Jan. 25, 2025

Denis Noble & Raymond Noble: Is Life Purposeful? A Paradigm Shift in Understanding Living Systems

The player is loading ...
Denis Noble & Raymond Noble: Is Life Purposeful? A Paradigm Shift in Understanding Living Systems

Denis Noble is Emeritus Professor and co-Director of Computational Physiology who held the Burdon Sanderson Chair of Cardiovascular Physiology at the University of Oxford. He is one of the pioneers of systems biology and developed the first viable mathematical model of the working heart. He is also a philosopher of biology, and his books The Music of Life and Dance to the Tune of Life challenge the foundations of current biological sciences, question the central dogma, its unidirectional view of information flow, and its imposition of a bottom-up methodology for research in the life sciences. Raymond Noble is Honorary Associate Professor at the Institute for Women’s Health, University College London. He held a Rockefeller Senior Research Fellowship with a joint appointment in Physiology and Obstetrics and Gynaecology at University College London, where he became Deputy Dean of Life Sciences and Graduate Tutor in Women’s Health and where he also taught medical ethics in reproductive health. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Biology and a chartered biologist, writing extensively on biological theory and philosophy, working extensively on how organisms sense their environment and make choices. TIMESTAMPS: (0:00) - Introduction (2:45) - Consciousness & the Mind-Body Dichotomy (12:50) - Biology's Evolution & the Importance of Stochasticity (18:00) - The Gene Delusion (25:35) - Arguments Against Richard Dawkins' "Selfish Gene" (35:45) - Moral/Philosophical Implications of The Selfish Gene (39:19) - Purposive Explanations of Life & Understanding Living Systems (45:40) - Ecological Intelligence (56:05) - Consciousness & the Self (1:05:07) - Biological Evolution from a Physiological Perspective (1:21:18) - The Music of Life (Unselfish Gene) (1:29:00) - Free Will & Dogma (1:36:03) - The Story of Noble Brothers (Differences & Similarities) (1:42:24) - When Two Became One (1:50:45) - Teleology & The Purpose of Life (Final Thoughts) (1:56:40) - Conclusion EPISODE LINKS: - Denis: https://tinyurl.com/7uzjuxxm - Ray: https://tinyurl.com/25z9jnk5 - Books: https://tinyurl.com/bdcpwetj - Denis' Publications: https://tinyurl.com/yr3es4ht - Ray's Publications: https://tinyurl.com/yunnfjc5 CONNECT: - Website: https://tevinnaidu.com

- Podcast: https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/mindbodysolution - YouTube: https://youtube.com/mindbodysolution - X: https://twitter.com/drtevinnaidu - Facebook: https://facebook.com/drtevinnaidu - Instagram: https://instagram.com/drtevinnaidu - LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/drtevinnaidu ============================= Disclaimer: The information provided on this channel is for educational purposes only. The content is shared in the spirit of open discourse and does not constitute, nor does it substitute, professional or medical advice. We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of listening/watching any of our contents. You acknowledge that you use the information provided at your own risk. Listeners/viewers are advised to conduct their own research and consult with their own experts in the respective fields.

1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:05,760
There's absolutely no reason why
attributing purpose to organisms

2
00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:08,400
is non scientific.
That's rubbish.

3
00:00:08,520 --> 00:00:13,080
We are effectively saying not
only are organisms purposive,

4
00:00:13,200 --> 00:00:18,120
and evidently so, but very
interestingly, as physiologists

5
00:00:18,120 --> 00:00:23,520
we know also that a purposive
explanation actually predicts

6
00:00:23,520 --> 00:00:28,000
downwards towards the molecular
level as to what kinds of

7
00:00:28,000 --> 00:00:32,800
mechanisms must exist for that
purpose to exist than the other

8
00:00:32,800 --> 00:00:36,360
way round.
What is interesting here is that

9
00:00:36,400 --> 00:00:41,680
purposive explanations actually
lead to good science.

10
00:00:42,120 --> 00:00:47,240
What is this doing?
Why does it consume 20% of the

11
00:00:47,240 --> 00:00:50,640
total energy that we use?
It's got nothing to do with

12
00:00:50,760 --> 00:00:53,760
whether there's something
ghostly out there that, as it

13
00:00:53,760 --> 00:00:57,160
were, as a goal that is
somewhere out there dragging us

14
00:00:57,160 --> 00:01:00,320
towards something.
That sort of causation is not

15
00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:03,360
involved.
All it's postulating is that

16
00:01:03,360 --> 00:01:07,800
there is anticipation of what
might happen in the future, and

17
00:01:07,800 --> 00:01:12,280
that has nothing to do with
backward time, causation, or

18
00:01:12,280 --> 00:01:16,320
anything ghostly like that.
All it's got to have any

19
00:01:16,320 --> 00:01:22,200
Organism is the ability to
anticipate very many different

20
00:01:22,200 --> 00:01:28,720
reactions rapidly to crisis
situations, and that can only be

21
00:01:28,720 --> 00:01:33,480
done by having anticipatory
process occurring inside here.

22
00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:38,160
Consciousness to me is like a
readiness, if you like to act,

23
00:01:39,160 --> 00:01:42,640
and thereby anticipatory.
And it goes back to what Dennis

24
00:01:42,640 --> 00:01:45,840
was saying earlier, that the key
thing there is anticipation.

25
00:01:46,960 --> 00:01:49,560
It's, it's the state of
readiness and anticipating what

26
00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:52,000
it is that's going on in the
world, regardless of whether

27
00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:56,000
we're right about it.
We cannot function without that.

28
00:01:56,400 --> 00:01:58,840
And that is consciousness.
You don't.

29
00:01:58,840 --> 00:02:01,480
That is Dennis, isn't it?
There are what are called

30
00:02:01,480 --> 00:02:05,960
readiness potentials in the
nervous system that have been

31
00:02:06,240 --> 00:02:11,800
recorded as inevitably what
happens when you are in the

32
00:02:11,800 --> 00:02:16,120
process of making a decision.
It's it's fascinating, it really

33
00:02:16,120 --> 00:02:18,680
is.
They are readiness potentials.

34
00:02:18,680 --> 00:02:22,720
The system is getting itself
geared up and we feel that

35
00:02:22,720 --> 00:02:25,440
consciously too.
It is well, that is the feeling

36
00:02:25,440 --> 00:02:26,920
that is the consciousness,
Dennis.

37
00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:29,160
That is the consciousness and
and you.

38
00:02:29,400 --> 00:02:31,280
But you know, I'll say
something, I'll say something

39
00:02:31,560 --> 00:02:34,120
highly controversial now,
something Dennis and I've been

40
00:02:34,120 --> 00:02:41,520
discussing more recently.
Great.

41
00:02:41,720 --> 00:02:43,960
Dennis, is there anything
particular you'd like me to

42
00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:46,360
touch on while we go through
this conversation?

43
00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:50,440
One of the things that I've been
thinking more about in recent

44
00:02:50,440 --> 00:02:53,520
times, as Dennis knows and
Dennis and I've had discussions

45
00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:58,080
about, and of course you must
understand that we never have

46
00:02:58,080 --> 00:03:01,480
closed minds, Dennis and I, on
anything.

47
00:03:01,480 --> 00:03:05,920
I mean, our whole approach is to
try and be as open to ideas as

48
00:03:05,920 --> 00:03:09,480
possible because it seems to us
that the only way you can begin

49
00:03:09,480 --> 00:03:13,240
to understand particularly
problems like the mind Body

50
00:03:13,760 --> 00:03:20,960
Issue is to to be open to ideas.
What what we've been doing is

51
00:03:20,960 --> 00:03:24,960
sort of focusing on, I think
it's fair to say I wanted to

52
00:03:25,520 --> 00:03:29,520
areas that I think are somewhat
mistaken in approach, if you

53
00:03:29,520 --> 00:03:32,120
like, it may be wrong on that
and corrected.

54
00:03:32,120 --> 00:03:40,000
But one of those is that the,
the, the, the idea of

55
00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:46,560
consciousness as a, an emergent
phenomenon, that it depends, as

56
00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:49,800
it were, on higher order
functionality.

57
00:03:50,240 --> 00:03:55,600
And our approach to that is
more, as we've expressed in one

58
00:03:55,600 --> 00:03:58,520
of our papers, in terms of the
title of one of our papers, a

59
00:03:58,600 --> 00:04:00,920
mergent.
It's just simply actually you

60
00:04:00,920 --> 00:04:03,000
can remove the word A
altogether.

61
00:04:03,000 --> 00:04:07,520
It's mergent and it's mergent
through levels and across

62
00:04:07,520 --> 00:04:11,360
levels, if you see what I mean,
within levels, it's mergent as

63
00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:12,760
well.
There's emergence going on.

64
00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:19,160
And that mergence we feel is
something which is true of all

65
00:04:19,160 --> 00:04:24,640
cells is as true of unicellular
organisms as it is of higher

66
00:04:24,640 --> 00:04:27,240
level.
The horrible word higher, more

67
00:04:27,240 --> 00:04:31,160
complex, more organised
entities.

68
00:04:31,880 --> 00:04:37,920
Multicellularity for example,
will involve some kind of coming

69
00:04:37,920 --> 00:04:42,600
together of what we would
normally look at in relation to

70
00:04:42,600 --> 00:04:47,280
individual organisms,
unicellular organisms, as what I

71
00:04:47,280 --> 00:04:52,840
believe you could refer to as
conscious in the sense that is,

72
00:04:52,840 --> 00:04:58,800
is to do with the state of being
of that Organism in relation to

73
00:04:58,800 --> 00:05:01,120
its readiness, if you like to
respond.

74
00:05:02,160 --> 00:05:05,840
And they are conditional states.
So in a sense consciousness is a

75
00:05:05,840 --> 00:05:09,160
conditional state and
conditional states exist,

76
00:05:09,200 --> 00:05:11,480
although with different levels
of faculty.

77
00:05:12,560 --> 00:05:16,920
What is what has evolved as a
result in in large part of that

78
00:05:17,240 --> 00:05:20,640
motivational consciousness, if
you like that that changing of

79
00:05:20,640 --> 00:05:25,640
States and responsiveness are
are the different faculties that

80
00:05:25,640 --> 00:05:30,560
we see in all sorts of forms of
life and life has explored

81
00:05:30,560 --> 00:05:34,800
different ways of being engaged
with the problem of maintaining

82
00:05:34,800 --> 00:05:37,880
its integrity.
So I, I, I think that's

83
00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:42,280
something encapsulates, I think
where our thoughts, I mean,

84
00:05:42,280 --> 00:05:45,560
Dennis might want to correct
some points, but I think that

85
00:05:45,800 --> 00:05:50,040
really sums up where we are.
But we're not closed, if you see

86
00:05:50,040 --> 00:05:51,280
what I mean.
I mean, one of the things that

87
00:05:51,280 --> 00:05:55,640
we're probably more closed about
is the idea that there is a, a

88
00:05:55,640 --> 00:05:59,840
mind body separation, as it
were.

89
00:06:01,440 --> 00:06:04,440
That's another aspect that I
think we think is, is, is

90
00:06:04,440 --> 00:06:08,960
mistaken and it leads to all
sorts of problems of regarding

91
00:06:08,960 --> 00:06:12,120
organisms as sort of
mechanistic, not just material.

92
00:06:12,120 --> 00:06:15,520
I don't think there's a problem
regarding it as material, but

93
00:06:16,080 --> 00:06:18,720
that's different and regarding
it as mechanistic.

94
00:06:19,400 --> 00:06:24,280
And, and it was the change to
looking at or, or life as

95
00:06:24,280 --> 00:06:28,160
mechanistic that I think created
all the problems back in the

96
00:06:28,160 --> 00:06:30,920
Western sense in terms of the
Enlightenment and so on.

97
00:06:31,200 --> 00:06:36,240
That for some reason we wanted
humans to be different and, and,

98
00:06:36,880 --> 00:06:40,400
and, and, and started to treat
organisms, other forms of life

99
00:06:40,400 --> 00:06:45,520
as being simply material in a
mechanistic sense.

100
00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:48,160
And it led to another kind of
dualism.

101
00:06:48,160 --> 00:06:50,000
I'm sorry, I'm banging on here,
but I just want to get you to

102
00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:52,680
feel of where our thoughts, I
think, lie.

103
00:06:53,920 --> 00:06:59,240
It led to an, another kind of,
of dualism, which we've referred

104
00:06:59,240 --> 00:07:01,080
to, which is a mechanistic
dualism.

105
00:07:01,320 --> 00:07:04,960
In other words, you look for the
bit within the system that is

106
00:07:04,960 --> 00:07:08,520
driving the system and we don't
think there is a bit within the

107
00:07:08,520 --> 00:07:11,560
system that drives the system.
The system drives the system.

108
00:07:11,560 --> 00:07:13,600
That's the whole essence of
life.

109
00:07:14,000 --> 00:07:17,720
It's, it's the distinctive
feature of, of living organisms.

110
00:07:19,120 --> 00:07:21,600
And I so I think that's, I think
that's where we are.

111
00:07:21,840 --> 00:07:25,400
And then of course, on top of
that, what we, the idea that

112
00:07:25,400 --> 00:07:29,360
we've, we've, we've kind of
developed over the years is this

113
00:07:29,360 --> 00:07:35,040
idea that the system at it's
different nested levels, nested

114
00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:39,040
functionality from the cells to
the tissues, to the organs, to

115
00:07:39,040 --> 00:07:43,040
the organ systems and so on, and
to the body and to the social

116
00:07:43,040 --> 00:07:45,200
interactions.
And this interspecies

117
00:07:45,200 --> 00:07:48,680
interaction, the ecological
leads to different levels of

118
00:07:48,680 --> 00:07:51,920
intelligence, if you like,
different, different ways of

119
00:07:51,920 --> 00:07:54,080
using information about what's
going on.

120
00:07:54,280 --> 00:07:57,880
So cells will influence cells
and communicate it with each

121
00:07:57,880 --> 00:07:59,960
other.
It's absolutely vital to the

122
00:07:59,960 --> 00:08:04,080
functionality and a lot of that
has got lost.

123
00:08:04,720 --> 00:08:07,720
We feel in, in medicine
actually, that we've, we've

124
00:08:07,720 --> 00:08:11,880
stopped looking for the way the
system controls itself and the

125
00:08:11,880 --> 00:08:15,640
way that that control of itself
can be a fundamental in what

126
00:08:15,640 --> 00:08:20,360
goes wrong with with health.
And then of course, you reach

127
00:08:20,360 --> 00:08:23,400
the, the sort of rather more
outer level, if you like, which

128
00:08:23,400 --> 00:08:27,040
we regard that that is regarded
as the psychological self, if

129
00:08:27,040 --> 00:08:31,440
you like, which creates all the
sort of problems of the mind

130
00:08:31,440 --> 00:08:35,880
body, which is of course, how on
earth can this apparently

131
00:08:35,880 --> 00:08:41,039
immaterial aspect of our lives
influence the material?

132
00:08:41,440 --> 00:08:44,600
And of course, in a sense, it's
not as immaterial as you as

133
00:08:44,600 --> 00:08:47,640
people think it is.
And that's the key there.

134
00:08:47,640 --> 00:08:50,280
I think that there's no, and
it's an open system, of course,

135
00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:54,000
it's exchanging what is what is
fundamental about that outer

136
00:08:54,000 --> 00:08:57,480
layer, that outer cultural
level, if you like, social,

137
00:08:57,480 --> 00:09:03,360
psychosocial, cultural level.
It is what what exists beyond

138
00:09:03,720 --> 00:09:10,640
the materiality of us as
individuals and therefore has a

139
00:09:10,640 --> 00:09:14,440
kind of spiritualism, if you see
what I mean, but without a

140
00:09:14,440 --> 00:09:16,680
dualism.
It has a spiritualism in the

141
00:09:16,680 --> 00:09:19,960
sense that there is something,
some aspect of maintaining the

142
00:09:19,960 --> 00:09:24,120
integrity of the system that is
not necessarily the maintaining

143
00:09:24,120 --> 00:09:29,160
of us personally.
And that is, AII think a crucial

144
00:09:29,160 --> 00:09:31,720
understanding.
And in a sense we commune with

145
00:09:31,720 --> 00:09:37,400
that as part of it.
Some people asked me when I

146
00:09:37,400 --> 00:09:40,040
expressed this that, you know,
are you talking about

147
00:09:40,040 --> 00:09:42,400
panpsychism?
I don't know whether I am or

148
00:09:42,400 --> 00:09:43,920
not.
I don't think there's any need

149
00:09:44,200 --> 00:09:48,560
necessarily to sort of label it,
but I understand why they asked

150
00:09:48,560 --> 00:09:52,600
that question.
You know, depending on how one

151
00:09:52,600 --> 00:09:56,200
defines a psychological state,
there are certainly social

152
00:09:56,200 --> 00:09:59,880
states.
And those social states are to

153
00:09:59,880 --> 00:10:09,760
do with the way we behave as
ensemble as as groups as opposed

154
00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:11,720
to as individuals.
And it's not just simply an

155
00:10:11,720 --> 00:10:13,360
aggregate of individual
behaviour.

156
00:10:13,920 --> 00:10:15,680
What happens when we behave as
good?

157
00:10:15,840 --> 00:10:19,160
That becomes a kind of a
communion, a different way of

158
00:10:19,160 --> 00:10:21,880
communicating.
We don't have to do what we're

159
00:10:21,880 --> 00:10:24,800
doing now, which is to explain
ourselves to each other when

160
00:10:24,800 --> 00:10:26,280
we're behaving in that kind of
way.

161
00:10:26,520 --> 00:10:28,680
In fact, the vast majority of
us, you know, we just don't have

162
00:10:28,680 --> 00:10:31,440
time to do that.
We, we behave in that way, we

163
00:10:31,440 --> 00:10:36,640
create psycho cultural norms, if
you like, in terms of normative

164
00:10:36,640 --> 00:10:38,480
behaviour.
And they will differ from

165
00:10:38,480 --> 00:10:41,880
culture to culture, different
kinds of cultures and, and, and

166
00:10:41,880 --> 00:10:45,480
over time they will change in
responsiveness as a way of

167
00:10:45,600 --> 00:10:48,640
solving the problems.
I'm going on far too much, but

168
00:10:48,840 --> 00:10:53,400
that I think, I think, I think
that encapsulates where we,

169
00:10:53,720 --> 00:10:57,680
where we are.
I, I suppose, sorry, sorry.

170
00:10:57,680 --> 00:11:00,360
I, I, I went on a bit long with
that and you probably didn't.

171
00:11:00,640 --> 00:11:03,640
Really take aspects.
To it.

172
00:11:04,320 --> 00:11:07,080
It's not surprising, therefore,
I think, that people can get so

173
00:11:07,080 --> 00:11:09,200
muddled over it all, including
us.

174
00:11:09,400 --> 00:11:11,800
And I think it's it's great
because it shows your passion

175
00:11:11,800 --> 00:11:13,960
towards the topic.
Dennis, anything about what Ray

176
00:11:13,960 --> 00:11:17,320
just mentioned that you'd like
to add on or clarify?

177
00:11:19,520 --> 00:11:23,800
I don't think I, I need to, no,
I remember the fact is that we

178
00:11:23,800 --> 00:11:26,320
can finish, finish each other's
sentences.

179
00:11:26,320 --> 00:11:29,720
I mean, this is ridiculous
communion.

180
00:11:31,080 --> 00:11:34,640
It's true.
I mean, ever since ages ago, you

181
00:11:35,120 --> 00:11:37,200
know, we we know where the mind
is going.

182
00:11:37,200 --> 00:11:42,080
The other one easily finished.
I was waiting to finish any of

183
00:11:42,080 --> 00:11:44,840
those sentences.
No, where.

184
00:11:44,840 --> 00:11:49,480
We've got this, this, this pins
down where we are and you might

185
00:11:49,480 --> 00:11:51,960
as well begin whenever you want,
Evan.

186
00:11:52,720 --> 00:11:55,800
Look, I think the best place to
start, you guys have both been

187
00:11:55,800 --> 00:11:57,240
in this field for such a long
time.

188
00:11:57,240 --> 00:12:00,640
And over the last few years,
I've noticed a, a nice shift or

189
00:12:00,640 --> 00:12:02,920
transition into the
philosophical aspects of it all,

190
00:12:03,160 --> 00:12:06,000
sort of bringing this up.
And I appreciate that because

191
00:12:06,000 --> 00:12:08,560
it, it fits then perfectly
within this podcast, because as

192
00:12:08,560 --> 00:12:11,200
a doctor, someone who's deeply
ingrained within biology,

193
00:12:11,200 --> 00:12:15,040
Physiology, I'm very fascinated
personally by the philosophical

194
00:12:15,040 --> 00:12:19,440
elements that our work entails.
And I want to first start with

195
00:12:19,440 --> 00:12:23,000
definitions, guys.
So let's try and define your

196
00:12:23,760 --> 00:12:27,080
philosophical idea of the mind
body problem and obviously the

197
00:12:27,120 --> 00:12:30,040
problem of this mind matter
dichotomy already.

198
00:12:30,520 --> 00:12:32,920
And thereafter let's define life
in consciousness.

199
00:12:33,200 --> 00:12:36,240
Anyone can start.
I'll do a beginning.

200
00:12:37,360 --> 00:12:45,240
I, I think I come from a long
period of interacting with a

201
00:12:45,240 --> 00:12:50,880
number of very good philosophers
and it's been a privilege to

202
00:12:51,320 --> 00:12:56,920
interact with them.
And I think what I've come round

203
00:12:56,920 --> 00:13:05,800
to are two things that matter. 1
is that many have felt that

204
00:13:05,800 --> 00:13:10,560
given the way biology was
developing in the 20th century

205
00:13:10,920 --> 00:13:16,000
under the influence of Francis
Crick's central dogma and

206
00:13:16,600 --> 00:13:20,720
various gene centric
interpretations, that they

207
00:13:20,720 --> 00:13:28,080
somehow had to position the mind
in a completely determinist

208
00:13:28,080 --> 00:13:31,400
world.
And I don't think it's possible.

209
00:13:31,800 --> 00:13:34,440
And you know, I, I, I've
discussed this with, for

210
00:13:34,440 --> 00:13:36,760
example, Anthony Kenny many
times.

211
00:13:37,200 --> 00:13:43,440
He did his best as a philosopher
to to approach these questions,

212
00:13:43,840 --> 00:13:49,080
accepting that biology had shown
that it's a determinate world.

213
00:13:49,320 --> 00:13:51,880
Well, it just ain't that's the
first thing.

214
00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:56,240
There is massive stochasticity,
there is almost virtually

215
00:13:56,240 --> 00:14:01,560
impossibility, computational
explosion and all of that to

216
00:14:01,720 --> 00:14:04,240
account for things indeterminate
models.

217
00:14:04,240 --> 00:14:06,760
So that's the first big thing I
would say.

218
00:14:07,240 --> 00:14:12,160
And the second thing they did
was therefore to become too

219
00:14:12,160 --> 00:14:16,560
captivated by the need to either
go with Descartes or against

220
00:14:16,560 --> 00:14:18,800
him.
And we don't see the need to

221
00:14:18,800 --> 00:14:20,800
bother with that argument at
all.

222
00:14:21,640 --> 00:14:26,360
That that that was, that would
be my gloss on the way Ray

223
00:14:26,360 --> 00:14:27,840
began.
Yes.

224
00:14:29,760 --> 00:14:31,400
Ray, anything about that you'd
like to add on?

225
00:14:33,440 --> 00:14:35,600
Yes.
Just to continue on from that

226
00:14:36,080 --> 00:14:41,800
aspect of the stochasticity, the
variability, the almost

227
00:14:41,800 --> 00:14:46,320
unpredictable variability at at
at that very basic level is, is

228
00:14:46,320 --> 00:14:50,200
that that nothing can work
without that.

229
00:14:50,400 --> 00:14:54,480
If it is both a problem for life
and the reason for life in a

230
00:14:54,480 --> 00:14:59,440
sense.
And what the system does, as we

231
00:14:59,440 --> 00:15:03,320
express it, is that it harnesses
that energy from that

232
00:15:03,320 --> 00:15:06,520
stochasticity, from that
variability, to create the

233
00:15:06,520 --> 00:15:08,920
things it needs to create in
order to solve the problems it

234
00:15:08,920 --> 00:15:11,800
needs to solve in order to
maintain its integrity.

235
00:15:12,120 --> 00:15:16,480
The distinctive feature of life,
I think, is that that there is

236
00:15:16,480 --> 00:15:20,120
this self maintenance of
integrity.

237
00:15:20,800 --> 00:15:25,680
It doesn't do that by meaning
the same.

238
00:15:26,600 --> 00:15:33,120
It does it by adaptation by
change at various stages and

239
00:15:33,120 --> 00:15:36,440
times.
So it can have an adaptation

240
00:15:36,480 --> 00:15:41,160
which is transgenerationally in
response to longer term changes.

241
00:15:41,680 --> 00:15:46,040
And it can have which
unfortunately the sort of modern

242
00:15:46,360 --> 00:15:53,560
view put aside because it it, it
had this inherent view of of

243
00:15:53,720 --> 00:15:56,160
inheritance of a quite
characteristics as it were.

244
00:15:56,480 --> 00:16:00,400
In other words, the use of
information in one generation to

245
00:16:00,400 --> 00:16:03,680
solve the problems in the
future, knowing in a sense that

246
00:16:03,680 --> 00:16:05,720
you can't solve them
immediately.

247
00:16:06,360 --> 00:16:10,400
But if, if some of you can, if
there is sufficient variability

248
00:16:10,400 --> 00:16:14,000
within the system for the
systems to explore different

249
00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:17,640
ways of dealing with a problem
and you can develop faculty.

250
00:16:18,200 --> 00:16:20,720
And that leads me to another
distinction, which is the

251
00:16:20,720 --> 00:16:25,760
distinction between and It's
not, it's not an absolute

252
00:16:25,760 --> 00:16:27,720
distinction, and I'll come back
to that in a moment, but the

253
00:16:27,720 --> 00:16:30,960
distinction between the
development of faculty on the

254
00:16:30,960 --> 00:16:34,640
one hand, both in terms of
development and also in terms of

255
00:16:35,320 --> 00:16:40,600
evolution, the ability to do
something and what one does with

256
00:16:40,600 --> 00:16:44,040
it, which I will call
facultative.

257
00:16:45,000 --> 00:16:47,040
So the distinction between
faculty on the one hand, and

258
00:16:47,040 --> 00:16:51,400
facultative.
And if you focus just on the

259
00:16:51,400 --> 00:16:56,000
faculty, you end up with kind of
just looking at the anatomy and

260
00:16:56,000 --> 00:16:58,720
Physiology, if you like.
I mean, here is my, it's, it's

261
00:16:58,720 --> 00:17:01,240
beautiful, no doubt.
I mean, look at it.

262
00:17:01,440 --> 00:17:04,839
These are my, my fingers and my
hands and my arms.

263
00:17:05,079 --> 00:17:08,839
And if you look at the fantastic
relationship between the muscles

264
00:17:08,839 --> 00:17:12,359
and the skeleton and how it
works, or if you look at an, if

265
00:17:12,359 --> 00:17:15,359
you look at organisms that are
arthropods, for example, the

266
00:17:15,760 --> 00:17:18,560
extraordinary beauty of the
arrangements that they've got to

267
00:17:18,560 --> 00:17:20,560
do similar kinds of thing, which
is to move.

268
00:17:20,920 --> 00:17:25,680
The reason why these are there
to move is not so much inherent

269
00:17:25,680 --> 00:17:28,280
in the faculty, but in the
facultative.

270
00:17:28,280 --> 00:17:29,920
In other words, what are you
doing with them?

271
00:17:30,800 --> 00:17:35,920
In any sense, these are tools of
the system society.

272
00:17:35,920 --> 00:17:38,600
The scientist doesn't don't seem
to have much problem.

273
00:17:39,520 --> 00:17:44,720
If I if I point to a hammer and
say, you know, that hammer is

274
00:17:44,720 --> 00:17:48,520
used to not nails in and hold
things together.

275
00:17:48,680 --> 00:17:52,600
Well, that screwdriver is
designed to unscrew things or

276
00:17:52,600 --> 00:17:55,840
whatever.
An implement that has been made

277
00:17:55,840 --> 00:17:59,040
in order to do something,
because it's created to do

278
00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:02,680
something, then you can see
reason in it.

279
00:18:02,840 --> 00:18:04,320
And this is important.
Reason.

280
00:18:05,120 --> 00:18:09,600
See reason is, as it were, the
non material bit because it's

281
00:18:09,600 --> 00:18:13,760
the situational logic.
Why has that been created?

282
00:18:13,760 --> 00:18:17,280
It's been created in order to
solve the particular problem of

283
00:18:17,440 --> 00:18:20,640
holding things together or
unscrewing things or doing

284
00:18:20,640 --> 00:18:24,040
things that we need to do.
What's really odd is the fact

285
00:18:24,040 --> 00:18:28,960
that here I have this pencil
which I use to write down notes.

286
00:18:28,960 --> 00:18:31,320
I'm going to be doing it while
we're talking in case I need to

287
00:18:31,320 --> 00:18:35,000
make a note of something.
And it's a curious kind of thing

288
00:18:35,000 --> 00:18:39,440
that somehow or other they want
us to divorce the idea that this

289
00:18:40,160 --> 00:18:48,080
has reason behind it, but this
hand that uses it doesn't.

290
00:18:48,640 --> 00:18:52,120
And it makes no sense to me
because this cannot do anything

291
00:18:52,320 --> 00:18:59,840
without this, and this can't do
very much without this, you see.

292
00:18:59,960 --> 00:19:03,960
So I don't know what happens to
the to science when it's somehow

293
00:19:03,960 --> 00:19:08,440
or other the more it gets into
this, the more it becomes hard

294
00:19:08,440 --> 00:19:12,840
and says, you know, you can't
have reason, you can't have why

295
00:19:12,840 --> 00:19:14,680
you can't.
And of course, one of the

296
00:19:14,680 --> 00:19:17,200
difficulties of why is that you
can't measure it.

297
00:19:17,840 --> 00:19:21,040
I mean, the why is certainly
immaterial in that sense.

298
00:19:21,040 --> 00:19:26,440
It's not something that can be
clearly weighed on a scale.

299
00:19:26,440 --> 00:19:31,640
I mean, what is half a reason?
I don't know, you see.

300
00:19:31,640 --> 00:19:35,120
So it's terribly difficult to
partition and sort of say what

301
00:19:35,120 --> 00:19:37,240
it is.
What it is, is of course,

302
00:19:37,240 --> 00:19:39,680
there's the situational logic.
And that situational logic is

303
00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:42,680
created in large part by us by
life.

304
00:19:43,320 --> 00:19:46,280
Life is both problem solving and
problem creating.

305
00:19:46,920 --> 00:19:50,320
So it creates the reason, the
reason we don't have to create

306
00:19:50,320 --> 00:19:53,680
some reason from somewhere else.
And, you know, it's a Plato kind

307
00:19:53,680 --> 00:19:56,000
of, you know, Platonic kind of
sense of, you know, there's an

308
00:19:56,000 --> 00:19:58,000
ideal out there that if only we
could find it.

309
00:19:58,360 --> 00:20:00,800
And and and you know, the
philosophers, of course, have

310
00:20:00,800 --> 00:20:02,480
the skill of being able to tell
us what it is.

311
00:20:02,800 --> 00:20:05,960
The the somehow or other, the
essence of being essences of

312
00:20:05,960 --> 00:20:08,680
being what we are.
And if any we knew what they

313
00:20:08,680 --> 00:20:12,840
were, we'd know the real, the
real Rey Noble, you see, is, is

314
00:20:12,840 --> 00:20:16,160
the essence of me.
And, and this kind of concept of

315
00:20:16,160 --> 00:20:20,440
an essence of that that really
drives the system, it either

316
00:20:20,440 --> 00:20:23,760
leads you to the hard
materialistic view or

317
00:20:23,760 --> 00:20:26,080
mechanistic view of the, you
know, or it's the genome.

318
00:20:26,920 --> 00:20:31,360
I mean, I've seen people refer
to Aristotle's view of the soul

319
00:20:31,360 --> 00:20:35,240
as being almost like the genome,
which I think is bonkers.

320
00:20:35,440 --> 00:20:39,320
It's not like that at all.
And in fact, he, he saw some of

321
00:20:39,320 --> 00:20:42,960
the fundamental problems with
dualism, which is again, how do

322
00:20:42,960 --> 00:20:46,000
you partition it?
I mean, how do you, if, if you

323
00:20:46,000 --> 00:20:50,760
have a faculty to act, why are
you creating a faculty for the

324
00:20:50,760 --> 00:20:54,680
faculty to act?
Why can't the faculty act

325
00:20:55,320 --> 00:20:58,160
without there being a faculty
for the faculty to act?

326
00:20:58,520 --> 00:21:02,120
You see, and, and I mean it, you
can find that in Aristotle's

327
00:21:02,120 --> 00:21:07,080
writings as well, you see, and,
and so why do we need a genome

328
00:21:07,080 --> 00:21:12,560
in order to act in order to, you
know, no gene is involved in

329
00:21:12,560 --> 00:21:16,520
this when I'm using my pencil,
and no gene certainly determines

330
00:21:16,520 --> 00:21:20,920
what it is I'm thinking when I'm
writing on a piece of paper with

331
00:21:20,920 --> 00:21:23,720
it.
I mean, it's very important to

332
00:21:23,800 --> 00:21:26,040
clarify there, Ray, just to
interrupt a moment.

333
00:21:26,240 --> 00:21:30,680
Yes, very important to clarify
there is that it does take time

334
00:21:31,120 --> 00:21:33,440
to change gene expression
levels.

335
00:21:33,440 --> 00:21:39,520
So there is inevitably a block
on being able if you're doing

336
00:21:39,520 --> 00:21:41,680
something quickly like playing
the piano.

337
00:21:42,720 --> 00:21:44,920
No genes are varying during
that.

338
00:21:45,600 --> 00:21:49,200
And, and indeed, you know, the
heartbeat, which is what I

339
00:21:49,200 --> 00:21:53,000
modelled many years ago, there's
no time for gene expression to

340
00:21:53,000 --> 00:21:56,720
change during each heartbeat.
That's something that people

341
00:21:56,720 --> 00:22:00,960
seem to have missed largely I
think because Dawkins is so

342
00:22:01,720 --> 00:22:05,600
utterly convincing with his
simplistic explanations of a

343
00:22:05,600 --> 00:22:10,040
gene centric view.
But once you abandoned that and

344
00:22:10,040 --> 00:22:13,640
realise that there's massive
stochasticity even at the

345
00:22:13,640 --> 00:22:17,760
molecular level, that of course
comes from the water based

346
00:22:18,560 --> 00:22:22,600
system, which has naturally got
huge stochasticity.

347
00:22:22,720 --> 00:22:26,640
We'll we'll never model all the
trillions of water molecules

348
00:22:26,640 --> 00:22:31,360
there are even in a single cell.
There's alone doing it in a

349
00:22:31,360 --> 00:22:34,760
whole body.
So I keep coming back to that

350
00:22:34,760 --> 00:22:39,280
fact that we have to recognize
that organisms are operating

351
00:22:39,560 --> 00:22:45,720
within an effectively infinite
space of possibility.

352
00:22:46,680 --> 00:22:49,200
I, I love the fact that I know,
Dennis, when you spoke, when you

353
00:22:49,200 --> 00:22:52,200
speak about this, this whole
issue, you talk about how if

354
00:22:52,200 --> 00:22:54,840
someone can create an artificial
intelligence, it'll be more

355
00:22:54,840 --> 00:22:56,800
impressive when they make one
out of water because then

356
00:22:56,800 --> 00:22:57,960
they've basically.
Made exactly.

357
00:22:58,320 --> 00:23:02,000
So I think it would be necessary
because I can't otherwise you

358
00:23:02,000 --> 00:23:05,200
see their answer would be, look,
Dennis, you've made a huge

359
00:23:05,360 --> 00:23:10,160
fundamental mistake.
The software is not dependent on

360
00:23:10,160 --> 00:23:13,280
the hardware.
And I say, wait a minute, what

361
00:23:13,280 --> 00:23:16,400
are organisms?
They're not software dependent

362
00:23:16,400 --> 00:23:19,680
on the hardware.
They are integrative holes.

363
00:23:19,920 --> 00:23:22,160
There is no distinction like
that.

364
00:23:22,680 --> 00:23:27,760
What is true is that what you
sometimes refer to as the

365
00:23:27,760 --> 00:23:31,800
hardware, the genes and the
proteins they can create are

366
00:23:31,960 --> 00:23:35,960
immensely fluid.
We know, for example, that the

367
00:23:35,960 --> 00:23:41,440
proteins can multitask.
You can have a protein that goes

368
00:23:41,440 --> 00:23:45,560
into a membrane and acts as a
channel and the same protein can

369
00:23:45,560 --> 00:23:51,360
be an enzyme in a different
context and most proteins are

370
00:23:51,360 --> 00:23:54,640
like that.
We, we, we know now about 70%

371
00:23:54,640 --> 00:23:57,640
have got variable.
Well, what has happened is easy

372
00:23:57,640 --> 00:23:59,960
to understand too.
It was shown in the first

373
00:23:59,960 --> 00:24:02,920
sequencing of the human genome
in 2001.

374
00:24:03,160 --> 00:24:06,360
If you compare the different
species for a particular type of

375
00:24:06,360 --> 00:24:10,680
protein, let's say it's a
chromatin and you, you look at

376
00:24:10,680 --> 00:24:14,000
the what's happened, bits have
been added on.

377
00:24:14,400 --> 00:24:18,000
There's been accretion of
functional bits.

378
00:24:18,400 --> 00:24:22,240
But that means that sometimes in
a complex protein, there may be

379
00:24:22,240 --> 00:24:28,560
7 or 8 functional bits that can
be used for that purpose or this

380
00:24:28,560 --> 00:24:30,280
purpose.
And they can be totally

381
00:24:30,280 --> 00:24:35,280
different as different between
between controlling iron moving

382
00:24:35,280 --> 00:24:40,640
in and out of a cell membrane in
a red cell or enabling econitase

383
00:24:40,640 --> 00:24:43,480
to do the enzymatic work that
he's doing.

384
00:24:43,600 --> 00:24:45,840
It's as different as that, you
know.

385
00:24:46,080 --> 00:24:49,400
So we've got to recognise that
there's a much more fluid

386
00:24:49,400 --> 00:24:53,680
situation that life encounters.
And that is true even a single

387
00:24:53,680 --> 00:24:56,640
cell.
If I represent a nucleotide as

388
00:24:56,640 --> 00:25:02,760
the size of my fist, and here in
Oxford it's the nucleus, this is

389
00:25:02,760 --> 00:25:08,360
the edge of the cell will be way
up in Scotland, it's that huge.

390
00:25:10,400 --> 00:25:13,440
It it's, it's quite astonishing
when you think about when you

391
00:25:13,440 --> 00:25:16,160
guys think about the current
state of biology, where do you

392
00:25:16,160 --> 00:25:21,560
think there's been a fundamental
misunderstanding with for you?

393
00:25:21,560 --> 00:25:23,600
You brought up Dawkins and he's
played a huge role with the

394
00:25:23,600 --> 00:25:25,920
selfish Gene book and the way
people are able to absorb that

395
00:25:25,920 --> 00:25:27,920
book because the contents quite
accessible.

396
00:25:28,480 --> 00:25:30,800
Where do you think there's been
a fundamental misunderstanding

397
00:25:30,800 --> 00:25:34,400
with how we perceive concepts
like life or or mind?

398
00:25:36,040 --> 00:25:41,320
Sad to say, it's the unfortunate
interpretations of molecular

399
00:25:41,320 --> 00:25:44,840
biology.
There are several key facts that

400
00:25:44,840 --> 00:25:50,120
just don't fit with the current
theories.

401
00:25:50,640 --> 00:25:54,320
First, DNA does not replicate
like a crystal.

402
00:25:55,000 --> 00:25:59,080
It does not self replicate.
It relies on the Organism itself

403
00:25:59,360 --> 00:26:02,640
to be able to correct many
errors in the replication

404
00:26:02,640 --> 00:26:05,720
process.
Second, there is no weisman

405
00:26:05,720 --> 00:26:11,920
barrier.
There is what's the word we use

406
00:26:11,920 --> 00:26:16,360
sometimes ray, the boundary
between the soma and the germ

407
00:26:16,360 --> 00:26:21,240
line, yes, but it's a functional
boundary and we know that

408
00:26:21,400 --> 00:26:27,600
control RNAs can just pass
across that in very readily.

409
00:26:27,600 --> 00:26:30,480
We know that many examples of
that.

410
00:26:30,480 --> 00:26:34,720
I do a paper that I published
with a colleague just last year

411
00:26:35,120 --> 00:26:42,960
or 2020 three 20/25/2023 I think
anyway it it simply shows the

412
00:26:42,960 --> 00:26:48,080
many examples of little V
circles of RNAs and control

413
00:26:48,320 --> 00:26:52,120
proteins and so on crossing that
boundary.

414
00:26:52,280 --> 00:26:55,080
So Weisman barrier, I'm afraid
is gone.

415
00:26:55,520 --> 00:26:57,640
Inheritance of acquired
characteristics.

416
00:26:57,880 --> 00:27:02,000
But we're now then in then into
the epigenetic area and and here

417
00:27:02,000 --> 00:27:06,160
again is a major fault.
What what Richard, I think would

418
00:27:06,160 --> 00:27:10,720
say is, OK, some of that is, is
an honorary gene.

419
00:27:10,880 --> 00:27:14,040
And he uses that expression
actually in his debates with

420
00:27:14,080 --> 00:27:16,120
people.
I guess I'll accept that as an

421
00:27:16,120 --> 00:27:19,200
honorary gene.
But once you do that, you're

422
00:27:19,200 --> 00:27:24,240
changing the definition of a
gene such that the whole theory

423
00:27:24,240 --> 00:27:28,640
becomes a tautology.
There is no way you can test it

424
00:27:28,640 --> 00:27:32,480
experimentally.
And that, I'm afraid, is true of

425
00:27:32,520 --> 00:27:36,120
the selfish gene theory.
He's very clever.

426
00:27:36,240 --> 00:27:43,040
He's produced a a, a structure
that seems to make extraordinary

427
00:27:43,040 --> 00:27:47,800
sense if you stay within it.
But as soon as you realise DNA

428
00:27:47,800 --> 00:27:50,560
does not replicate like a
crystal, that there is no

429
00:27:50,560 --> 00:27:53,720
Weissman barrier, and that
inheritance of acquired

430
00:27:53,720 --> 00:27:57,640
characteristics can occur
through epigenetics, and we can

431
00:27:57,640 --> 00:27:59,640
go into the detail of any of
those if we need to.

432
00:27:59,640 --> 00:28:02,280
But those are the three main
things that are just

433
00:28:02,480 --> 00:28:05,120
misinterpretations of the
molecular biology.

434
00:28:05,320 --> 00:28:09,080
And believe you me, over the
last 20 years we've furrowed in

435
00:28:09,280 --> 00:28:13,560
that area to such a degree.
When I put all of those points

436
00:28:13,560 --> 00:28:18,160
to Richard Dawkins two years ago
in a debate at the Institute of

437
00:28:18,160 --> 00:28:21,520
Arts and Ideas Festival, he
didn't answer any of those.

438
00:28:21,880 --> 00:28:26,400
He simply repeated his mantra.
Genes are causal, genes are

439
00:28:26,400 --> 00:28:29,880
causal and genes are causal
because we can make a measure an

440
00:28:29,880 --> 00:28:34,400
association between the two. 2A
physiologist association can be

441
00:28:34,400 --> 00:28:40,720
0 and it can still be causal.
That's, that's right, Dennis and

442
00:28:40,880 --> 00:28:44,920
I, I, I think there's a, there
has also been a fundamental

443
00:28:46,840 --> 00:28:48,240
reaching out to your
philosophers.

444
00:28:48,240 --> 00:28:51,080
Now there's also being a
fundamental philosophical error

445
00:28:51,080 --> 00:28:57,440
made, I think, and it goes back
to what we were saying a little

446
00:28:57,440 --> 00:29:06,840
bit earlier, that that that if
you as there's a concept that if

447
00:29:06,840 --> 00:29:11,320
you abandoned materialism, that
you're suggesting that there is

448
00:29:11,320 --> 00:29:14,000
something which is supernatural.
Yes, exactly.

449
00:29:14,400 --> 00:29:17,760
What what we've tried to do is
to show people that this is not

450
00:29:17,760 --> 00:29:21,640
necessarily the case at all,
that that reason is not

451
00:29:21,640 --> 00:29:27,680
supernatural, it is natural.
It's the only way nature can

452
00:29:27,720 --> 00:29:31,920
work because it it all
organisms, we say in our little

453
00:29:31,920 --> 00:29:36,840
book Understanding Living
Systems, all organisms have to

454
00:29:36,840 --> 00:29:41,640
assess their environment, and
they do so by sensing it, but

455
00:29:41,640 --> 00:29:46,640
also by anticipating it.
All organisms are dynamically

456
00:29:46,640 --> 00:29:50,560
engaged in their environment and
continuously assessing it.

457
00:29:51,280 --> 00:29:55,280
Now perhaps in the simplest of
organisms, unicellular

458
00:29:55,280 --> 00:29:59,840
organisms, that assessment is
relatively simple, although

459
00:29:59,840 --> 00:30:04,720
actually when you look at it,
it's rather complex and it

460
00:30:04,720 --> 00:30:09,920
involves an enormous amount of
changing of state and and

461
00:30:09,920 --> 00:30:16,240
exploratory behaviour.
And, and you know as you going

462
00:30:16,240 --> 00:30:22,360
back to this idea that as it
were, systems are nested within

463
00:30:22,360 --> 00:30:26,440
each other, organelles are
nested within the cells and the

464
00:30:26,440 --> 00:30:30,440
cells integrity function and
each cell is nested within.

465
00:30:30,720 --> 00:30:34,120
In multicellular organisms,
multicellular organisms may have

466
00:30:34,120 --> 00:30:41,000
come together in a sense through
the same kind of variabilities

467
00:30:41,000 --> 00:30:44,320
that exist within the cells
themselves, that, you know,

468
00:30:44,600 --> 00:30:49,200
cells will come together, merged
to create new organisms.

469
00:30:49,200 --> 00:30:51,520
And in the early period of
evolution that may have been a

470
00:30:51,520 --> 00:30:56,200
fundamental in determining the
way different species were

471
00:30:56,200 --> 00:31:01,000
created until we, what we see
now are very much more

472
00:31:01,000 --> 00:31:05,920
definitive species and groups,
but the sort of symbiotic

473
00:31:05,920 --> 00:31:11,120
relationships that can exist.
But going back to this

474
00:31:11,120 --> 00:31:18,160
philosophical thing, I think
another mistake that the Selfish

475
00:31:18,160 --> 00:31:24,880
gene makes is regarding the gene
as an immutable bit.

476
00:31:26,280 --> 00:31:29,560
Richard makes a great deal of
this in the Selfish Gene itself

477
00:31:29,560 --> 00:31:34,880
in the in the book.
This always reminds me a little

478
00:31:34,960 --> 00:31:39,480
of Plato's idea, if you like, of
you know that that what that

479
00:31:39,480 --> 00:31:43,640
there has to be some pure thing
that maintains itself that isn't

480
00:31:43,920 --> 00:31:45,360
that.
And and of course, the problem

481
00:31:45,360 --> 00:31:47,800
with being is the fact that it's
continually changing.

482
00:31:48,040 --> 00:31:51,760
The world is full of flux.
So what on earth should it be?

483
00:31:52,200 --> 00:31:55,800
What is the essence of being a
horse or a dog or a cat or a

484
00:31:55,800 --> 00:31:58,400
human being or a chair or
whatever?

485
00:31:59,040 --> 00:32:01,200
And of course it, it isn't like
that.

486
00:32:01,200 --> 00:32:05,360
There isn't a system that exists
outside determining what it is

487
00:32:05,360 --> 00:32:09,320
that it should be.
And, but, but curiously, I think

488
00:32:09,320 --> 00:32:13,080
that Richard Dawkins and others
have made a similar kind of

489
00:32:13,080 --> 00:32:16,920
mistake, but in a mechanistic
way of saying that what it must

490
00:32:16,920 --> 00:32:19,640
be, must be determined by
something which is pure.

491
00:32:20,280 --> 00:32:23,360
And their whole mathematics, in
a sense, their whole kind of

492
00:32:23,360 --> 00:32:28,520
maths approach to it is to
assume that, you know, the, the

493
00:32:28,520 --> 00:32:31,800
whole existence is to maintain
genes in a gene pool.

494
00:32:32,840 --> 00:32:34,960
Well, genes, genes don't exist
in a gene pool.

495
00:32:34,960 --> 00:32:36,560
It's, it's a figment of
imagination.

496
00:32:36,560 --> 00:32:38,840
In any event, there isn't a gene
pool.

497
00:32:38,840 --> 00:32:43,400
The genes are in US.
And yes, you can regard us as a

498
00:32:43,400 --> 00:32:46,960
pool, but once you decide that
they're in US and not in a gene

499
00:32:46,960 --> 00:32:50,760
pool, the idea of maintaining
genes in a gene pool evaporates.

500
00:32:50,760 --> 00:32:53,160
I mean, why on earth would you
want to maintain genes in a gene

501
00:32:53,160 --> 00:32:55,880
pool when in a gene pool they
can do absolutely nothing?

502
00:32:56,120 --> 00:32:58,840
The only way that genes can do
anything at all is by being used

503
00:32:58,840 --> 00:33:01,920
by systems that they exist in,
which are organisms.

504
00:33:02,400 --> 00:33:06,160
And the crucial thing is here
not to maintain the integrity of

505
00:33:06,160 --> 00:33:08,080
the gene, the immutability of
the gene.

506
00:33:08,120 --> 00:33:12,320
It is to change it.
And when you look at how this

507
00:33:12,320 --> 00:33:16,080
works in practice, the genes
are, yes, they're right that

508
00:33:16,080 --> 00:33:19,280
genes are a problem because the
errors are occurring all the

509
00:33:19,280 --> 00:33:22,680
time and those errors have to be
corrected.

510
00:33:22,680 --> 00:33:26,200
And there's a whole machinery
that exists to correct those

511
00:33:26,200 --> 00:33:28,360
changes.
If they didn't, we didn't have

512
00:33:28,360 --> 00:33:31,880
that machinery within our cells,
we would soon fall apart.

513
00:33:31,880 --> 00:33:35,040
In other words, we will fail to
do what organisms do, which is

514
00:33:35,040 --> 00:33:39,000
to maintain their integrity and
their integrity function.

515
00:33:39,520 --> 00:33:47,720
And how they do that will change
with age, because with age we do

516
00:33:48,360 --> 00:33:51,320
maintain our integrity in
somewhat different ways.

517
00:33:52,320 --> 00:33:56,400
And so we have to adapt to the
fact that we're not doing it in

518
00:33:56,400 --> 00:33:59,240
the same kind of way.
When you reach the age of 70

519
00:33:59,240 --> 00:34:03,440
plus, for example, you're no
longer doing it by generating

520
00:34:03,440 --> 00:34:07,200
more brain cells or you're not
generating it by altering the

521
00:34:07,200 --> 00:34:11,679
synaptic sort of connections in
the system other than perhaps

522
00:34:11,679 --> 00:34:15,320
losing more of them and so on.
So you're having to adapt to the

523
00:34:15,320 --> 00:34:20,159
fact that physically your
faculties are not as supple or

524
00:34:20,159 --> 00:34:24,320
as as responsive as they were
before, and you adapt to them.

525
00:34:24,320 --> 00:34:28,400
But this is not not about
keeping everything the same.

526
00:34:28,400 --> 00:34:31,880
It's adapting and changing.
And that's true at at all

527
00:34:31,880 --> 00:34:33,639
levels.
It's true as a cultural level.

528
00:34:33,639 --> 00:34:36,440
Cultures have to adapt,
otherwise they cease to exist.

529
00:34:37,840 --> 00:34:41,920
And any system that seeks to say
what something should be is

530
00:34:41,920 --> 00:34:44,600
problematic.
It creates a closed system which

531
00:34:44,600 --> 00:34:47,600
is then unable to adapt.
And that leads us to the sort of

532
00:34:47,600 --> 00:34:50,199
philosophical problem at the
social level.

533
00:34:50,880 --> 00:34:53,520
Is there a better way of being?
Well, probably, but I don't know

534
00:34:53,520 --> 00:34:57,120
what it would be.
And I think that attempts to

535
00:34:57,120 --> 00:35:02,760
define it probably lead to more
likely breakdown of social

536
00:35:03,000 --> 00:35:07,400
existence than it does enhancing
it, because we're dependent on

537
00:35:07,400 --> 00:35:10,560
the variability, not maintaining
things the same.

538
00:35:10,800 --> 00:35:14,680
And I think this is a major
philosophical mistake that the

539
00:35:14,680 --> 00:35:17,600
materialists made in a sense by
honing in on the gene as the

540
00:35:17,600 --> 00:35:20,160
immutable bit.
And that's the lot.

541
00:35:20,880 --> 00:35:23,400
Immortal.
That's extraordinary, Yes.

542
00:35:24,160 --> 00:35:27,040
Immortal.
The immortal gene has it.

543
00:35:27,560 --> 00:35:31,160
Not immortal at all.
Yes, that was the name he was

544
00:35:31,880 --> 00:35:35,080
when he was considering to name
it initially before his

545
00:35:35,280 --> 00:35:37,680
publishers told him to name it
The Selfish Gene.

546
00:35:39,000 --> 00:35:40,720
That's right.
Yes, Yes.

547
00:35:40,920 --> 00:35:44,040
I think something.
That that in itself created

548
00:35:44,040 --> 00:35:46,520
another philosophical problem of
a moral kind.

549
00:35:47,280 --> 00:35:50,320
Because see, it kind of, I know
that I know that Richard

550
00:35:51,200 --> 00:35:56,600
wouldn't have intended this to
be the case, but it led to the

551
00:35:56,680 --> 00:35:59,720
acceptance of the notion that we
are all born selfish.

552
00:36:01,600 --> 00:36:05,480
And this is fundamentally
philosophically flawed because

553
00:36:06,000 --> 00:36:10,360
you can't be selfish unless you
have a choice not to be.

554
00:36:12,400 --> 00:36:15,160
And that is fundamental, you
see, And I don't understand you,

555
00:36:15,160 --> 00:36:17,040
You can't be regarded as self as
a baby.

556
00:36:17,040 --> 00:36:19,080
A baby cannot be regarded as
selfish.

557
00:36:19,880 --> 00:36:23,640
I mean, all organisms, of
course, as I've said, you know,

558
00:36:24,280 --> 00:36:28,920
we're definitively seeking to
maintain our integrity, but that

559
00:36:28,920 --> 00:36:32,840
in itself is not selfish.
And none of us could exist if we

560
00:36:32,840 --> 00:36:35,360
didn't do that.
None of us could exist without

561
00:36:35,360 --> 00:36:38,200
helping each other maintain our
integrity, which leads to

562
00:36:38,200 --> 00:36:41,360
mutualism.
It leads to symbiotic activity.

563
00:36:41,360 --> 00:36:44,720
It leads to communal activity.
It leads to social activity.

564
00:36:45,120 --> 00:36:51,600
It leads to give and take.
It leads to a kind of morality,

565
00:36:51,600 --> 00:36:53,880
if you like.
That is certainly fundamentally

566
00:36:53,880 --> 00:36:56,680
different to the concept that
we're all born selfish.

567
00:36:57,880 --> 00:37:02,560
And it also leads to situations
like in packs of wolves, for

568
00:37:02,560 --> 00:37:07,720
example, where equity matters.
And, you know, individual

569
00:37:07,720 --> 00:37:13,040
members of a group of a pack in
wolves can be punished if they

570
00:37:13,040 --> 00:37:16,360
don't behave correctly.
In others, they don't behave for

571
00:37:16,360 --> 00:37:22,640
the sake of the of the group and
but at the same time as that is

572
00:37:22,640 --> 00:37:27,120
the case, you still got to have
the outriders for evolution to

573
00:37:27,120 --> 00:37:29,240
be able to occur.
You've still got to have those

574
00:37:29,240 --> 00:37:32,320
within the group that are going
to behave differently, who are

575
00:37:32,320 --> 00:37:35,640
going to be out slightly outside
the norm.

576
00:37:37,000 --> 00:37:41,320
And that at the social level is
also fundamentally creative.

577
00:37:41,920 --> 00:37:45,680
And if you don't have that,
you're not going to be able to

578
00:37:46,520 --> 00:37:52,200
evolve culturally and, and, and
adapt readily as, as groups.

579
00:37:52,880 --> 00:37:58,120
So even even that moral
normativeness, if you like in

580
00:37:58,160 --> 00:38:00,760
waffles has variability at the
edges.

581
00:38:00,760 --> 00:38:05,800
I mean, it will allow certain
kinds of certain kinds of

582
00:38:05,800 --> 00:38:09,640
behaviour which is is is not
conducive, so conducive to

583
00:38:10,040 --> 00:38:12,200
maintaining the organization of
the pack.

584
00:38:14,000 --> 00:38:17,880
I think it's, it's, there's
almost a, a beautiful mirroring.

585
00:38:17,880 --> 00:38:20,520
Yeah, when you're talking about
that sticks, putting sticking

586
00:38:20,520 --> 00:38:22,200
out and doing something creative
because you guys are doing

587
00:38:22,200 --> 00:38:25,240
something similar in that regard
with your thought processes and

588
00:38:25,240 --> 00:38:28,960
trying to bring back some sort
of a, a holistic view of

589
00:38:28,960 --> 00:38:32,200
everything.
Do you guys find that when you

590
00:38:32,200 --> 00:38:34,920
approach your work, you're
attacked from two sides?

591
00:38:34,920 --> 00:38:38,040
Let's say there's one group,
let's say materialists,

592
00:38:38,040 --> 00:38:42,080
reductionists, because in, in a
sense, you are not necessarily

593
00:38:42,080 --> 00:38:45,320
reducing us to our parts, but
acknowledging the extreme layers

594
00:38:45,320 --> 00:38:48,040
of reality and then bringing
them all back together, which is

595
00:38:48,040 --> 00:38:50,360
beautiful.
But then that means there's

596
00:38:50,840 --> 00:38:52,760
there are going to be people out
there who still call you

597
00:38:52,760 --> 00:38:55,880
reductionists and don't like it.
And then on on the flip side,

598
00:38:55,880 --> 00:38:58,480
the reductionists who are
fundamental reductionist don't

599
00:38:58,480 --> 00:39:01,400
like the fact that you guys are
almost bringing this holistic

600
00:39:01,400 --> 00:39:02,600
aspect.
So you're almost stuck in the

601
00:39:02,600 --> 00:39:04,520
middle, kind of kind of like
politics.

602
00:39:04,520 --> 00:39:06,880
When someone's either extreme
left, extreme right, you're

603
00:39:06,880 --> 00:39:09,360
kinda in, it's relational in the
middle zone.

604
00:39:09,360 --> 00:39:12,080
Do you find that makes it a
little bit harder to get a point

605
00:39:12,080 --> 00:39:14,840
across?
Well, you're putting your finger

606
00:39:14,840 --> 00:39:19,200
on a very important divide, so
let's first of all get the

607
00:39:19,200 --> 00:39:24,080
divide clear.
Just read page 18 as the biggest

608
00:39:24,080 --> 00:39:26,120
textbook of evolutionary
biology.

609
00:39:26,600 --> 00:39:32,600
Futuma and Kirkpatrick's book
just called Evolution, page 18

610
00:39:32,600 --> 00:39:36,280
there there's AI.
Think it's page 18.

611
00:39:36,480 --> 00:39:39,440
I could be out by a page 2.
Anyway, it's quite near the

612
00:39:39,440 --> 00:39:43,600
beginning.
It's the only page in the book

613
00:39:43,600 --> 00:39:48,400
that is devoted to philosophy,
and it is to dismiss it and it

614
00:39:48,400 --> 00:39:53,400
ends with the statement.
There is no room in science for

615
00:39:53,400 --> 00:39:58,280
purpose, full stop.
There's no justification, no

616
00:39:58,360 --> 00:40:02,440
argument as to why that
statement is necessarily true.

617
00:40:03,960 --> 00:40:09,080
That needs exposition.
It needs a philosophical

618
00:40:09,080 --> 00:40:12,280
argument for why that should be
accepted.

619
00:40:12,520 --> 00:40:17,000
There's none.
Now we are effectively saying,

620
00:40:17,760 --> 00:40:23,680
not only are organisms
purposive, and evidently so, we

621
00:40:23,680 --> 00:40:29,680
don't really need to bother too
much about precisely what that

622
00:40:29,680 --> 00:40:32,720
range of purpose is.
We can see the purposiveness.

623
00:40:33,240 --> 00:40:38,120
But very interestingly, as
physiologists, we know also that

624
00:40:38,120 --> 00:40:42,840
a purposive explanation actually
predicts downwards towards the

625
00:40:42,840 --> 00:40:47,880
molecular level as to what kinds
of mechanisms must exist for

626
00:40:47,880 --> 00:40:51,600
that purpose to exist than the
other way round.

627
00:40:51,800 --> 00:40:59,440
What is interesting here is that
purposive explanations actually

628
00:40:59,440 --> 00:41:03,400
lead to good science, good
reductionist science, if you

629
00:41:03,400 --> 00:41:06,120
want to call it that.
That's the strange thing.

630
00:41:06,560 --> 00:41:12,000
So we're by by making that
blanket statement, as happens in

631
00:41:12,400 --> 00:41:18,440
for two minutes and and
Kirkpatrick's book, we are

632
00:41:18,440 --> 00:41:23,560
actually closing off a major
scientific question.

633
00:41:23,760 --> 00:41:29,040
What is this doing?
Why does it concern twin consume

634
00:41:29,040 --> 00:41:32,160
20% of the total energy that we
use?

635
00:41:33,120 --> 00:41:35,520
It's got nothing to do with
whether there's something

636
00:41:35,520 --> 00:41:38,800
ghostly out there that, as it
were, as a goal that is

637
00:41:38,800 --> 00:41:42,360
somewhere out there dragging us
towards something.

638
00:41:42,680 --> 00:41:44,640
That sort of causation is not
involved.

639
00:41:45,000 --> 00:41:49,960
All it's postulating is that
there is anticipation of what

640
00:41:49,960 --> 00:41:53,960
might happen in the future, and
that has nothing to do with

641
00:41:54,000 --> 00:41:58,120
backward time, causation, or
anything ghostly like that.

642
00:41:58,640 --> 00:42:03,040
All it's got to have any
Organism is the ability to

643
00:42:03,040 --> 00:42:10,280
anticipate very many different
reactions rapidly to crisis

644
00:42:10,280 --> 00:42:15,240
situations, and that can only be
done by having anticipatory

645
00:42:15,440 --> 00:42:19,520
process occurring inside here.
It's all good science.

646
00:42:19,800 --> 00:42:25,520
There's absolutely no reason why
attributing purpose to organisms

647
00:42:25,720 --> 00:42:28,200
is non scientific.
That's rubbish.

648
00:42:29,240 --> 00:42:34,560
And by learning, and by learning
too, I mean, one of the crucial

649
00:42:34,560 --> 00:42:38,040
things about that that enhances
anticipation is learning to

650
00:42:38,040 --> 00:42:40,400
associate different levels of
activity.

651
00:42:40,960 --> 00:42:44,120
Now in the old days,
behaviourists used to treat this

652
00:42:44,120 --> 00:42:48,480
as in a reflexive kind of way,
associated reflexes and so on.

653
00:42:48,480 --> 00:42:51,440
That if you, you know, if you
ring bells and things and then

654
00:42:51,440 --> 00:42:54,640
stimulate the Organism, the
Organism learns to do whatever

655
00:42:54,640 --> 00:42:57,840
it needs to do in order to do,
you know, to prevent being

656
00:42:57,840 --> 00:43:02,720
electrocuted or whatever this
is, excuse me, The behaviourists

657
00:43:02,720 --> 00:43:06,240
wanted to do to them if they
didn't press the button or press

658
00:43:06,240 --> 00:43:09,280
the lever.
And then they started measuring,

659
00:43:10,120 --> 00:43:12,640
measuring the behaviour, the
intelligence of the Organism

660
00:43:12,720 --> 00:43:15,600
about how well it responded in
that kind of environment.

661
00:43:15,600 --> 00:43:18,200
I mean, if I bang you in a
chamber and then give you a, a

662
00:43:18,200 --> 00:43:21,160
lever to pull and you
accidentally pull it one day

663
00:43:21,160 --> 00:43:23,480
because you're starving.
You haven't been fed for a whole

664
00:43:23,480 --> 00:43:26,440
day and 1/2 or two days or three
days or even a week.

665
00:43:26,800 --> 00:43:30,000
And you accidentally press this
button or even just simply sit

666
00:43:30,000 --> 00:43:32,320
there as a human being, cogitate
a bit and say, I wonder what

667
00:43:32,320 --> 00:43:33,760
will happen if I press this
button.

668
00:43:34,160 --> 00:43:36,800
And you press the button and
learn, behold, a peanut arrives

669
00:43:36,800 --> 00:43:38,680
or something.
I mean, and you go on pressing

670
00:43:38,680 --> 00:43:40,720
the button to get the peanut.
I mean, is that really a

671
00:43:40,720 --> 00:43:43,440
definition of human intelligence
up to some point?

672
00:43:43,440 --> 00:43:46,560
It might be in the fact that we
learn, we learn to press things

673
00:43:46,560 --> 00:43:49,240
and do things to create and so
on.

674
00:43:49,360 --> 00:43:51,840
But what we're doing there is,
is reasoning.

675
00:43:52,640 --> 00:43:54,840
And it's, it's a curious thing
that people want to leave the

676
00:43:54,840 --> 00:43:56,960
reasoning out.
Oh, it's all reflexive.

677
00:43:57,120 --> 00:43:59,960
Well, it isn't all reflexes.
I mean, if you look at the way a

678
00:43:59,960 --> 00:44:05,520
crow solves the problem of
getting, getting food out of a,

679
00:44:05,640 --> 00:44:10,920
you know, jar of water and and
it starts doing it by doing all

680
00:44:10,920 --> 00:44:13,280
sorts of creative things.
I mean, it was some, you know,

681
00:44:13,960 --> 00:44:15,240
extraordinary imaginative
things.

682
00:44:15,240 --> 00:44:19,520
Like, for example, I mean, it
was the person Dennis who was

683
00:44:21,000 --> 00:44:23,920
the, the, the, the chap who
weighed things by, by by the

684
00:44:23,920 --> 00:44:27,120
displacement of water.
Remind me again.

685
00:44:28,240 --> 00:44:30,920
Who are we talking about?
Avogadro.

686
00:44:31,480 --> 00:44:34,720
I don't know.
Anyway, he, he, he decided that

687
00:44:34,720 --> 00:44:37,880
you could measure things by
seeing amount of water that was

688
00:44:37,880 --> 00:44:40,240
displaced.
Who's the chaplain to the Eureka

689
00:44:40,240 --> 00:44:42,280
thing in the bath, Dennis?
Wasn't it a displacement of

690
00:44:42,280 --> 00:44:43,680
water?
The measurement?

691
00:44:44,200 --> 00:44:46,400
I may be wrong, but I think
there's Evergardro.

692
00:44:46,760 --> 00:44:48,520
Well, I can't remember anyway.
Whatever.

693
00:44:48,520 --> 00:44:50,920
Whoever he was, you see.
I mean, is it?

694
00:44:51,000 --> 00:44:54,280
It's a bit like the crow.
I mean, the crow knew that if

695
00:44:54,280 --> 00:44:58,520
you could displace the water by
putting Oh yes, that was very

696
00:44:58,520 --> 00:45:00,200
clever.
Of the crow, yes, that's.

697
00:45:00,200 --> 00:45:02,640
Right.
I mean, then the water rises and

698
00:45:02,640 --> 00:45:05,000
the thing that's floating in the
water gets to the point where it

699
00:45:05,000 --> 00:45:06,840
can put its beacon and and
collect it.

700
00:45:07,360 --> 00:45:11,000
Now indeed, that's a measure of
intelligence, everybody, and

701
00:45:11,000 --> 00:45:14,320
it's a reason for the action.
Why is the crow doing that?

702
00:45:15,200 --> 00:45:17,200
Why is?
He what you're getting at right,

703
00:45:17,760 --> 00:45:19,640
yes.
So just coming quickly on this.

704
00:45:19,880 --> 00:45:22,440
I think what you're getting at
is that the learning is

705
00:45:22,520 --> 00:45:25,960
unlimited.
Yes, that's the point.

706
00:45:26,120 --> 00:45:28,800
It's no longer reflexive because
it's unlimited.

707
00:45:30,080 --> 00:45:33,720
Yes, unlimited associated
learning, which is the crucial

708
00:45:33,720 --> 00:45:41,520
ingredient of it and the so I
don't understand why they have a

709
00:45:42,160 --> 00:45:46,760
such a problem with a reason
that they would seek to dismiss

710
00:45:46,760 --> 00:45:50,120
it as a fundamental of
causality.

711
00:45:51,520 --> 00:45:54,960
When you look at in at what
we've termed in our little book

712
00:45:54,960 --> 00:45:57,640
Understanding living systems,
ecological intelligence.

713
00:45:58,600 --> 00:46:02,800
Ecological intelligence is
precisely that understanding of

714
00:46:02,800 --> 00:46:07,640
what is happening in the
environment and why, and the why

715
00:46:07,640 --> 00:46:12,440
is as important to all organisms
as it is to us.

716
00:46:13,280 --> 00:46:17,520
If, if Jack and Jill go up the
hill to fetch a pail of water,

717
00:46:17,520 --> 00:46:21,320
and I ask you, why did Jack and
Jill go up the hill?

718
00:46:21,600 --> 00:46:25,720
You might say, because you now
know they went up the hill to

719
00:46:25,720 --> 00:46:29,600
fetch a pail of water.
Jack fell down and broke his

720
00:46:29,600 --> 00:46:32,840
crown.
And I ask you, why did Jack fall

721
00:46:32,840 --> 00:46:35,880
down?
You don't answer that simply by

722
00:46:35,880 --> 00:46:39,760
how did Jack fall down, although
you might try.

723
00:46:39,760 --> 00:46:43,440
You may say, well, he slipped on
a stone and and lost his

724
00:46:43,440 --> 00:46:46,360
balance.
And I might say to you, but what

725
00:46:46,360 --> 00:46:50,880
if Jill pushed him?
They were playing, having fun,

726
00:46:50,880 --> 00:46:55,200
flirting with each other, and
she pushed him and he tripped on

727
00:46:55,200 --> 00:46:57,960
a stone and fell down the hill
and broke his crown.

728
00:46:58,480 --> 00:47:03,760
The only way you can understand
that situation is by reason, the

729
00:47:03,760 --> 00:47:06,680
reason, and it's the problem,
and it's a philosophical

730
00:47:06,680 --> 00:47:09,560
problem.
No doubt the reason may be

731
00:47:09,560 --> 00:47:16,960
wrong, and what we do with that
in practice as organisms is to

732
00:47:16,960 --> 00:47:20,480
try and work out the probability
of it being wrong.

733
00:47:21,280 --> 00:47:25,040
And even then we may not be
right when we see a chimpanzee

734
00:47:25,040 --> 00:47:30,520
pick up a stone because we have
learnt that chimpanzees use

735
00:47:30,520 --> 00:47:35,000
stones sometimes.
Not all chimpanzees do this, but

736
00:47:35,280 --> 00:47:40,160
groups of chimpanzees use stones
to crack nuts, and it's good for

737
00:47:40,160 --> 00:47:42,880
them because they can crack nuts
that are harder to crack just by

738
00:47:42,880 --> 00:47:48,520
their hands alone.
And so they find and repurpose

739
00:47:48,800 --> 00:47:52,640
stones.
They even reshape the stones in

740
00:47:52,640 --> 00:47:54,760
order to make them better suited
to cracking nuts.

741
00:47:54,760 --> 00:47:58,920
They'll even secrete a really
good stone so that they can go

742
00:47:58,920 --> 00:48:01,080
back to it and use it again when
needed.

743
00:48:01,200 --> 00:48:05,160
All these are reasons.
How can you possibly understand

744
00:48:05,160 --> 00:48:08,400
chimpanzee behaviour without
knowing those reasons?

745
00:48:08,400 --> 00:48:11,240
You can't.
Now, you may be wrong in your

746
00:48:11,240 --> 00:48:14,560
anticipation when you see a
chimpanzee pick up a stone and

747
00:48:14,560 --> 00:48:17,120
you think, ah, he's going to
crack nuts.

748
00:48:17,200 --> 00:48:19,640
Well, I may be wrong.
He may crack heads with it.

749
00:48:19,640 --> 00:48:22,760
He may throw it at you.
He may be fed up with you, a

750
00:48:22,760 --> 00:48:25,920
silly behaviourist trying to
understand his intelligence by

751
00:48:25,920 --> 00:48:28,960
not taking into account the fact
that he has reasons for doing

752
00:48:28,960 --> 00:48:31,240
things.
And the chimpanzee also will

753
00:48:31,240 --> 00:48:34,120
look at other chimpanzees and
when they, when they see them

754
00:48:34,120 --> 00:48:38,200
picking up stairs, they might
think also we're going to crack

755
00:48:38,200 --> 00:48:41,320
nuts.
But they may have already learnt

756
00:48:41,320 --> 00:48:45,240
too, that sometimes some
recalcitrant chimpanzees use it

757
00:48:45,240 --> 00:48:47,880
to throw at them and do other
things with it.

758
00:48:49,080 --> 00:48:52,720
And these are the the problem is
that it's not easily measurable.

759
00:48:52,720 --> 00:48:55,120
It's not easy to know when
you're right.

760
00:48:56,280 --> 00:49:00,960
And philosophy teaches us that
that's true of so many problems.

761
00:49:03,240 --> 00:49:08,920
You know, even the problem of,
of understanding of reality in

762
00:49:08,920 --> 00:49:11,040
perception is, is a fundamental
1.

763
00:49:11,040 --> 00:49:14,880
And unless we understand the
difficulties inherent in it, I

764
00:49:14,880 --> 00:49:17,480
don't understand how we can be
good scientists, as it were.

765
00:49:18,520 --> 00:49:21,880
Because science is to some
extent looking for better ways

766
00:49:21,880 --> 00:49:25,760
of measuring the reasons why
something happens, or the

767
00:49:25,760 --> 00:49:30,960
purpose, or the the causes.
And if reasons are part of the

768
00:49:30,960 --> 00:49:35,320
'cause we need to find ways of
seeing how they can be.

769
00:49:36,640 --> 00:49:39,000
Yes.
That I think is part of what we

770
00:49:39,000 --> 00:49:44,840
were trying to do in one of our
articles Ray, and our tentative

771
00:49:44,840 --> 00:49:47,640
solution.
There is an alignment issue.

772
00:49:48,200 --> 00:49:56,560
How is it that the processes
occurring here can align out of

773
00:49:56,560 --> 00:50:00,720
many behavioural options which
is already got because it has a

774
00:50:01,040 --> 00:50:03,760
huge behavioural repertoire
there?

775
00:50:04,960 --> 00:50:11,120
How does it align that best with
what the social context, as it

776
00:50:11,120 --> 00:50:14,000
were, dictates?
But we'll use the word dictate

777
00:50:14,000 --> 00:50:19,000
carefully, doesn't mean to say
determined, but rather

778
00:50:19,200 --> 00:50:24,240
encourages certain ways of
acting better than others.

779
00:50:24,680 --> 00:50:30,680
And I, I think it's hard to deny
that we align our behaviour with

780
00:50:31,040 --> 00:50:34,680
our moral and other social
convictions.

781
00:50:35,120 --> 00:50:38,760
Otherwise, how did the social
group hang together?

782
00:50:39,000 --> 00:50:43,160
That is part of the social
hanging together.

783
00:50:43,360 --> 00:50:45,840
And it will be different in
different cultures.

784
00:50:46,280 --> 00:50:50,720
There are some cultures that
forbid kissing in public.

785
00:50:51,360 --> 00:50:54,760
There are others that accept it.
It's as different as that.

786
00:50:55,000 --> 00:50:58,720
And that, of course, would be,
let's say, Paris at one end and

787
00:50:59,000 --> 00:51:01,160
and Japan, Tokyo at the other
end.

788
00:51:02,040 --> 00:51:05,120
And you know, they they will
have their own differences on

789
00:51:05,120 --> 00:51:10,600
what they regard as it being
desirable to align yourself to,

790
00:51:11,040 --> 00:51:14,680
but they are necessary because
they're aligned, allowing that

791
00:51:14,680 --> 00:51:18,520
alignment, and because there is
cohesion.

792
00:51:19,000 --> 00:51:20,720
Yeah.
And also the, the other thing

793
00:51:20,720 --> 00:51:23,840
that this leads to is which I
think is significant in what

794
00:51:23,840 --> 00:51:27,200
we've been trying to, to say to,
to people, which is that

795
00:51:28,840 --> 00:51:33,560
materialism is not incompatible
with free will.

796
00:51:34,080 --> 00:51:37,440
It's it materialism isn't the
same as deterministic.

797
00:51:38,840 --> 00:51:40,960
Mechanical system is
deterministic.

798
00:51:41,840 --> 00:51:44,720
If you look at clock, clock, how
clocks work and the clockwork

799
00:51:44,720 --> 00:51:47,880
works as clockwork and it, and
it does it in ways that it's

800
00:51:47,880 --> 00:51:50,400
going to do it.
Once you've wound it up, it'll

801
00:51:50,400 --> 00:51:53,640
do it.
And, and it's readily

802
00:51:53,640 --> 00:51:57,040
predictable because it does it
in a deterministic way.

803
00:51:57,040 --> 00:52:02,000
But that is not the fundamental
of materialism, as we made the

804
00:52:02,000 --> 00:52:06,920
point clear earlier, that one of
the fundamentals in life is the

805
00:52:07,320 --> 00:52:13,520
extraordinary stochasticity.
And much of life functions by

806
00:52:13,520 --> 00:52:16,320
harnessing that.
The very nature of our

807
00:52:16,560 --> 00:52:19,760
functioning of our brains, for
example, is dependent upon

808
00:52:20,080 --> 00:52:23,760
harnessing the stochasticity of,
of ions, different ions within

809
00:52:24,000 --> 00:52:29,240
the nerve cells and with the
synapses there, there's a huge

810
00:52:29,240 --> 00:52:31,360
amount of variability which is
harnessed.

811
00:52:32,680 --> 00:52:34,520
And, and you, when you look at
nerves, what are they?

812
00:52:34,600 --> 00:52:38,160
I mean, I was a neuroscientist
after many years, I trained as a

813
00:52:38,160 --> 00:52:40,520
neuroscientist, a zoologist and
a neuroscientist.

814
00:52:41,040 --> 00:52:44,880
And I, I, I tell you where, you
know, some people might think

815
00:52:44,880 --> 00:52:47,440
well, you know, you would, you
would reductionist because you

816
00:52:47,440 --> 00:52:50,680
were looking at what individual
cells were doing in the nervous

817
00:52:50,680 --> 00:52:53,320
system.
Because I did I quite proud of

818
00:52:53,320 --> 00:52:56,240
the fact that I was able to
record intracellularly as if

819
00:52:56,240 --> 00:52:58,640
this was some grand landing on
the moon.

820
00:52:58,640 --> 00:53:00,280
You know, great kind of
achievement.

821
00:53:01,080 --> 00:53:03,800
You land inside the cell with an
electrode and you record the

822
00:53:03,800 --> 00:53:06,040
potential difference across the
membrane.

823
00:53:06,360 --> 00:53:08,240
And I was doing it with
particular kind of cells.

824
00:53:08,240 --> 00:53:11,600
I was interested in receptive
fields in the skin, how our

825
00:53:12,080 --> 00:53:15,680
somatosensory system, how do we
sense the environment in terms

826
00:53:15,680 --> 00:53:19,800
of touch.
And there were various ideas

827
00:53:19,800 --> 00:53:22,200
that we had as a background to
what we were looking at.

828
00:53:22,200 --> 00:53:26,600
And one of those was that how we
locate a stimulus on the skin

829
00:53:26,600 --> 00:53:32,680
depended on the lability of the
receptive fields of the sensory

830
00:53:32,680 --> 00:53:39,680
cells, that they could be those
sensory, those sensory fields,

831
00:53:39,680 --> 00:53:45,120
those receptive fields, moment
by moment could change in their

832
00:53:45,440 --> 00:53:51,480
size in the area moment by
moment by using a combination of

833
00:53:51,480 --> 00:53:55,280
excitatory and inhibitory
processes within the

834
00:53:55,640 --> 00:53:59,880
somatosensory system.
And so when we, when you, when

835
00:53:59,880 --> 00:54:02,680
you record the neurons, you find
that this is exactly the case.

836
00:54:02,680 --> 00:54:06,200
You, you, you map out the
receptive field under certain

837
00:54:06,200 --> 00:54:08,720
conditions.
And then what we did was to see

838
00:54:08,720 --> 00:54:12,240
what happens to those receptive
fields if you do touch the skin.

839
00:54:12,360 --> 00:54:14,960
And if you touch the skin, the
receptive fields shrink.

840
00:54:16,600 --> 00:54:21,920
And what this does is to is to
enable the system to have

841
00:54:21,920 --> 00:54:27,120
greater acuity.
And by doing that, it is more

842
00:54:27,120 --> 00:54:29,440
able to locate the stimulus on
the skin.

843
00:54:31,080 --> 00:54:36,520
Now that doesn't mean that the
answer was self-evident in what

844
00:54:36,520 --> 00:54:38,160
we were doing by recording the
cells.

845
00:54:38,360 --> 00:54:41,640
When you record the cells, you,
you, you, you pop inside a cell

846
00:54:42,480 --> 00:54:45,640
and you hear this terrible
waffle going on all the time.

847
00:54:47,480 --> 00:54:50,080
In in sound.
We translate the electrical

848
00:54:50,080 --> 00:54:53,080
activity in sound.
And what all this waffling is

849
00:54:53,960 --> 00:54:56,960
are the electrical potentials.
And what those electrical

850
00:54:56,960 --> 00:55:02,240
potentials are, are the exchange
of ions of charged particles

851
00:55:02,240 --> 00:55:04,800
across the membrane going
waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle,

852
00:55:04,800 --> 00:55:06,840
waffle.
Sometimes the waffling waffle,

853
00:55:06,840 --> 00:55:09,800
waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle
get close, gets closer to what's

854
00:55:10,040 --> 00:55:16,240
called the the action potential.
If you like the threshold for

855
00:55:16,240 --> 00:55:18,960
generating an action potential,
and then the cell will generate

856
00:55:18,960 --> 00:55:21,240
an action potential or more
likely a burst of action

857
00:55:21,240 --> 00:55:23,920
potentials and you get a
different kind of sound.

858
00:55:23,920 --> 00:55:26,800
You see, I mean, it's full of
sound in terms of what we

859
00:55:26,800 --> 00:55:31,640
translated as, but the point
here is that waffling is going

860
00:55:31,640 --> 00:55:34,120
on all the time.
This is waffling.

861
00:55:34,480 --> 00:55:37,760
All this waffle and spurting and
splashing is going on in our

862
00:55:37,760 --> 00:55:40,080
brain all the time.
If you were to monitor what's

863
00:55:40,080 --> 00:55:43,520
happening at the synapses,
billions of them, billions of

864
00:55:43,520 --> 00:55:46,320
synapses going on here all the
time, it's waffling.

865
00:55:47,200 --> 00:55:50,880
But that waffling is kind of
like, it's like having a, a lump

866
00:55:50,880 --> 00:55:56,240
of soggy clay on a Potter's
wheel, that it can be shaped and

867
00:55:56,240 --> 00:55:59,800
changed in response to various
states.

868
00:56:00,560 --> 00:56:04,680
States.
And in a, in a sense, this goes

869
00:56:04,680 --> 00:56:07,120
back to this idea of states as
consciousness.

870
00:56:08,280 --> 00:56:10,760
What is consciousness?
Consciousness is a state of

871
00:56:10,760 --> 00:56:14,400
being.
It is no more than that.

872
00:56:15,640 --> 00:56:17,920
And in a sense it is far more
than that.

873
00:56:18,440 --> 00:56:24,000
But because it it, it gives us
the ability to sense our own

874
00:56:24,000 --> 00:56:30,920
sensing, to be aware of our
integrity.

875
00:56:31,880 --> 00:56:36,280
It's a consciousness to me is
like a readiness, if you like to

876
00:56:36,280 --> 00:56:41,280
act, and thereby anticipatory.
And it goes back to what Dennis

877
00:56:41,280 --> 00:56:45,880
was saying earlier, that the key
thing there is anticipation is,

878
00:56:45,880 --> 00:56:48,640
is the state of readiness and
anticipating what it is that's

879
00:56:48,640 --> 00:56:50,800
going on in the world.
Regardless of whether we're

880
00:56:50,800 --> 00:56:54,640
right about it.
We cannot function without that.

881
00:56:55,080 --> 00:56:57,480
And that is consciousness.
You don't.

882
00:56:57,480 --> 00:57:01,480
That is Dennis, isn't it?
Just briefly, there are what are

883
00:57:01,480 --> 00:57:05,880
called readiness potentials in
the nervous system that have

884
00:57:05,880 --> 00:57:12,120
been recorded as inevitably what
happens when you are in the

885
00:57:12,120 --> 00:57:16,400
process of making a decision.
It's it's fascinating, it really

886
00:57:16,400 --> 00:57:18,960
is.
They are readiness potentials.

887
00:57:18,960 --> 00:57:23,000
The system is getting itself
geared up and we feel that

888
00:57:23,000 --> 00:57:26,400
consciously too.
It is well that is the feeling

889
00:57:26,400 --> 00:57:28,880
that is the consciousness,
Dennis, that is the conscious

890
00:57:29,160 --> 00:57:31,120
and, and, and you, you.
But you know, I'll say

891
00:57:31,280 --> 00:57:33,560
something, I'll say something
really highly controversial now,

892
00:57:33,560 --> 00:57:37,120
something Dennis and I've been
discussing more recently and

893
00:57:37,120 --> 00:57:39,560
also with other colleagues.
I have to say, and a lot of this

894
00:57:39,560 --> 00:57:43,080
comes from discussions with a
group that we interact with in

895
00:57:43,080 --> 00:57:47,440
Edinburgh, that or based in
Edinburgh that looks at choices

896
00:57:48,360 --> 00:57:51,520
and the biology of choices,
choices in systems and

897
00:57:51,520 --> 00:57:54,440
organisms.
And, and obviously anticipation

898
00:57:54,440 --> 00:57:59,520
is a vital aspect of choice
because you, you can't really

899
00:57:59,520 --> 00:58:03,000
make it without some
anticipation of what the result

900
00:58:03,000 --> 00:58:05,320
will be of any decision or
action that you take.

901
00:58:05,600 --> 00:58:08,640
So there's an enormous amount
of, of anticipation involved in

902
00:58:08,880 --> 00:58:14,480
how organisms make choices.
But all organisms make choices,

903
00:58:15,760 --> 00:58:19,600
and all all organisms have
states of readiness to make

904
00:58:19,600 --> 00:58:23,640
choices.
And all organisms, to varying

905
00:58:23,640 --> 00:58:29,640
degrees, indeed have an ability
to identify self in some kind of

906
00:58:29,640 --> 00:58:33,560
functional way.
They they don't all eat their

907
00:58:33,560 --> 00:58:36,400
own backsides, for example,
because they recognize the fact

908
00:58:36,400 --> 00:58:39,520
that it is self as it were.
Now they don't do don't do it.

909
00:58:39,720 --> 00:58:43,360
In a linguistic way, like I've
just done, they don't use the

910
00:58:43,360 --> 00:58:46,960
word self.
That's me, and I am who I am.

911
00:58:47,160 --> 00:58:50,280
They don't do it linguistically,
but we do.

912
00:58:50,560 --> 00:58:52,640
And that is another level of
doing it.

913
00:58:54,000 --> 00:58:58,000
But it doesn't mean that
consciousness, as it were, has

914
00:58:58,000 --> 00:59:01,080
simply emerged out of that
process of doing.

915
00:59:02,720 --> 00:59:05,680
You know, one can just as
readily see things like

916
00:59:05,680 --> 00:59:13,400
readiness and, and, and a sense
of integrity at, at very, very

917
00:59:13,400 --> 00:59:16,680
low level forms of life.
I don't like the word low level.

918
00:59:16,880 --> 00:59:21,680
They're extraordinarily complex
and, and, you know, and, and

919
00:59:22,320 --> 00:59:26,960
have an enormous range of
functional capacity.

920
00:59:28,000 --> 00:59:32,440
And what we tend to do with the
lower forms is to just simply

921
00:59:32,440 --> 00:59:38,320
regard them in a robotic, excuse
me, in a robotic kind of way

922
00:59:38,320 --> 00:59:41,400
that they just an algorithm
could explain their behaviour.

923
00:59:43,160 --> 00:59:45,600
In large part, yes, indeed.
I mean, if you look at a

924
00:59:45,600 --> 00:59:48,680
paramecium, it sort of moves
forward and bumps into something

925
00:59:48,680 --> 00:59:51,440
and then comes back and changes
it's angle of approach and moves

926
00:59:51,440 --> 00:59:54,160
forward and eventually it gets
around the object.

927
00:59:56,360 --> 00:59:58,200
That's a kind of intelligence in
a way.

928
00:59:58,200 --> 01:00:00,800
But they'll say, Oh well, that's
just simply an algorithm.

929
01:00:02,560 --> 01:00:06,640
When you get very, very complex
algorithms that involve a choice

930
01:00:06,640 --> 01:00:11,960
between algorithms, how do you
choose which algorithm to

931
01:00:11,960 --> 01:00:15,360
insert?
If you like, and we don't like

932
01:00:15,360 --> 01:00:18,760
the the idea of inserting an
algorithm in variability isn't

933
01:00:18,760 --> 01:00:22,080
just inserted within a various
system to create decision

934
01:00:22,080 --> 01:00:25,520
making.
The the, the variabilities exist

935
01:00:25,520 --> 01:00:28,400
in all, all the time throughout
everywhere in the system.

936
01:00:28,400 --> 01:00:31,280
It's variability, it's
stochastic.

937
01:00:32,520 --> 01:00:36,200
The the, the, the the problem is
not so much that.

938
01:00:36,200 --> 01:00:39,320
The problem is how does the
system constrain it.

939
01:00:40,840 --> 01:00:44,880
And it it, it leads to what
we've called boundary conditions

940
01:00:44,880 --> 01:00:48,760
and the way the boundaries
function as bolting this

941
01:00:48,760 --> 01:00:54,280
stochasticity into reasoned
function, objective

942
01:00:54,280 --> 01:00:58,640
functionality.
And but, but not only do we say

943
01:00:58,640 --> 01:01:00,480
that it does that, but we
actually say that that

944
01:01:00,480 --> 01:01:04,840
definitively is what reason is
If, if that makes any kind of

945
01:01:04,840 --> 01:01:06,800
sense.
What do you have to?

946
01:01:07,760 --> 01:01:10,240
Do here Ray, just to come in
briefly on this.

947
01:01:10,520 --> 01:01:12,480
What you have to do is to
distinguish between the

948
01:01:12,480 --> 01:01:18,520
different forms of causation.
Much of it social context is

949
01:01:18,880 --> 01:01:22,400
causation by form, not by
mechanism.

950
01:01:23,200 --> 01:01:25,680
And that was a fundamental
distinction introduced by

951
01:01:25,680 --> 01:01:32,480
Aristotle in his De Anima 2000
odd years ago.

952
01:01:33,080 --> 01:01:37,920
And that's again to come back to
dear Richard.

953
01:01:37,920 --> 01:01:40,240
I can't dear Richard for so many
for so long.

954
01:01:40,480 --> 01:01:44,200
But you know, he, he, he just
ignores this distinction.

955
01:01:44,560 --> 01:01:48,560
He just, he says, well, genes
are our causes and but he

956
01:01:48,560 --> 01:01:53,200
doesn't clarify what he means by
a 'cause I say they are

957
01:01:53,200 --> 01:01:58,000
effectively as sequences, causes
of form.

958
01:01:58,240 --> 01:02:03,920
It is the form of the sequence
that is used to translate into

959
01:02:03,920 --> 01:02:09,800
an RNA and then into protein.
The DNA itself doesn't do

960
01:02:09,800 --> 01:02:13,680
anything about that.
It gets read, yes, but it

961
01:02:13,680 --> 01:02:17,480
doesn't actually.
It is not an active process, and

962
01:02:17,640 --> 01:02:21,680
this distinction between active
and passive causation is utterly

963
01:02:21,720 --> 01:02:26,520
fundamental in Physiology.
If I measure, for example, the

964
01:02:26,520 --> 01:02:30,680
association level between
knocking out a particular gene

965
01:02:30,680 --> 01:02:35,280
that's responsible for pacemaker
rhythm and observe a change in

966
01:02:35,280 --> 01:02:40,520
rhythm, maybe 10%.
I also know as a physiologist

967
01:02:40,520 --> 01:02:45,280
that's worked out the full
dynamic causation that the

968
01:02:45,280 --> 01:02:51,520
actual contribution can be 80%.
The difference between active

969
01:02:51,520 --> 01:02:58,840
causation and associative score,
which is what the G was people

970
01:02:58,840 --> 01:03:03,880
are measuring, is fundamental.
You can have AG was score of 0

971
01:03:04,040 --> 01:03:07,960
and there can still be a huge
contribution to causation.

972
01:03:08,200 --> 01:03:10,880
It's just that the system is
very robust.

973
01:03:11,120 --> 01:03:15,640
If one mechanism doesn't work,
it uses another one and that is

974
01:03:15,640 --> 01:03:19,240
fundamental here and it's the
reason why most of the G was

975
01:03:19,240 --> 01:03:23,040
scores are very low.
The only ones that are high are

976
01:03:23,040 --> 01:03:26,960
the ones that occur for the
monogenetic diseases where

977
01:03:27,120 --> 01:03:30,800
everybody would agree that if
you've got cystic fibrosis, the

978
01:03:30,840 --> 01:03:33,480
the genes for that you'll have
cystic fibrosis.

979
01:03:33,720 --> 01:03:37,680
Not much you can do about it,
but they affect only roughly

980
01:03:37,680 --> 01:03:39,920
speaking, of 5% of the
population.

981
01:03:40,160 --> 01:03:43,800
That's not to deny that that's
important to that 5%.

982
01:03:43,960 --> 01:03:48,960
It is, but for the great
majority, 95% of the association

983
01:03:48,960 --> 01:03:52,560
scores are so low that they're
almost useless for medical

984
01:03:52,560 --> 01:03:55,200
purposes.
Does anybody go and take their

985
01:03:55,200 --> 01:03:59,480
genome to their doctor?
Do I go with a great big book of

986
01:03:59,480 --> 01:04:05,320
my CGS, A's and T's and say to
my doctor, Joe, could you take a

987
01:04:05,320 --> 01:04:08,040
look at this?
He he would laugh me out of

988
01:04:08,040 --> 01:04:10,880
court.
You, you, you're touching on

989
01:04:10,880 --> 01:04:15,440
something quite important there,
Dennis, in the sense that when

990
01:04:15,440 --> 01:04:18,000
we consider twin studies, and I
think you guys also touched on

991
01:04:18,000 --> 01:04:20,840
this on your paper, can reasons
and values influence action?

992
01:04:21,040 --> 01:04:24,200
Or how might intentional agency
work physiologically, which

993
01:04:24,200 --> 01:04:27,200
we'll touch on because I do want
to focus on that macro level

994
01:04:27,200 --> 01:04:29,960
causation versus micro level
causation, how you're able to

995
01:04:29,960 --> 01:04:33,240
bring this up with harnessing
stochasticity.

996
01:04:33,560 --> 01:04:36,040
But the one thing you guys touch
on is the fact that in twin

997
01:04:36,040 --> 01:04:39,560
studies, you'll notice how the
genome there is fine prepped,

998
01:04:39,560 --> 01:04:42,160
ready to go.
However, both twins are not

999
01:04:42,160 --> 01:04:44,160
actively getting the same
information from the mother's

1000
01:04:44,160 --> 01:04:46,360
womb.
So while one might be receiving

1001
01:04:46,360 --> 01:04:48,400
a little bit more blood flow,
the other one might be receiving

1002
01:04:48,400 --> 01:04:51,760
a little bit more nutrients.
There's a varying, there's,

1003
01:04:51,760 --> 01:04:54,400
there's so much complexity here
and so many variables to

1004
01:04:54,400 --> 01:04:57,280
consider that it's impossible
for us to actually just say that

1005
01:04:57,280 --> 01:05:01,960
you can take ACTA and commanders
to have someone produce a

1006
01:05:01,960 --> 01:05:03,440
certain outcome.
It's not fixed.

1007
01:05:03,440 --> 01:05:06,640
It's very, very variable.
Do you want to touch on that any

1008
01:05:06,640 --> 01:05:10,840
of you guys?
Well, briefly from my point of

1009
01:05:10,840 --> 01:05:17,440
view, the egg cell of course, is
critical in determining which

1010
01:05:17,440 --> 01:05:22,920
genes get activated initially.
It isn't the DNA that determines

1011
01:05:22,920 --> 01:05:26,640
that.
It is the egg cell that has the

1012
01:05:27,360 --> 01:05:31,280
right mix, if you want to call
it right, a mix, let's put it

1013
01:05:31,280 --> 01:05:37,040
that way, a bit more neutral of
controlled molecules, RNAs and

1014
01:05:37,200 --> 01:05:41,080
transcription factors which are
characteristic of that

1015
01:05:41,080 --> 01:05:44,200
particular egg cell.
Which is why I don't think

1016
01:05:44,200 --> 01:05:48,400
anybody's going to recreate the
my mother's egg cell as it was

1017
01:05:48,400 --> 01:05:51,880
in February 1936 is as simple as
that.

1018
01:05:52,240 --> 01:05:58,880
They're all different.
And so the idea that somehow or

1019
01:05:58,880 --> 01:06:06,560
another you can get away from
the contextual form of causation

1020
01:06:06,840 --> 01:06:09,960
which triggers the beginning of
development, I think it's just

1021
01:06:09,960 --> 01:06:12,720
nonsense.
You need to know the initial

1022
01:06:12,720 --> 01:06:15,320
conditions for the development.
We don't know.

1023
01:06:16,240 --> 01:06:20,560
That's that's a big issue still,
it's an open area of Physiology

1024
01:06:20,560 --> 01:06:23,040
that needs more, more
experimentation.

1025
01:06:23,160 --> 01:06:28,120
It, it is an area of Physiology
that I was also involved in area

1026
01:06:28,280 --> 01:06:30,880
as well as having been a sensory
physiologist.

1027
01:06:31,720 --> 01:06:36,760
I, I became a joint director of
fetal and neonatal research

1028
01:06:36,760 --> 01:06:41,480
group at University College and
one of the things that the group

1029
01:06:41,480 --> 01:06:47,000
were looking at was the way in
which the maternal system

1030
01:06:47,480 --> 01:06:53,320
influences the developmental
choices of the fetal system and

1031
01:06:53,680 --> 01:06:58,320
the way the placenta largely
through epigenetic processing

1032
01:06:58,800 --> 01:07:04,000
that can be changed in order to
adapt to different states of

1033
01:07:04,000 --> 01:07:10,280
nutrition of maternal nutrition.
And the the outcomes comes can

1034
01:07:10,280 --> 01:07:14,080
be extraordinarily different.
And remember that we're dealing

1035
01:07:14,080 --> 01:07:18,920
with in a sense, genomes that
would be precisely the same

1036
01:07:18,920 --> 01:07:22,960
other than those early
developmental conditions.

1037
01:07:24,360 --> 01:07:30,240
And it the a group in
Southampton have looked at this

1038
01:07:30,240 --> 01:07:34,760
in in terms of human women and
looked at this

1039
01:07:34,760 --> 01:07:38,200
transgenerationally and found
that, for example, liver

1040
01:07:38,200 --> 01:07:42,080
function, which is determined
within the womb.

1041
01:07:42,080 --> 01:07:47,240
The metabolics strategy, if you
like, of the of the developing

1042
01:07:47,240 --> 01:07:54,360
fetus dictates the metabolic
strategy post natally and

1043
01:07:54,560 --> 01:08:01,160
through to adulthood and that
also can be passed on further

1044
01:08:01,200 --> 01:08:04,760
generationally depends very much
on the circumstances.

1045
01:08:04,760 --> 01:08:07,480
But they have found
transgenerational changes even

1046
01:08:07,480 --> 01:08:12,520
within humans and it to me this
was the key evidence to show

1047
01:08:12,520 --> 01:08:17,120
that there can be acquired
characteristics and many of

1048
01:08:17,120 --> 01:08:21,439
those acquired characteristics
operate when the system is much

1049
01:08:21,439 --> 01:08:26,000
more open to change.
So and there are certain periods

1050
01:08:26,000 --> 01:08:27,920
of development when that is the
case.

1051
01:08:28,080 --> 01:08:30,520
One is the developing embryo and
the fetus.

1052
01:08:31,240 --> 01:08:34,880
The other, of course, is during
adolescence, and another,

1053
01:08:34,880 --> 01:08:38,040
curiously, is when we come to
older age.

1054
01:08:40,040 --> 01:08:43,840
This is why I referred to this
earlier, the fact that the

1055
01:08:43,840 --> 01:08:49,319
system adapts differently as an
older system, but it is

1056
01:08:49,319 --> 01:08:51,520
nonetheless a dynamic
adaptation.

1057
01:08:51,520 --> 01:08:54,200
It's not just simply a
deterioration, it's taking

1058
01:08:54,200 --> 01:08:57,840
account of the fact that one's
faculties are now as it were,

1059
01:08:57,840 --> 01:09:03,279
not as, as adaptable.
And you know, we know that, for

1060
01:09:03,279 --> 01:09:09,640
example, I suffer tremendously
from hypertension and, and, and

1061
01:09:10,520 --> 01:09:13,040
that's not going to go away, but
it can be treated if we know

1062
01:09:13,040 --> 01:09:15,279
about it, if you see what I
mean, what what's occurring

1063
01:09:15,279 --> 01:09:17,120
there physiologically and
functionally.

1064
01:09:18,000 --> 01:09:22,040
And we know also that different,
different people will have

1065
01:09:22,040 --> 01:09:27,080
different degrees of that kind
of problem as they age.

1066
01:09:27,479 --> 01:09:30,279
And a lot of that is
epigenetically determined,

1067
01:09:30,520 --> 01:09:33,319
curiously enough, by what
happened to you in the womb.

1068
01:09:34,600 --> 01:09:36,279
And, and that is an
extraordinary.

1069
01:09:36,279 --> 01:09:41,680
So working out what's cause and
effect depends on the time, the

1070
01:09:41,760 --> 01:09:46,560
way in which the Organism
subsequently develops, the range

1071
01:09:46,560 --> 01:09:51,479
of possible outcomes that can
be, for example, produced

1072
01:09:51,479 --> 01:09:55,880
through exercise and various
other things, and all on the

1073
01:09:55,880 --> 01:10:00,200
basis of the same genome.
Do you think that it's it's

1074
01:10:00,200 --> 01:10:04,800
quite it would be almost
impossible for someone who does

1075
01:10:04,800 --> 01:10:09,360
consider this to be a
deterministic world that the

1076
01:10:09,760 --> 01:10:11,960
immeasurable amounts of
variables to consider.

1077
01:10:11,960 --> 01:10:14,440
I mean, it's, it's incalculable.
So it's it's, it's something

1078
01:10:14,440 --> 01:10:17,800
that at no point we're ever
going to be able to do this.

1079
01:10:18,120 --> 01:10:20,600
So there's almost an arrogance
here in assuming that it's

1080
01:10:20,600 --> 01:10:25,280
possible.
Well, we're never going to put

1081
01:10:25,280 --> 01:10:29,520
it because it's not too
difficult to calculate that

1082
01:10:29,520 --> 01:10:36,400
you'd need for some of these
potential computations, like

1083
01:10:37,040 --> 01:10:41,960
computing the activity of all
the water molecules in a single

1084
01:10:41,960 --> 01:10:45,520
cell.
That would require computational

1085
01:10:45,520 --> 01:10:49,280
power that would probably
require most of the material in

1086
01:10:49,280 --> 01:10:53,200
the solar system to build it.
I mean, it's not too difficult

1087
01:10:53,200 --> 01:11:00,480
to see once computational
explosion is rampant as it is in

1088
01:11:01,720 --> 01:11:05,960
systems made of water, you
simply you're never going to be

1089
01:11:05,960 --> 01:11:09,120
able to do fully molecular level
computations.

1090
01:11:09,120 --> 01:11:15,800
People try and even computing
let's say how an iron has its

1091
01:11:15,800 --> 01:11:20,000
water molecules surrounding it
because they're all polar and

1092
01:11:20,000 --> 01:11:23,920
they will line up like magnets
and how far out this goes and

1093
01:11:24,080 --> 01:11:29,680
how far you have to go out and
also what state is the water in.

1094
01:11:30,160 --> 01:11:33,760
There are more than just frozen
and fluid.

1095
01:11:33,920 --> 01:11:38,920
There are many states, as we
know from the snowflake issue,

1096
01:11:39,640 --> 01:11:43,160
in which water can, as it were,
form itself.

1097
01:11:43,680 --> 01:11:48,760
And again, it's an interaction
between what is in the water,

1098
01:11:48,760 --> 01:11:53,120
the proteins, the RNAs and and
goodness knows how many

1099
01:11:53,680 --> 01:11:59,160
metabolites, hormones and other
things, each of which will in a

1100
01:11:59,160 --> 01:12:03,680
relativistic way determine
partly what the water is doing.

1101
01:12:05,320 --> 01:12:09,040
The fact is that it's it's
incomputable at a molecular

1102
01:12:09,040 --> 01:12:10,960
level.
I think it's as simple as that.

1103
01:12:12,040 --> 01:12:15,160
There's a very funny thing here
that comes about as well, which

1104
01:12:15,160 --> 01:12:17,760
you see, you see, and obviously,
you know, we're physiologists.

1105
01:12:17,760 --> 01:12:20,080
I mean, sorry, another hat.
Again, you keep wearing

1106
01:12:20,080 --> 01:12:23,200
different hats.
But it's a very interesting

1107
01:12:23,200 --> 01:12:26,840
thing that one of the criticisms
that we do receive sometimes is

1108
01:12:26,840 --> 01:12:29,000
the fact that we're not, you
know, well, what do you know

1109
01:12:29,000 --> 01:12:33,120
about evolution?
And they, they also say to, they

1110
01:12:33,120 --> 01:12:36,960
say to us how mathematics works,
how computations work.

1111
01:12:37,320 --> 01:12:39,760
Well, really, because you
decided what the end product

1112
01:12:39,760 --> 01:12:42,120
should be, which is maintaining
genes in a gene pool.

1113
01:12:42,440 --> 01:12:45,320
But once you've done that, yes,
you can get a result and show

1114
01:12:45,320 --> 01:12:47,280
that, well, they behave like
this in order to maintain their

1115
01:12:47,280 --> 01:12:49,040
genes in a gene pool by behaving
like that.

1116
01:12:50,280 --> 01:12:54,720
But our answer to them is, well,
we're physiologists and our

1117
01:12:54,720 --> 01:12:58,160
computations work as well, but
they're fundamentally different

1118
01:12:58,160 --> 01:13:00,840
from your computations.
Exactly.

1119
01:13:01,320 --> 01:13:05,560
Yes, that's right.
Most of the population genetics

1120
01:13:05,560 --> 01:13:12,280
computations are not dynamic.
They're looking for to what will

1121
01:13:12,280 --> 01:13:16,400
the system tend to go, which is
a valid way of looking at things

1122
01:13:16,400 --> 01:13:20,520
and don't deny that.
But we as physiologists are

1123
01:13:20,520 --> 01:13:26,160
necessarily concerned with how
does it move from where it is to

1124
01:13:26,160 --> 01:13:31,400
where it might go, and that
requires dynamic differential

1125
01:13:31,400 --> 01:13:36,240
equation models.
And also we're concerned as, as

1126
01:13:36,240 --> 01:13:42,000
behaviourists as well as
physiologists with why does it

1127
01:13:42,000 --> 01:13:44,640
happen?
And, and, and again, you need

1128
01:13:44,640 --> 01:13:47,960
different kinds of computation
to understand that.

1129
01:13:48,800 --> 01:13:52,400
And so this idea that there's a,
one way of calculating things

1130
01:13:53,240 --> 01:13:55,960
and then having a system that
works because it works.

1131
01:13:55,960 --> 01:13:58,560
I mean, we've had this said to
us at meetings, you know, that

1132
01:13:58,800 --> 01:14:01,000
why fix something that isn't
broken?

1133
01:14:01,000 --> 01:14:05,200
Well, we say this fine, it does
what you want it to do and it

1134
01:14:05,200 --> 01:14:10,080
gives you an explanation within
a certain, certain bounds, but

1135
01:14:10,080 --> 01:14:15,280
it isn't applicable to either
the Physiology as such.

1136
01:14:15,320 --> 01:14:19,280
And in terms of purpose for
something to occur, I mean the

1137
01:14:19,280 --> 01:14:24,360
function of a cell, for example,
within a system can be

1138
01:14:24,360 --> 01:14:27,640
differential within the system.
And so you could then say as a

1139
01:14:27,640 --> 01:14:31,120
physiologist, the purpose of
that cell is to do whatever it's

1140
01:14:31,120 --> 01:14:33,360
doing.
So some cells might be filtering

1141
01:14:33,360 --> 01:14:37,480
in say the, the relation to the
kidney at at functions of the of

1142
01:14:37,480 --> 01:14:41,760
the renal system and other cells
may be concerned with creating

1143
01:14:41,760 --> 01:14:45,040
osmotic gradients and so on.
You see, but you can identify

1144
01:14:45,120 --> 01:14:47,360
this is what's so wonderful
about Physiology and anatomy.

1145
01:14:47,360 --> 01:14:51,040
You can see the most beautiful
arrangements in order to

1146
01:14:51,040 --> 01:14:55,320
generate these osmotic
gradients, which are how our

1147
01:14:55,320 --> 01:15:00,280
phenol system functions, and
then the way it utilises pumps

1148
01:15:00,720 --> 01:15:05,000
in order to create these
extraordinary gradients.

1149
01:15:05,600 --> 01:15:09,560
The ways nerve cells generate
electrical gradients which they

1150
01:15:09,560 --> 01:15:13,160
can then use to generate
signals, The way the signals are

1151
01:15:13,160 --> 01:15:18,720
used in order to generate the
release of chemicals held in

1152
01:15:19,120 --> 01:15:22,920
packets, membrane packets in
quanta that are released at

1153
01:15:22,920 --> 01:15:26,080
synapses to 'cause these things.
And you know, we as

1154
01:15:26,080 --> 01:15:28,880
physiologists see those things
happening as it were.

1155
01:15:29,320 --> 01:15:34,400
And so we understand reason
within that context too.

1156
01:15:34,440 --> 01:15:37,680
And then at the behavioural
level we understand reason in

1157
01:15:37,680 --> 01:15:40,480
the same way as we were
referring to the chimpanzee

1158
01:15:40,480 --> 01:15:44,680
using a stone to crack nuts.
And you don't, you don't go into

1159
01:15:44,680 --> 01:15:47,280
a different realm by doing that.
You're talking about the same

1160
01:15:47,280 --> 01:15:49,240
problem.
How do we understand behaviour?

1161
01:15:49,680 --> 01:15:52,800
And we can understand it at
various levels, and those levels

1162
01:15:52,800 --> 01:15:56,760
are interactive in causal
functionality.

1163
01:15:57,000 --> 01:15:59,240
They're not all one way.
They're going backwards,

1164
01:15:59,240 --> 01:16:01,880
forwards, sideways.
Some of them are just simply

1165
01:16:01,880 --> 01:16:05,560
conditional.
The, the beauty, I mean plants,

1166
01:16:06,520 --> 01:16:10,000
if you touch them, it can
generate this extraordinary

1167
01:16:10,000 --> 01:16:14,440
calcium transient within the
cells of the leaves and so on.

1168
01:16:14,720 --> 01:16:16,800
And this spreads through the
system.

1169
01:16:16,800 --> 01:16:19,720
And it, what that does is to
create a state of readiness, a

1170
01:16:19,720 --> 01:16:21,640
preparedness that something is
happening.

1171
01:16:21,960 --> 01:16:24,760
But if you look again at plants,
you find that it's actually

1172
01:16:24,880 --> 01:16:28,520
extraordinarily exquisite
because plants respond in

1173
01:16:28,520 --> 01:16:31,560
different ways depending on what
it is that has touched it.

1174
01:16:33,480 --> 01:16:37,520
Now that is amazing.
And so you can, in that context,

1175
01:16:37,520 --> 01:16:42,200
you see context, you see say
that the plant responded in this

1176
01:16:42,200 --> 01:16:47,200
way because it was touched by
that Organism and not by that

1177
01:16:47,200 --> 01:16:51,200
kind of Organism.
There is reason, you say, and

1178
01:16:51,200 --> 01:16:54,160
you cannot understand that
ecological context without

1179
01:16:54,160 --> 01:16:57,600
understanding the reason.
You can't explain it without

1180
01:16:57,600 --> 01:17:00,080
that.
And that's I in a sense, that's

1181
01:17:00,200 --> 01:17:03,680
all we are saying.
And why it is that people get so

1182
01:17:03,680 --> 01:17:06,880
cross about it.
It goes back, I think the fact

1183
01:17:06,880 --> 01:17:10,080
that they want to either they
want to have this strange, you

1184
01:17:10,080 --> 01:17:15,520
know, duality that the one never
meets anywhere and can explain

1185
01:17:15,520 --> 01:17:18,120
the same thing.
We're explaining the same thing.

1186
01:17:20,040 --> 01:17:22,280
Actually, red goes deeper,
doesn't it?

1187
01:17:22,280 --> 01:17:28,600
Historically, because once they
inserted the Weisman barrier as

1188
01:17:28,600 --> 01:17:33,120
an absolute barrier, that
automatically excluded any

1189
01:17:33,120 --> 01:17:36,480
physiological influence on the
next generation.

1190
01:17:37,200 --> 01:17:40,720
It's as simple as that.
Once you know that that barrier

1191
01:17:40,720 --> 01:17:44,520
doesn't stop the control
processes from influencing the

1192
01:17:44,520 --> 01:17:48,280
next generation, everything is
open again and you cannot

1193
01:17:48,280 --> 01:17:51,680
exclude Physiology from being
part of what determines the

1194
01:17:51,680 --> 01:17:55,440
direction of evolution.
And that's just straightforward

1195
01:17:55,440 --> 01:17:59,400
Is again coming back to the
fundamental molecular biological

1196
01:17:59,720 --> 01:18:05,720
detail that I outlined earlier.
Once you admit that DNA is not a

1197
01:18:05,720 --> 01:18:09,480
self replicator, so it cannot
replicate accurately

1198
01:18:09,480 --> 01:18:11,520
independently of the cell
itself.

1199
01:18:11,880 --> 01:18:14,680
In other words, there's no
replicator separate from the

1200
01:18:14,680 --> 01:18:17,440
vehicle.
And once you've also abandoned

1201
01:18:17,440 --> 01:18:22,000
the Weisman barrier, you can no
longer exclude physiological

1202
01:18:22,000 --> 01:18:25,280
processes from having a role in
the evolutionary process.

1203
01:18:25,760 --> 01:18:29,760
Now I was told many times by
Richard in the debate with him

1204
01:18:29,760 --> 01:18:34,080
two years ago, Dennis, you're a
Physiology just I'm an

1205
01:18:34,080 --> 01:18:37,440
evolutionary biologist and the
two are not the same.

1206
01:18:37,840 --> 01:18:42,200
I say you cannot exclude one
from the other.

1207
01:18:42,440 --> 01:18:49,200
It it doesn't unless you hang on
as it were at all costs to the

1208
01:18:49,200 --> 01:18:51,880
vice and barrier and to self
replication.

1209
01:18:52,040 --> 01:18:55,640
And neither of those are true.
It's a, it's a beautiful gap if

1210
01:18:55,640 --> 01:18:58,480
you think about it, a
physiologist and Even so, me as

1211
01:18:58,480 --> 01:19:01,040
a, as a medical doctor, I mean,
without Physiology bridging that

1212
01:19:01,040 --> 01:19:04,400
gap, that biological gap to the
psychological system, Physiology

1213
01:19:04,400 --> 01:19:06,240
plays the most fundamental role
here.

1214
01:19:07,120 --> 01:19:10,440
It has pains, a holistic pitch.
I mean, as you guys, to quote

1215
01:19:10,440 --> 01:19:13,920
you guys, organisms do not
behave as rational calculators.

1216
01:19:15,560 --> 01:19:19,840
That's a fundamental process.
Darwin spent the last 10 years

1217
01:19:19,840 --> 01:19:23,160
of his life collaborating with
the physiologist George Romanis

1218
01:19:23,600 --> 01:19:29,280
because he was determined to see
whether his idea of well, he

1219
01:19:29,280 --> 01:19:32,680
didn't know about the supposed
barrier because that only came

1220
01:19:32,680 --> 01:19:38,720
in 1883 when he had passed away.
But he was clear that there had

1221
01:19:38,720 --> 01:19:43,560
to be processes that communicate
from the soma to the germline,

1222
01:19:44,080 --> 01:19:49,000
and he spent a lot of time
interacting with George Romani

1223
01:19:49,000 --> 01:19:53,320
is to try to prove that with
various hybridisations.

1224
01:19:53,560 --> 01:19:56,760
What was missing in the 19th
century was the knowledge of

1225
01:19:56,760 --> 01:19:59,400
epigenetics.
Once you've got epigenetics,

1226
01:19:59,400 --> 01:20:04,160
you've got the environment
through physiological processes

1227
01:20:04,160 --> 01:20:08,240
of epigenetic nature controlling
the way the genome is

1228
01:20:08,240 --> 01:20:12,000
interpreted.
And it doesn't even need that.

1229
01:20:12,000 --> 01:20:15,200
It should be transmitted by the
genome because.

1230
01:20:15,480 --> 01:20:19,920
Culturally it can be transmitted
without any bothering with the

1231
01:20:20,280 --> 01:20:25,320
DNA, and if an environmental
change lasts a long time, which

1232
01:20:25,320 --> 01:20:28,760
is the only environmental
changes of interest evolutionary

1233
01:20:28,760 --> 01:20:33,680
wise, then so will the
epigenetic effects exist for a

1234
01:20:33,680 --> 01:20:37,080
long time, even if there's no
assimilation into the genome.

1235
01:20:37,320 --> 01:20:42,120
These are fundamental facts
which I'm afraid neo Darwinist

1236
01:20:42,200 --> 01:20:46,640
rivals have just simply missed.
Haven't seen the significance of

1237
01:20:46,640 --> 01:20:48,880
it.
What they will say is oh it all

1238
01:20:48,880 --> 01:20:51,080
dies out after a generation or
two.

1239
01:20:51,720 --> 01:20:57,360
But that's only true if you have
a point influence from the

1240
01:20:57,640 --> 01:21:00,440
environment.
If you maintain the environment,

1241
01:21:00,440 --> 01:21:03,120
it will maintain the epigenetic
change.

1242
01:21:03,320 --> 01:21:07,080
It's so obvious as to hardly
need to be expressed.

1243
01:21:08,480 --> 01:21:10,200
Another thing I really enjoy is
the way you guys have

1244
01:21:10,200 --> 01:21:14,160
incorporated music into this
understanding of life and this

1245
01:21:14,200 --> 01:21:16,640
this beautiful synchronicity of
the both of them.

1246
01:21:16,640 --> 01:21:17,800
Do you want to explore that a
bit?

1247
01:21:20,760 --> 01:21:23,960
Well, I did that in The Music of
life, deliberately of course,

1248
01:21:24,200 --> 01:21:28,160
but that was done largely to
produce a different metaphor

1249
01:21:28,160 --> 01:21:31,760
from Richard Dawkins, metaphor
of the selfish gene.

1250
01:21:32,280 --> 01:21:35,040
And so that was his main
function.

1251
01:21:35,520 --> 01:21:39,720
But actually, I've come to think
that there's more to it than

1252
01:21:39,720 --> 01:21:45,440
just an alternative metaphor.
What is being synchronised when

1253
01:21:45,960 --> 01:21:49,800
respiration is synchronised with
heartbeat variation?

1254
01:21:50,160 --> 01:21:56,560
What is being synchronised when
the processes of circadian

1255
01:21:56,560 --> 01:22:01,160
rhythm are are synchronised with
various hormonal changes?

1256
01:22:01,560 --> 01:22:06,840
This is all harmonisation to
vary degrees.

1257
01:22:06,840 --> 01:22:11,280
I mean, you can argue about what
kind of music this might be, and

1258
01:22:11,280 --> 01:22:15,920
it may not be Bath light, it may
or even be Beethoven light.

1259
01:22:16,200 --> 01:22:20,320
It may be more like avant-garde
than either of those.

1260
01:22:20,600 --> 01:22:25,680
But nevertheless, there is,
there's a sense in which there

1261
01:22:25,680 --> 01:22:31,680
almost has to be that kind of
resonance across different

1262
01:22:31,680 --> 01:22:35,880
processes within the body
because it's continually seeking

1263
01:22:36,120 --> 01:22:41,920
for, well, you might call it the
best compromise because they

1264
01:22:41,920 --> 01:22:44,520
will all want to go off in
different directions.

1265
01:22:44,720 --> 01:22:48,120
You've always got to have a kind
of compromise on what is

1266
01:22:48,120 --> 01:22:50,920
regulated this much with the
kidney function, what is

1267
01:22:51,080 --> 01:22:55,160
regulated that much with the
circulatory system and with the

1268
01:22:55,400 --> 01:22:58,080
hormonal system and the immune
system and so on.

1269
01:22:58,320 --> 01:23:01,920
And they're all having to be
regulated within certain

1270
01:23:02,080 --> 01:23:05,240
constraints, but not in a
terribly deterministic fashion.

1271
01:23:05,720 --> 01:23:08,080
It's it's a hunting process.
Hunting.

1272
01:23:08,080 --> 01:23:10,640
Again.
Got the idea of a musical

1273
01:23:10,960 --> 01:23:14,800
sequence.
So I, I actually come now to

1274
01:23:14,800 --> 01:23:19,400
think what I used in the music
of life all those years ago,

1275
01:23:19,680 --> 01:23:25,720
nearly 20 years ago now, what I
use there as as just an

1276
01:23:25,720 --> 01:23:30,880
alternative metaphor to Selfish
Gene as as as it were, got more

1277
01:23:31,160 --> 01:23:33,760
mileage to it than I thought
initially.

1278
01:23:34,240 --> 01:23:39,160
Absolutely, Dennis.
And, and in fact, the, the, the

1279
01:23:39,160 --> 01:23:44,360
harmonisation, if you like, of
the Physiology with the

1280
01:23:44,360 --> 01:23:50,040
behaviour is, is significant in
the way in which organisms use

1281
01:23:50,040 --> 01:23:55,840
music to do that.
It's not, it is in itself

1282
01:23:55,840 --> 01:24:01,440
harmony because it's because
organisms harmonize and isn't a

1283
01:24:01,440 --> 01:24:06,320
curious thing.
Whales, for example, I mean, we

1284
01:24:06,320 --> 01:24:09,120
can think of other kinds of
organisms as well, but they sing

1285
01:24:09,120 --> 01:24:14,160
to each other across huge
distances within a pod.

1286
01:24:14,160 --> 01:24:18,240
I mean, a pod doesn't have to be
in close proximity to act as a

1287
01:24:18,240 --> 01:24:23,480
pod and they communicate with
each other by sound and they

1288
01:24:23,480 --> 01:24:25,560
will sing essentially to each
other.

1289
01:24:25,560 --> 01:24:28,320
They will they make, they
phrase, they create phrases and

1290
01:24:28,320 --> 01:24:30,800
it's creative process.
This is what music does.

1291
01:24:30,800 --> 01:24:35,840
Of course they create these
phrases and I'm not going to try

1292
01:24:35,840 --> 01:24:40,360
and mimic one in in the event,
but what is interesting is that

1293
01:24:40,360 --> 01:24:47,600
they reply to each other but
also add to the phraseology bit

1294
01:24:47,600 --> 01:24:53,680
like it happens when you get
extemporisation in music.

1295
01:24:54,400 --> 01:24:57,800
There's an enormous
extemporisation going on in

1296
01:24:57,800 --> 01:25:04,720
behaviour in organisms and that
that is significant in

1297
01:25:04,720 --> 01:25:09,240
maintaining the integrity
function of the group or the pod

1298
01:25:09,240 --> 01:25:13,640
or the family or the community
or whatever.

1299
01:25:13,880 --> 01:25:17,640
And I think resonance is a
lovely term for it.

1300
01:25:18,440 --> 01:25:22,360
And it's, it's almost creating
that kind of readiness, if you

1301
01:25:22,360 --> 01:25:25,520
like for the group to act as a
group.

1302
01:25:25,880 --> 01:25:28,760
So that for example, when you
get a hunting a pack of lions

1303
01:25:28,760 --> 01:25:37,720
hunting as a pack, it's it's
whatever is going on there is in

1304
01:25:37,720 --> 01:25:41,320
harmony.
Each is anticipating the

1305
01:25:41,320 --> 01:25:47,360
behaviour of the other within
the pack, within the troop in

1306
01:25:47,360 --> 01:25:51,720
their hunting behaviour.
There will be one that will go

1307
01:25:51,720 --> 01:25:55,200
for the jugular as it were,
another that will go to the

1308
01:25:55,200 --> 01:26:00,160
back, another which will hassle
at the legs, another that will

1309
01:26:00,200 --> 01:26:03,560
hassle at some other vital organ
system and so on.

1310
01:26:03,560 --> 01:26:06,360
And it, and it's, it's
extraordinary looking at that

1311
01:26:06,360 --> 01:26:09,360
harmonious kind of structure
within it.

1312
01:26:09,360 --> 01:26:13,440
And it's a bit like, you know, a
major piece of a symphonic work.

1313
01:26:14,440 --> 01:26:17,360
It it's also the case when you
look at the opposite too, which

1314
01:26:17,360 --> 01:26:21,120
is looking at the way the herd
behaves to the presence of a

1315
01:26:21,120 --> 01:26:24,160
trooper of lions.
There is an alertness, a

1316
01:26:24,160 --> 01:26:28,080
readiness, a kind of a
communication going on between

1317
01:26:28,720 --> 01:26:33,440
the members of the herd.
And the lions also are feeling

1318
01:26:33,440 --> 01:26:36,120
for which of them is not
actually functioning

1319
01:26:36,200 --> 01:26:38,680
sufficiently well within that
harmony.

1320
01:26:39,120 --> 01:26:44,080
And they will go if they can,
for that stray, because they

1321
01:26:44,080 --> 01:26:46,720
don't want to risk their lives
going up against a massive great

1322
01:26:46,720 --> 01:26:52,440
big bull who could harm them.
And, and so first they'll prefer

1323
01:26:52,440 --> 01:26:55,520
to hunt as a pack if they can,
although they will hunt singly

1324
01:26:57,640 --> 01:27:03,840
and but equally the, the, the
herd know that there is a way to

1325
01:27:03,840 --> 01:27:08,920
defend themselves as a herd.
You, you, you know, birds create

1326
01:27:08,920 --> 01:27:12,600
the most extraordinary shapes
and patterns.

1327
01:27:13,360 --> 01:27:16,320
There's so much that we still
don't understand about what is

1328
01:27:16,320 --> 01:27:20,440
going Shoals of fish acting as a
Shoal of fish.

1329
01:27:21,480 --> 01:27:25,200
It's extraordinarily the case
that they are acting as one.

1330
01:27:27,040 --> 01:27:32,680
And we humans, I think do it as
well, sometimes to a

1331
01:27:32,680 --> 01:27:37,040
disadvantage in the sense that
it's, it's so easy for us to act

1332
01:27:37,040 --> 01:27:40,960
as a pack.
In a sense, it's very alluring.

1333
01:27:42,200 --> 01:27:46,440
It relieves you of an individual
responsibility, of individual

1334
01:27:46,440 --> 01:27:50,400
fear and hate and so on.
And you act as a pack and as a

1335
01:27:50,400 --> 01:27:54,920
pack you can become
extraordinarily dangerous, one

1336
01:27:54,920 --> 01:27:57,920
to each other as well.
It seems to me, worries me

1337
01:27:57,920 --> 01:28:02,120
immensely.
I, I hate being part of herds,

1338
01:28:02,400 --> 01:28:05,720
if you like, I don't like that
herd instinct.

1339
01:28:05,920 --> 01:28:08,280
But is there something to be
learnt from it?

1340
01:28:09,520 --> 01:28:13,120
And I think it's also how, how
politics can influence our

1341
01:28:13,120 --> 01:28:17,600
behaviour in a way as well.
It we want to be part of a herd,

1342
01:28:17,600 --> 01:28:21,600
we want to be accepted.
And so there's a psychology,

1343
01:28:21,760 --> 01:28:26,520
psychological element to the
music as well, Dennis, that is

1344
01:28:26,520 --> 01:28:28,640
not, not not always as
beautiful.

1345
01:28:30,480 --> 01:28:33,760
And I see that with the within
this niche of this podcast, when

1346
01:28:33,760 --> 01:28:36,040
you see the different thinkers,
the minds, and you can almost

1347
01:28:36,040 --> 01:28:39,560
tell when once they get into a
philosophical mindset or a

1348
01:28:39,560 --> 01:28:42,440
headspace regarding their theory
of consciousness, it's very

1349
01:28:42,440 --> 01:28:43,880
difficult for them to get out of
it.

1350
01:28:44,000 --> 01:28:47,920
That sort of herd mentality gets
you and and then you fight for

1351
01:28:47,920 --> 01:28:50,760
that value, that belief
throughout your entire career,

1352
01:28:50,760 --> 01:28:54,240
perhaps without looking back.
So it's very interesting to see

1353
01:28:54,240 --> 01:28:57,480
how this even plays a role
within academia because this is

1354
01:28:57,480 --> 01:29:01,000
a it's a big part of our lives.
It is indeed.

1355
01:29:01,000 --> 01:29:10,040
And it's, it's very difficult.
As an academic, you're, you

1356
01:29:10,720 --> 01:29:16,080
know, we're trained to to be
critical, but we're fearful of

1357
01:29:16,080 --> 01:29:19,880
the criticism.
It's a very strange dynamic

1358
01:29:20,480 --> 01:29:22,200
there is.
So, I mean, people often say,

1359
01:29:22,200 --> 01:29:26,600
why are you saying this now?
And it's a damn good question.

1360
01:29:28,360 --> 01:29:31,240
And I think one of the reasons
is because we're free to do so,

1361
01:29:32,160 --> 01:29:35,560
that freedom doesn't exist for
many, many, many academics in

1362
01:29:35,560 --> 01:29:37,400
different parts of the world,
that freedom can be

1363
01:29:37,400 --> 01:29:41,520
extraordinarily restricted.
And as students coming through,

1364
01:29:41,520 --> 01:29:48,520
they will experience dogma and,
and they will experience also

1365
01:29:52,400 --> 01:29:56,720
scientists and academics having
to operate within those dogmas.

1366
01:29:57,320 --> 01:30:00,720
And that is extremely difficult.
We, we find very often that we

1367
01:30:00,720 --> 01:30:05,400
are, we can be profoundly
misunderstood and our position

1368
01:30:05,400 --> 01:30:12,960
can be misused, misapplied.
We worry about that quite a bit

1369
01:30:15,560 --> 01:30:18,080
because it's sort of reasons
that I've said, which is that

1370
01:30:18,120 --> 01:30:22,960
not all academics are in a
position of, of, of freedom.

1371
01:30:22,960 --> 01:30:25,840
If you like to, you know, to, to
critique.

1372
01:30:27,960 --> 01:30:30,240
But it is all what we are doing
really.

1373
01:30:30,240 --> 01:30:34,000
We don't, I don't think we ever
set out to create another dogma

1374
01:30:35,360 --> 01:30:37,600
really.
I mean, we suffered under dogma,

1375
01:30:39,680 --> 01:30:45,920
you know, as when genetics
gained hold as a primary causal,

1376
01:30:47,960 --> 01:30:51,400
it was inevitable that money
started being diverted to

1377
01:30:51,400 --> 01:30:54,920
looking for those causes and
looking for the golden bullet,

1378
01:30:54,920 --> 01:30:57,960
if you like, that was going to
help us understand disease in a

1379
01:30:57,960 --> 01:31:03,960
way that would produce
inconceivable solutions to the

1380
01:31:03,960 --> 01:31:10,320
problems of, of human health.
And, and, and, and it was at the

1381
01:31:10,320 --> 01:31:16,840
expense of systems work.
And because if you, if you do

1382
01:31:16,840 --> 01:31:21,760
believe that that genes are
primarily causal, then

1383
01:31:22,160 --> 01:31:25,320
inevitably politicians in
particular are going to look for

1384
01:31:25,320 --> 01:31:28,040
easy solutions and they're going
to look for that's where they're

1385
01:31:28,040 --> 01:31:30,080
going to be best investing their
money.

1386
01:31:31,560 --> 01:31:37,000
And we're trying to get across
to, to people that what you need

1387
01:31:37,000 --> 01:31:44,280
to do in academic life is to
fund the thinkers to critique,

1388
01:31:45,640 --> 01:31:48,880
to ensure that you've always got
people at the edges that are

1389
01:31:48,880 --> 01:31:52,840
showing that variability, that,
that are challenging the, the,

1390
01:31:52,920 --> 01:31:57,040
the, the central dogma, if you
like that, that is, that is,

1391
01:31:57,040 --> 01:32:02,440
that is prevalent.
So we never set out to introduce

1392
01:32:02,440 --> 01:32:07,080
another dogma.
We don't have another dogma.

1393
01:32:07,400 --> 01:32:11,480
I mean, we have ideas that we
hold precious, which is the fact

1394
01:32:11,480 --> 01:32:14,360
that, I mean, you know, I don't
know whether you can call free

1395
01:32:14,360 --> 01:32:17,560
will a dogma.
Maybe you can, but I'd prefer

1396
01:32:17,560 --> 01:32:22,760
that dogma because without free
will you can't challenge dogma.

1397
01:32:23,040 --> 01:32:26,400
So I prefer the dogma of free
will to the dogma of

1398
01:32:26,400 --> 01:32:33,840
determinism.
And I can ask, I would ask those

1399
01:32:35,560 --> 01:32:38,760
determinists, if you like, who
don't believe in free one.

1400
01:32:38,760 --> 01:32:42,160
I think it's an illusion.
I'd ask this question.

1401
01:32:42,160 --> 01:32:48,760
Why are you telling me that?
You know, I mean, they're

1402
01:32:48,760 --> 01:32:54,440
telling me in order to influence
my behaviour or my thoughts,

1403
01:32:55,280 --> 01:32:58,080
they don't like the fact that I
really sincerely believe that

1404
01:32:58,080 --> 01:33:01,800
we're, we have a reasonably
large degree of free will.

1405
01:33:02,680 --> 01:33:05,400
I think we have to have,
otherwise we can't be adaptable

1406
01:33:05,400 --> 01:33:10,280
enough to survive as humans.
It, it reminds me, I posted AI

1407
01:33:10,280 --> 01:33:12,880
just posted a clip a few days
ago for an interview I had with

1408
01:33:12,880 --> 01:33:15,760
Noam Chomsky.
And I asked him about free will

1409
01:33:15,760 --> 01:33:19,520
and he said, everybody just like
when in one of your quotes says,

1410
01:33:19,640 --> 01:33:22,720
irrespective of what we believe,
everybody acts as if we have

1411
01:33:22,720 --> 01:33:25,960
freedom of the world.
So there's no point in denying

1412
01:33:25,960 --> 01:33:27,400
freedom of the world because of
that.

1413
01:33:27,440 --> 01:33:31,120
If if we're always going to act
in this way, most certainly it

1414
01:33:31,120 --> 01:33:32,520
doesn't really matter
philosophically.

1415
01:33:33,080 --> 01:33:35,240
No.
And we assume and, and we make

1416
01:33:35,240 --> 01:33:41,720
the assumption that we each have
free will and, and we do that.

1417
01:33:41,720 --> 01:33:45,080
Of course we do it because our
whole judicial system is based

1418
01:33:45,080 --> 01:33:47,720
on the fact that people have
freedom to act in different

1419
01:33:47,720 --> 01:33:50,160
kinds of ways.
And if you choose to act

1420
01:33:50,160 --> 01:33:53,520
malevolently, then you're
responsible for acting

1421
01:33:53,520 --> 01:33:56,040
malevolently.
Without free will, you wouldn't

1422
01:33:56,040 --> 01:33:59,160
be responsible for it.
I mean, you'd be a self driving

1423
01:33:59,160 --> 01:34:01,960
car.
And if you had an accident then

1424
01:34:01,960 --> 01:34:06,360
you'd have to find something
wrong with the machine rather

1425
01:34:06,360 --> 01:34:10,040
than the fact that you made a
judgement based on your wishes,

1426
01:34:10,040 --> 01:34:15,040
your hopes and fears and loves
and hates and you know, and you

1427
01:34:15,040 --> 01:34:18,200
killed that person because quite
frankly you didn't like them and

1428
01:34:18,200 --> 01:34:21,040
you got in your way and and so
on.

1429
01:34:21,040 --> 01:34:26,000
And yet we have strange kind of
devices called morals and ethics

1430
01:34:26,520 --> 01:34:28,840
in behaviour that we shouldn't
behave like that.

1431
01:34:29,480 --> 01:34:32,600
And so when we start imposing
them as much as possible on each

1432
01:34:32,600 --> 01:34:36,200
other, and we do that because we
know that people do have

1433
01:34:36,200 --> 01:34:40,000
choices.
So yes, I, I find, I mean, in

1434
01:34:40,000 --> 01:34:43,920
any case, even if we accepted it
as an illusion, it's fantastic

1435
01:34:43,920 --> 01:34:46,960
illusion.
I'd go go with it all the time.

1436
01:34:46,960 --> 01:34:49,720
I mean, I'd rather have that
illusion than not.

1437
01:34:50,240 --> 01:34:52,640
And, and what do they mean by an
illusion?

1438
01:34:52,640 --> 01:34:54,440
They mean that it doesn't really
exist.

1439
01:34:56,160 --> 01:34:58,160
But then I go back.
Why are you telling me this?

1440
01:35:00,400 --> 01:35:02,960
They're telling me it because
they know damn well actually

1441
01:35:02,960 --> 01:35:07,800
that the illusion matters.
Is the illusion is free will.

1442
01:35:08,000 --> 01:35:10,240
I mean, if it's an illusion, it
exists.

1443
01:35:12,120 --> 01:35:15,560
I can I can acknowledge to them,
OK, You you can have it if you

1444
01:35:15,560 --> 01:35:16,880
like.
Call it an illusion.

1445
01:35:18,240 --> 01:35:20,680
You're only having to call it an
illusion because you you, you

1446
01:35:20,680 --> 01:35:24,520
can't understand how something
immaterial can influence

1447
01:35:24,520 --> 01:35:29,760
something that's material.
I find fascinating, I see, I see

1448
01:35:29,760 --> 01:35:33,000
two brothers and one perhaps
looking at a microscope looking

1449
01:35:33,000 --> 01:35:37,200
at neural cells, the other one
looking at maybe the SA node,

1450
01:35:37,200 --> 01:35:39,360
looking at all these action
potentials in different parts of

1451
01:35:39,360 --> 01:35:42,360
the body physiologically,
obviously all intertwined at

1452
01:35:42,360 --> 01:35:45,920
some .1, looking at EE GS1,
looking at EC GS.

1453
01:35:47,040 --> 01:35:50,560
And then some of you guys
managed to almost develop a like

1454
01:35:50,560 --> 01:35:53,400
a hive mind together and, and
it's very inseparable.

1455
01:35:53,400 --> 01:35:56,080
You can sort of see how one of
you can think of something and

1456
01:35:56,080 --> 01:35:57,520
the other finishes.
The other person said.

1457
01:35:57,520 --> 01:36:01,120
It's do you guys disagree
fundamentally on anything

1458
01:36:01,480 --> 01:36:06,520
regarding this field?
I don't think we do, because we

1459
01:36:06,520 --> 01:36:08,640
don't.
We never tried to establish a

1460
01:36:08,640 --> 01:36:12,840
dogma.
I think what we've done is over

1461
01:36:12,840 --> 01:36:18,080
a period of what is it now,
getting on for about 20 years of

1462
01:36:18,080 --> 01:36:23,880
interaction in a sort of fairly
rigorous way.

1463
01:36:23,880 --> 01:36:27,720
Publishing papers together,
after all, is pretty rigorous.

1464
01:36:28,400 --> 01:36:35,280
We've we've come to hone a lot
of our own rough edges in how we

1465
01:36:35,280 --> 01:36:39,200
interact.
But that tells me that you you

1466
01:36:39,200 --> 01:36:43,280
need academic communities that
can interact in this kind of

1467
01:36:43,280 --> 01:36:49,080
way, because that is the way in
which we get closer to an

1468
01:36:49,080 --> 01:36:55,120
analysis which we can defend
because a group of people can

1469
01:36:55,120 --> 01:36:59,920
think of many more reasons why 1
might be wrong about something

1470
01:37:00,360 --> 01:37:04,680
than a single person can.
I don't think it's possible to

1471
01:37:04,680 --> 01:37:10,640
be a really good thinker
academically alone.

1472
01:37:12,600 --> 01:37:15,080
That's my explanation for what
has happened.

1473
01:37:15,560 --> 01:37:19,080
If people interact over a long
period of time, there is some

1474
01:37:19,080 --> 01:37:25,360
kind of honing away of the minor
differences that might have

1475
01:37:25,360 --> 01:37:28,320
existed.
And you see it in other

1476
01:37:28,320 --> 01:37:31,760
communities too.
Monastic communities do the

1477
01:37:31,760 --> 01:37:34,400
same.
They they, they well,

1478
01:37:34,560 --> 01:37:39,240
particularly some traditions,
like meditative traditions.

1479
01:37:39,560 --> 01:37:43,560
They're continually hacking away
at each other's so-called

1480
01:37:43,680 --> 01:37:49,320
misperceptions of the world.
They even have sutras to remind

1481
01:37:49,320 --> 01:37:51,320
them the fact.
You think you understand the

1482
01:37:51,320 --> 01:37:52,480
world.
No, you don't.

1483
01:37:52,640 --> 01:37:56,280
That's the Diamond Sutra.
You think you understand the

1484
01:37:56,920 --> 01:37:59,400
nature of the person, you know
you don't.

1485
01:37:59,400 --> 01:38:03,000
That's the Heart Sutra.
And so you can go on with the

1486
01:38:03,320 --> 01:38:06,400
the different ways in which it
has been expressed.

1487
01:38:06,800 --> 01:38:12,240
But there is a strong sense, I
think, to how long people

1488
01:38:12,240 --> 01:38:19,920
interact together to the process
by which you come to be able to

1489
01:38:19,920 --> 01:38:25,200
finish each other's sentences.
Because with, as it were danced

1490
01:38:26,440 --> 01:38:29,600
and created a harmonisation of
the way we think.

1491
01:38:30,680 --> 01:38:33,840
I think.
Maybe an illusion of another

1492
01:38:33,840 --> 01:38:35,920
kind.
It may be we should have a third

1493
01:38:35,920 --> 01:38:41,000
person doing this with a or 1/5
or 1/6 or a 20th, you know, But

1494
01:38:41,200 --> 01:38:44,920
but the group is met is group
think matters is what we're

1495
01:38:44,920 --> 01:38:49,120
really saying.
It is also the case that if one

1496
01:38:49,120 --> 01:38:53,600
or other of us comes up with an
idea at the boundary, as it

1497
01:38:53,600 --> 01:39:00,800
were, at the edge, and I mean,
one might think, gosh, you know,

1498
01:39:00,800 --> 01:39:03,320
should I really say that?
I mean, should I really go

1499
01:39:03,320 --> 01:39:06,200
there?
I mean, is it too, is it too

1500
01:39:06,200 --> 01:39:11,120
far?
We would bounce that off each

1501
01:39:11,120 --> 01:39:14,400
other in a sense.
I mean, you know, and, and build

1502
01:39:14,400 --> 01:39:17,920
on it rather than reject it, see
where it goes.

1503
01:39:18,560 --> 01:39:21,800
And if you do that often enough,
you begin to understand how the

1504
01:39:21,800 --> 01:39:27,440
other mind works.
It's also the case that we bring

1505
01:39:27,440 --> 01:39:30,280
to the table completely
different experiences.

1506
01:39:31,000 --> 01:39:34,040
That's right.
And I don't, I mean, many might,

1507
01:39:34,040 --> 01:39:36,960
many people might not know this,
might not understand that

1508
01:39:36,960 --> 01:39:40,600
because they might think, well,
we're the same family, but we

1509
01:39:40,600 --> 01:39:43,120
had completely different
trajectories in life.

1510
01:39:44,200 --> 01:39:48,320
And those trajectories mattered
in how what we brought to the

1511
01:39:48,320 --> 01:39:53,880
table.
I mean, I, I kind of had an

1512
01:39:53,880 --> 01:39:57,320
introduction to philosophy
before I had an introduction to

1513
01:39:57,320 --> 01:39:59,040
science.
I had no idea I'd be a

1514
01:39:59,040 --> 01:40:02,240
scientist.
And I, I mean, I left school

1515
01:40:02,240 --> 01:40:06,840
when I was 15.
I grew up in a one parent family

1516
01:40:06,840 --> 01:40:11,000
on a council estate and I left
school at 15.

1517
01:40:12,000 --> 01:40:18,440
And my school headmaster said of
me in my penultimate School

1518
01:40:18,440 --> 01:40:23,200
Report.
That he could see no reason I'm

1519
01:40:23,200 --> 01:40:27,040
quoting now, no reason why
public money should be wasted on

1520
01:40:27,040 --> 01:40:29,120
the attempted education of this
boy that's.

1521
01:40:30,360 --> 01:40:34,280
Harsh.
So you see, I left school.

1522
01:40:34,680 --> 01:40:36,400
Well, I couldn't see any reason
either.

1523
01:40:36,400 --> 01:40:40,800
And I I didn't didn't want to
stay there because they couldn't

1524
01:40:40,800 --> 01:40:44,000
see in me the potential.
Actually, to be fair, I mean,

1525
01:40:44,240 --> 01:40:47,440
there are one or two of them, my
teachers who could.

1526
01:40:48,840 --> 01:40:52,000
And so I left school and I left
school very young.

1527
01:40:54,000 --> 01:40:57,480
I did not know then that I would
become an academic.

1528
01:40:58,480 --> 01:41:01,080
I didn't know, certainly didn't
know I would become a scientist

1529
01:41:01,080 --> 01:41:05,080
of any kind.
My first interests were in

1530
01:41:05,080 --> 01:41:06,840
politics, philosophy and
economics.

1531
01:41:06,840 --> 01:41:09,960
When I say my first interests,
because that's not quite true, I

1532
01:41:10,040 --> 01:41:13,440
mean, you know, as they
developed my, my instinct was to

1533
01:41:13,640 --> 01:41:15,560
tend towards philosophy
actually.

1534
01:41:17,160 --> 01:41:20,120
And at one time I thought I
might study if I could get into

1535
01:41:20,120 --> 01:41:21,600
university.
In those days, it was back in

1536
01:41:21,600 --> 01:41:25,640
the 1960s and early 70s and it
was extremely difficult to get

1537
01:41:25,640 --> 01:41:28,360
into university if you'd left
school in the circumstances I

1538
01:41:28,360 --> 01:41:31,000
left in, very few people in the
United Kingdom went to

1539
01:41:31,000 --> 01:41:36,840
university.
About 6%, very tiny percentage

1540
01:41:36,840 --> 01:41:39,360
of, of those that had
qualifications went to

1541
01:41:39,360 --> 01:41:42,880
university.
I mean, we hadn't experienced

1542
01:41:42,880 --> 01:41:45,600
then the sort of massive
expansion in higher education,

1543
01:41:46,080 --> 01:41:48,320
which is wonderful.
Incidentally, I, I'd, you know,

1544
01:41:49,240 --> 01:41:51,480
that, that the more we have
higher education, the better it

1545
01:41:51,480 --> 01:41:53,760
seems to me, as long as it's
doing the right thing, which is

1546
01:41:53,760 --> 01:41:57,560
creating people who think, and I
don't willing to think outside

1547
01:41:57,560 --> 01:42:00,480
the box and protect them because
that's one of the other crucial

1548
01:42:00,480 --> 01:42:05,480
things about universities.
So I was outside the box, really

1549
01:42:05,480 --> 01:42:07,960
physically outside the box for a
long period of time.

1550
01:42:08,600 --> 01:42:15,760
And 11, for some reason, I'd,
I'd read, I started reading Karl

1551
01:42:15,760 --> 01:42:18,880
Popper, for example, which in a
sense was one of my early

1552
01:42:18,880 --> 01:42:23,440
introductions to science,
because I, I was fascinated by

1553
01:42:23,440 --> 01:42:27,400
his approach to scientific
thinking and methodology and

1554
01:42:27,760 --> 01:42:29,480
conjectures and refutations and
so on.

1555
01:42:30,360 --> 01:42:36,280
And how did we unravel problems?
But I was also fascinated by his

1556
01:42:36,280 --> 01:42:39,600
concepts of open Society, of
open systems.

1557
01:42:40,280 --> 01:42:43,760
I didn't know then,
incidentally, that what he was

1558
01:42:43,760 --> 01:42:46,640
going on to say was very similar
to the kinds of things that we

1559
01:42:46,640 --> 01:42:48,640
were saying.
I had no idea then.

1560
01:42:48,760 --> 01:42:50,800
I don't think he even he had any
idea then.

1561
01:42:51,440 --> 01:42:54,280
When I first, it was back in the
1960s, you see, late 60s.

1562
01:42:54,800 --> 01:42:57,960
And I started reading that.
So I came, I came at this in a

1563
01:42:57,960 --> 01:43:02,600
sense, primed with an interest
in philosophy rather than with

1564
01:43:02,720 --> 01:43:04,600
science.
When I eventually went to

1565
01:43:04,600 --> 01:43:10,920
university in the 1970s, I went
to study zoology, and the reason

1566
01:43:10,960 --> 01:43:14,160
for that was because I got so
fascinated and wanted to

1567
01:43:14,160 --> 01:43:16,200
understand how living systems
worked.

1568
01:43:16,960 --> 01:43:21,280
But I came to it, you see,
because I felt the need to do

1569
01:43:21,280 --> 01:43:23,520
that.
I needed to understand it.

1570
01:43:25,040 --> 01:43:28,440
It wasn't so much that I had
necessarily a love of zoology or

1571
01:43:28,440 --> 01:43:32,360
whatever, It's just I had AI
wanted to understand how this

1572
01:43:32,360 --> 01:43:38,800
system worked and when I did so
when I started studying zoology

1573
01:43:39,360 --> 01:43:42,720
at Manchester University, this
was at the very moment when

1574
01:43:42,720 --> 01:43:46,160
things were beginning to pivot
towards a more gene centric

1575
01:43:46,160 --> 01:43:48,720
view.
And I saw more behaviour being

1576
01:43:48,720 --> 01:43:52,320
explained by maintaining genes
and gene pools and so on.

1577
01:43:52,600 --> 01:43:55,160
I actually, even as a student,
repeated some of Richard

1578
01:43:55,160 --> 01:44:00,400
Dawson's experiments that he did
when he was doing his PhD and

1579
01:44:00,400 --> 01:44:03,480
then not long after he actually
had done them and, and so on.

1580
01:44:04,280 --> 01:44:09,320
And looking at bird behaviour
and, and things and hacking

1581
01:44:09,320 --> 01:44:11,920
regimes and things and
interpreting everything in terms

1582
01:44:11,920 --> 01:44:14,680
of Peck, Peck, Peck, changing
angle, Peck, Peck, Peck, all

1583
01:44:14,680 --> 01:44:20,720
very algorithm driven, you see.
And I just dissatisfied me

1584
01:44:20,720 --> 01:44:23,200
inherently because one of the
reasons I'd gone in to study

1585
01:44:23,440 --> 01:44:25,960
living systems is because I
wanted to really understand

1586
01:44:25,960 --> 01:44:28,960
reason.
Why did they behave like that?

1587
01:44:28,960 --> 01:44:31,600
Why did they make that decision?
How do they make decisions?

1588
01:44:33,040 --> 01:44:35,800
And you know, because I'd come
at it from a completely

1589
01:44:35,800 --> 01:44:38,760
different angle, if you like.
So what I'm saying is in a very

1590
01:44:38,760 --> 01:44:42,760
short trying to shorten what I'm
saying, we didn't come to each

1591
01:44:42,760 --> 01:44:46,560
other in by sitting around a
family table.

1592
01:44:47,880 --> 01:44:50,640
I mean, in the end, we.
Did as it were, but we didn't in

1593
01:44:50,640 --> 01:44:53,360
that it wasn't a natural sort of
thing that you know.

1594
01:44:56,320 --> 01:44:59,960
And curiously, while you were
encountering the gene centric

1595
01:44:59,960 --> 01:45:04,080
explanations in Manchester
University, I was examining Rich

1596
01:45:04,080 --> 01:45:10,920
Dawkins thesis.
Yes, it's strange and weaving

1597
01:45:12,000 --> 01:45:15,760
one thing after another.
It's it's Dennis at that.

1598
01:45:15,760 --> 01:45:17,680
What was yours like?
What did you bring to the table

1599
01:45:17,680 --> 01:45:19,800
and at what point did you guys
sort of come together and

1600
01:45:19,800 --> 01:45:21,280
coalesce in such a beautiful
way?

1601
01:45:22,720 --> 01:45:28,040
It is the last decade or two
that has really seen the Coming

1602
01:45:28,040 --> 01:45:34,760
Together flourish, but there
have been other things that

1603
01:45:34,760 --> 01:45:39,040
encouraged it.
We we both like music, we both

1604
01:45:39,800 --> 01:45:47,040
both even sing and play guitars
and we both have acquired also

1605
01:45:47,040 --> 01:45:52,640
through creating a music group
together, an interest there too.

1606
01:45:53,200 --> 01:46:01,040
And so we it's, it's a complex
padded as it were, it's a dance

1607
01:46:01,920 --> 01:46:07,480
and it's had many aspects which
have come together the more it's

1608
01:46:07,480 --> 01:46:09,600
gone on.
I think that's the best way I

1609
01:46:09,600 --> 01:46:12,800
can describe it.
But as Ray said earlier on, our

1610
01:46:13,120 --> 01:46:16,200
initial trajectories were miles
apart.

1611
01:46:16,200 --> 01:46:21,000
There's no no foreseeing what
was going to happen.

1612
01:46:22,760 --> 01:46:25,840
There were one or two events
that one might look back on.

1613
01:46:26,080 --> 01:46:32,360
I mean, one was a, a, a debate
that just shortly after Selfish

1614
01:46:32,360 --> 01:46:35,840
Gene was published at Bailey or
college.

1615
01:46:36,120 --> 01:46:38,320
And I, I came way down from
Edinburgh.

1616
01:46:38,320 --> 01:46:41,200
I, by that time I was now
starting to do my PhD in

1617
01:46:41,360 --> 01:46:43,960
Edinburgh and I, I came all the
way down from Edinburgh to

1618
01:46:43,960 --> 01:46:48,640
Oxford to this debate.
And I think it was Anthony Kenny

1619
01:46:48,640 --> 01:46:50,960
was Dennis.
I think it was part of that

1620
01:46:51,600 --> 01:46:54,920
chair.
With the two philosophers and

1621
01:46:55,080 --> 01:46:57,200
Anthony Kenny was absolutely
brilliant.

1622
01:46:57,200 --> 01:47:01,160
He asked Richard after he
presented his case for the

1623
01:47:01,160 --> 01:47:06,440
selfish gene and his his theory.
He said, look, I I want to know

1624
01:47:06,440 --> 01:47:09,960
the following.
If all I knew of the English

1625
01:47:09,960 --> 01:47:15,760
language was its alphabet, I
would not be entitled and would

1626
01:47:15,760 --> 01:47:18,840
not be able to understand
Shakespeare.

1627
01:47:19,640 --> 01:47:22,240
Now I was listening very
carefully was I was chairing

1628
01:47:22,240 --> 01:47:26,280
this meeting.
But Richard then said, well, I'm

1629
01:47:26,280 --> 01:47:28,320
not a philosopher, I'm just a
scientist.

1630
01:47:28,320 --> 01:47:33,880
I'm only interested in truth.
And that lost him from my point.

1631
01:47:35,000 --> 01:47:38,560
That was the break point.
I don't think he knows that.

1632
01:47:39,080 --> 01:47:46,360
But I broke with him there
because what Tony as a

1633
01:47:46,360 --> 01:47:51,680
philosopher was getting at is
that if all you know is the

1634
01:47:52,640 --> 01:47:55,960
sequence, you cannot know it's
meaning.

1635
01:47:57,880 --> 01:48:02,560
I I happen to have almost fluent
reading of Handel's script,

1636
01:48:02,560 --> 01:48:06,400
which is Korean script, but I
don't have a command of Korean

1637
01:48:06,400 --> 01:48:11,240
language and I would never be
able to understand a play or a

1638
01:48:11,240 --> 01:48:15,160
poem in Korean without a
considerable amount of

1639
01:48:15,160 --> 01:48:17,640
explanation.
And that illustrates the point.

1640
01:48:18,280 --> 01:48:21,640
And he missed the point.
He didn't even see what Tony was

1641
01:48:21,640 --> 01:48:23,120
getting at.
And I.

1642
01:48:23,120 --> 01:48:26,520
Did and, and, and you know that
I did that.

1643
01:48:26,520 --> 01:48:30,960
That was so influential on my
own thinking about all this.

1644
01:48:32,120 --> 01:48:35,680
I it, it just resonates in my
mind just listening to Anthony.

1645
01:48:35,680 --> 01:48:39,160
Can he make that point?
And then the surprise and shock

1646
01:48:39,200 --> 01:48:44,840
at Richard's replies to it.
I then later experienced a

1647
01:48:44,840 --> 01:48:47,200
similar kind of dismissal of
philosophy.

1648
01:48:47,840 --> 01:48:51,400
To me, that was an example of
how philosophical thinking can

1649
01:48:51,400 --> 01:48:55,920
be so helpful in unravelling a
problem.

1650
01:48:57,000 --> 01:49:02,200
And because there's a facility
of saying that something is like

1651
01:49:02,200 --> 01:49:07,880
something and then saying, but
wouldn't you say this about that

1652
01:49:07,880 --> 01:49:10,680
as it were?
And it's that preciseness that I

1653
01:49:10,680 --> 01:49:13,160
was, it was, I found it very
impressive.

1654
01:49:13,560 --> 01:49:16,440
And and I thought it just so
fundamentally destroyed the

1655
01:49:16,440 --> 01:49:19,320
notion of of the gene centric
view.

1656
01:49:20,120 --> 01:49:22,800
And so it was very influential
that there's a curiously if you,

1657
01:49:22,800 --> 01:49:24,960
if you like, you probably
discovered something very

1658
01:49:24,960 --> 01:49:29,360
interesting here, which is that
I think that that meeting at

1659
01:49:29,600 --> 01:49:33,240
Baylia was significant and was
probably the firm of what

1660
01:49:33,240 --> 01:49:36,720
subsequently came to be our our
sort of collaboratively.

1661
01:49:37,800 --> 01:49:39,160
Right.
That's a good point.

1662
01:49:39,160 --> 01:49:41,560
And it's come out of this
particular discussion.

1663
01:49:41,960 --> 01:49:45,680
Yeah, exactly.
So it's served a very useful

1664
01:49:45,680 --> 01:49:48,760
purpose for us too.
But I'm, I have to say I'm

1665
01:49:48,760 --> 01:49:52,600
beginning to watch the clock
because I was lecturing all day

1666
01:49:52,600 --> 01:49:57,320
today and I've been going since
about 5:00 this morning.

1667
01:50:00,080 --> 01:50:03,840
There are there are even limits
to what philosophers and

1668
01:50:03,840 --> 01:50:08,000
scientists can do.
So we're in your hands, Tevin.

1669
01:50:08,640 --> 01:50:10,480
When?
How are you going to wrap this

1670
01:50:10,480 --> 01:50:12,920
up?
I was just enjoying listening to

1671
01:50:12,920 --> 01:50:14,320
you guys reminisce.
It is beautiful.

1672
01:50:15,000 --> 01:50:16,920
Sorry guys, I got caught up in
the motion there as well.

1673
01:50:17,960 --> 01:50:20,720
OK, let's let's let's wrap this
up a little guys.

1674
01:50:20,880 --> 01:50:24,880
The one thing I wanted to ask
just before we close is I was

1675
01:50:24,880 --> 01:50:27,200
speaking to Professor Terence
Deacon and Michael Levin

1676
01:50:27,200 --> 01:50:31,160
recently about teleo dynamics
and teleophobia within science

1677
01:50:31,160 --> 01:50:33,160
and philosophy.
I love philosophers.

1678
01:50:33,880 --> 01:50:36,000
I hate talking about this.
I hate it.

1679
01:50:36,240 --> 01:50:37,640
Absolutely hate it.
Yes.

1680
01:50:38,080 --> 01:50:42,480
The purpose, meaning of this
universe of life and our final

1681
01:50:42,480 --> 01:50:44,880
thoughts from your side, Dennis.
And then Ray, you can end as

1682
01:50:44,880 --> 01:50:48,200
well.
Just briefly, the break occurred

1683
01:50:48,200 --> 01:50:51,920
between Wallace and Darwin way
back in 1866.

1684
01:50:53,040 --> 01:50:58,640
Darwin was utterly shocked when
Wallace decided he would go on a

1685
01:50:58,640 --> 01:51:01,600
different route completely from
Charles Darwin.

1686
01:51:01,760 --> 01:51:06,120
Charles Darwin was working on
his idea that the Peacock was

1687
01:51:06,120 --> 01:51:11,160
really trying to impress the PN
and that was an intentional,

1688
01:51:11,160 --> 01:51:15,040
conscious choice.
It's in the 1871 book.

1689
01:51:15,040 --> 01:51:17,240
I quoted almost verbatim from
it.

1690
01:51:17,760 --> 01:51:22,280
Wallace went off in the opposite
direction and said no, Charles,

1691
01:51:23,680 --> 01:51:26,920
natural selection explains
everything, full stop.

1692
01:51:27,560 --> 01:51:29,840
That's the break.
That's where purpose was

1693
01:51:29,840 --> 01:51:35,200
eliminated.
And I have one statement to add

1694
01:51:35,200 --> 01:51:39,000
to that, which is I don't think
you can fully understand life by

1695
01:51:39,000 --> 01:51:48,560
excluding reason.
And I think that that is such an

1696
01:51:48,560 --> 01:51:53,600
important ingredient.
We tend to dismiss I, I remember

1697
01:51:53,600 --> 01:51:55,800
a discussion.
I, I, I, I won't remember, I

1698
01:51:55,800 --> 01:52:02,960
won't say names, with a
colleague who was shocked by my

1699
01:52:02,960 --> 01:52:08,600
interest in philosophy and by my
interest in the significance of

1700
01:52:08,600 --> 01:52:17,040
psychology.
We create our niche as well as

1701
01:52:17,040 --> 01:52:20,800
adapt to it.
All organisms do that and each

1702
01:52:20,800 --> 01:52:24,120
creation is a fundamental in the
way life works.

1703
01:52:25,720 --> 01:52:30,240
A major part of that is the
psychological aspect.

1704
01:52:30,760 --> 01:52:33,560
We've referred to some of it in
terms of the way things work in

1705
01:52:33,560 --> 01:52:36,320
synchrony, the way things work
in harmony and so on.

1706
01:52:38,040 --> 01:52:41,480
That is, it is so significant to
our well-being, to our health

1707
01:52:41,480 --> 01:52:44,680
and well-being and understanding
how things can go wrong with the

1708
01:52:44,680 --> 01:52:49,320
system, with health
consequences, that if we

1709
01:52:49,320 --> 01:52:56,800
eliminate reason, it leaves a
void of understanding for humans

1710
01:52:56,800 --> 01:52:59,400
to cope with what it is that
having to cope with, which is

1711
01:52:59,400 --> 01:53:04,880
this extraordinarily difficult
psychosocial environment that we

1712
01:53:04,880 --> 01:53:07,760
have to be adapted to and
adaptable within.

1713
01:53:08,640 --> 01:53:12,360
And that is increasingly
difficult because it changes so

1714
01:53:12,360 --> 01:53:16,360
rapidly that it we find it
harder and harder to find the

1715
01:53:16,360 --> 01:53:20,520
normative within which we're
going to work ethically.

1716
01:53:20,520 --> 01:53:27,600
This is extremely difficult for
us because as we gain more

1717
01:53:27,840 --> 01:53:33,600
reason, more understanding, if
you like, the more we challenge

1718
01:53:33,600 --> 01:53:39,760
those very things that constrain
our behaviour, constrain us in

1719
01:53:39,760 --> 01:53:43,760
the, in a, in a, in a, in, at
that psychosocial level and

1720
01:53:43,760 --> 01:53:46,920
provide grounding, if you like,
things that we don't have to

1721
01:53:46,920 --> 01:53:50,280
question or, you know, accept as
given.

1722
01:53:50,880 --> 01:53:52,880
And those things that are
accepted as given are getting,

1723
01:53:52,880 --> 01:53:56,440
are now becoming smaller and
smaller and smaller, which makes

1724
01:53:56,440 --> 01:54:00,120
it very hard, I think, for
people to be so easily grounded

1725
01:54:01,600 --> 01:54:04,600
and, and that creates a
psychological problem.

1726
01:54:04,720 --> 01:54:08,200
So it's, it's no surprise to me
that so many people experience,

1727
01:54:08,200 --> 01:54:12,800
certainly in the Western world,
so many people experience some

1728
01:54:12,800 --> 01:54:18,520
kind of mental problem in life
at some point have some kind of

1729
01:54:18,520 --> 01:54:21,280
breakdown, even whether they
don't realise it.

1730
01:54:21,360 --> 01:54:25,480
I mean, I think many people go
through mental health issues

1731
01:54:25,480 --> 01:54:28,280
without realising that that's
been a major problem to them.

1732
01:54:29,480 --> 01:54:34,360
Having stable relationships
becomes harder and harder and

1733
01:54:34,360 --> 01:54:39,320
and working with others becomes
difficult too.

1734
01:54:40,160 --> 01:54:45,320
And so, so it, it matters,
reason matters.

1735
01:54:46,280 --> 01:54:50,320
The psychology that that level,
if you like, the psychosocial

1736
01:54:50,320 --> 01:54:56,560
level of causation is so
significant, particularly in an

1737
01:54:56,560 --> 01:55:00,040
Organism like ours that uses it
linguistically.

1738
01:55:00,040 --> 01:55:03,600
We use it to express ourselves,
to understand ourselves, that

1739
01:55:04,000 --> 01:55:11,760
our our our dependence on
cultural transmission of

1740
01:55:11,760 --> 01:55:15,280
information is as strong as our
dependence on anything that

1741
01:55:15,280 --> 01:55:21,440
might be regarded as genetic.
Who we are, our identity

1742
01:55:21,440 --> 01:55:26,240
matters.
And so sometimes that is

1743
01:55:26,240 --> 01:55:31,720
challenged.
It can breed hate or it can

1744
01:55:31,720 --> 01:55:34,880
breed love.
It can breed all sorts of create

1745
01:55:34,880 --> 01:55:38,680
all sorts of problems.
And so maintaining integrity

1746
01:55:38,680 --> 01:55:42,840
within that psychosocial, I kind
of call it space, but you know,

1747
01:55:42,840 --> 01:55:45,960
really I'm not wanting to create
a kind of dichotomy like that.

1748
01:55:46,360 --> 01:55:50,000
But this psychosocial space, it
can be extraordinarily

1749
01:55:50,000 --> 01:55:53,800
difficult.
And it's a challenge I think to

1750
01:55:53,800 --> 01:55:58,200
humanity.
And at the political level, it's

1751
01:55:58,200 --> 01:56:02,800
a challenge because I think that
we we are getting to the point

1752
01:56:02,800 --> 01:56:09,160
where even even in what we say
to each other, we can challenge

1753
01:56:09,160 --> 01:56:14,320
the foundations of it in terms
of reality in a way that perhaps

1754
01:56:14,320 --> 01:56:15,920
we wouldn't have done in the
past.

1755
01:56:17,840 --> 01:56:21,160
So what is truth becomes a
fundamental question.

1756
01:56:23,200 --> 01:56:28,200
And that's I, I think perhaps a
nice point to end it is a

1757
01:56:28,280 --> 01:56:31,520
philosophical question, but
curiously, it's a fundamental, I

1758
01:56:31,520 --> 01:56:34,200
mean, what is truth on social
media, for heaven's sake?

1759
01:56:34,520 --> 01:56:37,760
Yeah, it's the relativistic view
of it all.

1760
01:56:37,760 --> 01:56:40,680
And this, the way people are
approaching this becomes very,

1761
01:56:40,680 --> 01:56:42,320
very fishy territory at this
point.

1762
01:56:43,320 --> 01:56:45,520
But, but gentlemen, this has
been such a pleasure for me.

1763
01:56:45,520 --> 01:56:47,240
Thank you so much.
It's an honor and privilege to

1764
01:56:47,240 --> 01:56:49,720
chat to both of you.
Big fan of both of your works

1765
01:56:49,720 --> 01:56:53,000
for many years.
And I hope that in the future we

1766
01:56:53,000 --> 01:56:56,520
can discuss and dissect certain
papers and books in detail and,

1767
01:56:56,920 --> 01:57:00,080
and, and like focus and hone
into specific topics.

1768
01:57:00,080 --> 01:57:02,440
And it's been such a pleasure.
Thank you so much for joining

1769
01:57:02,440 --> 01:57:05,160
me.
Been a terrific host, Tevin.

1770
01:57:05,880 --> 01:57:08,120
Thank you very much, Dennis.
Well, you've made that.

1771
01:57:08,120 --> 01:57:10,800
You've made us think of some
things that we probably hadn't

1772
01:57:10,800 --> 01:57:13,000
focused.
On yes, yes.

1773
01:57:13,800 --> 01:57:16,040
Mark, thank you, gentlemen.
I really appreciate.

1774
01:57:16,040 --> 01:57:16,160
It.