279
return to to a kind of
geocentric thinking.
1041
01:08:38,920 --> 01:08:42,600
So yeah, I guess it's what what
I'm trying to say is, I'm
1042
01:08:42,600 --> 01:08:46,600
ambivalent about all that stuff.
And you're touching on something
1043
01:08:46,600 --> 01:08:49,240
very important because this
podcast, I mean it, touches on
1044
01:08:49,240 --> 01:08:54,000
the nature of consciousness,
reality, free will and morality.
1045
01:08:54,000 --> 01:08:56,279
So you're you're on that
morality spectrum at the moment.
1046
01:08:56,279 --> 01:08:57,520
What are your thoughts on free
will?
1047
01:08:58,120 --> 01:09:04,399
What role does that?
Yeah, I've really gone back and
1048
01:09:04,399 --> 01:09:07,760
forth.
I I think free will is a
1049
01:09:07,760 --> 01:09:11,800
philosophical rather than
scientific question.
1050
01:09:12,160 --> 01:09:16,840
And by that I mean that I don't
think free will is solvable.
1051
01:09:17,000 --> 01:09:22,800
I I don't think there are will
ever be a slam dunk argument
1052
01:09:22,800 --> 01:09:25,319
that proves yes, free will
exists.
1053
01:09:25,920 --> 01:09:30,600
No, it does not exist.
I can think about.
1054
01:09:30,840 --> 01:09:38,240
I can trace my own life back to,
you know, through my parents,
1055
01:09:38,359 --> 01:09:41,080
all the way back to the
beginning of life on Earth and
1056
01:09:41,080 --> 01:09:43,640
back to the beginning of the
universe.
1057
01:09:43,640 --> 01:09:45,279
I didn't ask for any of that to
happen.
1058
01:09:45,399 --> 01:09:51,920
How free can I be there?
Where was the choice in my life?
1059
01:09:51,920 --> 01:09:58,400
At the same time, I am aware of
myself as this creature who can
1060
01:09:58,400 --> 01:10:03,560
look into the future and discern
different trajectories I could
1061
01:10:03,560 --> 01:10:06,360
take from this point where I I
am now.
1062
01:10:07,040 --> 01:10:10,880
I know I have choices.
I make them all the time.
1063
01:10:10,880 --> 01:10:14,000
So therefore of course I have
free will.
1064
01:10:16,000 --> 01:10:19,760
So I so I can see it in both
these two ways.
1065
01:10:20,080 --> 01:10:24,960
I I call myself a free will
believer because I think it's
1066
01:10:24,960 --> 01:10:29,360
really important for us not to
feel as though we're victims of
1067
01:10:29,360 --> 01:10:33,120
forces beyond our control, in
part so we can take care of
1068
01:10:33,120 --> 01:10:36,320
these problems that I was
describing that lead to human
1069
01:10:36,320 --> 01:10:39,040
suffering.
All the various forms of
1070
01:10:39,040 --> 01:10:43,800
injustice and oppression,
oppression that 'cause people to
1071
01:10:43,800 --> 01:10:48,000
have horrible, painful lives.
We need to think we can do
1072
01:10:48,000 --> 01:10:52,400
something about sexism and
racism and and war and
1073
01:10:53,280 --> 01:10:57,280
inequality.
And to the extent we think we
1074
01:10:57,280 --> 01:11:03,080
believe the determinists, I
think we're less likely even to
1075
01:11:03,080 --> 01:11:06,000
try to really change things.
That's what worries me.
1076
01:11:07,600 --> 01:11:09,480
As you said, I mean it's deeply
entwined with the mind body
1077
01:11:09,480 --> 01:11:11,760
problem as well.
These these questions are
1078
01:11:11,760 --> 01:11:14,320
fundamentally going to affect
how we approach moral
1079
01:11:14,320 --> 01:11:17,680
responsibility, how we engage
with people, what we do.
1080
01:11:17,680 --> 01:11:20,640
So it's important that if we do
sort of come up with any sort of
1081
01:11:20,640 --> 01:11:23,560
theory.
That we remember that this does
1082
01:11:23,560 --> 01:11:27,080
have practical implications.
Absolutely.
1083
01:11:27,120 --> 01:11:31,600
So I have somewhere here.
I have AI.
1084
01:11:31,600 --> 01:11:35,040
Haven't read it yet, but I have
the new book by Robert Sapolsky,
1085
01:11:35,120 --> 01:11:38,600
the Stanford biologist.
And let me see, where is it?
1086
01:11:40,200 --> 01:11:44,600
Oh, yeah, here it is.
I've got to read this soon
1087
01:11:44,600 --> 01:11:49,440
because he agreed to have a
conversation with me about the
1088
01:11:49,440 --> 01:11:54,800
book by Zoom in just a few
weeks.
1089
01:11:55,440 --> 01:11:59,720
And so in this book he
apparently he argues against
1090
01:11:59,720 --> 01:12:01,080
free will.
Yes, he does.
1091
01:12:02,280 --> 01:12:04,640
OK, so you've read it.
I haven't, but I've spoken to
1092
01:12:04,640 --> 01:12:08,360
quite a few people who've read
it already and who've I've had
1093
01:12:08,360 --> 01:12:11,080
on the show and they they said
he makes quite a strong case for
1094
01:12:11,080 --> 01:12:13,360
it as well.
And I think Greg Caruso as well,
1095
01:12:13,760 --> 01:12:17,040
who he he quotes a lot of Greg
and Dirk Pierboom's work in it.
1096
01:12:17,600 --> 01:12:21,320
On rejecting retributivism and
and it's about hard
1097
01:12:21,320 --> 01:12:23,920
incompatibilism.
Yeah.
1098
01:12:23,920 --> 01:12:28,560
So I I really like Sapolsky as
I've met him a couple of times.
1099
01:12:29,480 --> 01:12:33,200
I've read several of his books.
I'm a huge fan.
1100
01:12:33,680 --> 01:12:39,080
And so I I wrote a book called
The End of War, which argues for
1101
01:12:39,080 --> 01:12:42,440
free will and choice and that we
can overcome war.
1102
01:12:42,440 --> 01:12:45,280
Shouldn't think of it as
something that is imposed on us
1103
01:12:45,280 --> 01:12:49,840
by our nature, by circumstance.
And I cited Sapolsky's work,
1104
01:12:49,840 --> 01:12:55,200
which I thought supported that.
And and so to know that he's
1105
01:12:55,200 --> 01:12:56,880
written a book against free
will.
1106
01:12:56,880 --> 01:13:03,800
Now it really it upsets me, so
I'm sort of bracing myself to
1107
01:13:03,800 --> 01:13:06,360
read it.
Maybe there's a way of looking
1108
01:13:06,360 --> 01:13:11,360
at free will because he's a very
humane, kind, compassionate
1109
01:13:11,360 --> 01:13:13,000
person.
Maybe there's a way to look at
1110
01:13:13,000 --> 01:13:17,240
free will that's consistent with
a program of social justice and
1111
01:13:17,400 --> 01:13:20,920
progressive values.
I assume that makes that case in
1112
01:13:20,920 --> 01:13:25,600
his book.
But I'm I'm at this point, I'm
1113
01:13:25,600 --> 01:13:28,040
skeptical, but we're going to
talk about it in a few weeks.
1114
01:13:28,040 --> 01:13:29,800
No, John, I can, I can
completely agree with that
1115
01:13:29,800 --> 01:13:32,520
because when I.
When I think of Robert Sapolsky,
1116
01:13:32,560 --> 01:13:36,520
I almost never expected him to
write a book where he would
1117
01:13:36,760 --> 01:13:39,360
defend determinism.
It was something that I also, it
1118
01:13:39,360 --> 01:13:42,280
took me by surprise as well.
But when I saw Greg Caruso talk
1119
01:13:42,280 --> 01:13:44,720
about the fact that he's quoted
him a couple times at Dirk
1120
01:13:44,720 --> 01:13:47,360
Pierbun, I realized how he's
going to approach it because
1121
01:13:47,560 --> 01:13:51,560
they make very good cases for
social justice within an
1122
01:13:51,560 --> 01:13:53,800
illusionist framework of free
will.
1123
01:13:54,040 --> 01:13:56,000
So I think you're going to find
it quite fascinating when you
1124
01:13:56,000 --> 01:13:57,320
read it.
And I think you might enjoy it.
1125
01:13:57,320 --> 01:14:02,640
Yeah, I, you know, I've, I've
got so I've got some Buddhist
1126
01:14:02,640 --> 01:14:07,640
friends.
I, I'm, I, I once interviewed a
1127
01:14:07,640 --> 01:14:10,000
great length, a British
psychologist named Susan
1128
01:14:10,000 --> 01:14:11,800
Blackmore.
Have you heard of her?
1129
01:14:12,320 --> 01:14:16,640
Yeah, she's yeah, she's a great
she's really an interesting
1130
01:14:16,640 --> 01:14:21,760
person, a really lively mind.
And she is.
1131
01:14:21,760 --> 01:14:24,720
I don't think she likes being
called a Zen Buddhist, but she
1132
01:14:24,720 --> 01:14:29,040
practices Zen Buddhism, She
practices mindfulness, she
1133
01:14:29,040 --> 01:14:36,440
meditates a lot and she was an
an adamant denier of free will,
1134
01:14:36,680 --> 01:14:41,720
and she tried to convince me
that to give up free will means
1135
01:14:41,720 --> 01:14:47,120
kind of being liberated.
She saw it as as a kind of
1136
01:14:47,880 --> 01:14:54,040
enlightenment and where you're
totally living in the moment and
1137
01:14:55,160 --> 01:14:59,440
and you realize that you really
have no control of your life,
1138
01:14:59,440 --> 01:15:04,320
you don't have any true choices,
so just go along with things.
1139
01:15:04,960 --> 01:15:09,840
And she, she said all this very
eloquently.
1140
01:15:09,840 --> 01:15:12,040
I never bought it.
I never, I just can't.
1141
01:15:12,040 --> 01:15:16,000
It's just one of those.
I never understood it, seeing
1142
01:15:16,000 --> 01:15:22,400
the lack of free will as
liberating, although I sometimes
1143
01:15:22,400 --> 01:15:24,840
I find my own choices
oppressive.
1144
01:15:24,840 --> 01:15:28,440
If I'm trying to decide between
doing two things, one of which
1145
01:15:28,440 --> 01:15:31,160
might be the right thing to do,
but it's very difficult, another
1146
01:15:31,160 --> 01:15:35,520
is easier, but not such the
right thing to do.
1147
01:15:36,840 --> 01:15:42,160
That can be.
That can be hard, and freedom is
1148
01:15:42,160 --> 01:15:44,320
hard.
It can be.
1149
01:15:44,880 --> 01:15:47,320
I can see you might think it's
liberating to live in a
1150
01:15:47,320 --> 01:15:51,200
totalitarian or fundamentalist
religious state that tells you
1151
01:15:51,200 --> 01:15:53,120
exactly what to think and do all
the time.
1152
01:15:53,160 --> 01:15:56,000
OK, sure, fine.
But I don't want to live there.
1153
01:15:57,800 --> 01:16:02,880
I'd rather have these choices,
even if they're illusory.
1154
01:16:02,880 --> 01:16:05,520
I'd.
So I sometimes say I I don't.
1155
01:16:06,200 --> 01:16:11,440
I don't.
I don't believe in God, At least
1156
01:16:11,440 --> 01:16:14,760
not any kind of God that I've
encountered yet.
1157
01:16:16,200 --> 01:16:20,480
But I do believe in free will,
or I have faith in free will.
1158
01:16:20,480 --> 01:16:23,160
That's that's like a crucial
part of my world view.
1159
01:16:23,600 --> 01:16:27,280
It's interesting 'cause, I mean,
while Sapolsky does a complete
1160
01:16:28,200 --> 01:16:31,680
take me like a 180 from what
you'd expect him to believe,
1161
01:16:31,920 --> 01:16:34,800
someone who does that for me as
well is Daniel Dennett.
1162
01:16:34,800 --> 01:16:37,520
Because I would.
I would assume Dennett would be
1163
01:16:37,840 --> 01:16:41,080
a A Free Will Illusionist.
But some reason is not and I'm
1164
01:16:41,080 --> 01:16:44,440
always surprised by that.
Yeah, he wrote.
1165
01:16:44,440 --> 01:16:46,160
Let me see.
He wrote a book called Freedom
1166
01:16:46,160 --> 01:16:51,840
Evolves that I I thought was
really profound.
1167
01:16:51,880 --> 01:16:57,840
I I, I then it annoys me often
just because he's such a smarty
1168
01:16:57,840 --> 01:16:59,200
pants.
He's so smug.
1169
01:16:59,200 --> 01:17:02,040
He's a brilliant writer, but
he's always so pleased with
1170
01:17:02,040 --> 01:17:05,960
himself and and he's always so
sure that he's right about
1171
01:17:06,320 --> 01:17:09,960
absolutely everything and he's
got this idea that consciousness
1172
01:17:09,960 --> 01:17:14,600
is an illusion, which he's he's
criticized for that in some ways
1173
01:17:14,600 --> 01:17:18,080
that are unfair, but in other
ways that I think are absolutely
1174
01:17:18,080 --> 01:17:20,200
justified.
So you're right, I would have
1175
01:17:20,200 --> 01:17:23,760
expected him to be a hardcore
determinist because he's a
1176
01:17:23,760 --> 01:17:28,520
hardcore materialist, but he
almost talks, he talks about
1177
01:17:28,520 --> 01:17:35,000
free will as being a kind of an
invention like like money or
1178
01:17:35,000 --> 01:17:37,840
marriage.
So it's not part of the nature
1179
01:17:37,840 --> 01:17:41,640
of reality, but it's an
invention that has proved to be
1180
01:17:42,960 --> 01:17:50,000
extremely useful and meaningful.
And once, like money, once it's
1181
01:17:50,000 --> 01:17:54,200
there, it is real.
Once you start believing it free
1182
01:17:54,200 --> 01:17:59,320
will, you start believing that
you have all these choices, then
1183
01:17:59,880 --> 01:18:01,800
you can't deny it.
It's it's there.
1184
01:18:01,800 --> 01:18:05,280
It's it's part of our lives.
And what I like about Dennett
1185
01:18:05,280 --> 01:18:10,440
made me realize that free will
is it is not something that is
1186
01:18:10,440 --> 01:18:16,080
just on the level of
individuals, it's it's political
1187
01:18:16,080 --> 01:18:18,840
as well.
So I think you can even look at
1188
01:18:18,840 --> 01:18:22,480
different societies, judge them,
rank them according to how much
1189
01:18:23,160 --> 01:18:27,280
free will citizens have, which
means how many choices they
1190
01:18:27,280 --> 01:18:29,360
have.
There's some societies in which
1191
01:18:29,360 --> 01:18:33,680
people have very few choices,
and especially if you go back in
1192
01:18:33,680 --> 01:18:36,960
history, most people had very
few choices in how to live their
1193
01:18:36,960 --> 01:18:41,040
lives.
But nowadays, lots of people,
1194
01:18:41,040 --> 01:18:43,920
I'm assuming you and I are part
of this category.
1195
01:18:44,320 --> 01:18:46,880
There are all sorts of crazy
things we can do with our lives.
1196
01:18:47,520 --> 01:18:51,440
And that is one of the great
triumphs of of human evolution
1197
01:18:51,440 --> 01:18:55,920
and the evolution of of culture
to give us more and more
1198
01:18:55,920 --> 01:18:58,440
choices, to give us more and
more free will.
1199
01:19:00,080 --> 01:19:03,840
And so that's another reason why
I don't like denying free will,
1200
01:19:03,840 --> 01:19:07,320
because it seems to me that
you're denying this really
1201
01:19:07,320 --> 01:19:10,320
amazing, fundamental part of
human progress.
1202
01:19:11,080 --> 01:19:13,920
Have you Seen Dennis wrote a new
book called I've Been Thinking.
1203
01:19:14,200 --> 01:19:15,560
I think it's called I've Been
Thinking.
1204
01:19:16,080 --> 01:19:20,920
It's a memoir.
I started reading it because I I
1205
01:19:20,920 --> 01:19:24,080
get people send me galleys.
They're they're they they keep
1206
01:19:24,080 --> 01:19:27,080
hoping I'm going to write
something positive about these
1207
01:19:27,080 --> 01:19:29,040
books, even though evidence
suggests otherwise.
1208
01:19:29,040 --> 01:19:33,040
And I got it.
And it this is probably unfair.
1209
01:19:33,040 --> 01:19:39,400
It just I I it was so self
congratulatory from the start
1210
01:19:39,840 --> 01:19:42,040
that it kind of turned me off.
So I set it aside.
1211
01:19:42,040 --> 01:19:44,040
I should probably try it again.
Have you read it?
1212
01:19:44,280 --> 01:19:46,840
No, not yet.
But I have seen similar reviews
1213
01:19:46,880 --> 01:19:49,920
online.
I saw someone defended it by
1214
01:19:49,920 --> 01:19:51,880
saying I mean if you're a
philosopher.
1215
01:19:53,760 --> 01:19:56,480
Yeah, your job is to actually
talk, to counter argue and talk
1216
01:19:56,480 --> 01:19:58,040
to people and have that sort of
smugness.
1217
01:19:58,040 --> 01:19:59,480
You need to almost have that
confidence.
1218
01:19:59,480 --> 01:20:01,920
So I I saw a lot of people
defending him as well saying,
1219
01:20:01,920 --> 01:20:04,560
look you should actually be this
confident when you're trying to
1220
01:20:04,560 --> 01:20:07,080
make such profound counter
arguments to things.
1221
01:20:07,440 --> 01:20:10,360
But I mean, but it seems to me
everyone's everyone is
1222
01:20:10,360 --> 01:20:14,560
commenting on that.
And and for a for a philosopher,
1223
01:20:15,000 --> 01:20:17,640
he's really a good writer.
He constantly is coining all
1224
01:20:17,640 --> 01:20:21,160
these all these phrases.
And by the way we're talking
1225
01:20:21,160 --> 01:20:27,960
about Dennett, I I want to, I'd
like to mention this famous idea
1226
01:20:28,800 --> 01:20:33,040
that he's had and I mentioned it
a little bit earlier and he's
1227
01:20:33,040 --> 01:20:35,920
been really criticized for IT.
People sometimes say that he
1228
01:20:35,920 --> 01:20:39,480
claims consciousness is an
illusion and that means
1229
01:20:39,480 --> 01:20:43,920
consciousness doesn't exist.
And how could a such a smart
1230
01:20:43,920 --> 01:20:46,440
person have such a stupid idea,
is what a lot of people have
1231
01:20:46,440 --> 01:20:51,000
said.
And so he went on and on about
1232
01:20:51,000 --> 01:20:52,880
this idea in his book
Consciousness.
1233
01:20:53,920 --> 01:20:59,480
Explained no, yes, but in a more
recent book, From Bacteria to
1234
01:20:59,480 --> 01:21:08,280
Bach and and so and I finally
realized what he was up, what he
1235
01:21:08,280 --> 01:21:10,720
meant by this idea that
consciousness is an illusion.
1236
01:21:11,120 --> 01:21:16,120
In that book, he had this
wonderful phrase, competence
1237
01:21:16,120 --> 01:21:19,200
without comprehension.
And he's just making the point
1238
01:21:19,200 --> 01:21:23,840
that much of what we do that
gets us through a typical day
1239
01:21:24,360 --> 01:21:28,520
involves unconscious information
processing.
1240
01:21:28,920 --> 01:21:34,480
We're sort of like zombies.
We're like automatons performing
1241
01:21:34,520 --> 01:21:37,440
various chores.
Then it might say, even this
1242
01:21:37,440 --> 01:21:40,760
conversation that you and I are
having right now, we've got
1243
01:21:40,760 --> 01:21:44,160
these programs kind of stored up
and we're sort of switching them
1244
01:21:44,160 --> 01:21:46,600
on and and off.
I don't buy that.
1245
01:21:46,600 --> 01:21:51,080
But I understand what he means.
And the more I've thought about
1246
01:21:51,080 --> 01:21:58,760
it, the more I have to recognize
this disturbing truth that I am
1247
01:21:58,760 --> 01:22:02,960
kind of like an automaton and I
and I am kind of like a zombie.
1248
01:22:03,160 --> 01:22:06,360
And I think most humans are.
So Dennett isn't saying that
1249
01:22:06,360 --> 01:22:10,760
consciousness doesn't exist.
He's basically saying it's it's
1250
01:22:10,760 --> 01:22:15,120
just not very important.
It's so unimportant that it
1251
01:22:15,120 --> 01:22:19,600
might as well not exist.
I think that's that's his point.
1252
01:22:19,960 --> 01:22:24,920
And I've done a lot of
reflection on this in part
1253
01:22:24,920 --> 01:22:28,800
'cause I just wrote this book
about quantum mechanics and I
1254
01:22:29,000 --> 01:22:31,760
and A lot of physicists, as you
probably know, they learn
1255
01:22:31,760 --> 01:22:35,640
quantum mechanics and they're
told to shut up and calculate.
1256
01:22:35,640 --> 01:22:38,320
They're told not to think about
what quantum mechanics means.
1257
01:22:38,560 --> 01:22:41,720
So in other words, they're
they're taught in a way that
1258
01:22:41,720 --> 01:22:49,080
promotes competence over
comprehension and and trying to
1259
01:22:49,080 --> 01:22:52,960
learn quantum mechanics and
learning all the math and doing
1260
01:22:52,960 --> 01:22:57,920
all these math exercises just
made me aware of myself as this
1261
01:22:57,920 --> 01:23:02,560
gigantic collection of
algorithms that are all
1262
01:23:02,560 --> 01:23:08,560
constantly chugging along and
and propelling me through life.
1263
01:23:09,000 --> 01:23:11,920
And I don't, I don't really
understand any of them.
1264
01:23:13,040 --> 01:23:21,040
So I give, I give, I give
Dennett more credit for that now
1265
01:23:21,280 --> 01:23:23,880
than I used to.
And in fact it it's a very
1266
01:23:23,880 --> 01:23:31,800
disturbing but profound insight
into the human condition.
1267
01:23:31,800 --> 01:23:34,760
And by the way, it's kind of the
same thing with that, with that
1268
01:23:34,760 --> 01:23:37,240
Henry James was saying in the
Golden Bowl.
1269
01:23:37,720 --> 01:23:41,520
Nobody really knows anything.
You know, it's it's Dennis
1270
01:23:41,520 --> 01:23:44,360
Dennis's a very good writer.
I mean, when I wrote my own
1271
01:23:44,360 --> 01:23:47,000
dissertation, I actually helped
defend some of his own, his
1272
01:23:47,000 --> 01:23:49,200
views, because he made such an
impact on me.
1273
01:23:49,200 --> 01:23:51,600
And I wrote on Illusionism as a
theory of consciousness.
1274
01:23:52,000 --> 01:23:55,680
And I mean to quote him,
consciousness is an illusion of
1275
01:23:55,680 --> 01:23:57,520
the brain for the brain by the
brain.
1276
01:23:58,520 --> 01:24:01,400
There is no central homunculus.
He he he's just trying to say
1277
01:24:01,400 --> 01:24:05,720
that that phenomenal essence
like ethereal entity that we all
1278
01:24:05,720 --> 01:24:08,320
think so mystical.
Is just not there.
1279
01:24:08,320 --> 01:24:12,160
There's no such thing as that.
It's it's a misinterpretation
1280
01:24:12,160 --> 01:24:15,480
because of our algorithms
telling us that something is is
1281
01:24:15,480 --> 01:24:18,120
sort of there and it takes us
out of that pedestal that you
1282
01:24:18,120 --> 01:24:21,160
were talking about earlier.
He he's basically trying to tell
1283
01:24:21,160 --> 01:24:23,880
us that we're not as important
as we think we're.
1284
01:24:24,840 --> 01:24:28,160
We pretty much like to believe
we are but there is no sort of
1285
01:24:28,520 --> 01:24:30,360
on switch that kind of just
switches.
1286
01:24:30,480 --> 01:24:33,880
Switches hold zombie on, but
basically we are on that
1287
01:24:33,880 --> 01:24:35,440
autopilot state most of the
time.
1288
01:24:36,960 --> 01:24:41,160
Yeah I you know and and this
whole idea that we're we're
1289
01:24:41,160 --> 01:24:49,160
zombies or automatons.
I think it's I think it's a
1290
01:24:49,160 --> 01:24:57,600
really important point to make
and to accept because it gets us
1291
01:24:57,600 --> 01:25:01,920
to try to oppose it to counter
it.
1292
01:25:02,200 --> 01:25:08,440
So I've become aware of I think
Dennett one of the implications
1293
01:25:08,440 --> 01:25:11,640
of his writing or maybe he's
even spelled that this out is
1294
01:25:11,640 --> 01:25:17,720
that we're we're machines that
are designed to do various
1295
01:25:17,720 --> 01:25:23,880
things mainly to live long
enough to reproduce and and send
1296
01:25:23,880 --> 01:25:29,440
our offspring off into the next
generation without us.
1297
01:25:29,440 --> 01:25:31,400
That's our that's our basic
purpose here.
1298
01:25:31,400 --> 01:25:34,760
Then we can accomplish various
other things that are kind of
1299
01:25:34,760 --> 01:25:37,360
related to that and we don't
really need a lot of
1300
01:25:37,360 --> 01:25:41,800
consciousness and our brains are
designed to detect novelty and
1301
01:25:41,800 --> 01:25:44,880
to sort of overlook things that
aren't necessary for adjusting
1302
01:25:44,880 --> 01:25:49,560
our worldview and and trying to
solve problems in a different
1303
01:25:49,560 --> 01:25:54,400
way.
So as a result we're we're
1304
01:25:54,400 --> 01:25:56,760
constantly being habituated to
life.
1305
01:25:57,640 --> 01:26:02,800
We're, we're, we take it for
granted and we don't really see
1306
01:26:02,800 --> 01:26:08,320
anything.
And this is how I I see myself.
1307
01:26:08,320 --> 01:26:13,600
I'm constantly sort of trying to
remind myself, just wake up,
1308
01:26:13,600 --> 01:26:17,440
quit sleepwalking through this
day, just stop and look around
1309
01:26:17,440 --> 01:26:20,400
you and notice things for a
change.
1310
01:26:21,160 --> 01:26:26,480
And it seems to me that that's.
We haven't really talked that
1311
01:26:26,480 --> 01:26:29,600
much about spirituality in this
conversation yet.
1312
01:26:29,600 --> 01:26:34,520
But for me, spirituality just
means waking up and overcoming
1313
01:26:34,520 --> 01:26:38,880
your habituation, stepping
outside of your zombie robot
1314
01:26:38,880 --> 01:26:44,120
self and saying, holy shit, look
at look at this.
1315
01:26:45,000 --> 01:26:48,640
Look at where we are.
What?
1316
01:26:48,640 --> 01:26:53,920
How infinitely improbable this
situation right here is.
1317
01:26:53,920 --> 01:26:59,680
How infinitely improbable I am
and you are, and this whole
1318
01:26:59,680 --> 01:27:02,480
thing.
And unfortunately, our brains
1319
01:27:02,480 --> 01:27:09,120
are designed to get us to forget
about that, the improbability of
1320
01:27:09,120 --> 01:27:13,480
things.
And so I'm grateful for to
1321
01:27:13,760 --> 01:27:18,000
Dennett for having pointed out
this tendency that we have to
1322
01:27:18,000 --> 01:27:23,200
become unconscious and to have
just competence without
1323
01:27:23,200 --> 01:27:25,600
comprehension, and to become
zombies.
1324
01:27:25,960 --> 01:27:28,560
Because it makes me think, no, I
don't want to be that way.
1325
01:27:28,560 --> 01:27:32,200
I want to try to wake up at
least for a couple of seconds
1326
01:27:32,240 --> 01:27:35,360
every day.
Someone who adds to Dennett's
1327
01:27:35,360 --> 01:27:38,400
work and Frankish's work on what
you're talking about right now
1328
01:27:38,600 --> 01:27:41,920
is actually Susan Blackmore.
She she writes on delusionism
1329
01:27:41,920 --> 01:27:45,240
and she she asks this, she she
forces the reader to ask this
1330
01:27:45,240 --> 01:27:47,280
question.
Am I conscious now?
1331
01:27:47,720 --> 01:27:50,720
Because we'd never walk through
life really asking that
1332
01:27:50,720 --> 01:27:52,600
question.
And that's why it's a delusion.
1333
01:27:52,880 --> 01:27:55,480
It's almost a delusional thought
to assume you're conscious when
1334
01:27:55,480 --> 01:27:57,520
you walk through most of your
life, not even asking that
1335
01:27:57,520 --> 01:27:58,120
question.
What?
1336
01:27:59,120 --> 01:28:00,720
Because not many people ask that
question.
1337
01:28:00,720 --> 01:28:03,960
Am I conscious right now?
Like, what am I really in this
1338
01:28:03,960 --> 01:28:06,720
moment?
Am I present completely aware?
1339
01:28:07,080 --> 01:28:10,040
It's it's very, it's most people
have to train a skill to do
1340
01:28:10,040 --> 01:28:11,360
that.
You have to meditate for years.
1341
01:28:11,360 --> 01:28:14,800
You have to go through sort of a
trip, some sort of an experience
1342
01:28:14,800 --> 01:28:17,480
because for the most part most
people are actually in that
1343
01:28:17,480 --> 01:28:22,920
state.
Yeah, I so I'm I'm again because
1344
01:28:22,920 --> 01:28:25,360
I'm I'm an old hippie.
I'm really interested in the
1345
01:28:25,360 --> 01:28:29,680
whole spirituality scene and the
possibility of enlightenment and
1346
01:28:29,680 --> 01:28:34,360
gurus and and all that nonsense.
And you know, there's so much
1347
01:28:34,360 --> 01:28:38,880
bullshit in the realm of
spirituality and what I call the
1348
01:28:38,880 --> 01:28:44,840
Enlightenment racket, but but
there's something at the core of
1349
01:28:44,840 --> 01:28:51,120
it that's real.
I think a lot of spirituality is
1350
01:28:51,400 --> 01:28:57,840
is aimed at just making people
happy and at overcoming bad
1351
01:28:57,840 --> 01:29:01,360
habits of thought or just bad
habits, period.
1352
01:29:01,360 --> 01:29:05,640
And I see it in some cases as a
form of brainwashing.
1353
01:29:05,680 --> 01:29:07,520
Just don't have those negative
thoughts.
1354
01:29:07,520 --> 01:29:09,640
Just be happy, you know, That
kind of thing.
1355
01:29:10,000 --> 01:29:14,800
I'm actually not interested in
spirituality as a as a route to
1356
01:29:15,480 --> 01:29:17,680
happiness.
I'm I'm fortunate and I'm like
1357
01:29:18,680 --> 01:29:22,560
more or less a pretty happy
person.
1358
01:29:23,320 --> 01:29:26,360
I'm prone to anxiety.
I have been depressed in my
1359
01:29:26,360 --> 01:29:27,760
life.
But I'm OK.
1360
01:29:27,760 --> 01:29:32,000
I think I got good genes.
So I'm more interested in
1361
01:29:32,000 --> 01:29:36,240
spirituality and mysticism as a
root to truth.
1362
01:29:36,920 --> 01:29:40,960
And that means being conscious.
That means waking up.
1363
01:29:41,000 --> 01:29:44,000
And then you know what is the
truth?
1364
01:29:44,080 --> 01:29:44,640
What?
What?
1365
01:29:44,640 --> 01:29:49,360
What are you supposed to see
when you when you're conscious
1366
01:29:49,360 --> 01:29:51,160
when you stop and wake up And
it's.
1367
01:29:51,160 --> 01:29:54,720
And for me and I've talked about
this with a lot of people who
1368
01:29:55,560 --> 01:30:02,680
claim to be enlightened and and
some of them agree with this,
1369
01:30:02,800 --> 01:30:05,720
but many of them don't.
Many of them see enlightenment
1370
01:30:05,720 --> 01:30:09,600
as a kind of like state of
terminal chilling out.
1371
01:30:09,680 --> 01:30:12,720
You're just like, yeah, man,
everything is copacetic.
1372
01:30:12,720 --> 01:30:18,680
That's fine.
I see it more as what I was
1373
01:30:18,680 --> 01:30:25,040
talking about before,
recognizing that the odds that
1374
01:30:25,040 --> 01:30:32,640
we existed all are infinite if
we if we see things accurately.
1375
01:30:32,640 --> 01:30:34,760
And I think science points to
this too.
1376
01:30:35,960 --> 01:30:40,320
Physics and complexity theory
and even attempts to understand
1377
01:30:40,320 --> 01:30:44,280
the origin of life, all points
to our existence here.
1378
01:30:45,320 --> 01:30:48,320
The existence of humanity, let
alone each of us as individuals,
1379
01:30:48,640 --> 01:30:55,680
as infinitely improbable.
And And therefore when you see
1380
01:30:55,680 --> 01:31:01,000
things that way, you're not
saying, well, yeah, they're
1381
01:31:01,000 --> 01:31:04,040
infinitely improbable because
there was the fluctuation and
1382
01:31:04,040 --> 01:31:07,800
the primordial void and that it
led to inflation.
1383
01:31:07,800 --> 01:31:11,840
But it's not.
You're not seeing how things
1384
01:31:11,840 --> 01:31:13,480
are, you're just seeing that
things are.
1385
01:31:13,920 --> 01:31:19,880
So actually Wittgenstein, who's
also, you know, a philosopher,
1386
01:31:19,880 --> 01:31:23,680
has had an an effect on me.
But I read him as a poet and his
1387
01:31:23,800 --> 01:31:29,200
book Tractatus, which is just
like a crazy prose poem.
1388
01:31:29,600 --> 01:31:35,680
He's got a phrase at the end
that says this is translated
1389
01:31:35,680 --> 01:31:40,200
from the German.
The gist of it is not how the
1390
01:31:40,200 --> 01:31:45,160
world is is the mystical, but
that it is.
1391
01:31:46,800 --> 01:31:49,080
So you're not saying.
You're not looking at the world
1392
01:31:49,080 --> 01:31:51,360
and saying, Oh yeah, it's 'cause
it.
1393
01:31:51,360 --> 01:31:54,440
The world is here because it was
created by God.
1394
01:31:54,440 --> 01:31:57,160
Oh, isn't that far out?
You're just seeing the stark
1395
01:31:58,160 --> 01:32:03,240
fact of existence and it blows
you away and you realize the
1396
01:32:03,240 --> 01:32:08,520
total inadequacy of any theory
or theology of any language for
1397
01:32:09,200 --> 01:32:11,760
or explanation for doing it
justice.
1398
01:32:11,760 --> 01:32:20,680
He just are overwhelmed by it.
And that's to me that's that is
1399
01:32:20,680 --> 01:32:24,080
what enlightenment would be,
being like that all the time.
1400
01:32:24,200 --> 01:32:28,320
The problem is if you're in,
you're going like, oh fuck, Oh
1401
01:32:28,320 --> 01:32:30,240
my God, I can't believe I'm
alive.
1402
01:32:31,360 --> 01:32:33,720
You still gotta, you know, I I
gotta go teach a bunch of
1403
01:32:33,720 --> 01:32:37,440
freshmen tomorrow.
I got to pay my bills, I have to
1404
01:32:37,440 --> 01:32:40,080
hang out with my girlfriend, and
she doesn't want me to be
1405
01:32:40,080 --> 01:32:43,880
totally nuts and babbling about
the mystery of existence all the
1406
01:32:43,880 --> 01:32:46,360
time.
So you still got to live your
1407
01:32:46,360 --> 01:32:51,040
life.
But I try to have some of those
1408
01:32:51,040 --> 01:32:54,520
moments as often as I can.
It's about trying to find that
1409
01:32:54,520 --> 01:32:56,680
balance of not merely staying
alive, but living.
1410
01:32:57,600 --> 01:33:04,040
Yes, and some people pull it off
better than others.
1411
01:33:04,040 --> 01:33:06,360
I mean, you can go and live in a
cave in the woods, but I don't
1412
01:33:06,360 --> 01:33:09,560
want to.
I don't want to do that, you
1413
01:33:09,560 --> 01:33:12,920
know?
I like, I like the practical
1414
01:33:13,800 --> 01:33:16,120
aspects of life too.
I like being a good teacher.
1415
01:33:16,120 --> 01:33:19,600
I like writing, talking to
people like you and and I like
1416
01:33:19,600 --> 01:33:22,240
having friends.
I like having a girlfriend.
1417
01:33:22,240 --> 01:33:25,200
I've got two kids that I love
all that stuff.
1418
01:33:26,560 --> 01:33:30,560
It keeps me rooted in the world
and that's that's fine.
1419
01:33:31,120 --> 01:33:33,240
And I think that's that's
absolutely beautiful and it's a
1420
01:33:33,240 --> 01:33:35,960
great way to sort of round this
conversation up.
1421
01:33:35,960 --> 01:33:38,960
John, what do you think from
from your years of experience
1422
01:33:38,960 --> 01:33:43,560
and as a as a very well known
science writer, how how else do
1423
01:33:43,560 --> 01:33:46,600
you believe we should pursue
truth and how should we approach
1424
01:33:46,600 --> 01:33:50,840
science moving forward?
Oh wow.
1425
01:33:52,800 --> 01:33:56,280
I think it's doing OK.
I the one of the problems with
1426
01:33:56,280 --> 01:34:00,960
science right now that a lot of
people are commenting on is the
1427
01:34:01,440 --> 01:34:09,840
the careerism, the ambition.
The constant pressure to publish
1428
01:34:10,320 --> 01:34:16,360
and to publicize your results is
leading to a lot of crappy
1429
01:34:16,360 --> 01:34:21,480
science and including I mean, if
it's string theory, who cares?
1430
01:34:22,040 --> 01:34:24,720
But it's leading to crappy
science in areas that matter.
1431
01:34:24,720 --> 01:34:28,600
In biomedicine, you know, drugs
for cancer are being promoted
1432
01:34:28,600 --> 01:34:31,680
that actually aren't very
effective or might even be
1433
01:34:31,680 --> 01:34:34,200
harmful.
Same with drugs for mental
1434
01:34:34,200 --> 01:34:39,840
illness.
I I still think science is this
1435
01:34:39,840 --> 01:34:45,440
incredible cultural invention,
and I'm so happy to be kind of
1436
01:34:45,880 --> 01:34:50,800
along for the ride, watching
what the scientists do and
1437
01:34:50,800 --> 01:34:57,120
watching new ideas emerge
related to consciousness or the
1438
01:34:57,120 --> 01:35:00,080
origin of the universe or
whatever.
1439
01:35:01,840 --> 01:35:06,160
I don't really, I don't really
have any big ideas for reform
1440
01:35:06,160 --> 01:35:09,560
except just to tell people.
And this is it's hard.
1441
01:35:09,560 --> 01:35:11,360
If you're out there, you're
ambitious, you're trying to get
1442
01:35:11,360 --> 01:35:14,040
a name for yourself.
But I think scientists just need
1443
01:35:14,040 --> 01:35:18,080
to be a little more modest and
humble in their claims and to
1444
01:35:18,080 --> 01:35:21,400
recognize that there are, and
this is weird coming from a guy
1445
01:35:21,400 --> 01:35:23,640
named The Who wrote a book
called The End of Science.
1446
01:35:23,840 --> 01:35:26,640
But to realize that they're part
of an infinite conversation,
1447
01:35:27,120 --> 01:35:31,960
it's it's going to keep going
forever.
1448
01:35:32,680 --> 01:35:37,920
And not to make the claim that
they've got final answers ever,
1449
01:35:37,920 --> 01:35:39,760
because there are no final
answers.
1450
01:35:40,880 --> 01:35:43,240
John, thank you so much.
Any final words from your side?
1451
01:35:43,240 --> 01:35:44,680
It's been such a pleasure, man.
Thanks.
1452
01:35:44,680 --> 01:35:48,480
Thanks so much for joining me.
Hey, I, you know, as I said,
1453
01:35:48,560 --> 01:35:52,320
this is, this is the best part
of the job for me is talking
1454
01:35:52,320 --> 01:35:56,720
about this stuff with somebody
else who who cares about these
1455
01:35:56,720 --> 01:35:58,560
issues as well.
So it's been an enormous
1456
01:35:58,560 --> 01:35:59,640
pleasure for me.
00:00:10,240 --> 00:00:14,160
John, you wrote a wonderful book
called Mind Body Problems and I
2
00:00:14,160 --> 00:00:16,239
remember when I read it I
thought this is such a creative
3
00:00:16,239 --> 00:00:19,200
way to approach the infamous
mind body problem.
4
00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:23,280
So my first question for you is
what is your interpretation of
5
00:00:23,280 --> 00:00:27,040
the mind Body problem and how
did that inspire you to write
6
00:00:27,040 --> 00:00:30,160
the book?
Yeah, good question.
7
00:00:31,840 --> 00:00:36,840
My, my, my way of looking at the
mind body problem has evolved a
8
00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:44,600
lot over the decades.
I first started writing about it
9
00:00:45,400 --> 00:00:49,160
when I was writing about
consciousness in the early 90s.
10
00:00:49,200 --> 00:00:54,440
Consciousness.
The hard problem I was actually
11
00:00:54,800 --> 00:00:57,400
at.
A talk by David Chalmers in the
12
00:00:57,400 --> 00:01:01,240
early 1990s at this big
conference in in Tucson, AZ,
13
00:01:01,400 --> 00:01:05,040
where he used the phrase the
hard problem for the first time.
14
00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:07,920
And there weren't many people in
the audience.
15
00:01:07,960 --> 00:01:11,160
Chalmers was just this obscure
long haired philosopher from
16
00:01:11,160 --> 00:01:14,040
Australia.
But I remember the audience
17
00:01:14,040 --> 00:01:16,560
there is it was early morning
and people were kind of sleepy,
18
00:01:16,560 --> 00:01:19,600
but people perked up at that
phrase, the hard consciousness.
19
00:01:19,960 --> 00:01:22,360
I mean the hard problem.
And I wrote it down in my
20
00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:24,600
notebook.
I reported on this.
21
00:01:25,320 --> 00:01:28,680
This talk and other things that
happened at this meeting for
22
00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:34,160
Scientific American.
So my initial idea of the mind
23
00:01:34,160 --> 00:01:40,360
body problem was how does the
brain generate conscious states?
24
00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:45,240
These first person states that I
and you presumably also are
25
00:01:45,240 --> 00:01:49,200
having right now.
So I saw the mind body problem
26
00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:54,640
in pretty narrow terms.
And this is the way it had been
27
00:01:54,640 --> 00:01:58,800
defined by Francis Crick, this
guy named Christophe Koch, who
28
00:01:58,800 --> 00:02:03,600
is was Crick's collaborator in
trying to solve the the mind
29
00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:07,720
body problem.
Over time, my my view of the
30
00:02:07,720 --> 00:02:12,800
mind body problem became much
more expansive, and now I think
31
00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:20,120
of it as the question of what we
are, what we are as humans, and
32
00:02:20,120 --> 00:02:24,760
that encompasses.
Personal identity What am I?
33
00:02:25,680 --> 00:02:31,400
What kind of human being am I?
It it it encompasses the idea of
34
00:02:31,400 --> 00:02:35,280
collective identity.
What are humans in general?
35
00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:39,000
What have we always been?
What will we be in the future?
36
00:02:39,160 --> 00:02:43,480
I think it encompasses moral
questions, because if you're if
37
00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:47,360
we're talking about what we are,
we also, at least implicitly,
38
00:02:47,360 --> 00:02:52,040
are always talking about.
What we should be, what
39
00:02:52,160 --> 00:02:55,280
constitutes a good person?
What constitutes a good life?
40
00:02:55,840 --> 00:03:00,320
And we're also talking about
what we can be.
41
00:03:00,320 --> 00:03:02,920
And that's where science comes
in.
42
00:03:02,920 --> 00:03:07,640
To what extent can we alter what
we are through these different
43
00:03:07,640 --> 00:03:09,480
technologies?
Brain implants, genetic
44
00:03:09,480 --> 00:03:12,360
engineering, drugs, those sorts
of things.
45
00:03:12,360 --> 00:03:15,800
So now the mind body problem is
all these different
46
00:03:15,800 --> 00:03:19,640
interconnected questions.
They come down to the big
47
00:03:19,680 --> 00:03:23,120
primordial question.
What are we really?
48
00:03:30,910 --> 00:03:33,230
Sorry, Jonah, the connection
just stopped for a second there.
49
00:03:33,390 --> 00:03:36,030
Are you back?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I saw you.
50
00:03:36,150 --> 00:03:38,510
You just froze.
You're in South Africa, right?
51
00:03:38,710 --> 00:03:40,750
No.
So that's my fault because I
52
00:03:40,750 --> 00:03:43,910
just switched over to my to my
to another Internet connection.
53
00:03:44,910 --> 00:03:46,670
Oh, OK.
Sorry about that.
54
00:03:46,990 --> 00:03:48,910
Continue.
Yeah.
55
00:03:49,270 --> 00:03:51,150
Sorry.
Yes, I am South Africa, by the
56
00:03:51,150 --> 00:03:56,880
way.
Yeah, so my point was that the
57
00:03:56,880 --> 00:04:02,640
mind body problem I see now as
including the hard problem of
58
00:04:02,640 --> 00:04:06,160
consciousness, but all these
other sorts of questions too,
59
00:04:06,160 --> 00:04:12,040
about personal identity, about
collective collective identity,
60
00:04:12,040 --> 00:04:14,120
about how we should live our
lives.
61
00:04:14,120 --> 00:04:19,440
So it includes these sorts of
moral and and even political
62
00:04:19,800 --> 00:04:23,440
questions.
And it also includes questions
63
00:04:23,440 --> 00:04:28,800
about what we can be, to what
extent can we alter ourselves
64
00:04:29,240 --> 00:04:34,440
with technology, with with brain
implants and genetic engineering
65
00:04:34,440 --> 00:04:38,280
and and these sorts of things.
I remember when I spoke to
66
00:04:38,280 --> 00:04:41,360
Nicholas Humphrey, he he was the
one who told me about your book
67
00:04:41,360 --> 00:04:43,920
because I hadn't I I had not
seen it at the time.
68
00:04:43,920 --> 00:04:46,400
And when I read it, I found this
approach very fascinating
69
00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:49,000
because essentially what you're
talking about right now, how
70
00:04:49,000 --> 00:04:51,200
this incorporates so many
different ideas, personal
71
00:04:51,200 --> 00:04:56,120
identity, moral responsibility.
I mean you you approached it by
72
00:04:56,120 --> 00:04:59,040
looking at the philosophers or
scientists from their own
73
00:04:59,040 --> 00:05:01,560
journeys and their personal
journeys moving forward.
74
00:05:01,560 --> 00:05:03,000
So talk to me about that
process.
75
00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:10,040
What inspired them?
Well, I gradually began to
76
00:05:11,080 --> 00:05:16,400
arrive at this idea that I began
questioning the idea that there
77
00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:19,680
was.
A solution to the mind body
78
00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:25,040
problem, either as narrowly
defined as the the hard problem
79
00:05:25,040 --> 00:05:28,520
of consciousness or this more
expansive idea of the mind body
80
00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:31,480
problem, answering the question
of what we really are.
81
00:05:31,760 --> 00:05:38,200
How can it possibly be that one
answer can suffice for all of
82
00:05:38,200 --> 00:05:41,160
us?
Now you can look at human
83
00:05:41,160 --> 00:05:45,480
history in a way as the struggle
to find one answer.
84
00:05:46,160 --> 00:05:48,720
To this question of what we
really are, all religions
85
00:05:49,000 --> 00:05:53,720
purport to answer that question.
You've got non religious
86
00:05:53,800 --> 00:05:58,280
ideologies like Marxism.
That also is really kind of a
87
00:05:58,280 --> 00:06:01,440
response to to the mind body
problem.
88
00:06:01,440 --> 00:06:03,240
Marx is saying this is what we
are.
89
00:06:03,240 --> 00:06:06,520
We're these economic agents and
we they're we, we inhabit
90
00:06:06,520 --> 00:06:08,200
different classes and all this
sorts of.
91
00:06:08,880 --> 00:06:11,960
All this sort of stuff.
And this is how we should live
92
00:06:11,960 --> 00:06:14,680
our lives.
We should reform ourselves in in
93
00:06:15,200 --> 00:06:17,680
these various ways that Marx
spelled out.
94
00:06:17,960 --> 00:06:21,760
Then you've got these other
scientific theories like
95
00:06:21,760 --> 00:06:26,000
eugenics that also is this
implicit answer to the mind body
96
00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:28,960
problem.
Lots of theories when you get
97
00:06:29,040 --> 00:06:33,000
closer to the present, saying
that we're we're a bunch of
98
00:06:33,000 --> 00:06:36,440
algorithms, we're a collection
of genes.
99
00:06:37,640 --> 00:06:41,120
Richard Dawkins, the famous
biologist, defined us as just a
100
00:06:41,520 --> 00:06:44,120
a cluster of selfish genes
trying to get into the next
101
00:06:44,120 --> 00:06:47,080
generation.
That's an interesting idea.
102
00:06:47,760 --> 00:06:50,760
We're just a bunch of
neurotransmitters rattling
103
00:06:50,760 --> 00:06:58,360
around in in our skulls.
So the answers, the potential
104
00:06:58,360 --> 00:07:02,880
answers to the mind body problem
have have proliferated
105
00:07:02,880 --> 00:07:05,040
enormously.
And that.
106
00:07:05,600 --> 00:07:10,120
Especially makes me think that
no answer can suffice,
107
00:07:10,920 --> 00:07:14,320
especially since science keeps
evolving, philosophy keeps
108
00:07:14,320 --> 00:07:18,640
evolving and that means that
there will be answers proposed
109
00:07:18,640 --> 00:07:23,240
to this question 10/20/50 years
from now that nobody even
110
00:07:23,240 --> 00:07:29,480
anticipated.
Also, each individual is going
111
00:07:29,480 --> 00:07:34,600
to answer the mind body problem.
At different times in his or her
112
00:07:34,600 --> 00:07:39,360
life, in different ways, and I
personally, and I assume this
113
00:07:39,360 --> 00:07:42,280
happens with you too, I keep
changing my mind about what I
114
00:07:42,280 --> 00:07:45,920
really AM and what I should be
and what I want out of life.
115
00:07:47,480 --> 00:07:51,720
So to dramatize this idea, which
at first was very kind of blurry
116
00:07:51,720 --> 00:07:56,160
in my head, I decided to write a
book about.
117
00:07:57,000 --> 00:08:01,880
Mind body scholars, coming from
very different philosophical or
118
00:08:01,880 --> 00:08:07,200
scientific perspectives, who
actually had struggled with the
119
00:08:07,200 --> 00:08:09,560
mind body problem in a really
personal way.
120
00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:13,720
They had, they had, They weren't
sure about their own sexual
121
00:08:13,720 --> 00:08:17,520
identity.
They struggled with profound
122
00:08:17,760 --> 00:08:20,920
depression.
I interviewed this one
123
00:08:20,920 --> 00:08:24,600
philosopher who had a brain
tumor that dramatically changed
124
00:08:24,600 --> 00:08:26,640
his.
His personality.
125
00:08:26,640 --> 00:08:31,080
People struggling with severe
grief and as a result, changing
126
00:08:31,080 --> 00:08:36,640
their ideas about who they
really are and about what humans
127
00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:40,880
collectively should be.
So that was my that was my goal
128
00:08:40,880 --> 00:08:44,039
in writing this, in writing the
book, was to dramatize this
129
00:08:44,039 --> 00:08:48,760
suddenly pluralistic view I had
of the mind body problem.
130
00:08:49,240 --> 00:08:52,560
I think you're right, because
not only do I change my mind in
131
00:08:52,560 --> 00:08:55,320
general, but from starting this
podcast, I mean, obviously I
132
00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:57,480
call it Mind Body solution,
paying homage to the problem,
133
00:08:58,000 --> 00:09:00,800
but I don't necessarily believe
we'll find one.
134
00:09:01,240 --> 00:09:05,160
And my own perspective on the
problem in itself has changed
135
00:09:05,360 --> 00:09:07,080
dramatically since starting the
podcast.
136
00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:10,480
I mean, I came in with certain
biases and views and and I've
137
00:09:10,480 --> 00:09:13,520
noticed it just changed the more
someone's able to provide me a
138
00:09:13,640 --> 00:09:16,480
coherent counter arguments to
whatever I believe.
139
00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:19,400
And I find that very fascinating
because it shows just how
140
00:09:19,400 --> 00:09:21,040
difficult this problem actually
is.
141
00:09:22,360 --> 00:09:26,120
And it it's.
I mean, I understand why some
142
00:09:26,120 --> 00:09:33,560
people want to have the answer.
Life is puzzling and it's
143
00:09:33,760 --> 00:09:36,680
agonizing and it can be very,
very difficult.
144
00:09:37,040 --> 00:09:41,720
And we want to think that there
is a solution out there.
145
00:09:42,680 --> 00:09:47,400
We get it and and we and we
realize, ah, this is how I
146
00:09:47,400 --> 00:09:49,680
should live my life.
This is how we should all live
147
00:09:49,680 --> 00:09:54,280
our lives.
And there are lots of people out
148
00:09:54,280 --> 00:09:56,880
there saying that they have
discovered the answer and
149
00:09:56,880 --> 00:10:01,120
they're telling us we should
accept the same answer as as
150
00:10:01,120 --> 00:10:03,320
they do.
But that's such a cramped,
151
00:10:03,320 --> 00:10:07,920
narrow way of looking at life.
It's so much more exhilarating
152
00:10:07,920 --> 00:10:12,880
to me and also more of a
reflection of what reality
153
00:10:12,880 --> 00:10:17,480
actually is to to be open minded
and to say, well here's an
154
00:10:17,480 --> 00:10:21,760
interesting idea.
I'm going to explore this for a
155
00:10:21,760 --> 00:10:24,960
little while, but oh, look over
there.
156
00:10:24,960 --> 00:10:28,480
There's an interesting idea too.
This is something that happens
157
00:10:28,840 --> 00:10:32,320
when a person like you just
talks to other people and you
158
00:10:32,320 --> 00:10:37,720
read books and and you suddenly
see the whole issue in a in a
159
00:10:37,720 --> 00:10:40,320
different light.
That's a wonderful thing, but it
160
00:10:40,320 --> 00:10:47,040
just means you have to give up
this idea of reaching a final
161
00:10:47,040 --> 00:10:49,840
answer.
You have to give up the idea
162
00:10:49,840 --> 00:10:54,160
that there can be certainty when
we're trying to figure out who
163
00:10:54,160 --> 00:10:57,880
we really are.
I spoke to a philosopher named
164
00:10:58,240 --> 00:11:02,440
Francois.
He's French he's he's a camera.
165
00:11:02,480 --> 00:11:04,080
I'm not sure if I'm saying that
correctly surname.
166
00:11:04,080 --> 00:11:08,360
But anyway, he he's a strong
defendant of illusionism and I
167
00:11:08,360 --> 00:11:10,200
told him how my views shifted
over time.
168
00:11:10,200 --> 00:11:12,720
And and even though some
sometimes when I do chat to
169
00:11:12,720 --> 00:11:15,280
certain people, I do disagree
with the view fundamentally.
170
00:11:15,600 --> 00:11:18,920
But I'm able to sort of now at
this time in my life and this
171
00:11:18,920 --> 00:11:20,800
point in my life, I'm able to
create these almost virtual
172
00:11:20,800 --> 00:11:22,080
realities.
And that's what he said I'm
173
00:11:22,080 --> 00:11:25,080
doing is basically I'm creating
this virtual reality, going with
174
00:11:25,080 --> 00:11:27,400
the narrative and just having
the conversation.
175
00:11:27,720 --> 00:11:31,160
And I believe that's been so
vital to making this work
176
00:11:31,160 --> 00:11:35,000
because that way I'm open minded
to all the possibilities while
177
00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:39,440
still remaining a while still
maintaining a reasonable amount
178
00:11:39,440 --> 00:11:41,160
of scepticism.
Do you think that's a good way,
179
00:11:41,160 --> 00:11:44,320
as you from writing, as a
science journalist, someone who
180
00:11:44,320 --> 00:11:48,200
very much attacks a lot of
science from a sceptical manner,
181
00:11:48,200 --> 00:11:51,600
not necessarily anti science?
Well, we'll chat about that in
182
00:11:51,600 --> 00:11:54,520
more detail, but do you think
that's a great way to maintain
183
00:11:54,520 --> 00:11:59,720
an open mind?
Yeah, so I have this this old
184
00:11:59,720 --> 00:12:04,120
friend.
He used to teach history of
185
00:12:04,120 --> 00:12:06,880
science at my school's name is
Jim McClellan.
186
00:12:07,120 --> 00:12:09,960
He retired a few years ago but
we're we're still constantly in
187
00:12:09,960 --> 00:12:13,720
in in touch and he's an honest
to God postmodernist.
188
00:12:13,880 --> 00:12:16,920
So he thinks whenever you talk
about truth or knowledge you
189
00:12:16,920 --> 00:12:20,520
should put it in put those terms
in scare quotes.
190
00:12:21,440 --> 00:12:24,880
He says that all our theories
are best.
191
00:12:24,880 --> 00:12:28,520
Scientific knowledge is really
just a bunch of stories.
192
00:12:29,720 --> 00:12:31,560
And the stories.
Some stories are better than
193
00:12:31,560 --> 00:12:35,840
others, but you should never
mistake your any story for the
194
00:12:35,840 --> 00:12:40,640
final word on what's out there
or what's in here.
195
00:12:42,280 --> 00:12:48,320
And I completely reject
postmodernism as it applies to,
196
00:12:48,320 --> 00:12:50,240
I don't know, mapping out the
universe.
197
00:12:51,800 --> 00:12:56,360
I think we discover, we have
discovered lots of things.
198
00:12:57,840 --> 00:13:02,880
That are are true about the
universe from the existence of
199
00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:06,080
sub atomic particles like
electrons and protons to to
200
00:13:06,080 --> 00:13:10,480
elements galaxies out there
beyond the the Milky Way.
201
00:13:10,480 --> 00:13:13,120
Those aren't stories.
Those are real things about
202
00:13:13,800 --> 00:13:17,840
about the universe.
But when it comes to ourselves,
203
00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:23,280
when it comes to understanding.
What we are I think
204
00:13:23,280 --> 00:13:26,200
postmodernism is absolutely
appropriate.
205
00:13:26,200 --> 00:13:30,920
I think we should see
neuroscientific or evolutionary
206
00:13:30,920 --> 00:13:38,040
or computer science models of
the human mind as stories that
207
00:13:38,040 --> 00:13:42,440
can do things for us, that can
help us see ourselves in ways
208
00:13:42,440 --> 00:13:46,960
that are that are useful, that
might help us come up with
209
00:13:46,960 --> 00:13:49,920
better treatments for mental
illness that might be consoling
210
00:13:49,920 --> 00:13:54,200
to us.
That help us deal with death and
211
00:13:54,320 --> 00:14:00,240
the ephemerality of of life, but
that are always replaceable by
212
00:14:00,240 --> 00:14:04,040
better stories or just by
different stories in the future.
213
00:14:04,280 --> 00:14:05,560
It's almost like a useful
analogy.
214
00:14:05,640 --> 00:14:09,320
The same way religion was useful
to the people at the time and
215
00:14:09,800 --> 00:14:12,920
and it was it was thought to be
the truth for those people at
216
00:14:12,920 --> 00:14:14,560
the time.
It was very useful.
217
00:14:14,600 --> 00:14:18,240
I mean, you can still see a lot
of usage within it, and the same
218
00:14:18,240 --> 00:14:21,920
way descending applies for
Newtonian physics when when he
219
00:14:21,920 --> 00:14:25,560
came across telling people this
is how the motion of bodies work
220
00:14:26,000 --> 00:14:28,200
and then Einstein comes and
changed that along, but you
221
00:14:28,200 --> 00:14:29,840
realize that it's still very
useful.
222
00:14:31,160 --> 00:14:35,720
Yeah, and and usefulness can be
defined in lots, lots of
223
00:14:35,720 --> 00:14:40,920
different ways.
So there are some theories that
224
00:14:41,040 --> 00:14:44,440
have enormous practical
consequences.
225
00:14:44,440 --> 00:14:47,880
So.
Plain old Newtonian mechanics is
226
00:14:47,880 --> 00:14:51,680
enough to land a spaceship on
the moon, which is pretty
227
00:14:51,680 --> 00:14:57,680
impressive.
Nuclear physics allowed us to
228
00:14:57,680 --> 00:15:03,360
build hydrogen bombs, which have
altered history in ways that are
229
00:15:04,680 --> 00:15:07,520
horrible.
But still, that's an impressive
230
00:15:07,520 --> 00:15:13,360
sign.
That those theories of subatomic
231
00:15:13,360 --> 00:15:16,320
matter and energy are on to
something, That they're pretty
232
00:15:16,320 --> 00:15:19,520
close to grasping the actual
truth.
233
00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:24,120
But there are these less
tangible ways of saying that a
234
00:15:24,560 --> 00:15:30,040
theory works.
For example, I'm I'm interested
235
00:15:30,040 --> 00:15:33,600
in theories that say
consciousness is the basis of
236
00:15:33,600 --> 00:15:37,720
reality instead of matter.
I mean, there's this ancient
237
00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:43,560
debate about the primacy of
matter versus versus mind, and I
238
00:15:43,560 --> 00:15:45,440
haven't made-up my mind, which
is right.
239
00:15:45,440 --> 00:15:49,200
Maybe we can talk about that.
But the idea that everything is
240
00:15:49,200 --> 00:15:54,080
consciousness and that the
consciousness that you and I
241
00:15:54,080 --> 00:15:57,280
both possess right now, in some
sense, it's ever.
242
00:15:57,280 --> 00:16:01,920
It's never ending.
It's just going to merge in in
243
00:16:01,920 --> 00:16:04,920
with some kind of.
Greater collective consciousness
244
00:16:04,920 --> 00:16:08,200
when we're gone, I find that
very consoling.
245
00:16:08,880 --> 00:16:13,240
I don't necessarily believe it,
but I like to think about it now
246
00:16:13,240 --> 00:16:18,320
and then when I'm feeling a
little fragile and and mortal.
247
00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:22,200
So that is another way in which
a theory can be very powerful
248
00:16:22,200 --> 00:16:24,720
and very effective.
I was, yeah.
249
00:16:24,720 --> 00:16:25,680
I was going to ask you about
that.
250
00:16:25,680 --> 00:16:28,360
At this point in your life,
after chatting to all these
251
00:16:28,360 --> 00:16:30,920
philosophers and scientists,
where's your header?
252
00:16:30,920 --> 00:16:33,600
What is consciousness to you?
What do you believe it really
253
00:16:33,600 --> 00:16:35,160
is?
Is there a group you fall into
254
00:16:35,160 --> 00:16:36,840
at this point?
Do you consider yourself a pan
255
00:16:36,840 --> 00:16:38,520
psychist in that regard?
Or idealist?
256
00:16:38,880 --> 00:16:44,600
Or where are you?
No, I am, you said before I I'm,
257
00:16:45,800 --> 00:16:48,240
I'm a sceptic.
I I love ideas.
258
00:16:48,640 --> 00:16:50,920
I became a science journalist
because I love.
259
00:16:51,440 --> 00:16:56,400
I love watching science do it's
thing and coming up come up with
260
00:16:56,400 --> 00:16:58,600
these.
These different ideas about
261
00:16:58,600 --> 00:17:05,400
what's going on in the world and
I I've been reporting on mind
262
00:17:05,400 --> 00:17:09,560
body theories, theories of
consciousness for decades now.
263
00:17:10,040 --> 00:17:16,599
And I'll be honest the the more
I do it and I I right up to the
264
00:17:16,599 --> 00:17:20,880
present I've been, I've been
commenting on some developments
265
00:17:20,880 --> 00:17:25,760
in in consciousness studies just
recently just over the last
266
00:17:25,760 --> 00:17:30,200
couple of months.
The more I do this, the more I
267
00:17:30,200 --> 00:17:32,400
think nobody really knows what
they're talking about.
268
00:17:33,800 --> 00:17:39,120
The more I the more mysterious
the problem becomes, the more
269
00:17:39,120 --> 00:17:41,960
mysterious.
This experience I'm having right
270
00:17:41,960 --> 00:17:47,160
now of being this conscious
thing becomes absolutely
271
00:17:47,160 --> 00:17:54,200
baffling to me.
I think that when we look
272
00:17:54,200 --> 00:17:58,400
straight.
At our own existence, including
273
00:18:00,400 --> 00:18:05,320
the fact that we're conscious,
if we really saw it clearly, we
274
00:18:05,320 --> 00:18:10,440
should be absolutely dumbfounded
all the time.
275
00:18:11,240 --> 00:18:14,200
And we should realize that every
single theory, no matter how
276
00:18:14,200 --> 00:18:19,240
powerful, no matter how
seemingly effective, no matter
277
00:18:19,240 --> 00:18:23,760
the practical consequences that
it has, is absolutely
278
00:18:24,400 --> 00:18:28,000
inadequate.
And that includes panpsychism
279
00:18:28,000 --> 00:18:31,960
and idealism and materialism.
I don't even think we have the
280
00:18:31,960 --> 00:18:36,800
right language yet to solve
these problems, to even talk
281
00:18:36,800 --> 00:18:42,480
about them in a coherent way.
I think this is almost like the
282
00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:48,480
equivalent of physics in the
14th century, where you look
283
00:18:48,480 --> 00:18:52,520
back at how people were talking
about about matter and things
284
00:18:52,520 --> 00:18:55,520
moving around in space and you
think, wow, they were just.
285
00:18:56,720 --> 00:18:58,840
So deluded.
They really didn't know.
286
00:18:58,840 --> 00:19:01,600
I mean, they're making an honest
effort, but they really don't
287
00:19:01,600 --> 00:19:03,440
know what the hell they're
talking about.
288
00:19:03,720 --> 00:19:06,320
I think in the future we're
going to look back on this
289
00:19:06,320 --> 00:19:09,800
period with integrated
information theory and the
290
00:19:09,800 --> 00:19:13,160
global workspace theory and all
these different theories of
291
00:19:13,160 --> 00:19:16,800
mine, and we're going to go, Oh
my God, those those people
292
00:19:16,800 --> 00:19:18,720
actually believed in that shit
that time.
293
00:19:20,240 --> 00:19:24,160
I mean, I saw you wrote the that
paper on the brouhaha of the
294
00:19:24,160 --> 00:19:27,480
whole IIT dilemma.
What are your thoughts on that?
295
00:19:28,960 --> 00:19:30,240
Yeah, do you want to give some
thought?
296
00:19:30,320 --> 00:19:31,960
This is to the to the list of
viewers.
297
00:19:31,960 --> 00:19:35,960
Maybe you you can also do that.
Yeah, so Integrated Information
298
00:19:35,960 --> 00:19:42,240
Theory is this very serious
attempt to solve the hard
299
00:19:42,240 --> 00:19:44,720
problem of consciousness.
It's about 20 years old.
300
00:19:45,320 --> 00:19:49,680
It was introduced by this guy
named Giulio Tononi, who's got a
301
00:19:49,680 --> 00:19:51,720
fancy.
Pedigree.
302
00:19:51,720 --> 00:19:55,000
He was a graduate student under
this guy named Gerald Edelman, a
303
00:19:55,240 --> 00:19:59,480
Nobel Prize winner who also had
very ambitious ideas about
304
00:19:59,560 --> 00:20:01,640
solving the hard problem of
consciousness.
305
00:20:01,640 --> 00:20:08,320
So Tononi is a really serious
guy and and he proposed this
306
00:20:09,240 --> 00:20:14,560
mathematical theory of and the
and the the fact that it's it's
307
00:20:14,560 --> 00:20:18,760
mathematical impresses a lot of
people but it's a mathematical
308
00:20:18,760 --> 00:20:23,600
theory of consciousness.
That says consciousness arises
309
00:20:23,920 --> 00:20:29,880
out of any system that has parts
that interact in the certain way
310
00:20:29,880 --> 00:20:32,600
that you can mathematically
define.
311
00:20:33,600 --> 00:20:37,080
The interconnection of the
components is sometimes called
312
00:20:37,080 --> 00:20:42,320
the synergy of the system.
The mathematical quantity is
313
00:20:42,320 --> 00:20:46,480
called Phi, and there's this
little Greek symbol for for
314
00:20:46,480 --> 00:20:50,600
that.
It's really impenetrable.
315
00:20:50,600 --> 00:20:54,880
If you read the initial papers,
it's extremely dense.
316
00:20:55,320 --> 00:20:58,440
I went to a workshop in 2015
because I was trying to
317
00:20:58,440 --> 00:21:00,760
understand it.
The main reason I took it
318
00:21:00,760 --> 00:21:05,200
seriously was not only because
Tononi had proposed it, but
319
00:21:05,240 --> 00:21:09,400
because Christophe Koch, who I
mentioned before, one of the
320
00:21:09,400 --> 00:21:13,000
world's leading neuroscientists,
embraced it about, I don't know,
321
00:21:13,000 --> 00:21:16,280
15 years ago or so and said,
yeah, this is it, man.
322
00:21:16,280 --> 00:21:19,560
This is, this is the best theory
of consciousness we've got.
323
00:21:19,840 --> 00:21:23,160
So these very serious people
were espousing this theory.
324
00:21:23,160 --> 00:21:27,880
They got lots of other folks,
graduate students, postdocs,
325
00:21:27,920 --> 00:21:30,240
other theorists to jump on the
bandwagon.
326
00:21:30,800 --> 00:21:33,680
And the New York Times wrote big
stories about it.
327
00:21:33,960 --> 00:21:36,120
I wrote about it for Scientific
American.
328
00:21:36,120 --> 00:21:39,440
A lot of people were saying I
was skeptical of my sake from
329
00:21:39,440 --> 00:21:43,800
the beginning, but a lot of
people were saying, yeah, man,
330
00:21:43,800 --> 00:21:46,840
this is it.
Maybe this is at least if it's
331
00:21:46,840 --> 00:21:49,840
not the final theory of
consciousness, it's a stepping
332
00:21:49,840 --> 00:21:54,280
stone.
But the theory is was ridiculous
333
00:21:54,280 --> 00:21:57,880
from the start.
It it I mean it.
334
00:21:57,880 --> 00:22:00,560
Basically.
It basically says what
335
00:22:00,560 --> 00:22:07,320
Christophe KOK told me was that
the synergy that's defined by
336
00:22:07,320 --> 00:22:13,000
the theory can occur in a single
proton, which consists of three
337
00:22:13,000 --> 00:22:16,040
interacting quarks that are, if
you can think of them as
338
00:22:16,040 --> 00:22:18,720
exchanging information.
So there's a little spark of
339
00:22:18,720 --> 00:22:20,880
consciousness in a single
protein.
340
00:22:21,040 --> 00:22:23,200
That means that consciousness is
everywhere.
341
00:22:23,560 --> 00:22:29,360
So that's panpsychism.
I went to this workshop at NYU
342
00:22:29,360 --> 00:22:33,000
on on Integrated Information
Theory as I mentioned in 2015,
343
00:22:33,280 --> 00:22:36,560
and there was actually a bit a
debate at one point over whether
344
00:22:36,560 --> 00:22:44,000
dark energy is conscious.
Whether I integrated information
345
00:22:44,000 --> 00:22:49,720
theory implies that there was
this this brilliant computer
346
00:22:49,720 --> 00:22:55,720
scientist named Scott Aronson
who is at the meeting and mainly
347
00:22:55,720 --> 00:22:57,920
the meeting was sort of
cheerleading for for this
348
00:22:57,920 --> 00:23:01,160
theory.
Scott Aronson just drove a stake
349
00:23:01,160 --> 00:23:05,040
through the theory's heart by
pointing out that according to
350
00:23:05,040 --> 00:23:13,720
the mathematical definition of
the theory, A ACD player should
351
00:23:13,720 --> 00:23:15,680
be more conscious than a human
being.
352
00:23:16,640 --> 00:23:21,760
So he was just pointing out all
these absurd conclusions of of
353
00:23:21,760 --> 00:23:25,400
the theory.
But it's it's persisted.
354
00:23:25,880 --> 00:23:30,760
And because it's exciting and
it's ambitious and it's
355
00:23:30,760 --> 00:23:36,080
mathematical and all that.
But there's some people who've
356
00:23:36,080 --> 00:23:39,120
always been skeptical, not just
as science journalists like me,
357
00:23:39,120 --> 00:23:41,920
but some other serious
theorists, scientists and
358
00:23:41,920 --> 00:23:47,280
philosophers and and just
recently, I guess it was last
359
00:23:47,280 --> 00:23:49,680
month, a bunch of them got
together.
360
00:23:49,680 --> 00:23:52,080
More than 100 people signed this
letter, and this is including
361
00:23:52,080 --> 00:23:56,720
some real big shots like Daniel
Dennett and Joe Ledoux was a
362
00:23:56,720 --> 00:24:01,920
neuroscientist at NYU.
And they said we're just sick of
363
00:24:01,920 --> 00:24:04,720
basically, I'm paraphrasing,
we're sick of all the attention
364
00:24:04,720 --> 00:24:07,360
this theory has been getting
because this theory is
365
00:24:07,360 --> 00:24:12,040
pseudoscience.
And and so I wrote a piece about
366
00:24:12,040 --> 00:24:16,920
that for my blog and 'cause I
thought it was really funny.
367
00:24:17,440 --> 00:24:21,920
And I, you know, my reaction was
kind of, yeah, of course it's
368
00:24:22,280 --> 00:24:24,920
pseudoscience.
All theories of consciousness at
369
00:24:24,920 --> 00:24:28,840
this point are pseudoscience,
and that none of them can
370
00:24:28,840 --> 00:24:30,640
really.
None of them is rigorously
371
00:24:30,640 --> 00:24:36,080
enough defined so that they can
be falsified.
372
00:24:36,840 --> 00:24:40,280
So that was that was my column.
Basically I'm saying yeah,
373
00:24:40,360 --> 00:24:42,240
integrated information theory,
pseudoscience.
374
00:24:42,480 --> 00:24:45,040
But then here look at some of
these other theories that are
375
00:24:45,040 --> 00:24:48,120
also pseudoscience.
And then I went on to say that
376
00:24:48,120 --> 00:24:53,680
their theories in physics and I
just started shooting wildly in
377
00:24:53,680 --> 00:24:58,120
all directions, pointing out
that science is is riddled with
378
00:24:58,120 --> 00:25:02,960
pseudoscience if you really want
to be mean about it.
379
00:25:03,240 --> 00:25:06,240
So why single out integrated
information theory?
380
00:25:06,840 --> 00:25:09,840
So anyway, yeah, that's the back
story of that controversy.
381
00:25:10,360 --> 00:25:13,400
I think it's it's amazing how
much controversy that's
382
00:25:13,560 --> 00:25:17,960
initiated because it was such a
big topic of conversation that
383
00:25:17,960 --> 00:25:20,280
some neuroscientists and
philosophers who came out made a
384
00:25:20,280 --> 00:25:23,080
statement, even started
retracting these statements
385
00:25:23,080 --> 00:25:26,840
because it was so intense.
I mean, that's probably a great
386
00:25:26,840 --> 00:25:30,640
thing in the sense that finally
consciousness research at least
387
00:25:31,600 --> 00:25:33,560
is getting the attention it
deserves.
388
00:25:33,560 --> 00:25:36,960
But then it also reminds people
of the fact that there was a
389
00:25:36,960 --> 00:25:39,000
time where this happened and it
keeps going through these sort
390
00:25:39,000 --> 00:25:41,800
of influxes of like, people are
interested, people lose
391
00:25:41,800 --> 00:25:44,320
interest, people are interested,
people lose interest.
392
00:25:44,640 --> 00:25:48,280
Do you see that as a pattern
lately or do you think it's
393
00:25:48,280 --> 00:25:52,800
finally the recognition phase in
reality that it deserves?
394
00:25:53,920 --> 00:25:58,720
I I think I have the and.
It's not even that important and
395
00:25:58,720 --> 00:26:00,840
we should focus on more
important science.
396
00:26:01,880 --> 00:26:05,040
Well, or just more important
things out there in the world.
397
00:26:05,320 --> 00:26:11,320
I I think I've got, I've got
sort of a jaded view.
398
00:26:11,360 --> 00:26:14,280
You know, I've been writing
about science for 40 years now
399
00:26:14,280 --> 00:26:17,320
and I've seen seen a lot of fads
come and go.
400
00:26:17,320 --> 00:26:22,160
I've seen these boom bust cycles
and and and all sorts of
401
00:26:23,080 --> 00:26:26,320
different fields and it makes
me, I I'm, you know, what I had
402
00:26:26,320 --> 00:26:30,120
try to guard against is becoming
so jaded that any new idea that
403
00:26:30,120 --> 00:26:34,200
comes up, I go, that's bullshit.
Come on, nobody's going to
404
00:26:34,200 --> 00:26:37,800
believe that because sometimes
new ideas do come along that are
405
00:26:37,800 --> 00:26:42,960
really exciting and and some of
those ideas might be kind of
406
00:26:42,960 --> 00:26:44,920
bullshitty.
They might be pseudo scientific
407
00:26:44,920 --> 00:26:52,640
in one sense and still really
exciting, still there, they're
408
00:26:52,640 --> 00:26:56,200
interesting and they give you a
new way of looking at the world.
409
00:26:57,240 --> 00:26:59,920
I think that's true of
integrated information theory.
410
00:27:00,840 --> 00:27:04,960
This theory actually has made me
think really hard.
411
00:27:04,960 --> 00:27:09,160
Just trying to figure out why
it's wrong why it it's not
412
00:27:09,160 --> 00:27:15,320
really a serious theory makes me
think about the hard problem and
413
00:27:15,360 --> 00:27:20,120
and new ways and focus on it
more intently and this happens
414
00:27:20,120 --> 00:27:25,520
throughout science.
So in in the book that my first
415
00:27:25,520 --> 00:27:28,120
book, which is the book that I'm
best known for in the end of
416
00:27:28,120 --> 00:27:34,120
science, I I coined this term
ironic science to describe
417
00:27:34,120 --> 00:27:41,520
science that is so speculative
that it can never be confirmed.
418
00:27:41,520 --> 00:27:45,200
You can never really get
evidence that it's true.
419
00:27:46,160 --> 00:27:51,720
And I as as an example of that,
I I cited string theory, super
420
00:27:51,720 --> 00:27:56,200
string theory, which is this
this unified theory of matter
421
00:27:56,200 --> 00:28:00,000
and energy that's been kicking
around for more than 40 years
422
00:28:00,000 --> 00:28:03,480
now was really popular.
Now it's kind of declining.
423
00:28:03,600 --> 00:28:06,600
The problem with it from the
start was that it predicts
424
00:28:06,600 --> 00:28:10,760
things that can't be accessed by
any experiment.
425
00:28:12,400 --> 00:28:14,560
But what an amazing theory it
is.
426
00:28:14,960 --> 00:28:18,240
So from the start I thought,
God, I don't see this going
427
00:28:18,240 --> 00:28:22,600
anywhere, but holy cow, little
strings wriggling in 11
428
00:28:22,600 --> 00:28:27,400
dimensions give rise to our four
dimensional space-time.
429
00:28:28,920 --> 00:28:33,000
That's really cool.
The same way with multiverse
430
00:28:33,000 --> 00:28:36,120
theories, which also are an
implication of string theory and
431
00:28:36,600 --> 00:28:41,040
the many worlds interpretation
of of quantum mechanics.
432
00:28:41,920 --> 00:28:46,080
Other universes in addition to
our own that never can be
433
00:28:46,080 --> 00:28:48,440
accessed experimentally.
Come on.
434
00:28:48,440 --> 00:28:55,440
But wow, what an idea.
It's mind blowing at the same
435
00:28:55,440 --> 00:29:00,400
time as I'm like pointing out
all the flaws with it.
436
00:29:00,600 --> 00:29:06,560
So I've always had this
ambivalence about about, I don't
437
00:29:06,560 --> 00:29:09,480
know what you might call
pseudoscience and kind of
438
00:29:09,480 --> 00:29:13,560
bullshit science, ironic
science, to use the term that I
439
00:29:13,560 --> 00:29:16,880
coined.
But in a way, some of that
440
00:29:16,880 --> 00:29:22,560
science is the most fun to write
about because it's wild.
441
00:29:22,560 --> 00:29:26,200
It's ambitious, it's
imaginative, it's scientists
442
00:29:26,200 --> 00:29:31,400
going beyond the bounds of
what's respectable and making up
443
00:29:31,400 --> 00:29:34,840
some really crazy shit and
saying maybe the world is this
444
00:29:34,840 --> 00:29:39,200
way and you go, yeah, well,
probably not, but yeah, that's
445
00:29:39,200 --> 00:29:42,400
really cool.
Do you think that people often
446
00:29:42,400 --> 00:29:47,800
misinterpret your scepticism as
not not anti scientism, but
447
00:29:47,800 --> 00:29:52,360
almost a version of wouldn't
even say pseudoscience?
448
00:29:52,360 --> 00:29:54,560
But I'm I'm sure you get what
I'm trying to say, but people do
449
00:29:54,560 --> 00:29:58,000
put you in this category that.
Do you think you deserve that?
450
00:29:59,160 --> 00:30:04,760
Yeah, I listen, I've, I've taken
a lot of heat and I I don't
451
00:30:04,760 --> 00:30:10,160
really, it doesn't bother me
that much because I'm out there.
452
00:30:10,720 --> 00:30:14,640
I'm out there taking shots at
other people's ideas.
453
00:30:14,640 --> 00:30:16,600
I've said some really mean
things about different
454
00:30:16,600 --> 00:30:21,280
scientists and about different
theories over the years.
455
00:30:21,280 --> 00:30:29,280
I could be very mocking and and
dismissive and I'll use all my
456
00:30:29,280 --> 00:30:33,040
rhetorical tricks to try to
puncture different theories.
457
00:30:33,040 --> 00:30:38,000
And so people accuse me of being
anti science or or pseudo
458
00:30:38,160 --> 00:30:43,480
scientific or say you know, a
lot of people just say who
459
00:30:43,480 --> 00:30:46,080
listens to John Oregon, He's
just a science writer.
460
00:30:46,080 --> 00:30:49,960
He only has a degree in
literature and journalism.
461
00:30:49,960 --> 00:30:53,760
He doesn't know what the hell
he's talking about and you know
462
00:30:53,760 --> 00:31:00,240
go yeah I guess that's true.
I mean I you just like I just
463
00:31:00,240 --> 00:31:02,400
look at my track record.
I think I've got a pretty good
464
00:31:02,400 --> 00:31:06,760
track record and and and saying
that certain theories are are
465
00:31:06,760 --> 00:31:08,880
dead ends and they're not going
to go anywhere.
466
00:31:08,880 --> 00:31:11,760
Finally people are starting to
accept that when it comes to
467
00:31:12,200 --> 00:31:16,160
string theory and multiverse
theories and and things like
468
00:31:16,160 --> 00:31:19,840
that.
So I'm pretty thick skinned.
469
00:31:20,160 --> 00:31:25,560
I what what I'm what makes me
happy is that people still
470
00:31:26,400 --> 00:31:28,840
serious philosophers and
scientists still want to talk to
471
00:31:28,840 --> 00:31:31,000
me.
They still want to persuade me
472
00:31:31,000 --> 00:31:36,000
that their theory is yeah.
Morgan you've like been trashing
473
00:31:36,000 --> 00:31:38,080
and everything in this field for
decades now.
474
00:31:38,080 --> 00:31:40,400
But I've got a theory that I
think you're really going to
475
00:31:40,400 --> 00:31:41,320
like.
It's really cool.
476
00:31:41,320 --> 00:31:44,280
And I'm like OK bring it on man.
Let me let me check this out.
477
00:31:44,280 --> 00:31:46,240
Let me see what you got.
And.
478
00:31:46,760 --> 00:31:48,400
In that sense, you're almost
like the girl who's playing hard
479
00:31:48,400 --> 00:31:50,680
to get for them.
They're still trying to win you
480
00:31:50,680 --> 00:31:53,400
over there.
They've got this deepest and
481
00:31:53,920 --> 00:31:57,160
psychological urge to please you
at this point.
482
00:31:58,480 --> 00:32:03,520
I think that's part of it.
And but the fact is I the best
483
00:32:03,520 --> 00:32:07,400
part of this job is feeling like
I'm part of this conversation
484
00:32:08,080 --> 00:32:13,920
that goes back actually
thousands of years about what is
485
00:32:13,920 --> 00:32:17,040
this like?
What's going on here?
486
00:32:17,280 --> 00:32:18,480
What am I?
What are you?
487
00:32:19,000 --> 00:32:22,040
What is existence?
And there are all these smart
488
00:32:22,040 --> 00:32:25,160
people out there trying to
figure it out, people who know a
489
00:32:25,160 --> 00:32:29,120
lot more than I do.
And and then I'm, I'm listening
490
00:32:29,120 --> 00:32:32,880
to what they have to say and I
have reactions to it.
491
00:32:33,120 --> 00:32:35,720
And some of them say, oh, shut
up, nobody cares what you think.
492
00:32:35,840 --> 00:32:40,160
And others say, oh, OK, yeah, I
think you might have a point
493
00:32:40,160 --> 00:32:42,440
there.
But the But what's cool for me
494
00:32:42,440 --> 00:32:46,880
is that I am part of this
conversation and that I picked
495
00:32:46,880 --> 00:32:49,280
the right job.
Science journalism turned out to
496
00:32:49,280 --> 00:32:52,600
be the I'm I'm kind of a misfit,
but science journalism turned
497
00:32:52,600 --> 00:32:55,160
out to be the perfect career for
me.
498
00:32:56,080 --> 00:32:58,520
I mean, in that regard, I
completely empathize with you
499
00:32:58,520 --> 00:33:01,600
because starting this podcast,
I've been able to chat to some
500
00:33:01,600 --> 00:33:03,640
of my heroes.
I mean, it's been it's been such
501
00:33:03,640 --> 00:33:08,000
an amazing journey for me and
even though I feel like I'm not
502
00:33:08,000 --> 00:33:10,560
bringing much to the table, it's
still so great to be.
503
00:33:11,120 --> 00:33:13,960
In in such great company, I mean
you guys have done so much,
504
00:33:13,960 --> 00:33:15,080
you've written so much about
this.
505
00:33:15,080 --> 00:33:17,440
So even just chatting to you
guys, it's it's quite surreal
506
00:33:17,440 --> 00:33:20,520
sometimes.
Yeah, it's.
507
00:33:20,640 --> 00:33:26,560
And to me, you know, I described
before how I think if you see
508
00:33:26,560 --> 00:33:30,400
things, if you see reality
clearly you're like, what the
509
00:33:30,440 --> 00:33:32,040
hell.
Your eyes are bugging out, your
510
00:33:32,040 --> 00:33:37,160
mouth is dropping open.
You're just in a state of of awe
511
00:33:37,160 --> 00:33:42,760
and wonderment and confusion,
and it's kind of a mystical
512
00:33:42,760 --> 00:33:44,040
state.
This happens to me when I'm
513
00:33:44,040 --> 00:33:49,200
tripping too, and talking to
other people about their
514
00:33:49,200 --> 00:33:53,200
theories often puts me in that
state, swapping ideas with
515
00:33:53,200 --> 00:33:58,720
Christophe Koch about about
integrated information theory
516
00:33:59,040 --> 00:34:02,080
and the hard problem and his
dark energy conscious.
517
00:34:02,080 --> 00:34:09,440
And I'm like, yeah, man, it's
everything is is so God damn
518
00:34:09,440 --> 00:34:14,120
weird.
That's that's one of the joys of
519
00:34:14,280 --> 00:34:18,239
of, of this whole process of
science journalism.
520
00:34:18,760 --> 00:34:21,840
Yeah, I mean the universe in
itself, The story of the
521
00:34:21,840 --> 00:34:25,320
universe is quite trippy.
When when you actually try and
522
00:34:25,320 --> 00:34:27,400
understand it, it is.
It's one of those things where I
523
00:34:27,400 --> 00:34:30,400
often tell people you don't need
religion to have a a truly awe
524
00:34:30,400 --> 00:34:34,560
inspiring religious experience.
With science you can just trying
525
00:34:34,560 --> 00:34:36,639
to understand the well, not even
just with science, but I mean
526
00:34:36,639 --> 00:34:40,880
with understanding the universe.
It's a yeah, it's quite trippy.
527
00:34:42,000 --> 00:34:49,320
I So one thing that's a little
distressing to me is so I I
528
00:34:49,320 --> 00:34:52,080
teach college.
I I teach at an engineering
529
00:34:52,080 --> 00:34:55,440
school, I live in Hoboken, and I
teach at a school called Stevens
530
00:34:55,440 --> 00:34:59,440
Institute of Technology.
I teach freshman humanities
531
00:34:59,440 --> 00:35:02,160
classes.
I teach a seminar in science
532
00:35:02,160 --> 00:35:05,280
writing.
I teach a class on on science
533
00:35:05,280 --> 00:35:07,160
and war.
I wrote I'm interested in war,
534
00:35:07,160 --> 00:35:11,840
and I wrote a book about that.
And I sometimes try to get my
535
00:35:11,880 --> 00:35:14,280
students to care about the
things I care about.
536
00:35:14,600 --> 00:35:20,240
And so I I might say, you know
maybe I saw some images from the
537
00:35:20,240 --> 00:35:24,160
James Webb telescope and I'm
like yeah wow those those
538
00:35:24,160 --> 00:35:29,200
pictures of those galaxies way
back in time or or messing up
539
00:35:29,200 --> 00:35:33,200
the cosmologists, they they the
they don't know what to make of
540
00:35:33,200 --> 00:35:36,680
these galaxies.
It seems to have formed before
541
00:35:36,680 --> 00:35:39,320
The Big Bang theory says they
should have formed.
542
00:35:39,600 --> 00:35:41,920
And I kind of looking at my
students and some look
543
00:35:41,960 --> 00:35:44,640
interested and most of them are
just kind of gone.
544
00:35:45,320 --> 00:35:49,000
And I say, I did this just like
within the last couple weeks.
545
00:35:49,000 --> 00:35:52,240
I say who cares about where the
universe came from.
546
00:35:52,760 --> 00:35:55,960
And they're all kind of looking
at each other and maybe a couple
547
00:35:55,960 --> 00:35:59,200
of hands go go up.
They don't really care about
548
00:35:59,200 --> 00:36:03,400
this stuff where the I'm like,
are you crazy?
549
00:36:03,400 --> 00:36:04,840
How could you not care about
that?
550
00:36:09,880 --> 00:36:15,280
And I and then I try to tell
them about what we know about
551
00:36:15,280 --> 00:36:18,480
the universe and how one of the
most amazing discoveries of all
552
00:36:18,480 --> 00:36:25,680
time, because it's
comprehensible is the idea that
553
00:36:25,680 --> 00:36:29,760
the universe is expanding and
probably had this beginning
554
00:36:29,760 --> 00:36:34,280
about when we've calculated it
to be about 14 billion years
555
00:36:34,280 --> 00:36:36,320
ago.
Why do we believe that?
556
00:36:36,320 --> 00:36:40,360
So I go through the redshift
data and the abundances of
557
00:36:40,360 --> 00:36:46,640
elements and the the the cosmic
afterglow, microwave afterglow
558
00:36:46,640 --> 00:36:50,080
of the universe and I tell them
all that and some of them are
559
00:36:50,080 --> 00:36:52,200
like, yeah, that is kind of
cool.
560
00:36:54,000 --> 00:36:59,480
And so that's another thing I
try to do in my own writing, not
561
00:36:59,480 --> 00:37:05,520
only to just kind of dump on
theories that I think are a
562
00:37:05,520 --> 00:37:09,360
little overly ambitious, aren't
that well supported, but to to
563
00:37:10,160 --> 00:37:13,720
talk about what we do know and
what is really well supported,
564
00:37:13,720 --> 00:37:17,640
like the basic Big Bang Theory.
And I present the evidence.
565
00:37:17,640 --> 00:37:22,080
I just remind people of how well
supported that is and try to get
566
00:37:22,080 --> 00:37:25,560
them to realize how incredible
that is.
567
00:37:25,560 --> 00:37:30,400
The universe had a beginning.
Wow, think of the implications
568
00:37:30,400 --> 00:37:32,760
of that.
The Big Bang theory was rejected
569
00:37:32,760 --> 00:37:36,320
for a long time by a lot of
physicists, astronomers,
570
00:37:36,840 --> 00:37:40,120
scientists in general because it
was seen as being too religious.
571
00:37:40,520 --> 00:37:44,160
It had too much in common with
creation stories coming from the
572
00:37:44,160 --> 00:37:46,920
Bible and and other sacred
texts.
573
00:37:47,280 --> 00:37:51,000
But hey, guess what?
The Big Bang theory seems real.
574
00:37:51,200 --> 00:37:55,320
This is 1 area where I don't my
old friend Jim McClellan, the
575
00:37:55,320 --> 00:37:57,960
postmodernist.
He thinks that The Big Bang
576
00:37:57,960 --> 00:38:01,000
theory is just another story.
I just wrote a piece recently
577
00:38:01,000 --> 00:38:04,040
saying The Big Bang theory is
true.
578
00:38:04,320 --> 00:38:08,080
Deal with it, because the
evidence for it is overwhelming.
579
00:38:08,840 --> 00:38:10,600
I think, well, that's also one
of my favorite stories.
580
00:38:10,600 --> 00:38:13,240
I remember the first time going
through that figuring out, I
581
00:38:13,240 --> 00:38:16,240
mean the guys I I think there
was it was birds.
582
00:38:16,960 --> 00:38:18,800
They thought it was, they
thought birds were making a
583
00:38:18,800 --> 00:38:20,880
noise and they're trying to
eliminate the sound.
584
00:38:20,880 --> 00:38:23,360
And and then slowly Hubble comes
in and shows you that the
585
00:38:23,360 --> 00:38:25,360
universe it was.
It's one of those awe inspiring
586
00:38:25,360 --> 00:38:26,640
stories.
It's kind of like this.
587
00:38:26,800 --> 00:38:30,080
It's such a logical jump to
think, OK, if it's moving this
588
00:38:30,080 --> 00:38:32,920
way, let's just go backward.
And sort of figure out what
589
00:38:32,920 --> 00:38:35,040
would happen.
I mean, that's such a good thing
590
00:38:35,040 --> 00:38:38,200
to think about.
Do you think it's like, yeah,
591
00:38:38,240 --> 00:38:40,240
well, things where it's just
it's incredible.
592
00:38:40,240 --> 00:38:43,040
It's one of those things.
It's so obvious and yet it's so
593
00:38:43,040 --> 00:38:45,720
epic at the same time.
Yeah.
594
00:38:45,920 --> 00:38:49,800
And well, another thing that's
amazing about the whole story of
595
00:38:49,800 --> 00:38:54,600
The Big Bang is that if you go
back just like 100 years ago, I
596
00:38:54,600 --> 00:38:56,240
mean that's a blink of the an
eye.
597
00:38:58,760 --> 00:39:02,880
Most astronomers, physicists,
people who thought about the
598
00:39:02,880 --> 00:39:06,560
structure of the universe at
all, just assume that the
599
00:39:06,560 --> 00:39:08,440
universe consists of the Milky
Way.
600
00:39:08,440 --> 00:39:11,040
All these stars that that we can
see at night.
601
00:39:11,040 --> 00:39:14,640
We're in this big.
Our sun is in this big swirl of
602
00:39:14,640 --> 00:39:16,800
stars.
There were these little fuzzy
603
00:39:16,800 --> 00:39:21,520
patches in the sky that some
people going back to Immanuel
604
00:39:21,520 --> 00:39:26,800
Kant, the great Austrian
philosopher thought might be
605
00:39:26,920 --> 00:39:29,560
other island universes like the
Milky Way.
606
00:39:29,920 --> 00:39:33,760
But we couldn't be sure until
then.
607
00:39:33,760 --> 00:39:37,840
Telescopes in the 1920s got big
enough so they could look at
608
00:39:37,840 --> 00:39:41,640
those little tiny fuzzy patches
and see individual stars in
609
00:39:41,640 --> 00:39:44,400
them.
And they realized those are
610
00:39:44,760 --> 00:39:50,400
other galaxies like the Milky
Way, really far away.
611
00:39:51,200 --> 00:39:54,680
So even before we discovered the
redshift which indicated the
612
00:39:54,680 --> 00:39:58,880
expansion, all of a sudden the
universe became exponentially
613
00:39:58,880 --> 00:40:04,480
bigger.
The boundaries of our world just
614
00:40:05,160 --> 00:40:09,240
flew out.
So that and that just just 100
615
00:40:09,240 --> 00:40:10,240
years ago, it's.
It's.
616
00:40:11,280 --> 00:40:15,360
It's and the story I remember,
it was, I think Hubble just
617
00:40:15,360 --> 00:40:18,160
decided to leave the telescope
placed in that spot.
618
00:40:18,480 --> 00:40:20,880
It wasn't really an active
decision, it was more one of
619
00:40:20,880 --> 00:40:22,320
those things.
That's where the ultra deep feel
620
00:40:22,320 --> 00:40:24,400
comes from.
It was more just one of those
621
00:40:24,400 --> 00:40:26,120
random things where you're like,
let's just leave it, then
622
00:40:26,120 --> 00:40:29,560
collect as much photons as
possible and then you get blown
623
00:40:29,560 --> 00:40:32,480
away with this information that
literally changes everything,
624
00:40:32,480 --> 00:40:36,000
you know.
Yeah, the Redshift data.
625
00:40:36,440 --> 00:40:41,640
And then another very
serendipitous discovery that
626
00:40:41,760 --> 00:40:46,640
really helped.
It convinced most people that
627
00:40:46,640 --> 00:40:49,720
The Big Bang is real.
Happened right here in northern
628
00:40:49,720 --> 00:40:54,120
New Jersey, just down the road
from my school at Bell
629
00:40:54,120 --> 00:40:57,040
Laboratories.
You had a bunch of guys, radio
630
00:40:57,040 --> 00:41:01,520
engineers who were working on a
microwave communication system
631
00:41:01,520 --> 00:41:05,120
for the the telephone network
and kept getting this weird
632
00:41:05,120 --> 00:41:09,960
buzzing.
And in their transmissions and
633
00:41:09,960 --> 00:41:15,040
they thought that it might be
that, you know, birds had pooped
634
00:41:15,040 --> 00:41:16,040
up.
Yeah, that was, that was what I
635
00:41:16,040 --> 00:41:17,920
was mentioning earlier.
The birds, they thought it was
636
00:41:17,920 --> 00:41:21,480
birds pooping and stuff.
Yeah, epic story.
637
00:41:22,520 --> 00:41:26,080
So they and then they realized.
Then one of them remembered,
638
00:41:26,960 --> 00:41:32,440
Hey, I read this paper that said
that the The Big Bang should
639
00:41:32,440 --> 00:41:35,920
have left A.
A residual afterglow in the form
640
00:41:35,920 --> 00:41:40,560
of microwaves that are almost
exactly what we're observing
641
00:41:40,560 --> 00:41:41,840
here.
Could it be that?
642
00:41:43,120 --> 00:41:46,640
And of course it was that and
these guys who weren't even
643
00:41:46,640 --> 00:41:50,480
looking for it won a Nobel Prize
for discovering the afterglow of
644
00:41:50,480 --> 00:41:53,120
The Big Bang, just trying to
eliminate a sound.
645
00:41:53,160 --> 00:41:57,040
Can you imagine the the
scientific and philosophical
646
00:41:57,040 --> 00:42:00,360
implications that from the IT?
It's such a shift in thought
647
00:42:00,360 --> 00:42:03,160
because I often tell people, Can
you imagine living in a universe
648
00:42:03,160 --> 00:42:08,120
where, well, in what was a
Galaxy, where suddenly it's just
649
00:42:08,120 --> 00:42:10,960
open up to almost an infinite
reality?
650
00:42:10,960 --> 00:42:12,760
That's such a weird thing to go
through.
651
00:42:13,200 --> 00:42:15,120
Do you think that's currently
happening, 'cause I saw a tweet
652
00:42:15,120 --> 00:42:16,520
today, I think it was Brian
Keating.
653
00:42:16,760 --> 00:42:19,120
He could have just been
clickbait, but he 'cause now, as
654
00:42:19,120 --> 00:42:23,000
you mentioned, they are starting
to question whether this is
655
00:42:23,240 --> 00:42:26,360
whether it does expand further
than 13.8 billion watches.
656
00:42:26,720 --> 00:42:28,680
Do you think this is?
I haven't followed the data
657
00:42:28,680 --> 00:42:29,120
enough?
What?
658
00:42:29,120 --> 00:42:34,040
What are your thoughts there?
So I've been tracking cosmology,
659
00:42:34,040 --> 00:42:38,440
this, the study of the whole
universe, for decades now and
660
00:42:40,240 --> 00:42:44,520
and it's the field is in a funny
situation because in a sense,
661
00:42:44,520 --> 00:42:48,480
they're really proud of having a
basic framework for
662
00:42:48,480 --> 00:42:54,040
understanding the universe.
It's the the basic Big Bang
663
00:42:54,040 --> 00:42:57,320
expanding universe model which
we just been.
664
00:42:58,000 --> 00:43:01,120
Talking about But The Big Bang
is kind of like the theory of
665
00:43:01,120 --> 00:43:02,760
evolution by a natural
selection.
666
00:43:03,000 --> 00:43:07,440
It's it's always, there are
always these outstanding
667
00:43:07,640 --> 00:43:10,240
questions.
So for evolution, well, how
668
00:43:10,240 --> 00:43:14,280
exactly do species form and how
do they diverge from each other?
669
00:43:15,000 --> 00:43:19,320
For The Big Bang cosmology, it's
how do galaxies form.
670
00:43:19,320 --> 00:43:21,960
Well, how did they form?
When did they form?
671
00:43:21,960 --> 00:43:26,680
After the initial Big Bang?
And there are lots of other
672
00:43:26,680 --> 00:43:29,760
questions, like that sort of
detailed questions about how we
673
00:43:29,760 --> 00:43:33,120
got from this supposed creation
event to where we are today.
674
00:43:33,560 --> 00:43:38,160
And there are all these
additions to The Big Bang theory
675
00:43:39,680 --> 00:43:44,600
to try to solve some of these
questions involving dark matter,
676
00:43:45,400 --> 00:43:51,080
dark energy, something called
inflation, which is a a theory
677
00:43:51,080 --> 00:43:55,400
of enormous cosmic expansion.
That happened right after the
678
00:43:55,400 --> 00:43:57,480
initial Big Bang.
That would solve some of the
679
00:43:57,480 --> 00:44:03,120
observational problems we have.
So, and a lot of these theories
680
00:44:03,120 --> 00:44:07,200
sort of come and go.
I've seen them come and go and
681
00:44:07,640 --> 00:44:12,080
and then when there are problems
with some of these additional
682
00:44:12,080 --> 00:44:15,800
theories, people say, oh, The
Big Bang is in trouble in the
683
00:44:15,800 --> 00:44:18,440
same way that sometimes.
I don't know.
684
00:44:18,440 --> 00:44:23,000
Epigenetics or something in
biology leads people to say, oh,
685
00:44:23,000 --> 00:44:26,280
Darwin was wrong.
No, Darwin wasn't wrong.
686
00:44:26,720 --> 00:44:30,200
The theory of evolution by
natural selection is rock solid
687
00:44:30,920 --> 00:44:36,040
and The Big Bang that the idea
that the universe had a
688
00:44:36,040 --> 00:44:40,280
beginning and is still expanding
to this day, that is rock solid.
689
00:44:40,480 --> 00:44:44,600
But there are all these other
questions that that we've tried
690
00:44:44,600 --> 00:44:46,280
to solve with additional
theories.
691
00:44:46,600 --> 00:44:51,040
And those come and go and lead
cosmologists to say, oh, we need
692
00:44:51,040 --> 00:44:54,920
a new paradigm, everything is in
peril now and we're going to
693
00:44:54,920 --> 00:44:57,880
have a revolution.
And they want that to happen
694
00:44:57,880 --> 00:45:01,040
because it's getting a little
boring in cosmology nowadays.
695
00:45:01,680 --> 00:45:03,840
Yeah, no, for sure.
I spoke to Lawrence Krauss.
696
00:45:03,840 --> 00:45:07,880
It was about a week or two ago,
and we were discussing whether
697
00:45:07,880 --> 00:45:10,160
science needs philosophy.
And I know you've addressed this
698
00:45:11,400 --> 00:45:14,080
quite a lot, including the topic
of him discussing it.
699
00:45:14,480 --> 00:45:17,120
What are your thoughts about?
Because he firmly believes
700
00:45:17,120 --> 00:45:21,360
science is the ultimate truth,
so the anything beyond
701
00:45:21,360 --> 00:45:25,680
scientific truth or empirical
evidence is not possible from
702
00:45:25,680 --> 00:45:29,360
his perspective.
Yeah, it's, I don't know, I'm,
703
00:45:29,400 --> 00:45:34,600
I'm got I I have sort of.
Let me see what can I say about
704
00:45:34,640 --> 00:45:39,640
old Lawrence Krauss?
I'm chatting to you and maybe I
705
00:45:39,640 --> 00:45:45,280
can ask a question for you.
Yeah, he's he's he's a funny
706
00:45:45,280 --> 00:45:50,400
person because he does a lot of
philosophy in his writing.
707
00:45:50,600 --> 00:45:54,120
He's just not very good at it.
He's what I'd call a naive
708
00:45:54,120 --> 00:45:56,200
philosopher.
So he wrote a book, I can't
709
00:45:56,200 --> 00:45:58,840
remember the title, that's
basically saying we've solved
710
00:45:58,840 --> 00:46:01,640
this.
The the mystery of why the
711
00:46:01,640 --> 00:46:06,040
universe exists at all.
Yeah, Universe from nothing.
712
00:46:06,560 --> 00:46:09,960
And and and he made disparaging
comments about philosophy.
713
00:46:10,440 --> 00:46:15,720
In in that book, even though
there are lots of philosophical
714
00:46:15,720 --> 00:46:18,560
assumptions in the book.
So he's basically saying that
715
00:46:18,560 --> 00:46:22,160
and this is an old idea, it
wasn't, it certainly wasn't
716
00:46:22,160 --> 00:46:25,120
something that he came up with
that the universe might have
717
00:46:25,120 --> 00:46:29,720
started with some kind of
quantum fluctuation in a cosmic
718
00:46:30,680 --> 00:46:34,360
void.
And this is the inflation theory
719
00:46:34,360 --> 00:46:37,960
which I mentioned earlier is
kind of that.
720
00:46:39,120 --> 00:46:43,080
General idea that quantum
mechanics says that there's no
721
00:46:43,080 --> 00:46:45,520
such thing as a true vacuum.
You always get these particles
722
00:46:45,840 --> 00:46:48,680
blinking in and out of existence
and one of those might have
723
00:46:48,960 --> 00:46:52,480
suddenly expanded and become a a
whole universe.
724
00:46:52,800 --> 00:46:56,440
Well then the question is, well,
where did that quantum field
725
00:46:56,440 --> 00:46:59,240
come from?
That's not nothing, that's
726
00:46:59,240 --> 00:47:02,040
something.
And this is what some critics
727
00:47:02,040 --> 00:47:07,560
pointed out about Kraus.
So I think another area where
728
00:47:07,920 --> 00:47:11,960
physics needs philosophy or
philosophy has certainly been
729
00:47:11,960 --> 00:47:15,520
helpful is in interpreting
theories like quantum mechanics.
730
00:47:15,840 --> 00:47:20,840
Is this incredibly powerful
mathematical model of that
731
00:47:20,840 --> 00:47:25,680
explains why light and why
electrons and protons and
732
00:47:25,680 --> 00:47:29,600
neutrons do what they do, why
they behave in certain ways in
733
00:47:30,120 --> 00:47:33,160
in experiments?
But nobody knows what it means.
734
00:47:33,480 --> 00:47:36,600
It doesn't make any sense.
And so you've got all these
735
00:47:36,600 --> 00:47:39,360
philosophers who are trying to
explain it.
736
00:47:39,360 --> 00:47:43,000
But even more importantly,
they're pointing out all the
737
00:47:43,000 --> 00:47:48,480
ways in which quantum mechanics
on its face is incoherent and
738
00:47:48,480 --> 00:47:51,680
actually poses all these
fundamental philosophical
739
00:47:52,440 --> 00:47:57,520
problems about the universe so,
and about the nature of reality
740
00:47:57,760 --> 00:48:01,120
so.
You know, I take a lot of shots
741
00:48:01,120 --> 00:48:05,240
at philosophers too.
I think philosophy makes a
742
00:48:05,240 --> 00:48:08,840
mistake when it thinks it's
solving problems.
743
00:48:09,160 --> 00:48:11,640
Some philosophers actually think
that they're going to come up
744
00:48:11,640 --> 00:48:15,600
with a solution to the meaning
of quantum mechanics.
745
00:48:15,880 --> 00:48:18,960
Here it is, it's the pilot wave
theory, or it's many worlds, or
746
00:48:19,160 --> 00:48:22,720
something like that.
What I think philosophers are
747
00:48:22,720 --> 00:48:26,160
best at, even though this is not
something they would necessarily
748
00:48:26,240 --> 00:48:30,120
agree with, is.
Pointing all out, all the
749
00:48:30,120 --> 00:48:34,440
inadequacies of our knowledge,
all the ways in which our
750
00:48:34,440 --> 00:48:39,360
theories, as powerful as they
might be, don't really tell us
751
00:48:39,360 --> 00:48:43,080
what we want to know about how
the world works.
752
00:48:43,840 --> 00:48:46,760
So yeah, I maybe I say this
about philosophy because I
753
00:48:46,760 --> 00:48:50,240
consider myself a kind of
amateur philosopher.
754
00:48:51,040 --> 00:48:54,680
I think I was guilty of the same
thing as Lawrence from coming
755
00:48:54,680 --> 00:48:58,640
into studying medicine, going
through pretty much a phase of
756
00:48:58,640 --> 00:49:01,200
life where hard science was the
only answer for me.
757
00:49:01,320 --> 00:49:04,080
And I thought that is the only
way to gain truth.
758
00:49:04,080 --> 00:49:07,480
But often doing a philosophy
degree, I realized how blindly
759
00:49:07,480 --> 00:49:09,840
ignorant I was.
I'm not speaking for Lawrence
760
00:49:09,840 --> 00:49:12,960
because this is not this podcast
isn't a platform for people to
761
00:49:12,960 --> 00:49:15,040
get into debates, it's more
about understanding everyone's
762
00:49:15,040 --> 00:49:17,960
perspective, getting the ideas.
But I did realize that I had
763
00:49:17,960 --> 00:49:22,040
fundamental flaws in assuming
everything could be answered in
764
00:49:22,040 --> 00:49:24,920
science or or the scientific
method as a body of knowledge
765
00:49:25,160 --> 00:49:29,360
used to gain truth.
I I mean that postmodernist
766
00:49:29,360 --> 00:49:31,760
belief it kind of.
I mean I empathize with that
767
00:49:31,760 --> 00:49:33,400
too.
It's very difficult I feel
768
00:49:33,400 --> 00:49:38,240
sometimes to gain access to the
ultimate truth and and I think
769
00:49:38,240 --> 00:49:41,800
that's probably that probably
opens the door to philosophers
770
00:49:41,800 --> 00:49:45,480
then going against science in
many ways where a scientist
771
00:49:45,480 --> 00:49:48,200
cannot really defend themselves.
So if someone does claim, OK,
772
00:49:48,200 --> 00:49:50,720
well we don't understand
Augment, do you think that sort
773
00:49:50,720 --> 00:49:53,640
of puts them in a position out
to then argue for anything is
774
00:49:53,640 --> 00:49:56,680
possible?
They're relativist argument.
775
00:49:57,800 --> 00:50:00,040
That's the problem.
This is why I'm not a
776
00:50:00,040 --> 00:50:06,720
postmodernist, not a true
postmodernist who thinks that
777
00:50:06,720 --> 00:50:11,600
everything is relative, that one
story is is as good as another,
778
00:50:11,600 --> 00:50:15,360
and that we never really settle
any scientific questions for
779
00:50:15,360 --> 00:50:17,080
once and for all.
I just think that that is
780
00:50:17,080 --> 00:50:19,520
obviously untrue.
There are lots of scientific
781
00:50:19,520 --> 00:50:22,960
questions that we have settled
once and for all of, like like
782
00:50:22,960 --> 00:50:25,600
the one I mentioned earlier, one
of those fuzzy patches.
783
00:50:26,160 --> 00:50:29,000
In the sky or the Are those
clouds of gas here in the Milky
784
00:50:29,000 --> 00:50:33,400
Way, or are those other galaxies
far beyond our own?
785
00:50:33,600 --> 00:50:36,480
We solved that There are other
galaxies out there.
786
00:50:38,240 --> 00:50:42,680
But in terms of I've become more
I became a science journalist
787
00:50:42,680 --> 00:50:46,720
because I thought in the 1980s,
because I thought science is the
788
00:50:46,720 --> 00:50:50,040
most exciting.
Human endeavor.
789
00:50:50,120 --> 00:50:53,480
It's the human endeavor that
most makes progress.
790
00:50:53,480 --> 00:50:56,080
It gets somewhere.
It's transformed our world
791
00:50:56,080 --> 00:51:01,320
intellectually and materially,
in just countless ways.
792
00:51:01,600 --> 00:51:05,960
And I also thought that science
was our best hope of telling us
793
00:51:05,960 --> 00:51:08,920
what we are and explaining where
the universe came from, solving
794
00:51:08,920 --> 00:51:13,800
all these profound mysteries
that once religion tried to
795
00:51:13,800 --> 00:51:16,160
solve.
The older I get, the more I
796
00:51:16,160 --> 00:51:22,280
realize how limited science is.
And and how much we need
797
00:51:24,320 --> 00:51:32,440
philosophy and the arts and
mysticism.
798
00:51:32,440 --> 00:51:35,360
Certain kinds of religion,
especially if it's not dogmatic
799
00:51:35,360 --> 00:51:39,960
religion.
To try to understand what the
800
00:51:39,960 --> 00:51:45,240
hell is going on.
I just posted this morning a
801
00:51:45,240 --> 00:51:51,320
little column on.
The Golden Bowl, which is the
802
00:51:51,320 --> 00:51:57,840
last novel written by Henry
James, it's It came out in 1904.
803
00:51:58,040 --> 00:52:01,960
It's one of James's most
famously obscure difficult
804
00:52:01,960 --> 00:52:03,880
works.
Hardly anybody reads it because
805
00:52:03,880 --> 00:52:08,920
it's just it's just nasty.
It's interminable and but James
806
00:52:08,920 --> 00:52:12,720
thought it was his best book.
So I thought, OK, I've got to
807
00:52:12,720 --> 00:52:16,600
read this and.
I read it.
808
00:52:16,600 --> 00:52:19,360
I finished the damn thing.
I don't recommend it to anybody
809
00:52:19,360 --> 00:52:23,120
else, but in the course of
reading it, I think I figured
810
00:52:23,120 --> 00:52:28,120
out what James was up to.
It's, you know, it's got a
811
00:52:28,120 --> 00:52:30,200
really simple plot.
It's just four people.
812
00:52:30,200 --> 00:52:34,560
It's kind of a love quadrangle 2
two of the characters or having
813
00:52:34,560 --> 00:52:37,880
an affair that can hurt the
other two to whom they're
814
00:52:37,880 --> 00:52:40,120
married.
And it's so it's like really
815
00:52:40,120 --> 00:52:43,080
simple.
But then James just goes on and
816
00:52:43,080 --> 00:52:45,600
on about it.
What he's trying to do is.
817
00:52:46,480 --> 00:52:52,840
Show that each of us has what's
called what cognitive scientists
818
00:52:52,840 --> 00:52:58,800
call a theory of mind, meaning a
a kind of model of other people.
819
00:52:58,800 --> 00:53:03,400
So you and I both have a little
theory of mind for each other
820
00:53:03,400 --> 00:53:06,000
now just because of this
conversation we're having and
821
00:53:06,560 --> 00:53:09,560
we're constantly updating it and
changing and you know it's it's
822
00:53:09,560 --> 00:53:13,240
based on very limited data.
And we're we're constantly
823
00:53:13,320 --> 00:53:15,400
updating it as we talk to each
other.
824
00:53:15,760 --> 00:53:21,720
You also have a theory of mind
of other people around you that
825
00:53:21,720 --> 00:53:26,200
you're close to, that you love
and your theories of mind of
826
00:53:26,200 --> 00:53:31,040
those other people, those are
also always changing and and
827
00:53:31,120 --> 00:53:35,040
when you have a theory of a mind
of someone else, you also have
828
00:53:35,040 --> 00:53:38,920
to have an idea of what their
theory of mind is for you.
829
00:53:39,920 --> 00:53:43,240
So, James.
I realized this is what James is
830
00:53:43,360 --> 00:53:46,000
up to.
He's showing that you have just
831
00:53:46,000 --> 00:53:53,080
4 characters, and there is this
what could be called what
832
00:53:53,080 --> 00:53:59,040
complexity theorists would call
a combinatorial explosion of
833
00:53:59,040 --> 00:54:04,840
theories of mind, which are all
sort of feeding back to each
834
00:54:04,840 --> 00:54:08,960
other in these endless loops.
This is theory of mind.
835
00:54:09,440 --> 00:54:13,320
Is one of the deepest questions
in cognitive science and
836
00:54:13,320 --> 00:54:18,720
philosophy right now.
And here is Henry James in this
837
00:54:19,280 --> 00:54:23,160
bizarre novel about a bunch of
rich assholes Who cares about
838
00:54:23,160 --> 00:54:25,160
them?
But there's this theme at the
839
00:54:25,160 --> 00:54:29,960
bottom of it that is absolutely
profound and applies to all of
840
00:54:29,960 --> 00:54:32,840
us.
It's it's like a punch in the
841
00:54:32,840 --> 00:54:37,320
face that's telling us.
No one really knows what's going
842
00:54:37,320 --> 00:54:43,480
on in anybody else's head.
We all we do is guess and that's
843
00:54:43,760 --> 00:54:46,920
that is something that
supplements through this work of
844
00:54:46,920 --> 00:54:50,520
brilliant literature.
Although brilliant but really
845
00:54:50,520 --> 00:54:52,920
hard to read.
You know I'm I'm looking at it
846
00:54:52,920 --> 00:54:55,680
now so it's your tweets.
To distract myself from
847
00:54:55,680 --> 00:54:57,240
everything.
I just wrote a review on Henry
848
00:54:57,240 --> 00:55:01,240
James so it's called Paulo.
So I'm I'm looking at your
849
00:55:01,240 --> 00:55:03,600
Twitter Bible.
It says know nothing know it all
850
00:55:03,600 --> 00:55:08,000
science lovers science basher.
I mean I like that it's a it's a
851
00:55:08,000 --> 00:55:10,880
good way to sort of maintain
that humility among while
852
00:55:11,280 --> 00:55:13,200
performing this search for
truth.
853
00:55:13,360 --> 00:55:15,880
Well, I I know you don't like
the postmodern version of that.
854
00:55:16,440 --> 00:55:21,040
That a quote.
Yeah, the, the, the know nothing
855
00:55:21,040 --> 00:55:23,320
know it all because who the hell
am I?
856
00:55:23,320 --> 00:55:26,920
I'm I'm like passing judgement
on string theory and.
857
00:55:27,800 --> 00:55:34,960
Interpretations of of quantum
mechanics and you know theories
858
00:55:34,960 --> 00:55:38,760
all across integrated
information theory at with and
859
00:55:38,760 --> 00:55:41,600
all I do is I sort of look into
these things and talk to people
860
00:55:41,600 --> 00:55:46,320
about them and then I I dare to
have opinions on them.
861
00:55:46,320 --> 00:55:51,040
So that makes me a big know it
all you know and an arrogant
862
00:55:51,040 --> 00:55:53,760
bastard.
And at the same time, as I told
863
00:55:53,760 --> 00:55:57,080
you, the the older I get, the
more I realize that.
864
00:55:57,680 --> 00:55:59,200
I don't know anything.
I'm.
865
00:55:59,400 --> 00:56:08,600
I feel appallingly ignorant and
confused by by reality, and I I
866
00:56:08,600 --> 00:56:12,960
feel as though and I I don't.
I've given up hope that I'll
867
00:56:12,960 --> 00:56:18,320
have some huge revelation that
will suddenly make everything
868
00:56:19,480 --> 00:56:23,600
sensible to me.
In fact it's it's pretty it's
869
00:56:23,600 --> 00:56:26,440
pretty consistently going the
other way and I've just tried to
870
00:56:26,440 --> 00:56:28,480
embrace it.
So it might seem like a paradox.
871
00:56:28,480 --> 00:56:34,080
The know it all know nothing
thing, but from where I am it,
872
00:56:34,160 --> 00:56:38,520
it actually works really well.
Tell me throughout the years
873
00:56:38,520 --> 00:56:41,400
when writing on these topics,
particularly let's get back to
874
00:56:41,400 --> 00:56:43,120
the mind body problem.
When you wrote about these
875
00:56:43,120 --> 00:56:46,720
topics, which philosophers and
scientists do you think had the
876
00:56:46,720 --> 00:56:47,520
best?
Sort of.
877
00:56:47,560 --> 00:56:51,320
Well, the closest approach to
the to the solution.
878
00:56:51,320 --> 00:56:53,840
That's it.
Yeah.
879
00:56:56,240 --> 00:57:00,760
In terms of so there's there's
when it comes to philosophers,
880
00:57:00,920 --> 00:57:03,480
see I think of philosophy as
being kind of a branch of
881
00:57:03,480 --> 00:57:10,440
literature almost like a kind of
really weird poetry and that has
882
00:57:10,440 --> 00:57:14,400
very various aesthetic effects.
So I'm I'm.
883
00:57:16,120 --> 00:57:20,280
I look at the I I respond to the
style of philosophers as well as
884
00:57:20,280 --> 00:57:22,520
to the substance of what they're
actually saying.
885
00:57:22,760 --> 00:57:25,520
And one of my all time favorite
philosophers and I and I've been
886
00:57:25,520 --> 00:57:28,360
fortunate enough to interview a
lot of the greatest philosophers
887
00:57:28,960 --> 00:57:32,240
of the 20th century, especially
philosophers of science.
888
00:57:32,240 --> 00:57:36,720
And one of my favourites was
this guy named Paul Feyerabend
889
00:57:37,280 --> 00:57:41,120
was an Austrian philosopher.
He was old enough to actually
890
00:57:41,120 --> 00:57:45,080
have served.
In the German army at the toward
891
00:57:45,080 --> 00:57:49,480
the tail end of of World War Two
he was shot in the back.
892
00:57:49,480 --> 00:57:53,160
So he was permanent, permanently
crippled.
893
00:57:53,640 --> 00:58:00,240
He had difficulty walking and
and he had trained in physics
894
00:58:00,240 --> 00:58:04,240
and then decided to go into
philosophy because he just loved
895
00:58:04,240 --> 00:58:10,600
arguing with people and and he
turned into he called himself a
896
00:58:10,600 --> 00:58:16,520
philosophical anarchist.
Meaning that he didn't believe
897
00:58:16,520 --> 00:58:20,120
in philosophical systems, he was
kind of destructive, he liked to
898
00:58:20,120 --> 00:58:28,080
tear things down and and he had
the the style of doing it that
899
00:58:28,080 --> 00:58:31,200
was really flamboyant.
He's kind of like a performance
900
00:58:31,200 --> 00:58:33,680
artist.
So he's he's basically a
901
00:58:33,680 --> 00:58:37,360
philosopher who's saying that
philosophy is impossible.
902
00:58:38,280 --> 00:58:42,160
And so he's like a walking
contradiction and he kind of
903
00:58:42,160 --> 00:58:45,600
embraced that.
He was he he savagely mocked
904
00:58:45,640 --> 00:58:51,400
other people, but he also
savagely mocked himself and and
905
00:58:51,400 --> 00:58:58,560
he especially mocked the whole
idea of understanding reality.
906
00:58:58,560 --> 00:59:02,560
I I interviewed him in the 1990s
at a period when a lot of people
907
00:59:02,560 --> 00:59:06,280
were still taken seriously.
The idea of A of a Theory of
908
00:59:06,280 --> 00:59:09,200
everything.
This is a term that Stephen
909
00:59:09,200 --> 00:59:12,760
Hawking helped to popularize a A
theory of physics.
910
00:59:12,760 --> 00:59:15,960
But it could also be coming from
other fields that would tell us
911
00:59:15,960 --> 00:59:20,200
why we're here, that could tell
us why there's something rather
912
00:59:20,200 --> 00:59:24,480
than nothing and Fire.
Rob and I still kind of believe
913
00:59:24,480 --> 00:59:28,800
that when I talked to Firebin
and Fire, Robin said to me, are
914
00:59:28,800 --> 00:59:32,720
you kidding me?
A theory that's going to tell
915
00:59:32,720 --> 00:59:36,840
us.
What really is out there?
916
00:59:36,880 --> 00:59:39,680
We're nothing.
Human beings are nothing.
917
00:59:39,800 --> 00:59:44,600
We're we're just like like flies
that are here for a second and
918
00:59:45,000 --> 00:59:47,560
then we're gone.
We think and we keep saying we
919
00:59:47,560 --> 00:59:52,560
found the truth about reality.
Meanwhile the truth is behind is
920
00:59:52,920 --> 00:59:55,480
is still out there laughing at
us.
921
00:59:55,760 --> 01:00:01,640
So he had this this really
dramatic way of of of talking
922
01:00:01,640 --> 01:00:03,040
that I.
That I loved.
923
01:00:03,040 --> 01:00:06,480
And at the time when I
interviewed him, I thought he
924
01:00:06,480 --> 01:00:10,200
goes too far.
He was just denigrating science
925
01:00:10,840 --> 01:00:15,600
and the whole Western
intellectual tradition so much
926
01:00:16,120 --> 01:00:22,640
and even saying that we have to
have more consideration for the
927
01:00:22,680 --> 01:00:28,920
the beliefs of indigenous people
and religious ideas of creation.
928
01:00:29,400 --> 01:00:31,640
And I I was, I didn't want to
hear that.
929
01:00:31,960 --> 01:00:35,440
And as time goes on, I've I've
become more sympathetic toward
930
01:00:35,440 --> 01:00:40,080
him, especially because I
realized what he was telling me
931
01:00:40,080 --> 01:00:45,400
was that knowledge can become
oppressive knowledge when you
932
01:00:45,400 --> 01:00:48,720
know the scientists are saying
this is what's happening and you
933
01:00:48,720 --> 01:00:50,520
must accept it because it's
true.
934
01:00:51,360 --> 01:00:54,680
And fire Robin was saying, and
this is radical at the time.
935
01:00:54,680 --> 01:00:58,840
Now it doesn't seem so radical
fire, Robin was saying, saying
936
01:00:59,520 --> 01:01:04,160
why do we have to accept it?
Maybe we prefer to see the the
937
01:01:04,160 --> 01:01:09,560
earth is being born out of some
like primordial earth goddess.
938
01:01:10,160 --> 01:01:15,720
And if that gives us comfort, if
and if that connects us to our
939
01:01:16,680 --> 01:01:20,520
our ancestors, then who are the
scientists to take that away
940
01:01:20,520 --> 01:01:24,400
from us?
So it was he was showing that
941
01:01:24,400 --> 01:01:27,520
there's this kind of dichotomy
between truth and freedom.
942
01:01:28,160 --> 01:01:29,600
Fire.
Robin believed in truth.
943
01:01:29,600 --> 01:01:31,160
People didn't understand that
about him.
944
01:01:32,200 --> 01:01:34,480
He believed in truth.
And that's one reason why he
945
01:01:34,480 --> 01:01:40,000
thought science was dangerous,
because it actually does figure
946
01:01:40,000 --> 01:01:43,480
out the world and it and imposes
ideas on people.
947
01:01:43,720 --> 01:01:46,680
But he didn't necessarily.
He thought that that might be
948
01:01:48,240 --> 01:01:51,320
lead to some kind of
totalitarian system where people
949
01:01:51,320 --> 01:01:53,040
all have to believe the same
thing.
950
01:01:54,080 --> 01:01:59,440
And I'm, you know, I still have
problems at that point of view,
951
01:01:59,440 --> 01:02:02,560
but I really.
But I see what he is after and
952
01:02:02,560 --> 01:02:07,360
more and more freedom of
thought, which is what mattered
953
01:02:07,360 --> 01:02:09,920
to fire Rob and also matters to
me.
954
01:02:10,400 --> 01:02:12,680
That's I'm I'm definitely going
to check him out and it sounds
955
01:02:12,960 --> 01:02:17,760
it sounds very intriguing.
Have you noticed the the IT
956
01:02:17,760 --> 01:02:21,880
seems that a lot of people
online today when they approach
957
01:02:21,880 --> 01:02:25,400
this topic of consciousness and
the mind body problem.
958
01:02:26,440 --> 01:02:29,240
It seems that there seems to be
an increase of illusionist
959
01:02:29,240 --> 01:02:32,000
thinkers now, I think
particularly within the last,
960
01:02:32,000 --> 01:02:35,640
let's say 10 years.
I think Dennis and then wrote a
961
01:02:35,640 --> 01:02:38,080
paper around 2016 Keith
Frankish.
962
01:02:38,080 --> 01:02:40,200
They wrote on illusionism as a
theory of consciousness.
963
01:02:40,400 --> 01:02:42,400
Something I noticed recently is
that all of them seem to be
964
01:02:42,400 --> 01:02:46,560
quitting Twitter one by one.
I think Dennis recently posted a
965
01:02:46,560 --> 01:02:48,640
tweet that he's leaving.
Keith seems to be doing the same
966
01:02:48,640 --> 01:02:49,800
thing.
What are your thoughts on
967
01:02:49,800 --> 01:02:51,480
illusionism as a theory of
consciousness?
968
01:02:53,160 --> 01:03:01,960
Yeah, all right, so I actually
just post reposted something on
969
01:03:02,240 --> 01:03:08,800
related to Illusionism.
I'm an old acid head, OK?
970
01:03:09,120 --> 01:03:13,280
I started taking LSD
psychedelics when I was just a
971
01:03:13,280 --> 01:03:16,560
boy.
I was like 15 or 16 years old
972
01:03:17,080 --> 01:03:24,040
and and that has that has
altered my thinking or it's
973
01:03:24,040 --> 01:03:27,440
something that always is there
in the background when I'm
974
01:03:27,440 --> 01:03:31,400
thinking about questions like
what is reality really?
975
01:03:31,400 --> 01:03:34,760
What's the relation of mind and
and matter and which is the
976
01:03:34,760 --> 01:03:38,320
primary?
Does matter come out of mind or
977
01:03:38,320 --> 01:03:41,680
does mind come out of matter?
What is it?
978
01:03:42,120 --> 01:03:49,280
I'm also really interested in in
mysticism, by which I mean these
979
01:03:49,280 --> 01:03:52,080
extraordinary experiences that
people have had throughout
980
01:03:52,080 --> 01:03:56,720
history and still have from all
different cultures and
981
01:03:56,880 --> 01:04:02,760
traditions that seem to point
toward the existence of
982
01:04:02,760 --> 01:04:09,960
something beyond this where we
are right now and different
983
01:04:09,960 --> 01:04:14,360
mystical traditions in different
ways, Buddhism, Hinduism and
984
01:04:14,360 --> 01:04:18,800
even Christianity.
Some of the the western
985
01:04:18,800 --> 01:04:25,080
religions all suggest they imply
and or some state very
986
01:04:25,080 --> 01:04:28,320
explicitly that this is an
illusion.
987
01:04:29,440 --> 01:04:35,200
This is like a dream state and
the actual reality is something
988
01:04:35,200 --> 01:04:41,720
entirely different.
So I had enough LSD that I take
989
01:04:41,720 --> 01:04:46,840
that idea very seriously.
I've been, I'd been tripping and
990
01:04:46,840 --> 01:04:49,880
suddenly thought yeah this is
this is like a dream.
991
01:04:50,320 --> 01:04:56,560
And I've even felt like I sort
of went beyond the veil and and
992
01:04:56,560 --> 01:05:00,720
saw what was what was behind it.
I I wrote a whole book on this
993
01:05:00,720 --> 01:05:03,480
called Rational Mysticism where
I tried to make sense of some of
994
01:05:03,480 --> 01:05:10,480
these experiences that I'd had
the problem and then you know
995
01:05:10,480 --> 01:05:13,640
their modern scientific versions
of illusionism.
996
01:05:14,280 --> 01:05:16,880
Donald Hoffman is 1 purveyor of
this.
997
01:05:17,200 --> 01:05:20,280
I also have become sort of
unlikely friends over the last
998
01:05:20,280 --> 01:05:23,760
few years with Deepak Chopra
who's who's kind of an
999
01:05:23,760 --> 01:05:26,800
illusionist.
It's somebody who basically says
1000
01:05:26,800 --> 01:05:33,880
that mind is the basis of of
everything and not and and not
1001
01:05:33,880 --> 01:05:35,520
matter.
So I'm sympathetic toward these
1002
01:05:35,720 --> 01:05:42,280
ideas, but at the same time I'm,
I'm really skeptical of them and
1003
01:05:42,440 --> 01:05:48,400
I even have a moral objection to
them in this world.
1004
01:05:48,400 --> 01:05:50,440
They're bad things happening.
They're suffering and
1005
01:05:50,440 --> 01:05:55,880
oppression.
I mean, like right now of just
1006
01:05:56,440 --> 01:05:59,560
they're suffering.
That is unimaginable.
1007
01:06:00,640 --> 01:06:06,640
And and what bothers me about
illusionism, or even the idea
1008
01:06:06,640 --> 01:06:10,440
that everything is consciousness
and and this is true of
1009
01:06:10,440 --> 01:06:16,120
multiverse theories too, they
sort of get us to discount this
1010
01:06:16,120 --> 01:06:19,920
world we're living in where
there are people in pain like
1011
01:06:19,960 --> 01:06:27,880
right now and and people who are
being treated unfairly, who are
1012
01:06:27,880 --> 01:06:32,240
being brutalized.
And I don't.
1013
01:06:32,240 --> 01:06:36,320
Apart from whether Illusionism
is right or wrong, or whether
1014
01:06:36,320 --> 01:06:39,720
idealism or pan psychism or
they're right or wrong.
1015
01:06:40,640 --> 01:06:44,720
They're the practical moral
consequences of ideas like this.
1016
01:06:45,280 --> 01:06:54,880
And I don't like any theory or
world view that gets us off the
1017
01:06:54,880 --> 01:07:00,160
hook to an extent about doing
something, about the terrible
1018
01:07:00,160 --> 01:07:04,720
things happening in this world
that are not illusions that are
1019
01:07:04,720 --> 01:07:07,360
real.
There's nothing more real than
1020
01:07:07,360 --> 01:07:11,840
human pain.
So I'm, I'm kind of I, you know
1021
01:07:11,840 --> 01:07:17,400
I've written about it a lot also
I it bothers me that so humans
1022
01:07:17,400 --> 01:07:20,440
are sort of narcissists.
We're all natural narcissists.
1023
01:07:20,760 --> 01:07:24,880
Every person is the center of of
his or her cosmos.
1024
01:07:25,360 --> 01:07:28,680
Right.
And we humans collectively think
1025
01:07:28,680 --> 01:07:30,880
we're really great.
We think we're better than all
1026
01:07:30,880 --> 01:07:34,680
the other organisms on Earth.
So from the beginning, and we've
1027
01:07:34,680 --> 01:07:38,400
always thought that the all of
existence was about us, it was
1028
01:07:38,400 --> 01:07:42,400
created for us for some kind of
spiritual project that we're
1029
01:07:42,400 --> 01:07:47,200
engaged in.
And we started seriously
1030
01:07:47,200 --> 01:07:49,360
questioning that about 500 years
ago.
1031
01:07:49,560 --> 01:07:53,880
And I see that as one of
humanity's triumphs is to
1032
01:07:53,880 --> 01:07:58,080
overcome its innate narcissism
and realize that no, we're just
1033
01:07:58,080 --> 01:08:03,640
like 1 little type of Organism
on a little speck of dust going
1034
01:08:03,640 --> 01:08:08,800
around one little star in this
unimaginably big universe.
1035
01:08:09,400 --> 01:08:15,440
So we should get over ourselves.
And now I see this trend, I call
1036
01:08:15,440 --> 01:08:18,439
it Neo geocentrism.
It's like a return of
1037
01:08:19,439 --> 01:08:25,000
geocentrism.
I see this as theories like
1038
01:08:25,680 --> 01:08:28,720
integrated information theory
and Donald Hoffman's theory, and
1039
01:08:28,720 --> 01:08:33,160
all these theories that give
primacy to consciousness as as a
1040
01:08:33,160 --> 01:08:38,279
return to to a kind of
geocentric thinking.
1041
01:08:38,920 --> 01:08:42,600
So yeah, I guess it's what what
I'm trying to say is, I'm
1042
01:08:42,600 --> 01:08:46,600
ambivalent about all that stuff.
And you're touching on something
1043
01:08:46,600 --> 01:08:49,240
very important because this
podcast, I mean it, touches on
1044
01:08:49,240 --> 01:08:54,000
the nature of consciousness,
reality, free will and morality.
1045
01:08:54,000 --> 01:08:56,279
So you're you're on that
morality spectrum at the moment.
1046
01:08:56,279 --> 01:08:57,520
What are your thoughts on free
will?
1047
01:08:58,120 --> 01:09:04,399
What role does that?
Yeah, I've really gone back and
1048
01:09:04,399 --> 01:09:07,760
forth.
I I think free will is a
1049
01:09:07,760 --> 01:09:11,800
philosophical rather than
scientific question.
1050
01:09:12,160 --> 01:09:16,840
And by that I mean that I don't
think free will is solvable.
1051
01:09:17,000 --> 01:09:22,800
I I don't think there are will
ever be a slam dunk argument
1052
01:09:22,800 --> 01:09:25,319
that proves yes, free will
exists.
1053
01:09:25,920 --> 01:09:30,600
No, it does not exist.
I can think about.
1054
01:09:30,840 --> 01:09:38,240
I can trace my own life back to,
you know, through my parents,
1055
01:09:38,359 --> 01:09:41,080
all the way back to the
beginning of life on Earth and
1056
01:09:41,080 --> 01:09:43,640
back to the beginning of the
universe.
1057
01:09:43,640 --> 01:09:45,279
I didn't ask for any of that to
happen.
1058
01:09:45,399 --> 01:09:51,920
How free can I be there?
Where was the choice in my life?
1059
01:09:51,920 --> 01:09:58,400
At the same time, I am aware of
myself as this creature who can
1060
01:09:58,400 --> 01:10:03,560
look into the future and discern
different trajectories I could
1061
01:10:03,560 --> 01:10:06,360
take from this point where I I
am now.
1062
01:10:07,040 --> 01:10:10,880
I know I have choices.
I make them all the time.
1063
01:10:10,880 --> 01:10:14,000
So therefore of course I have
free will.
1064
01:10:16,000 --> 01:10:19,760
So I so I can see it in both
these two ways.
1065
01:10:20,080 --> 01:10:24,960
I I call myself a free will
believer because I think it's
1066
01:10:24,960 --> 01:10:29,360
really important for us not to
feel as though we're victims of
1067
01:10:29,360 --> 01:10:33,120
forces beyond our control, in
part so we can take care of
1068
01:10:33,120 --> 01:10:36,320
these problems that I was
describing that lead to human
1069
01:10:36,320 --> 01:10:39,040
suffering.
All the various forms of
1070
01:10:39,040 --> 01:10:43,800
injustice and oppression,
oppression that 'cause people to
1071
01:10:43,800 --> 01:10:48,000
have horrible, painful lives.
We need to think we can do
1072
01:10:48,000 --> 01:10:52,400
something about sexism and
racism and and war and
1073
01:10:53,280 --> 01:10:57,280
inequality.
And to the extent we think we
1074
01:10:57,280 --> 01:11:03,080
believe the determinists, I
think we're less likely even to
1075
01:11:03,080 --> 01:11:06,000
try to really change things.
That's what worries me.
1076
01:11:07,600 --> 01:11:09,480
As you said, I mean it's deeply
entwined with the mind body
1077
01:11:09,480 --> 01:11:11,760
problem as well.
These these questions are
1078
01:11:11,760 --> 01:11:14,320
fundamentally going to affect
how we approach moral
1079
01:11:14,320 --> 01:11:17,680
responsibility, how we engage
with people, what we do.
1080
01:11:17,680 --> 01:11:20,640
So it's important that if we do
sort of come up with any sort of
1081
01:11:20,640 --> 01:11:23,560
theory.
That we remember that this does
1082
01:11:23,560 --> 01:11:27,080
have practical implications.
Absolutely.
1083
01:11:27,120 --> 01:11:31,600
So I have somewhere here.
I have AI.
1084
01:11:31,600 --> 01:11:35,040
Haven't read it yet, but I have
the new book by Robert Sapolsky,
1085
01:11:35,120 --> 01:11:38,600
the Stanford biologist.
And let me see, where is it?
1086
01:11:40,200 --> 01:11:44,600
Oh, yeah, here it is.
I've got to read this soon
1087
01:11:44,600 --> 01:11:49,440
because he agreed to have a
conversation with me about the
1088
01:11:49,440 --> 01:11:54,800
book by Zoom in just a few
weeks.
1089
01:11:55,440 --> 01:11:59,720
And so in this book he
apparently he argues against
1090
01:11:59,720 --> 01:12:01,080
free will.
Yes, he does.
1091
01:12:02,280 --> 01:12:04,640
OK, so you've read it.
I haven't, but I've spoken to
1092
01:12:04,640 --> 01:12:08,360
quite a few people who've read
it already and who've I've had
1093
01:12:08,360 --> 01:12:11,080
on the show and they they said
he makes quite a strong case for
1094
01:12:11,080 --> 01:12:13,360
it as well.
And I think Greg Caruso as well,
1095
01:12:13,760 --> 01:12:17,040
who he he quotes a lot of Greg
and Dirk Pierboom's work in it.
1096
01:12:17,600 --> 01:12:21,320
On rejecting retributivism and
and it's about hard
1097
01:12:21,320 --> 01:12:23,920
incompatibilism.
Yeah.
1098
01:12:23,920 --> 01:12:28,560
So I I really like Sapolsky as
I've met him a couple of times.
1099
01:12:29,480 --> 01:12:33,200
I've read several of his books.
I'm a huge fan.
1100
01:12:33,680 --> 01:12:39,080
And so I I wrote a book called
The End of War, which argues for
1101
01:12:39,080 --> 01:12:42,440
free will and choice and that we
can overcome war.
1102
01:12:42,440 --> 01:12:45,280
Shouldn't think of it as
something that is imposed on us
1103
01:12:45,280 --> 01:12:49,840
by our nature, by circumstance.
And I cited Sapolsky's work,
1104
01:12:49,840 --> 01:12:55,200
which I thought supported that.
And and so to know that he's
1105
01:12:55,200 --> 01:12:56,880
written a book against free
will.
1106
01:12:56,880 --> 01:13:03,800
Now it really it upsets me, so
I'm sort of bracing myself to
1107
01:13:03,800 --> 01:13:06,360
read it.
Maybe there's a way of looking
1108
01:13:06,360 --> 01:13:11,360
at free will because he's a very
humane, kind, compassionate
1109
01:13:11,360 --> 01:13:13,000
person.
Maybe there's a way to look at
1110
01:13:13,000 --> 01:13:17,240
free will that's consistent with
a program of social justice and
1111
01:13:17,400 --> 01:13:20,920
progressive values.
I assume that makes that case in
1112
01:13:20,920 --> 01:13:25,600
his book.
But I'm I'm at this point, I'm
1113
01:13:25,600 --> 01:13:28,040
skeptical, but we're going to
talk about it in a few weeks.
1114
01:13:28,040 --> 01:13:29,800
No, John, I can, I can
completely agree with that
1115
01:13:29,800 --> 01:13:32,520
because when I.
When I think of Robert Sapolsky,
1116
01:13:32,560 --> 01:13:36,520
I almost never expected him to
write a book where he would
1117
01:13:36,760 --> 01:13:39,360
defend determinism.
It was something that I also, it
1118
01:13:39,360 --> 01:13:42,280
took me by surprise as well.
But when I saw Greg Caruso talk
1119
01:13:42,280 --> 01:13:44,720
about the fact that he's quoted
him a couple times at Dirk
1120
01:13:44,720 --> 01:13:47,360
Pierbun, I realized how he's
going to approach it because
1121
01:13:47,560 --> 01:13:51,560
they make very good cases for
social justice within an
1122
01:13:51,560 --> 01:13:53,800
illusionist framework of free
will.
1123
01:13:54,040 --> 01:13:56,000
So I think you're going to find
it quite fascinating when you
1124
01:13:56,000 --> 01:13:57,320
read it.
And I think you might enjoy it.
1125
01:13:57,320 --> 01:14:02,640
Yeah, I, you know, I've, I've
got so I've got some Buddhist
1126
01:14:02,640 --> 01:14:07,640
friends.
I, I'm, I, I once interviewed a
1127
01:14:07,640 --> 01:14:10,000
great length, a British
psychologist named Susan
1128
01:14:10,000 --> 01:14:11,800
Blackmore.
Have you heard of her?
1129
01:14:12,320 --> 01:14:16,640
Yeah, she's yeah, she's a great
she's really an interesting
1130
01:14:16,640 --> 01:14:21,760
person, a really lively mind.
And she is.
1131
01:14:21,760 --> 01:14:24,720
I don't think she likes being
called a Zen Buddhist, but she
1132
01:14:24,720 --> 01:14:29,040
practices Zen Buddhism, She
practices mindfulness, she
1133
01:14:29,040 --> 01:14:36,440
meditates a lot and she was an
an adamant denier of free will,
1134
01:14:36,680 --> 01:14:41,720
and she tried to convince me
that to give up free will means
1135
01:14:41,720 --> 01:14:47,120
kind of being liberated.
She saw it as as a kind of
1136
01:14:47,880 --> 01:14:54,040
enlightenment and where you're
totally living in the moment and
1137
01:14:55,160 --> 01:14:59,440
and you realize that you really
have no control of your life,
1138
01:14:59,440 --> 01:15:04,320
you don't have any true choices,
so just go along with things.
1139
01:15:04,960 --> 01:15:09,840
And she, she said all this very
eloquently.
1140
01:15:09,840 --> 01:15:12,040
I never bought it.
I never, I just can't.
1141
01:15:12,040 --> 01:15:16,000
It's just one of those.
I never understood it, seeing
1142
01:15:16,000 --> 01:15:22,400
the lack of free will as
liberating, although I sometimes
1143
01:15:22,400 --> 01:15:24,840
I find my own choices
oppressive.
1144
01:15:24,840 --> 01:15:28,440
If I'm trying to decide between
doing two things, one of which
1145
01:15:28,440 --> 01:15:31,160
might be the right thing to do,
but it's very difficult, another
1146
01:15:31,160 --> 01:15:35,520
is easier, but not such the
right thing to do.
1147
01:15:36,840 --> 01:15:42,160
That can be.
That can be hard, and freedom is
1148
01:15:42,160 --> 01:15:44,320
hard.
It can be.
1149
01:15:44,880 --> 01:15:47,320
I can see you might think it's
liberating to live in a
1150
01:15:47,320 --> 01:15:51,200
totalitarian or fundamentalist
religious state that tells you
1151
01:15:51,200 --> 01:15:53,120
exactly what to think and do all
the time.
1152
01:15:53,160 --> 01:15:56,000
OK, sure, fine.
But I don't want to live there.
1153
01:15:57,800 --> 01:16:02,880
I'd rather have these choices,
even if they're illusory.
1154
01:16:02,880 --> 01:16:05,520
I'd.
So I sometimes say I I don't.
1155
01:16:06,200 --> 01:16:11,440
I don't.
I don't believe in God, At least
1156
01:16:11,440 --> 01:16:14,760
not any kind of God that I've
encountered yet.
1157
01:16:16,200 --> 01:16:20,480
But I do believe in free will,
or I have faith in free will.
1158
01:16:20,480 --> 01:16:23,160
That's that's like a crucial
part of my world view.
1159
01:16:23,600 --> 01:16:27,280
It's interesting 'cause, I mean,
while Sapolsky does a complete
1160
01:16:28,200 --> 01:16:31,680
take me like a 180 from what
you'd expect him to believe,
1161
01:16:31,920 --> 01:16:34,800
someone who does that for me as
well is Daniel Dennett.
1162
01:16:34,800 --> 01:16:37,520
Because I would.
I would assume Dennett would be
1163
01:16:37,840 --> 01:16:41,080
a A Free Will Illusionist.
But some reason is not and I'm
1164
01:16:41,080 --> 01:16:44,440
always surprised by that.
Yeah, he wrote.
1165
01:16:44,440 --> 01:16:46,160
Let me see.
He wrote a book called Freedom
1166
01:16:46,160 --> 01:16:51,840
Evolves that I I thought was
really profound.
1167
01:16:51,880 --> 01:16:57,840
I I, I then it annoys me often
just because he's such a smarty
1168
01:16:57,840 --> 01:16:59,200
pants.
He's so smug.
1169
01:16:59,200 --> 01:17:02,040
He's a brilliant writer, but
he's always so pleased with
1170
01:17:02,040 --> 01:17:05,960
himself and and he's always so
sure that he's right about
1171
01:17:06,320 --> 01:17:09,960
absolutely everything and he's
got this idea that consciousness
1172
01:17:09,960 --> 01:17:14,600
is an illusion, which he's he's
criticized for that in some ways
1173
01:17:14,600 --> 01:17:18,080
that are unfair, but in other
ways that I think are absolutely
1174
01:17:18,080 --> 01:17:20,200
justified.
So you're right, I would have
1175
01:17:20,200 --> 01:17:23,760
expected him to be a hardcore
determinist because he's a
1176
01:17:23,760 --> 01:17:28,520
hardcore materialist, but he
almost talks, he talks about
1177
01:17:28,520 --> 01:17:35,000
free will as being a kind of an
invention like like money or
1178
01:17:35,000 --> 01:17:37,840
marriage.
So it's not part of the nature
1179
01:17:37,840 --> 01:17:41,640
of reality, but it's an
invention that has proved to be
1180
01:17:42,960 --> 01:17:50,000
extremely useful and meaningful.
And once, like money, once it's
1181
01:17:50,000 --> 01:17:54,200
there, it is real.
Once you start believing it free
1182
01:17:54,200 --> 01:17:59,320
will, you start believing that
you have all these choices, then
1183
01:17:59,880 --> 01:18:01,800
you can't deny it.
It's it's there.
1184
01:18:01,800 --> 01:18:05,280
It's it's part of our lives.
And what I like about Dennett
1185
01:18:05,280 --> 01:18:10,440
made me realize that free will
is it is not something that is
1186
01:18:10,440 --> 01:18:16,080
just on the level of
individuals, it's it's political
1187
01:18:16,080 --> 01:18:18,840
as well.
So I think you can even look at
1188
01:18:18,840 --> 01:18:22,480
different societies, judge them,
rank them according to how much
1189
01:18:23,160 --> 01:18:27,280
free will citizens have, which
means how many choices they
1190
01:18:27,280 --> 01:18:29,360
have.
There's some societies in which
1191
01:18:29,360 --> 01:18:33,680
people have very few choices,
and especially if you go back in
1192
01:18:33,680 --> 01:18:36,960
history, most people had very
few choices in how to live their
1193
01:18:36,960 --> 01:18:41,040
lives.
But nowadays, lots of people,
1194
01:18:41,040 --> 01:18:43,920
I'm assuming you and I are part
of this category.
1195
01:18:44,320 --> 01:18:46,880
There are all sorts of crazy
things we can do with our lives.
1196
01:18:47,520 --> 01:18:51,440
And that is one of the great
triumphs of of human evolution
1197
01:18:51,440 --> 01:18:55,920
and the evolution of of culture
to give us more and more
1198
01:18:55,920 --> 01:18:58,440
choices, to give us more and
more free will.
1199
01:19:00,080 --> 01:19:03,840
And so that's another reason why
I don't like denying free will,
1200
01:19:03,840 --> 01:19:07,320
because it seems to me that
you're denying this really
1201
01:19:07,320 --> 01:19:10,320
amazing, fundamental part of
human progress.
1202
01:19:11,080 --> 01:19:13,920
Have you Seen Dennis wrote a new
book called I've Been Thinking.
1203
01:19:14,200 --> 01:19:15,560
I think it's called I've Been
Thinking.
1204
01:19:16,080 --> 01:19:20,920
It's a memoir.
I started reading it because I I
1205
01:19:20,920 --> 01:19:24,080
get people send me galleys.
They're they're they they keep
1206
01:19:24,080 --> 01:19:27,080
hoping I'm going to write
something positive about these
1207
01:19:27,080 --> 01:19:29,040
books, even though evidence
suggests otherwise.
1208
01:19:29,040 --> 01:19:33,040
And I got it.
And it this is probably unfair.
1209
01:19:33,040 --> 01:19:39,400
It just I I it was so self
congratulatory from the start
1210
01:19:39,840 --> 01:19:42,040
that it kind of turned me off.
So I set it aside.
1211
01:19:42,040 --> 01:19:44,040
I should probably try it again.
Have you read it?
1212
01:19:44,280 --> 01:19:46,840
No, not yet.
But I have seen similar reviews
1213
01:19:46,880 --> 01:19:49,920
online.
I saw someone defended it by
1214
01:19:49,920 --> 01:19:51,880
saying I mean if you're a
philosopher.
1215
01:19:53,760 --> 01:19:56,480
Yeah, your job is to actually
talk, to counter argue and talk
1216
01:19:56,480 --> 01:19:58,040
to people and have that sort of
smugness.
1217
01:19:58,040 --> 01:19:59,480
You need to almost have that
confidence.
1218
01:19:59,480 --> 01:20:01,920
So I I saw a lot of people
defending him as well saying,
1219
01:20:01,920 --> 01:20:04,560
look you should actually be this
confident when you're trying to
1220
01:20:04,560 --> 01:20:07,080
make such profound counter
arguments to things.
1221
01:20:07,440 --> 01:20:10,360
But I mean, but it seems to me
everyone's everyone is
1222
01:20:10,360 --> 01:20:14,560
commenting on that.
And and for a for a philosopher,
1223
01:20:15,000 --> 01:20:17,640
he's really a good writer.
He constantly is coining all
1224
01:20:17,640 --> 01:20:21,160
these all these phrases.
And by the way we're talking
1225
01:20:21,160 --> 01:20:27,960
about Dennett, I I want to, I'd
like to mention this famous idea
1226
01:20:28,800 --> 01:20:33,040
that he's had and I mentioned it
a little bit earlier and he's
1227
01:20:33,040 --> 01:20:35,920
been really criticized for IT.
People sometimes say that he
1228
01:20:35,920 --> 01:20:39,480
claims consciousness is an
illusion and that means
1229
01:20:39,480 --> 01:20:43,920
consciousness doesn't exist.
And how could a such a smart
1230
01:20:43,920 --> 01:20:46,440
person have such a stupid idea,
is what a lot of people have
1231
01:20:46,440 --> 01:20:51,000
said.
And so he went on and on about
1232
01:20:51,000 --> 01:20:52,880
this idea in his book
Consciousness.
1233
01:20:53,920 --> 01:20:59,480
Explained no, yes, but in a more
recent book, From Bacteria to
1234
01:20:59,480 --> 01:21:08,280
Bach and and so and I finally
realized what he was up, what he
1235
01:21:08,280 --> 01:21:10,720
meant by this idea that
consciousness is an illusion.
1236
01:21:11,120 --> 01:21:16,120
In that book, he had this
wonderful phrase, competence
1237
01:21:16,120 --> 01:21:19,200
without comprehension.
And he's just making the point
1238
01:21:19,200 --> 01:21:23,840
that much of what we do that
gets us through a typical day
1239
01:21:24,360 --> 01:21:28,520
involves unconscious information
processing.
1240
01:21:28,920 --> 01:21:34,480
We're sort of like zombies.
We're like automatons performing
1241
01:21:34,520 --> 01:21:37,440
various chores.
Then it might say, even this
1242
01:21:37,440 --> 01:21:40,760
conversation that you and I are
having right now, we've got
1243
01:21:40,760 --> 01:21:44,160
these programs kind of stored up
and we're sort of switching them
1244
01:21:44,160 --> 01:21:46,600
on and and off.
I don't buy that.
1245
01:21:46,600 --> 01:21:51,080
But I understand what he means.
And the more I've thought about
1246
01:21:51,080 --> 01:21:58,760
it, the more I have to recognize
this disturbing truth that I am
1247
01:21:58,760 --> 01:22:02,960
kind of like an automaton and I
and I am kind of like a zombie.
1248
01:22:03,160 --> 01:22:06,360
And I think most humans are.
So Dennett isn't saying that
1249
01:22:06,360 --> 01:22:10,760
consciousness doesn't exist.
He's basically saying it's it's
1250
01:22:10,760 --> 01:22:15,120
just not very important.
It's so unimportant that it
1251
01:22:15,120 --> 01:22:19,600
might as well not exist.
I think that's that's his point.
1252
01:22:19,960 --> 01:22:24,920
And I've done a lot of
reflection on this in part
1253
01:22:24,920 --> 01:22:28,800
'cause I just wrote this book
about quantum mechanics and I
1254
01:22:29,000 --> 01:22:31,760
and A lot of physicists, as you
probably know, they learn
1255
01:22:31,760 --> 01:22:35,640
quantum mechanics and they're
told to shut up and calculate.
1256
01:22:35,640 --> 01:22:38,320
They're told not to think about
what quantum mechanics means.
1257
01:22:38,560 --> 01:22:41,720
So in other words, they're
they're taught in a way that
1258
01:22:41,720 --> 01:22:49,080
promotes competence over
comprehension and and trying to
1259
01:22:49,080 --> 01:22:52,960
learn quantum mechanics and
learning all the math and doing
1260
01:22:52,960 --> 01:22:57,920
all these math exercises just
made me aware of myself as this
1261
01:22:57,920 --> 01:23:02,560
gigantic collection of
algorithms that are all
1262
01:23:02,560 --> 01:23:08,560
constantly chugging along and
and propelling me through life.
1263
01:23:09,000 --> 01:23:11,920
And I don't, I don't really
understand any of them.
1264
01:23:13,040 --> 01:23:21,040
So I give, I give, I give
Dennett more credit for that now
1265
01:23:21,280 --> 01:23:23,880
than I used to.
And in fact it it's a very
1266
01:23:23,880 --> 01:23:31,800
disturbing but profound insight
into the human condition.
1267
01:23:31,800 --> 01:23:34,760
And by the way, it's kind of the
same thing with that, with that
1268
01:23:34,760 --> 01:23:37,240
Henry James was saying in the
Golden Bowl.
1269
01:23:37,720 --> 01:23:41,520
Nobody really knows anything.
You know, it's it's Dennis
1270
01:23:41,520 --> 01:23:44,360
Dennis's a very good writer.
I mean, when I wrote my own
1271
01:23:44,360 --> 01:23:47,000
dissertation, I actually helped
defend some of his own, his
1272
01:23:47,000 --> 01:23:49,200
views, because he made such an
impact on me.
1273
01:23:49,200 --> 01:23:51,600
And I wrote on Illusionism as a
theory of consciousness.
1274
01:23:52,000 --> 01:23:55,680
And I mean to quote him,
consciousness is an illusion of
1275
01:23:55,680 --> 01:23:57,520
the brain for the brain by the
brain.
1276
01:23:58,520 --> 01:24:01,400
There is no central homunculus.
He he he's just trying to say
1277
01:24:01,400 --> 01:24:05,720
that that phenomenal essence
like ethereal entity that we all
1278
01:24:05,720 --> 01:24:08,320
think so mystical.
Is just not there.
1279
01:24:08,320 --> 01:24:12,160
There's no such thing as that.
It's it's a misinterpretation
1280
01:24:12,160 --> 01:24:15,480
because of our algorithms
telling us that something is is
1281
01:24:15,480 --> 01:24:18,120
sort of there and it takes us
out of that pedestal that you
1282
01:24:18,120 --> 01:24:21,160
were talking about earlier.
He he's basically trying to tell
1283
01:24:21,160 --> 01:24:23,880
us that we're not as important
as we think we're.
1284
01:24:24,840 --> 01:24:28,160
We pretty much like to believe
we are but there is no sort of
1285
01:24:28,520 --> 01:24:30,360
on switch that kind of just
switches.
1286
01:24:30,480 --> 01:24:33,880
Switches hold zombie on, but
basically we are on that
1287
01:24:33,880 --> 01:24:35,440
autopilot state most of the
time.
1288
01:24:36,960 --> 01:24:41,160
Yeah I you know and and this
whole idea that we're we're
1289
01:24:41,160 --> 01:24:49,160
zombies or automatons.
I think it's I think it's a
1290
01:24:49,160 --> 01:24:57,600
really important point to make
and to accept because it gets us
1291
01:24:57,600 --> 01:25:01,920
to try to oppose it to counter
it.
1292
01:25:02,200 --> 01:25:08,440
So I've become aware of I think
Dennett one of the implications
1293
01:25:08,440 --> 01:25:11,640
of his writing or maybe he's
even spelled that this out is
1294
01:25:11,640 --> 01:25:17,720
that we're we're machines that
are designed to do various
1295
01:25:17,720 --> 01:25:23,880
things mainly to live long
enough to reproduce and and send
1296
01:25:23,880 --> 01:25:29,440
our offspring off into the next
generation without us.
1297
01:25:29,440 --> 01:25:31,400
That's our that's our basic
purpose here.
1298
01:25:31,400 --> 01:25:34,760
Then we can accomplish various
other things that are kind of
1299
01:25:34,760 --> 01:25:37,360
related to that and we don't
really need a lot of
1300
01:25:37,360 --> 01:25:41,800
consciousness and our brains are
designed to detect novelty and
1301
01:25:41,800 --> 01:25:44,880
to sort of overlook things that
aren't necessary for adjusting
1302
01:25:44,880 --> 01:25:49,560
our worldview and and trying to
solve problems in a different
1303
01:25:49,560 --> 01:25:54,400
way.
So as a result we're we're
1304
01:25:54,400 --> 01:25:56,760
constantly being habituated to
life.
1305
01:25:57,640 --> 01:26:02,800
We're, we're, we take it for
granted and we don't really see
1306
01:26:02,800 --> 01:26:08,320
anything.
And this is how I I see myself.
1307
01:26:08,320 --> 01:26:13,600
I'm constantly sort of trying to
remind myself, just wake up,
1308
01:26:13,600 --> 01:26:17,440
quit sleepwalking through this
day, just stop and look around
1309
01:26:17,440 --> 01:26:20,400
you and notice things for a
change.
1310
01:26:21,160 --> 01:26:26,480
And it seems to me that that's.
We haven't really talked that
1311
01:26:26,480 --> 01:26:29,600
much about spirituality in this
conversation yet.
1312
01:26:29,600 --> 01:26:34,520
But for me, spirituality just
means waking up and overcoming
1313
01:26:34,520 --> 01:26:38,880
your habituation, stepping
outside of your zombie robot
1314
01:26:38,880 --> 01:26:44,120
self and saying, holy shit, look
at look at this.
1315
01:26:45,000 --> 01:26:48,640
Look at where we are.
What?
1316
01:26:48,640 --> 01:26:53,920
How infinitely improbable this
situation right here is.
1317
01:26:53,920 --> 01:26:59,680
How infinitely improbable I am
and you are, and this whole
1318
01:26:59,680 --> 01:27:02,480
thing.
And unfortunately, our brains
1319
01:27:02,480 --> 01:27:09,120
are designed to get us to forget
about that, the improbability of
1320
01:27:09,120 --> 01:27:13,480
things.
And so I'm grateful for to
1321
01:27:13,760 --> 01:27:18,000
Dennett for having pointed out
this tendency that we have to
1322
01:27:18,000 --> 01:27:23,200
become unconscious and to have
just competence without
1323
01:27:23,200 --> 01:27:25,600
comprehension, and to become
zombies.
1324
01:27:25,960 --> 01:27:28,560
Because it makes me think, no, I
don't want to be that way.
1325
01:27:28,560 --> 01:27:32,200
I want to try to wake up at
least for a couple of seconds
1326
01:27:32,240 --> 01:27:35,360
every day.
Someone who adds to Dennett's
1327
01:27:35,360 --> 01:27:38,400
work and Frankish's work on what
you're talking about right now
1328
01:27:38,600 --> 01:27:41,920
is actually Susan Blackmore.
She she writes on delusionism
1329
01:27:41,920 --> 01:27:45,240
and she she asks this, she she
forces the reader to ask this
1330
01:27:45,240 --> 01:27:47,280
question.
Am I conscious now?
1331
01:27:47,720 --> 01:27:50,720
Because we'd never walk through
life really asking that
1332
01:27:50,720 --> 01:27:52,600
question.
And that's why it's a delusion.
1333
01:27:52,880 --> 01:27:55,480
It's almost a delusional thought
to assume you're conscious when
1334
01:27:55,480 --> 01:27:57,520
you walk through most of your
life, not even asking that
1335
01:27:57,520 --> 01:27:58,120
question.
What?
1336
01:27:59,120 --> 01:28:00,720
Because not many people ask that
question.
1337
01:28:00,720 --> 01:28:03,960
Am I conscious right now?
Like, what am I really in this
1338
01:28:03,960 --> 01:28:06,720
moment?
Am I present completely aware?
1339
01:28:07,080 --> 01:28:10,040
It's it's very, it's most people
have to train a skill to do
1340
01:28:10,040 --> 01:28:11,360
that.
You have to meditate for years.
1341
01:28:11,360 --> 01:28:14,800
You have to go through sort of a
trip, some sort of an experience
1342
01:28:14,800 --> 01:28:17,480
because for the most part most
people are actually in that
1343
01:28:17,480 --> 01:28:22,920
state.
Yeah, I so I'm I'm again because
1344
01:28:22,920 --> 01:28:25,360
I'm I'm an old hippie.
I'm really interested in the
1345
01:28:25,360 --> 01:28:29,680
whole spirituality scene and the
possibility of enlightenment and
1346
01:28:29,680 --> 01:28:34,360
gurus and and all that nonsense.
And you know, there's so much
1347
01:28:34,360 --> 01:28:38,880
bullshit in the realm of
spirituality and what I call the
1348
01:28:38,880 --> 01:28:44,840
Enlightenment racket, but but
there's something at the core of
1349
01:28:44,840 --> 01:28:51,120
it that's real.
I think a lot of spirituality is
1350
01:28:51,400 --> 01:28:57,840
is aimed at just making people
happy and at overcoming bad
1351
01:28:57,840 --> 01:29:01,360
habits of thought or just bad
habits, period.
1352
01:29:01,360 --> 01:29:05,640
And I see it in some cases as a
form of brainwashing.
1353
01:29:05,680 --> 01:29:07,520
Just don't have those negative
thoughts.
1354
01:29:07,520 --> 01:29:09,640
Just be happy, you know, That
kind of thing.
1355
01:29:10,000 --> 01:29:14,800
I'm actually not interested in
spirituality as a as a route to
1356
01:29:15,480 --> 01:29:17,680
happiness.
I'm I'm fortunate and I'm like
1357
01:29:18,680 --> 01:29:22,560
more or less a pretty happy
person.
1358
01:29:23,320 --> 01:29:26,360
I'm prone to anxiety.
I have been depressed in my
1359
01:29:26,360 --> 01:29:27,760
life.
But I'm OK.
1360
01:29:27,760 --> 01:29:32,000
I think I got good genes.
So I'm more interested in
1361
01:29:32,000 --> 01:29:36,240
spirituality and mysticism as a
root to truth.
1362
01:29:36,920 --> 01:29:40,960
And that means being conscious.
That means waking up.
1363
01:29:41,000 --> 01:29:44,000
And then you know what is the
truth?
1364
01:29:44,080 --> 01:29:44,640
What?
What?
1365
01:29:44,640 --> 01:29:49,360
What are you supposed to see
when you when you're conscious
1366
01:29:49,360 --> 01:29:51,160
when you stop and wake up And
it's.
1367
01:29:51,160 --> 01:29:54,720
And for me and I've talked about
this with a lot of people who
1368
01:29:55,560 --> 01:30:02,680
claim to be enlightened and and
some of them agree with this,
1369
01:30:02,800 --> 01:30:05,720
but many of them don't.
Many of them see enlightenment
1370
01:30:05,720 --> 01:30:09,600
as a kind of like state of
terminal chilling out.
1371
01:30:09,680 --> 01:30:12,720
You're just like, yeah, man,
everything is copacetic.
1372
01:30:12,720 --> 01:30:18,680
That's fine.
I see it more as what I was
1373
01:30:18,680 --> 01:30:25,040
talking about before,
recognizing that the odds that
1374
01:30:25,040 --> 01:30:32,640
we existed all are infinite if
we if we see things accurately.
1375
01:30:32,640 --> 01:30:34,760
And I think science points to
this too.
1376
01:30:35,960 --> 01:30:40,320
Physics and complexity theory
and even attempts to understand
1377
01:30:40,320 --> 01:30:44,280
the origin of life, all points
to our existence here.
1378
01:30:45,320 --> 01:30:48,320
The existence of humanity, let
alone each of us as individuals,
1379
01:30:48,640 --> 01:30:55,680
as infinitely improbable.
And And therefore when you see
1380
01:30:55,680 --> 01:31:01,000
things that way, you're not
saying, well, yeah, they're
1381
01:31:01,000 --> 01:31:04,040
infinitely improbable because
there was the fluctuation and
1382
01:31:04,040 --> 01:31:07,800
the primordial void and that it
led to inflation.
1383
01:31:07,800 --> 01:31:11,840
But it's not.
You're not seeing how things
1384
01:31:11,840 --> 01:31:13,480
are, you're just seeing that
things are.
1385
01:31:13,920 --> 01:31:19,880
So actually Wittgenstein, who's
also, you know, a philosopher,
1386
01:31:19,880 --> 01:31:23,680
has had an an effect on me.
But I read him as a poet and his
1387
01:31:23,800 --> 01:31:29,200
book Tractatus, which is just
like a crazy prose poem.
1388
01:31:29,600 --> 01:31:35,680
He's got a phrase at the end
that says this is translated
1389
01:31:35,680 --> 01:31:40,200
from the German.
The gist of it is not how the
1390
01:31:40,200 --> 01:31:45,160
world is is the mystical, but
that it is.
1391
01:31:46,800 --> 01:31:49,080
So you're not saying.
You're not looking at the world
1392
01:31:49,080 --> 01:31:51,360
and saying, Oh yeah, it's 'cause
it.
1393
01:31:51,360 --> 01:31:54,440
The world is here because it was
created by God.
1394
01:31:54,440 --> 01:31:57,160
Oh, isn't that far out?
You're just seeing the stark
1395
01:31:58,160 --> 01:32:03,240
fact of existence and it blows
you away and you realize the
1396
01:32:03,240 --> 01:32:08,520
total inadequacy of any theory
or theology of any language for
1397
01:32:09,200 --> 01:32:11,760
or explanation for doing it
justice.
1398
01:32:11,760 --> 01:32:20,680
He just are overwhelmed by it.
And that's to me that's that is
1399
01:32:20,680 --> 01:32:24,080
what enlightenment would be,
being like that all the time.
1400
01:32:24,200 --> 01:32:28,320
The problem is if you're in,
you're going like, oh fuck, Oh
1401
01:32:28,320 --> 01:32:30,240
my God, I can't believe I'm
alive.
1402
01:32:31,360 --> 01:32:33,720
You still gotta, you know, I I
gotta go teach a bunch of
1403
01:32:33,720 --> 01:32:37,440
freshmen tomorrow.
I got to pay my bills, I have to
1404
01:32:37,440 --> 01:32:40,080
hang out with my girlfriend, and
she doesn't want me to be
1405
01:32:40,080 --> 01:32:43,880
totally nuts and babbling about
the mystery of existence all the
1406
01:32:43,880 --> 01:32:46,360
time.
So you still got to live your
1407
01:32:46,360 --> 01:32:51,040
life.
But I try to have some of those
1408
01:32:51,040 --> 01:32:54,520
moments as often as I can.
It's about trying to find that
1409
01:32:54,520 --> 01:32:56,680
balance of not merely staying
alive, but living.
1410
01:32:57,600 --> 01:33:04,040
Yes, and some people pull it off
better than others.
1411
01:33:04,040 --> 01:33:06,360
I mean, you can go and live in a
cave in the woods, but I don't
1412
01:33:06,360 --> 01:33:09,560
want to.
I don't want to do that, you
1413
01:33:09,560 --> 01:33:12,920
know?
I like, I like the practical
1414
01:33:13,800 --> 01:33:16,120
aspects of life too.
I like being a good teacher.
1415
01:33:16,120 --> 01:33:19,600
I like writing, talking to
people like you and and I like
1416
01:33:19,600 --> 01:33:22,240
having friends.
I like having a girlfriend.
1417
01:33:22,240 --> 01:33:25,200
I've got two kids that I love
all that stuff.
1418
01:33:26,560 --> 01:33:30,560
It keeps me rooted in the world
and that's that's fine.
1419
01:33:31,120 --> 01:33:33,240
And I think that's that's
absolutely beautiful and it's a
1420
01:33:33,240 --> 01:33:35,960
great way to sort of round this
conversation up.
1421
01:33:35,960 --> 01:33:38,960
John, what do you think from
from your years of experience
1422
01:33:38,960 --> 01:33:43,560
and as a as a very well known
science writer, how how else do
1423
01:33:43,560 --> 01:33:46,600
you believe we should pursue
truth and how should we approach
1424
01:33:46,600 --> 01:33:50,840
science moving forward?
Oh wow.
1425
01:33:52,800 --> 01:33:56,280
I think it's doing OK.
I the one of the problems with
1426
01:33:56,280 --> 01:34:00,960
science right now that a lot of
people are commenting on is the
1427
01:34:01,440 --> 01:34:09,840
the careerism, the ambition.
The constant pressure to publish
1428
01:34:10,320 --> 01:34:16,360
and to publicize your results is
leading to a lot of crappy
1429
01:34:16,360 --> 01:34:21,480
science and including I mean, if
it's string theory, who cares?
1430
01:34:22,040 --> 01:34:24,720
But it's leading to crappy
science in areas that matter.
1431
01:34:24,720 --> 01:34:28,600
In biomedicine, you know, drugs
for cancer are being promoted
1432
01:34:28,600 --> 01:34:31,680
that actually aren't very
effective or might even be
1433
01:34:31,680 --> 01:34:34,200
harmful.
Same with drugs for mental
1434
01:34:34,200 --> 01:34:39,840
illness.
I I still think science is this
1435
01:34:39,840 --> 01:34:45,440
incredible cultural invention,
and I'm so happy to be kind of
1436
01:34:45,880 --> 01:34:50,800
along for the ride, watching
what the scientists do and
1437
01:34:50,800 --> 01:34:57,120
watching new ideas emerge
related to consciousness or the
1438
01:34:57,120 --> 01:35:00,080
origin of the universe or
whatever.
1439
01:35:01,840 --> 01:35:06,160
I don't really, I don't really
have any big ideas for reform
1440
01:35:06,160 --> 01:35:09,560
except just to tell people.
And this is it's hard.
1441
01:35:09,560 --> 01:35:11,360
If you're out there, you're
ambitious, you're trying to get
1442
01:35:11,360 --> 01:35:14,040
a name for yourself.
But I think scientists just need
1443
01:35:14,040 --> 01:35:18,080
to be a little more modest and
humble in their claims and to
1444
01:35:18,080 --> 01:35:21,400
recognize that there are, and
this is weird coming from a guy
1445
01:35:21,400 --> 01:35:23,640
named The Who wrote a book
called The End of Science.
1446
01:35:23,840 --> 01:35:26,640
But to realize that they're part
of an infinite conversation,
1447
01:35:27,120 --> 01:35:31,960
it's it's going to keep going
forever.
1448
01:35:32,680 --> 01:35:37,920
And not to make the claim that
they've got final answers ever,
1449
01:35:37,920 --> 01:35:39,760
because there are no final
answers.
1450
01:35:40,880 --> 01:35:43,240
John, thank you so much.
Any final words from your side?
1451
01:35:43,240 --> 01:35:44,680
It's been such a pleasure, man.
Thanks.
1452
01:35:44,680 --> 01:35:48,480
Thanks so much for joining me.
Hey, I, you know, as I said,
1453
01:35:48,560 --> 01:35:52,320
this is, this is the best part
of the job for me is talking
1454
01:35:52,320 --> 01:35:56,720
about this stuff with somebody
else who who cares about these
1455
01:35:56,720 --> 01:35:58,560
issues as well.
So it's been an enormous
1456
01:35:58,560 --> 01:35:59,640
pleasure for me.